From nobody Sun Aug 1 18:54:31 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietf.org Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF1A3A0A63 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:54:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.35.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <162786926929.9940.12634429009943664451@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 18:54:29 -0700 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: Subject: [Dots] Milestones changed for dots WG X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 01:54:29 -0000 Changed milestone "DOTS Telemetry draft to WGLC", set state to active from review, accepting new milestone, resolved as "Done". Changed milestone "8782-bis draft to WGLC", set state to active from review, accepting new milestone, resolved as "Done". Changed milestone "DOTS Multihoming draft to WGLC", set state to active from review, accepting new milestone. Changed milestone "DOTS Telemetry Use Cases document to WGLC", set state to active from review, accepting new milestone. URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dots/about/ From nobody Mon Aug 2 06:09:10 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF2C3A1CE2; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 06:09:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=smyslov.net Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O2ZxcVooRmum; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 06:09:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from direct.host-care.com (direct.host-care.com [198.136.54.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C285D3A1CE0; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 06:09:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smyslov.net ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=StEnVB45Bjgg5KbKz5wnmqlkAyFyt6LrvcoVVvujm/o=; b=RFpDQ2fuW3MSFfOt0yu9O4g4Ar +YQQtDG4pxi9YI744ZZ9Yp7F8Yu156FCpXC/Og7O4LyzFk5q+u0tWN4orAZuYmFpO4gHSTntWRsJB Flis3T7/z5Gsf20Y/BdgOw18BkKPog5r92GxmM0L6YVl/p7JxoQfGKaEGMExKTtq+qoWisD0Yy8Yq Vebe486dxR16u/3seCyHDARSZaRI7pQ67X9UPFwGWj3UqhwxsG2woMr7V92MShXu3OXC8254eLEBI jkhPykIrb9gLBqT6PeWoOusvpKtUAx0Vcy1PVEW/V947GpNoPPT+r/Yf4A5Phg6A8/4PNrkKwhSox m8eEIi5A==; Received: from [93.188.44.204] (port=59983 helo=buildpc) by direct.host-care.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mAXgg-0000gS-VK; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 09:08:59 -0400 From: "Valery Smyslov" To: "'Jon Shallow'" , Cc: References: <03cf01d78586$a87571e0$f96055a0$@smyslov.net> <06e201d78629$35057450$9f105cf0$@jpshallow.com> In-Reply-To: <06e201d78629$35057450$9f105cf0$@jpshallow.com> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 16:08:56 +0300 Message-ID: <1ea501d7879f$8f13fa80$ad3bef80$@smyslov.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQG6C09Vsd5BpO7lSoNjHPSqaQK1EgEy3eIRq5GRERA= Content-Language: ru X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - direct.host-care.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - smyslov.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: direct.host-care.com: authenticated_id: valery@smyslov.net X-Authenticated-Sender: direct.host-care.com: valery@smyslov.net Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Dots] DOTS at IETF111 draft minutes X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:09:08 -0000 Hi Jon, fixed all, except for (see below): > Hi Frank and Valery, > > Some comments on the minutes (for clarity) > > DOTS Multihoming > > s/Jon: there isn't too much there, just [list of topics], but yes/Jon: there > isn't too much there to review, just guidance with a set of examples, but > yes, this may trigger some more reviews/ > > DOTS Q-Block interop report > > s/what (CoAP) method to use for requesting missing blocks - using PUT > triggered a full response, but should not have./What (CoAP) method to use > for requesting missing response blocks - e.g. using PUT triggered a full > response, but should use PUT to request missing response blocks./ > > s/Clarify that GET (NUM==0, Mbit=1) should be treated as a request for the > entire body./Clarified that GET (NUM==0, Mbit=1) should be treated only as a > request for the entire body./ > > s/ implementation/ implementation/ Sorry, I didn't get what to change here. Can you please clarify? > s/ telemetry document to talk about it/ telemetry document to encourage its > use/ Regards, Valery. > Regards > > Jon > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Valery Smyslov [mailto: valery@smyslov.net] > > Sent: 30 July 2021 22:06 > > To: dots@ietf.org > > Cc: dots-chairs@ietf.org > > Subject: [Dots] DOTS at IETF111 draft minutes > > > > Hi, > > > > draft minutes for IETF 111 are uploaded to the datatracker: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/minutes-111-dots-02 > > > > Many thanks to Ben for taking them. > > Please review and send corrections to chairs. > > > > Regards, > > Frank & Valery. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dots mailing list > > Dots@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots From nobody Fri Aug 6 02:29:01 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF063A268D; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 02:28:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=smyslov.net Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dAP9SR1D0GbY; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 02:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from direct.host-care.com (direct.host-care.com [198.136.54.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9180D3A2684; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 02:28:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smyslov.net ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BspkueZBjZCEZab+7XmdHj6hVEMo7IF1jE9i3lrlD6o=; b=apZvZITUHyNy+CBXesainoazS5 SCPIgfdIlWMF1KA1IpF/liV5waaxyo8cKdSZ+FRt34DHOapXlvZY6DoDU5ehnuF/ODuPXNucb2TgY xEEEmmQnwqcyTGi4fo+OTKLNEPc6cVc0Z8jhVAutcqgmdbMgFD0k6C0ZF2cjYDYbHSpy7HTwILXUI qGz+VTBkGRLbAmcT8S/COdq1xncjdVGicDPruPeivvwoh30BMVmhlyFM2WNQn0Mt/QDMLM870wEUZ Uxyx50N2ZhlHigJ6W4YEgKiwgAlfa7MfAMN7ORzPJV+XyctgoxA1tgnYkh0d0bT5lAM3SxY6XT1kh q+roWXhg==; Received: from [93.188.44.204] (port=64947 helo=buildpc) by direct.host-care.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mBw9j-0001OY-Lz; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 05:28:44 -0400 From: "Valery Smyslov" To: Cc: Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 12:28:41 +0300 Message-ID: <226b01d78aa5$75ca0610$615e1230$@smyslov.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdeKo+r7GOeOeZL8THGVLBjhJiPH+Q== Content-Language: ru X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - direct.host-care.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - smyslov.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: direct.host-care.com: authenticated_id: valery@smyslov.net X-Authenticated-Sender: direct.host-care.com: valery@smyslov.net Archived-At: Subject: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks-03 X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 09:29:00 -0000 Hi, on the DOTS session at IETF 111 many people expressed an interest in adopting the document draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks-03 (Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Configuration Attributes for Robust Block Transmission). This message starts a two weeks adoption call for draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks-03. The call will end on Saturday, August the 21st. Please send your opinion to the list. It'll be great if you also provide some reasoning for your opinion and also expressed whether you are going to review the document (in case you are on favor of adoption). Regards, Frank & Valery. From nobody Sat Aug 7 23:30:07 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietf.org Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9713A1D7A; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 23:30:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.36.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <162840420419.13276.15131849909005487955@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2021 23:30:04 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Dots] The DOTS WG has placed draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 06:30:04 -0000 The DOTS WG has placed draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Valery Smyslov) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks/ From nobody Sun Aug 8 17:38:18 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824773A1FAC; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 17:38:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.898 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iGYsy66V0YOw; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 17:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065823A1FC2; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 17:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.7]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app09-12009 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee9611078dbb4b-3cc1f; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 08:37:48 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee9611078dbb4b-3cc1f X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from cmcc-PC (unknown[10.2.50.233]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee4611078db780-291e2; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 08:37:48 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee4611078db780-291e2 Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 08:37:51 +0800 From: "Meiling Chen" To: "Valery Smyslov" , dots Cc: dots-chairs References: <226b01d78aa5$75ca0610$615e1230$@smyslov.net> X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.115[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <202108090837507025615@chinamobile.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart231223753626_=----" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks-03 X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 00:38:16 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_001_NextPart231223753626_=---- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgYWxsLA0KSSBoYXZlIHJldmlld2VkIHRoZSBkcmFmdCwgYWRkIHBhcmFtZXRlcnMgb2YgY2hh bm5lbCBjb25maWd1cmF0aW9uLg0KSSBzdXBwb3J0Lg0KDQpCZXN0LA0KTWVpbGluZw0KIA0KRnJv bTogVmFsZXJ5IFNteXNsb3YNCkRhdGU6IDIwMjEtMDgtMDYgMTc6MjgNClRvOiBkb3RzQGlldGYu b3JnDQpDQzogZG90cy1jaGFpcnMNClN1YmplY3Q6IFtEb3RzXSBBZG9wdGlvbiBjYWxsIGZvciBk cmFmdC1ib3NoLWRvdHMtcXVpY2stYmxvY2tzLTAzDQpIaSwNCiANCm9uIHRoZSAgRE9UUyBzZXNz aW9uIGF0IElFVEYgMTExIG1hbnkgcGVvcGxlIGV4cHJlc3NlZCBhbiBpbnRlcmVzdCBpbiBhZG9w dGluZyANCnRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCBkcmFmdC1ib3NoLWRvdHMtcXVpY2stYmxvY2tzLTAzIChEaXN0 cmlidXRlZCBEZW5pYWwtb2YtU2VydmljZSANCk9wZW4gVGhyZWF0IFNpZ25hbGluZyAoRE9UUykg U2lnbmFsIENoYW5uZWwgQ29uZmlndXJhdGlvbiBBdHRyaWJ1dGVzIGZvciBSb2J1c3QgQmxvY2sg VHJhbnNtaXNzaW9uKS4NCiANClRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBzdGFydHMgYSB0d28gd2Vla3MgYWRvcHRp b24gY2FsbCBmb3IgZHJhZnQtYm9zaC1kb3RzLXF1aWNrLWJsb2Nrcy0wMy4gDQpUaGUgY2FsbCB3 aWxsIGVuZCBvbiBTYXR1cmRheSwgQXVndXN0IHRoZSAyMXN0LiBQbGVhc2Ugc2VuZCB5b3VyIG9w aW5pb24NCnRvIHRoZSBsaXN0LiBJdCdsbCBiZSBncmVhdCBpZiB5b3UgYWxzbyBwcm92aWRlIHNv bWUgcmVhc29uaW5nIGZvciB5b3VyIG9waW5pb24NCmFuZCBhbHNvIGV4cHJlc3NlZCB3aGV0aGVy IHlvdSBhcmUgZ29pbmcgdG8gcmV2aWV3IHRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCAoaW4gY2FzZSB5b3UgYXJlIA0K b24gZmF2b3Igb2YgYWRvcHRpb24pLg0KIA0KUmVnYXJkcywNCkZyYW5rICYgVmFsZXJ5Lg0KIA0K IA0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCkRvdHMg bWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpEb3RzQGlldGYub3JnDQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFu L2xpc3RpbmZvL2RvdHMNCiANCg== ------=_001_NextPart231223753626_=---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A
Hi all,
I have reviewed the draft, add = parameters of channel configuration.
I support.

Best,
Meiling
=0A
=0A
 
<= b>Date: 2021-08-06 17:28
Subject:<= /b> [Dots] Adoption call for draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks-03
Hi,
=0A
 
=0A
on the  DOTS = session at IETF 111 many people expressed an interest in adopting
= =0A
the document draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks-03 (Distributed Denial-o= f-Service
=0A
Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Config= uration Attributes for Robust Block Transmission).
=0A
 =0A
This message starts a two weeks adoption call for draft-bosh-dot= s-quick-blocks-03.
=0A
The call will end on Saturday, August the= 21st. Please send your opinion
=0A
to the list. It'll be great i= f you also provide some reasoning for your opinion
=0A
and also e= xpressed whether you are going to review the document (in case you are =0A
on favor of adoption).
=0A
 
=0A
Regards= ,
=0A
Frank & Valery.
=0A
 
=0A
 =
=0A
_______________________________________________
=0ADots mailing list
=0A
Dots@ietf.org
=0A
https://www.iet= f.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
=0A
 
=0A
------=_001_NextPart231223753626_=------ From nobody Mon Aug 9 10:57:25 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E833A0EC2; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:57:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M2VN0uFhHQuc; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:57:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.jpshallow.com (mail.jpshallow.com [217.40.240.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F0DA3A0EBD; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.jpshallow.com ([192.168.0.3] helo=N01332) by mail.jpshallow.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1mD9WJ-0006wH-Ni; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 18:57:03 +0100 From: "Jon Shallow" To: "'Valery Smyslov'" , , References: <226b01d78aa5$75ca0610$615e1230$@smyslov.net> In-Reply-To: <226b01d78aa5$75ca0610$615e1230$@smyslov.net> Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 18:57:02 +0100 Message-ID: <9a7f01d78d47$f4e8c950$deba5bf0$@jpshallow.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQOjkTPv0rlJp0R/94pNKQPefHxK+6fTbGxw Content-Language: en-gb Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks-03 X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 17:57:24 -0000 Hi All, As an author, naturally I support this adoption call! Yes, I have reviewed the document and have also added the functionality into libcoap in PR https://github.com/obgm/libcoap/pull/611 . Regards Jon > -----Original Message----- > From: Valery Smyslov [mailto: valery@smyslov.net] > Sent: 06 August 2021 10:29 > To: dots@ietf.org > Cc: dots-chairs@ietf.org > Subject: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks-03 > > Hi, > > on the DOTS session at IETF 111 many people expressed an interest in > adopting > the document draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks-03 (Distributed Denial-of- > Service > Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Configuration Attributes for > Robust Block Transmission). > > This message starts a two weeks adoption call for draft-bosh-dots-quick- > blocks-03. > The call will end on Saturday, August the 21st. Please send your opinion > to the list. It'll be great if you also provide some reasoning for your opinion > and also expressed whether you are going to review the document (in case > you are > on favor of adoption). > > Regards, > Frank & Valery. > > > _______________________________________________ > Dots mailing list > Dots@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots From nobody Wed Aug 11 14:58:04 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietf.org Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DF03A26A1; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:58:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Martin Duke via Datatracker To: "The IESG" Cc: draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home@ietf.org, dots-chairs@ietf.org, dots@ietf.org, Valery Smyslov , valery@smyslov.net X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.36.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Reply-To: Martin Duke Message-ID: <162871907946.26337.16632177859526295459@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:57:59 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Dots] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:58:00 -0000 Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (5.3.1) Please clarify if the entire source-prefix needs to fall within the responsibility of the DOTS server. e.g. If the client needs all of 1.2.3.0/24 to be squelched, and this prefix is split between two domains, can the client send the same request to both servers, or can it simply replicate the same message to both and expect them to administer the relevant portions? From nobody Wed Aug 11 20:47:06 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietf.org Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1946D3A335C; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:47:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sean Turner via Datatracker To: Cc: dots@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.36.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <162874002105.1973.832104527449655362@ietfa.amsl.com> Reply-To: Sean Turner Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:47:01 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Dots] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14 X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 03:47:01 -0000 Reviewer: Sean Turner Review result: Ready Hi! Reviewing this because I got asked. I will note that it appears this document has already been through IETF LC, SECDIR, and GENART among others. These two are pretty minor (and look like a secret secdir review): 1. I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis refers to DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13}. Should this I-D also refer to DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13} in s1? Pretty sure changing the reference isn't going to slow down publication because this I-D normatively references I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis. 2. Assuming that the answer is yes and you could use (D)TLS1.3 with this protocol, I think you need to say something about or refer to the early data concerns (see s7.2 of I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis). You might consider just expand the 2nd sentence in the 1st para of s8 to also refer to s7.2 or I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis? From nobody Wed Aug 11 22:28:41 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA8F3A36A7; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 22:28:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.499 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DBH-oqX92ziI; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 22:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDC93A36A9; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 22:28:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 17C5SKe8017570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:28:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 22:28:20 -0700 From: Benjamin Kaduk To: Sean Turner Cc: art@ietf.org, dots@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org Message-ID: <20210812052820.GL50759@kduck.mit.edu> References: <162874002105.1973.832104527449655362@ietfa.amsl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <162874002105.1973.832104527449655362@ietfa.amsl.com> Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Dots] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14 X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 05:28:33 -0000 Hi Sean, On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 08:47:01PM -0700, Sean Turner via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Sean Turner > Review result: Ready > > Hi! Reviewing this because I got asked. I will note that it appears this > document has already been through IETF LC, SECDIR, and GENART among others. > > These two are pretty minor (and look like a secret secdir review): > > 1. I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis refers to DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13}. Should > this I-D also refer to DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13} in s1? Pretty sure > changing the reference isn't going to slow down publication because this I-D > normatively references I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis. > > 2. Assuming that the answer is yes and you could use (D)TLS1.3 with this > protocol, I think you need to say something about or refer to the early data > concerns (see s7.2 of I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis). You might consider just > expand the 2nd sentence in the 1st para of s8 to also refer to s7.2 or > I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis? Thanks for spotting these; they are good questions to ask (it's what I get for not advancing this document until after DTLS 1.3 got approved). My first reeaction is that there's not a clear reason to pick one route or the other, but I could be missing something. (I agree that changing the reference is unlikely to slow down publication.) -Ben From nobody Thu Aug 12 02:10:56 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69373A3E30 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 02:10:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l1ufjCLICj2j for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 02:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.jpshallow.com (mail.jpshallow.com [217.40.240.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 850513A3E32 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 02:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.jpshallow.com ([192.168.0.3] helo=N01332) by mail.jpshallow.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1mE6h1-0000MG-66; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:08:03 +0100 From: To: "'Martin Duke'" , "'The IESG'" Cc: , , , References: <162871907946.26337.16632177859526295459@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <162871907946.26337.16632177859526295459@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:08:00 +0100 Message-ID: <007501d78f59$8cdb90e0$a692b2a0$@jpshallow.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQK+GA8Zqa3cHzfcew7Mlx6nUmM98qmigoKQ Content-Language: en-gb Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Dots] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:10:55 -0000 Hi Martin, Please see inline. Regards Jon > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Duke via Datatracker [mailto: noreply@ietf.org] > Sent: 11 August 2021 22:58 > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home@ietf.org; dots-chairs@ietf.org; > valery@smyslov.net; dots@ietf.org > Subject: [Dots] Martin Duke's No Objection on > draft-ietf-dots-signal-call- > home-14: (with COMMENT) > > Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14: No Objection Jon> Thanks. > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > this introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > (5.3.1) Please clarify if the entire source-prefix needs to fall > within the responsibility of the DOTS server. > > e.g. If the client needs all of 1.2.3.0/24 to be squelched, and this > prefix is split between two domains, can the client send the same > request to both servers, or can it simply replicate the same message > to both and expect them to administer the relevant portions? > Jon> Yes, the entire source prefix needs to fall within the Jon> responsibility of the DOTS server. Further into 5.3.1, there is:- " The Call Home DOTS server MUST check that the 'source-prefix' is within the scope of the Call Home DOTS server domain. .... Invalid mitigation requests are handled as per Section 4.4.1 of [I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis]." > > > _______________________________________________ > Dots mailing list > Dots@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots From nobody Mon Aug 16 02:43:26 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E793A0FC2; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 02:43:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qoygOLrH20Wh; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 02:43:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA873A0FB9; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 02:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id i28so6447439lfl.2; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 02:43:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZpVZ/YLeijhdYM3UdM5t0EwVPr7K+yRR7yEC/qlKB3s=; b=TSh7P2Ewcw7kz/9BMk0QMkOniINnekMSgsHUAlG+iS9CHxuUqdxfgKakf5tuEUhkkb 5v3fMaWl8pJwX3FoHaa2I2iFeUzXAUt4eXvtFyk4uPDYw/Qh/zy5NSQdidEBStgn9p/8 jBEUXG0C0roKDJyMupti9ttaU/uh2U9iIT+fqdGoi5KVSC3wCRH4L/y8xT10N39+lzQ0 cfpJsAY87DRIDKp5wqcbWdHYg5JNA0sFe9lhK96i6y6EF2MtKsJ/uvBeuWV/u4dhCG4M nCZgD6Pdpeb3R/DYMWdV1h7o0GJREi9ZpFnVCRqLt0Y1v1pw3P/PU/cNNXWbAVk4lvLe MuWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZpVZ/YLeijhdYM3UdM5t0EwVPr7K+yRR7yEC/qlKB3s=; b=YGUkDKNQVI/wkPZqwxTqAVTv9yXE5rEvy8Lj2zqrV3GqapMXz60hlDFHWQvAMGWHUs X0jxWmDqEr88iSyHO/nPZJhT+DYlKLNY+rsMW8dyh1jdGYfi5FulpnCPXDJuInK+6gBu t0RFqyddSN1DTZ0o5q6vq/QHCffPDeOcKq2NKYsZDApS9Zsea2I7Ts3lml4uAYbZzkDz Y6waXsQyS8d+cEKE0z//j1e7yNnfYAwAz8jhRPuutk189hkPUMONI5XhbE3cYTzu2S1r 9ybvHiZUgdMN+zabrsZ8UDtfrkQHtdgzPYqcmW5NR1rUmLpuErP+C/nVchzq5O7ZVowT uG8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ATle40EGCxRPX03SbSGw76BxgtoA7gXjo7w5RdImizmVi6DVZ 4Y8dHBf9R162gW8np41kKAjET//Ikz8053PGl7M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx36BchUWUUkubjRCQ0KnAjeQ6ioxOvynblNtwzOJH2kfCF/No4acb1F6AuAsGUXY6T0hE/WXdHE7UykdmFPr8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:b27:: with SMTP id w39mr11143850lfu.129.1629106995767; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 02:43:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <162874002105.1973.832104527449655362@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <162874002105.1973.832104527449655362@ietfa.amsl.com> From: tirumal reddy Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:13:04 +0530 Message-ID: To: Sean Turner Cc: art@ietf.org, dots@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c8aebf05c9aa0763" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Dots] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14 X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:43:25 -0000 --000000000000c8aebf05c9aa0763 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Thanks Sean for the review. Please see inline On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 09:17, Sean Turner via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Sean Turner > Review result: Ready > > Hi! Reviewing this because I got asked. I will note that it appears this > document has already been through IETF LC, SECDIR, and GENART among others. > > These two are pretty minor (and look like a secret secdir review): > > 1. I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis refers to DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13}. > Should > this I-D also refer to DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13} in s1? Pretty sure > changing the reference isn't going to slow down publication because this > I-D > normatively references I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis. > Yes, I will update the draft to refer to DTLS 1.3. > > 2. Assuming that the answer is yes and you could use (D)TLS1.3 with this > protocol, I think you need to say something about or refer to the early > data > concerns (see s7.2 of I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis). You might consider just > expand the 2nd sentence in the 1st para of s8 to also refer to s7.2 or > I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis ? > Sure, I will update the draft to discuss early data. Cheers, -Tiru --000000000000c8aebf05c9aa0763 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Sean for the review. Please see inline=C2=A0
On= Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 09:17, Sean Turner via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
Reviewer: Sean Turner
Review result: Ready

Hi! Reviewing this because I got asked. I will note that it appears this document has already been through IETF LC, SECDIR, and GENART among others.=

These two are pretty minor (and look like a secret secdir review):

1. I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis refers to DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13}. Shou= ld
this I-D also refer to DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13} in s1? Pretty sure changing the reference isn't going to slow down publication because thi= s I-D
normatively references I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis.

=
Yes, I will update the draft to refer to DTLS 1.3.=C2=A0
=C2=A0

2. Assuming that the answer is yes and you could use (D)TLS1.3 with this protocol, I think you need to say something about or refer to the early dat= a
concerns (see s7.2 of I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis). You might consider just expand the 2nd sentence in the 1st para of s8 to also refer to s7.2 or
I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis ?

Sure, I wil= l update the draft to discuss early data.

Cheers,<= /div>
-Tiru
--000000000000c8aebf05c9aa0763-- From nobody Mon Aug 16 08:19:39 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietf.org Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52603A0969; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:19:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.36.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Cc: The IESG , Valery Smyslov , dots-chairs@ietf.org, dots@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home@ietf.org, kaduk@mit.edu, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, valery@smyslov.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <162912716092.6590.438482858128548898@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:19:20 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Dots] Protocol Action: 'Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Call Home' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14.txt) X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:19:30 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Call Home' (draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the DDoS Open Threat Signaling Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Benjamin Kaduk and Roman Danyliw. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home/ Technical Summary This document specifies the DOTS signal channel Call Home, which enables a DOTS server to initiate a secure connection to a DOTS client, and to receive the attack traffic information from the DOTS client. The DOTS server in turn uses the attack traffic information to identify the compromised devices launching the outgoing DDoS attack and takes appropriate mitigation action(s). The DOTS signal channel Call Home is not specific to the home networks; the solution targets any deployment which requires to block DDoS attack traffic closer to the source(s) of a DDoS attack. Working Group Summary WG support for the adoption was strong. The draft was well discussed and has been reviewed by many WG members. Document Quality The document authors are also co-authors of core DOTS documents (signal channel, data channel etc.) They have good understanding of DOTS architecture so this document should fit well into that architecture. There are at least two implementations of the draft. The IANA ports expert did not see sufficient reason to allocate another port for this usage, but the WG has found flaws in all alternate proposals raised to date. It is also noted that NETCONF and RESTCONF call home have their own dedicated port numbers, and the situation here is somewhat analogous. Personnel Valery Smyslov (shepherd) Benjamin Kaduk (AD) From nobody Mon Aug 16 08:35:22 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9553A09E4; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:35:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.553 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.452, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7bh77FLqdkA5; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EUR02-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr20062.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.2.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23BEA3A09C6; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:35:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=K/U7BqMjXtnDrgiihMmCB+bz9TMst8ijnR6OEWzAO//nDN4cCBdex+EXkdlzKznXfoYOx2beC4R22r+Albd8FOxNW3RsjYWQE5ytfwAdsJ1qrPTCsOVEoiPwbJaCylYbbFAdPvzlqjo+ZDOqWnBgy4Ae4hn20uB1eo4i1RYohYVTkmPpBDF+02ujyZghWjm8hRVITdR9HdZ7DklgPuAGgt8JPg+aq5Gx7Bxwz4UA5H5DjtoSEFqu8o1tB1lmrne2WMuAvwdGnWSSiuT/IZIQCgqFJYAcIbNexepHWCU/s6z12XSf//pvPfIXNo7mX5ncplcYJxzYmEP4phnxYWSpBg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=WXG2FTuQKE4ApuzJ5TE5pLss3KcnvtvzoJnyZpT2VfU=; b=R7l+3WC+qc3nGvRIbDRjakXRnVtzo+AMfnLf7zDZ2OL7V61ya8iXdVQXH8NZEYWvBZ7Iw9AzwAS8+9gCfIoZ7Yka4vk23szRSwvqf9NnC+8KzuEVdhapnyzlMhiU/egxu+OQjbvk9W/VZhy626Gh1dRhW7NduDl79RGeTEOhv3+JSpFMq6FTUiNraCusGo7aZL4XAwp3Hu1OQ0W7QDnFSWQv4gNAkt1J1FlKL2TGQh/eifSIa8O8inERLgDAMfoiUTLj9CC1iMmhp7PnrgDRuehze69DLZyQAfTDP42j720lmw0mdR4WpWmKhGNTmvAbdxm1PBx4sc8VBEkti3Snqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=WXG2FTuQKE4ApuzJ5TE5pLss3KcnvtvzoJnyZpT2VfU=; b=IOxq1i0QaXTbsmFLeu2FKqHOKPxHBSvh1mxo4omjps4cu1ypNXXdQdkzZBD88oVXkWyCGePY8IHI2Bjh1dPubWfu61KqWXdiLpXhnv7WUqxqdIm78fNVuHS4zt2bF1onRf/rOIjoC2nJnYERqbaBxmMgbVD/wS7smcl73sa5WXk= Received: from HE1PR07MB4217.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:7:96::33) by HE1PR07MB3292.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:7:2e::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4436.9; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:35:08 +0000 Received: from HE1PR07MB4217.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6536:1eff:d4ae:d51a]) by HE1PR07MB4217.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6536:1eff:d4ae:d51a%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4436.018; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:35:08 +0000 From: Francesca Palombini To: Sean Turner , "art@ietf.org" CC: "last-call@ietf.org" , "dots@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home.all@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [art] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14 Thread-Index: AQHXjyzK7wPqr3kxqUqFEZLUXD4CBat2a8MA Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:35:08 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-GB X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.51.21071101 authentication-results: sn3rd.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;sn3rd.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com; x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d780da03-d87f-4b11-f5e2-08d960cb6db8 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR07MB3292: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: DvTa353B/JQAcnekRHQD0+nuV0YLnKJTZfldWddrVAYanBUM42iG0ukVIy1Fyx+cTWeyyNOi5YGzy3Rn296pGj3b4kz8QO2qwMvZjjfI79ajK/NnmZsSntn56dX49Zo30+9X06RVhfw4llkYJFNs1kEaYgyx2WtJuZbHIxkK5upTNuqBR1yxcWDf91SlLkrGWoJzglTC3mLaZVekS49U0Elbh/vFZ9wB1STCm5aXABVncYr9U1sMRSgKAutlIbOD56IqETj6FJ2GqRs20jOxqtQwGq9DaW5FUX+SvpegyvJP1imNA9woKjCiRPLU5v9hgRvrnYk4X6+KZ6gff3Hnh15qx3Jvdt1iM29Ag0OKKhvIWDW8b4f3CG/CbOErxF2cEk9KsQ27wFnl78aU7cg9fXsj9Vi24cc6sM+0Jc6uCHxlF+WfR+UUrASniEa/MsLTBIk+uCjWY2rRjLWK+PXo9/LhJuFYeMe624yVBn9oJbpU44c476AZEYv4nNlh40cjeMKwzh6/hJVSEsExlR+dghLWzb0KBb3PppWX90HtVu1d12xXQTTUWyuSzvybW6SLoc5HlzqcEojVceqocnvrLhDoI1SCNcjJKvG4rNQUTFD6osupevxFWbGwjJ2xir6zpJFqANh9Yqy1hTJ5NHx5SF4uOxH4JvlndP6DjK9v8rTE4dJDA1LcQfhIP9l8YSRO87uUDET9TV6C4LXlRiynMeW5rYrLXR/i59e6n6eSYdvv2sIeUB7ZWYe31b1dIqcqFt1lwi040/JL6gVIokS09zLMTKf1luAGC6qghGzBMDNVjPckGXp7xFkM059GPqyU x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:HE1PR07MB4217.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(376002)(346002)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(6506007)(36756003)(5660300002)(2616005)(54906003)(110136005)(122000001)(186003)(316002)(2906002)(38070700005)(966005)(44832011)(38100700002)(6512007)(8676002)(71200400001)(6486002)(86362001)(478600001)(8936002)(76116006)(66946007)(33656002)(66476007)(66446008)(66556008)(64756008)(4326008)(45980500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1 x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: =?utf-8?B?ZmwwVTQyWDJENjdMQjVMMnlzZG1LMGRiZU5MRGtaZDR5dFV4Zi9URS94c21L?= =?utf-8?B?Zkh3WnlmeHI0NUp0RWhMeFJGZ2tueE9DUzhPNGpXVkVhS2ZVSC9VMDZPUHV4?= =?utf-8?B?d1BBVytORGRxbGt1WlBDVTAwLzcwV3hLUFo2VWZ5NCt3TjRaYUNBOUtkUlBY?= =?utf-8?B?VU5YM0gwTzkwcVV2TTcrdWcxSVJXNDVQRUJ5azVKSHlmbTNpYUVta2dOcGNU?= =?utf-8?B?ZlcwQXltNURIaVFTZEhDR3N1cUg0V3Z6T0ZjajE5ZEo2eGdiZExhZjFrRDBt?= =?utf-8?B?UFF1cjdMOFhabmFDRWJRakNHcmtJanZqL2V3TUpsajZYSi9WWlhHbGtnMWVj?= =?utf-8?B?NmV0UGVTWkdCVVE2MUMxeFgwR2w3V0NSbUtMcEpZNHgyZ3UyaFdNWE5ESkdu?= =?utf-8?B?S1BEMWw5a0l5cDVVMDhyNGQ3djczWEVmRG9OR0pwbXZIWHoxMHRwN3RaaCtB?= =?utf-8?B?Mi9sSytQOVBJcnB0TUFEMHJuK0VUWEhxVGpTYXE2TUpRWW9yWHlWaGdhOGJn?= =?utf-8?B?NUNnVnp4N29KSDF5SENwd0RyZTBTajB0QXlQVDZQWU9aYWwzb1ZuMDR5c1hP?= =?utf-8?B?RVRwYTd2NWwyVmx3dy9XZmZDSDR6cW5vd3o5SGwrdDZlSFdVVk9RT3pRaHZG?= =?utf-8?B?dWxmTXNWSU8xdHoxSEhhdllVZDNJV1d0Vmk2SmlHM0FjaytUYndsdWovelVw?= =?utf-8?B?VHA2UUJ2ZU9mWHFCREZpcTFNcndGWDZLV1NqR2h4Qm1UbjNFR09KaHBSclFq?= =?utf-8?B?aHJPWDBVZDduRG83aCtYQWh0aUFBQWxoMC9lWk4xczRxblBDMXNQbnVEdHdq?= =?utf-8?B?QjNUVHhFZ1JhdWdoWVhmVlB3dnRkMWlRZVNxZFoxaUdmTWJxd25jYlNJMGd6?= =?utf-8?B?a2l4bkFFQUtFVUdHQ1JMUzYvbDhpSHRGSExMWU1vZHJoUmlXakl0RFRXVkRL?= =?utf-8?B?NGt3RGtCL1JtZHdTOVhOMllwNUtLQnZ6ZjVQYmtYTVk4R0J4UW5nNXQ3Q2JL?= =?utf-8?B?cnB5WS9OcjY4ZFY2cDVON0tMalR2WGNOWEV5MThLd3orUmtOVmY0WlMxUVZU?= =?utf-8?B?MjRZaklCdWNNaWd5SVZWUStKcjU5cm9sck9LaWs3VEJSWmcyUjE5M0V0QmNK?= =?utf-8?B?STRyeFVrMXNMZGRpL212eFZsTDRzMWRHR0QyNU00eVNnSHJwaytjalAvLzhv?= =?utf-8?B?Q1dQZC9uUkxKb1FyNDNJNkUxaEptMUhPbE5FTUdONmRBWURoSVVZSHd5bzlY?= =?utf-8?B?ZmVxck9oY3M3aS8xd21ieVhRbTZIYnRxck1tQ05lODJaeTVUUG15OG03K05X?= =?utf-8?B?WmhmK1Q0VEZMNklXdEZxUUFRTy9VYXpnU2Z2YUlWMVEwc0dGY09vMVBLUkVx?= =?utf-8?B?TC9GcUR6d095UzBHdDRhSGxGS1c5RnhuZW1Fc1llbWhPZTh3R1lNdVJqU2Ni?= =?utf-8?B?Vk8rRkxuNmo1Q3pDLzR2cTc3RTVoTkFaTjh0NlUxWDRaUUpkTEd1Q2hjNmZv?= =?utf-8?B?OXVCQXJaTDllbm1YbHNzTkZLaFVDS1QrZGdIRFJjRHFJVENRU1IrZk5HNEk3?= =?utf-8?B?VGw2NHBubUtyV1FoeW0yUHZqWnU1Njl2WU9nY3FSTGI0ekVIQmsxQm9HZ3RY?= =?utf-8?B?MXZla3BZenRnWlhKZXIwTFFHRmVLWDAwMk44K0QxRy9KS3JTRW56N0loNFZI?= =?utf-8?B?ZUM5QWVsV3BKOTdOdGZBbjk4dmFWRlBFRUxTNUpDd0RjZitlMlNTdE1TVG4y?= =?utf-8?B?N0lQNzJTY1g5VGt5RUduL2g4WGViY1JENTg3NnM5WXpQWGFNS3JXSktsMGM3?= =?utf-8?B?ZW03NHRkVUlyaU5LSTFwS1FROEV2QTJKK2FGNVUwaWV6YjVpakNVaGFZQWdl?= =?utf-8?B?MTF1OVd1TzNaWVVIeEhTbDBOWEJOKy9IakVuTzg0L2ZCZnc9PQ==?= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <172A2095518B8940816AAF412BED3B26@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: HE1PR07MB4217.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d780da03-d87f-4b11-f5e2-08d960cb6db8 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Aug 2021 15:35:08.4152 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: LXKDpeRAZV9KTtWjy90/kV8/ARpkdeT7GdCgxyw8cqFNEhx7BzFtfEUEVHj1WOOmrq4h/z9SkKLq1tC+Za5pnrlcD83xZDgtTroS5Shfi7rm30FkzvgSxa1QwgmtF0dp X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR07MB3292 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Dots] [art] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-home-14 X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:35:16 -0000 VGhhbmtzIGZvciB0aGUgcmV2aWV3LCBTZWFuISBBbGwgY29tbWVudHMgYXJlIGFwcHJlY2lhdGVk LCBpbmNsdWRpbmcgdGhvc2UgdGhhdCBsb29rIGxpa2Ugc2VjISA6KQ0KDQpGcmFuY2VzY2ENCg0K 77u/T24gMTIvMDgvMjAyMSwgMDU6NDcsICJhcnQgb24gYmVoYWxmIG9mIFNlYW4gVHVybmVyIHZp YSBEYXRhdHJhY2tlciIgPGFydC1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnIG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiBub3JlcGx5 QGlldGYub3JnPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KICAgIFJldmlld2VyOiBTZWFuIFR1cm5lcg0KICAgIFJldmll dyByZXN1bHQ6IFJlYWR5DQoNCiAgICBIaSEgUmV2aWV3aW5nIHRoaXMgYmVjYXVzZSBJIGdvdCBh c2tlZC4gSSB3aWxsIG5vdGUgdGhhdCBpdCBhcHBlYXJzIHRoaXMNCiAgICBkb2N1bWVudCBoYXMg YWxyZWFkeSBiZWVuIHRocm91Z2ggSUVURiBMQywgU0VDRElSLCBhbmQgR0VOQVJUIGFtb25nIG90 aGVycy4NCg0KICAgIFRoZXNlIHR3byBhcmUgcHJldHR5IG1pbm9yIChhbmQgbG9vayBsaWtlIGEg c2VjcmV0IHNlY2RpciByZXZpZXcpOg0KDQogICAgMS4gSS1ELmlldGYtZG90cy1yZmM4NzgyLWJp cyByZWZlcnMgdG8gRFRMUyAxLjMgW0ktRC5pZXRmLXRscy1kdGxzMTN9LiBTaG91bGQNCiAgICB0 aGlzIEktRCBhbHNvIHJlZmVyIHRvIERUTFMgMS4zIFtJLUQuaWV0Zi10bHMtZHRsczEzfSBpbiBz MT8gUHJldHR5IHN1cmUNCiAgICBjaGFuZ2luZyB0aGUgcmVmZXJlbmNlIGlzbid0IGdvaW5nIHRv IHNsb3cgZG93biBwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiBiZWNhdXNlIHRoaXMgSS1EDQogICAgbm9ybWF0aXZlbHkg cmVmZXJlbmNlcyBJLUQuaWV0Zi1kb3RzLXJmYzg3ODItYmlzLg0KDQogICAgMi4gQXNzdW1pbmcg dGhhdCB0aGUgYW5zd2VyIGlzIHllcyBhbmQgeW91IGNvdWxkIHVzZSAoRClUTFMxLjMgd2l0aCB0 aGlzDQogICAgcHJvdG9jb2wsIEkgdGhpbmsgeW91IG5lZWQgdG8gc2F5IHNvbWV0aGluZyBhYm91 dCBvciByZWZlciB0byB0aGUgZWFybHkgZGF0YQ0KICAgIGNvbmNlcm5zIChzZWUgczcuMiBvZiBJ LUQuaWV0Zi1kb3RzLXJmYzg3ODItYmlzKS4gWW91IG1pZ2h0IGNvbnNpZGVyIGp1c3QNCiAgICBl eHBhbmQgdGhlIDJuZCBzZW50ZW5jZSBpbiB0aGUgMXN0IHBhcmEgb2YgczggdG8gYWxzbyByZWZl ciB0byBzNy4yIG9yDQogICAgSS1ELmlldGYtZG90cy1yZmM4NzgyLWJpcz8NCg0KDQogICAgX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCiAgICBhcnQgbWFp bGluZyBsaXN0DQogICAgYXJ0QGlldGYub3JnDQogICAgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFp bG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9hcnQNCg0K From nobody Sun Aug 22 23:39:33 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785A73A0FC4; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 23:39:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=smyslov.net Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XbD2kmbo0FSv; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 23:39:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from direct.host-care.com (direct.host-care.com [198.136.54.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C4C3A0FC0; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 23:39:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smyslov.net ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SJR6gzgZ9GYdNq0birvx0F9g6ezqs7QkEPb1/XJW0wM=; b=sAt/oCck+IktAcW4/FgboXzv4e G0U24hmfTwF3Qwb7J90/hzJKicuM9KC6Ft20u+pQzUVQ2g3ivTeBECEAC59GYVehwmtC9b/L4p6yA FGpWqnujswiQ7lfFnjzS1gSLbLT/oFlQWdYGLLu2r2jxpL4XbdiVw8oyqqSvONmbDt0fHEolgTR22 NebPsF0JCR1P32NLZUv7IGmG7gvWreSYMBlw36FrPaOudXJqnC6oEtFjiMyelQeeq41ToIVgBroYx 5ovgnANPUVgxfc6CHp9w+nix70ZWf6gyuIHAlM2S452RIhRvYb+YNPzJUWLSm6KnbYAl5vCftLNP4 ANIixL9g==; Received: from [93.188.44.204] (port=63672 helo=buildpc) by direct.host-care.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mI3c6-00022Y-T1; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 02:39:19 -0400 From: "Valery Smyslov" To: Cc: References: <226b01d78aa5$75ca0610$615e1230$@smyslov.net> In-Reply-To: <226b01d78aa5$75ca0610$615e1230$@smyslov.net> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:39:17 +0300 Message-ID: <2b5601d797e9$99f05e80$cdd11b80$@smyslov.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQOjkTPv0rlJp0R/94pNKQPefHxK+6forCOQ Content-Language: ru X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - direct.host-care.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - smyslov.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: direct.host-care.com: authenticated_id: valery@smyslov.net X-Authenticated-Sender: direct.host-care.com: valery@smyslov.net Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks-03 X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 06:39:30 -0000 Hi, noone objected the adoption, and some people promised to review it, so the draft is adopted. Authors, please re-submit it with draft-ietf-dots- name. Regards, Valery. > Hi, > > on the DOTS session at IETF 111 many people expressed an interest in adopting > the document draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks-03 (Distributed Denial-of-Service > Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Configuration Attributes for Robust Block Transmission). > > This message starts a two weeks adoption call for draft-bosh-dots-quick-blocks-03. > The call will end on Saturday, August the 21st. Please send your opinion > to the list. It'll be great if you also provide some reasoning for your opinion > and also expressed whether you are going to review the document (in case you are > on favor of adoption). > > Regards, > Frank & Valery. > > > _______________________________________________ > Dots mailing list > Dots@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots From nobody Mon Aug 23 07:35:46 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dots@ietf.org Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610483A040A; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 07:35:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: dots@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.36.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dots@ietf.org Message-ID: <162972934533.15036.10607224022450451206@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 07:35:45 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Dots] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-00.txt X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:35:46 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the DDoS Open Threat Signaling WG of the IETF. Title : Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Configuration Attributes for Robust Block Transmission Authors : Mohamed Boucadair Jon Shallow Filename : draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-00.txt Pages : 19 Date : 2021-08-23 Abstract: This document specifies new DOTS signal channel configuration parameters that are negotiated between DOTS peers to enable the use of Q-Block1 and Q-Block2 Options. These options enable robust and faster transmission rates for large amounts of data with less packet interchanges as well as supporting faster recovery should any of the blocks get lost in transmission. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks/ There is also an htmlized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-00 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/