Received: from asmtpout015.mac.com (asmtpout015.mac.com [17.148.16.90]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3TFb9X8012859; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:37:09 -0700 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Received: from [192.168.4.98] (dsl092-149-198.wdc2.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.149.198]) by asmtp015.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KIV00BH5BWA1600@asmtp015.mac.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:19:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Lovell To: Hans Kruse , M.Bhutta@surrey.ac.uk Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:19:20 -0400 Message-id: <20090429151920.750058079@smtp.mac.com> In-reply-to: References: <89E48AE60E64EF4E8EB32B0B7EC74920A1B0F5@EVS-EC1-NODE2.surrey.ac.uk> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail version 6.0.2 build 4601 English (intel) Cc: dtn-security@maillists.intel-research.net, dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net Subject: [dtn-security] Re(2): [dtn-interest] Bundle Security Protocol Implementation X-BeenThere: dtn-security@maillists.intel-research.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: DTN Security Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:37:10 -0000 Hi Nasir and Hans, If I remember correctly, ION does not yet include BSP in its implementation. That may have changed but I think that was the situation a few months ago. So I would suggest that you begin with DTN2 BSP which is intended to be a reference implementation. That's not completely up-to-date but fairly close (and that will be corrected soon). I am happy to provide suggestions and advice on this one (since I wrote it). Regards.....Peter On Wed, Apr 29, 2009, Hans Kruse wrote: >Nasir, >the Java implementation you refer to has not been supported in a long >time as we have been focusing on the NASA ION code base. I would >suggest that either ION or DTN2 would be the best place to start from. > >On Apr 29, 2009, at 7:59 AM, wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> We at Surrey university are implementing the Bundle Security >> Protocol Specification internet draft .. The implementation will >> have following features: >> >> BSP Features: >> - Support for Authentication via BAB, PIB >> - Support for confidentiality via PCB >> - Support for compulsory cipher suites >> >> We are going to use "BP reference implementation by Ohio university >> in Java". We thought that some may be working on security >> implementation. So, any one with any progress, or want to give some >> suggestion. All inputs will be realy appreciated. >> >> "Most important how we should merge this with Bundle Protocol >> Implementation" .. >> >> regards, >> Nasir >> University of Surrey >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dtn-interest mailing list >> dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net >> http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest > >Hans Kruse, Professor >J. Warren McClure School of Information and Telecommunication Systems >Adjunct Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer >Science >292 Lindley Hall, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701 >740-593-4891 voice, 740-593-4889 fax > > >_______________________________________________ >dtn-security mailing list >dtn-security@maillists.intel-research.net >http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-security Received: from smtpout1.cns.ohiou.edu (smtpout1.cns.ohiou.edu [132.235.51.146]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3TDdVBe007213; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:39:31 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,266,1238990400"; d="scan'208,217";a="1405741934" Received: from oak3a.cats.ohiou.edu (HELO oak.cats.ohiou.edu) ([132.235.8.151]) by smtpout1.cns.ohiou.edu with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2009 09:22:08 -0400 Received: from 132.235.232.204 by pm2 (PureMessage); Wed Apr 29 09:21:08 2009 Received: from lin4.its.ohiou.edu (lin4.its.ohiou.edu [132.235.232.204]) (authenticated bits=0) by oak.cats.ohiou.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3TDL0rO1983358 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:21:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: From: Hans Kruse To: In-Reply-To: <89E48AE60E64EF4E8EB32B0B7EC74920A1B0F5@EVS-EC1-NODE2.surrey.ac.uk> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4-711055148 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:21:00 -0400 References: <89E48AE60E64EF4E8EB32B0B7EC74920A1B0F5@EVS-EC1-NODE2.surrey.ac.uk> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.2.313940, Antispam-Data: 2009.3.17.84053 (pm2) X-PMX-Information: http://technology.ohio.edu/email/filtering/ X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='CTYPE_MULTIPART_NO_QUOTE 0.5, HTML_50_70 0.1, HTML_NO_HTTP 0.1, BODY_SIZE_5000_5999 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, FROM_EDU_TLD 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __C230066_P5 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __HAS_HTML 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __pbl.spamhaus.org_TIMEOUT ' Cc: dtn-security@maillists.intel-research.net, dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net Subject: Re: [dtn-security] [dtn-interest] Bundle Security Protocol Implementation X-BeenThere: dtn-security@maillists.intel-research.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: DTN Security Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:39:33 -0000 --Apple-Mail-4-711055148 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nasir, the Java implementation you refer to has not been supported in a long time as we have been focusing on the NASA ION code base. I would suggest that either ION or DTN2 would be the best place to start from. On Apr 29, 2009, at 7:59 AM, wrote: > Hi All, > > We at Surrey university are implementing the Bundle Security > Protocol Specification internet draft .. The implementation will > have following features: > > BSP Features: > - Support for Authentication via BAB, PIB > - Support for confidentiality via PCB > - Support for compulsory cipher suites > > We are going to use "BP reference implementation by Ohio university > in Java". We thought that some may be working on security > implementation. So, any one with any progress, or want to give some > suggestion. All inputs will be realy appreciated. > > "Most important how we should merge this with Bundle Protocol > Implementation" .. > > regards, > Nasir > University of Surrey > > _______________________________________________ > dtn-interest mailing list > dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net > http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest Hans Kruse, Professor J. Warren McClure School of Information and Telecommunication Systems Adjunct Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 292 Lindley Hall, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701 740-593-4891 voice, 740-593-4889 fax --Apple-Mail-4-711055148 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nasir,
the Java = implementation you refer to has not been supported in a long time as we = have been focusing on the NASA ION code base.  I would suggest that = either ION or DTN2 would be the best place to start = from.

On Apr 29, 2009, at 7:59 AM, <M.Bhutta@surrey.ac.uk> = wrote:

Hi All,

We at Surrey university are implementing the = Bundle Security Protocol Specification internet draft .. The = implementation will have following features:

BSP Features:
= - Support for Authentication via BAB, PIB
- Support for = confidentiality via PCB
- Support for compulsory cipher suites
=
We are going to use "BP reference implementation by Ohio university = in Java". We thought that some may be working on security = implementation. So, any one with any progress, or want to give some = suggestion. All inputs will be realy appreciated.

"Most = important how we should merge this with Bundle Protocol Implementation" = ..

regards,
Nasir
University of Surrey

=
_______________________________________________
dtn-interest = mailing list
dtn-interest@mai= llists.intel-research.net
http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailm= an/listinfo/dtn-interest

Hans Kruse, Professor

J. Warren McClure School of Information and = Telecommunication Systems

Adjunct Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and = Computer Science

292 Lindley Hall, Ohio University, Athens, OH, = 45701

740-593-4891 voice, 740-593-4889 fax


 =

= --Apple-Mail-4-711055148-- Received: from mail114.messagelabs.com (mail114.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.163]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id n3TCGJLC003186; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:16:20 -0700 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: M.Bhutta@surrey.ac.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-114.messagelabs.com!1241006345!59544582!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [131.227.102.140] Received: (qmail 17066 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2009 11:59:05 -0000 Received: from ads40.surrey.ac.uk (HELO ads40.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.102.140) by server-7.tower-114.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2009 11:59:05 -0000 Received: from EVS-EC1-NODE2.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.102.137]) by ads40.surrey.ac.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:59:05 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9C8C1.E48928D5" Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:59:04 +0100 Message-ID: <89E48AE60E64EF4E8EB32B0B7EC74920A1B0F5@EVS-EC1-NODE2.surrey.ac.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Bundle Security Protocol Implementation Thread-Index: AcnIweQPi7jVv7QrQTSzlLayRqUNNA== From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2009 11:59:05.0451 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5171BB0:01C9C8C1] Cc: dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net Subject: [dtn-security] Bundle Security Protocol Implementation X-BeenThere: dtn-security@maillists.intel-research.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: DTN Security Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:16:21 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9C8C1.E48928D5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, We at Surrey university are implementing the Bundle Security Protocol = Specification internet draft .. The implementation will have following = features: BSP Features:=20 - Support for Authentication via BAB, PIB=20 - Support for confidentiality via PCB - Support for compulsory cipher suites=20 We are going to use "BP reference implementation by Ohio university in = Java". We thought that some may be working on security implementation. = So, any one with any progress, or want to give some suggestion. All = inputs will be realy appreciated.=20 "Most important how we should merge this with Bundle Protocol = Implementation" ..=20 regards, Nasir University of Surrey ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9C8C1.E48928D5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bundle Security Protocol Implementation

Hi All,

We at Surrey university are implementing the Bundle Security Protocol = Specification internet draft .. The implementation will have following = features:

BSP Features:
- Support for Authentication via BAB, PIB
- Support for confidentiality via PCB
- Support for compulsory cipher suites

We are going to use "BP reference implementation by Ohio university = in Java". We thought that some may be working on security = implementation. So, any one with any progress, or want to give some = suggestion. All inputs will be realy appreciated.

"Most important how we should merge this with Bundle Protocol = Implementation" ..

regards,
Nasir
University of Surrey

------_=_NextPart_001_01C9C8C1.E48928D5--