Subject: [eap] Issue 77: Section 7.2 security claim [f] excessive

From: [email-masked] (Bernard Aboba)
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:01:08 -0800 (PST)

I would like to recommend that we accept this change. Claim [f] is indeed
excessive --  it was so bothersome that it hardly even seemed worthwhile
to bothering complying with it, within the same document!

> Issue: 7.2 security claim [f] excessive?
> Submitter name: Henrik Levkowetz
> Submitter email address: [email-masked]
> Date first submitted: 4 Feb 2003
> Document: draft-ietf-eap-rfc2284bis-00a.txt
> Comment type: Editorial
> Priority: 1
> Section: 7.2
> Rationale:
>
> 2284bis itself does not adhere to item [f] of section 7.2. So it seems
> that this item may be an excessive requirement, and might be removed
> or reworded?