Subject: [Ecrit] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-rosen-rph-reg-policy-00.txt

From: "Rosen, Brian" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:27:51 -0500

It processing  draft-polk-local-emergency-rph-namespace  through the IESG, we came across a problem.  The emergency-rph document merely creates a namespace and new priority values, it doesn't contain any protocol mechanism.  Some ADs complained that this was not, therefore, an appropriate document for standards track.  However, the registry of namespaces and the priority registry were created with a policy of standards-track required to add values.

In hindsight, this was a mistake.  Adding a namespace or priorities doesn't necessarily alter any protocol, and shouldn't need standard-track.

I wrote a document that updates RFC4412 to change the registries to "IETF Review" (new designation for what was "IETF Consensus").  That's all it does, change the policy.  It makes NO other changes.

It is entered in the "shortest RFC" contest.

I would like to move this through the process expeditiously.  Our AD is behind this effort.  If you would take a quick look at the document, or, if you are in favor of, or not in favor of changing the registry policy, please respond to the list so we know if we have a quick consensus.

Brian

Begin forwarded message:

From: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Subject: I-D Action: draft-rosen-rph-reg-policy-00.txt
Date: February 11, 2013 9:15:57 AM EST
To: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Reply-To: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.

Title           : Resource Priority Header (RPH) Registry Management Policy to IETF Review
Author(s)       : Brian Rosen
Filename        : draft-rosen-rph-reg-policy-00.txt
Pages           : 3
Date            : 2013-02-08

Abstract:
  RFC4412 defines "Resource-Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-Priority
  Priority-values" registries.  The management policy of these
  registries is "Standards Action".  This document changes the
  management policy of these registries to "IETF Review".

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rosen-rph-reg-policy

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-rph-reg-policy-00

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt