From nobody Mon Nov 2 10:03:37 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@ietf.org Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E5D3A0114; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:03:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: ecrit@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.21.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ecrit@ietf.org Message-ID: <160434021012.18217.15481258826588676831@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 10:03:30 -0800 Archived-At: Subject: [Ecrit] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00.txt X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 18:03:30 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies WG of the IETF. Title : Changing the LoST Location Profile Registry Policy Author : Randall Gellens Filename : draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00.txt Pages : 4 Date : 2020-11-02 Abstract: This document changes the policy of the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Location Profile registry established by RFC5222 from Standards Action to Specification Required. This allows standards development organizations (SDOs) other than the IETF to add new values. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Nov 2 13:51:06 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBAB3A08B8 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:51:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.996 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wkSNRR72HTZY for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:51:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E293A07BD for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:51:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id w1so14759289edv.11 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 13:51:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CJVObPnUi2bOYeVavXmtnAqaKd6GxAAgw/nhgJqIrFs=; b=nX9DNwW4tT4JoUHx8HDJd0wsFApo5jWaCGfvtMrMehtNnIe1p2NqtAE/4gqRa9h62g G71dEW4pO3tdnIquv2BA8cRyG3vP5c5tm7kq7DhRp+fNeCQBtyCtnKzPJ2hTSzxVOGF1 gfMQmvRVxJHMbVv2z/xF7vvapCd1t+jpaDNtm2wPzVOEswL6s43a37xLitbk6O1AK5tZ FNK4ipP1mgbvTpS7wZlplj6QqY3i8QjULp6OMvoL66ykVv/8lQasfidfx9XHbryo20FW QeE8X0WoLmlUGXIZJMLk02RKfIft2Q8XKZ3YlDjqSPN44fOvjhmU7z4Yh8Ci/+vk7YEM l69A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CJVObPnUi2bOYeVavXmtnAqaKd6GxAAgw/nhgJqIrFs=; b=coW9q6VOAeIh1DLIDoEjXR0Ns+QJA7g/Icps6WAmpFamVE7J+/mC1aftpk3gA24wLt Rtyf6XZ0qWEFAegNbWXionvhkBfaEpNmET/oOl8YQphOFPr3Yt8rwMo8A5mcld9mxzv6 Tbffg2gJ3osURUL8CocsCwi4R7dJG4sC9qbTYLS+PBDLadoruKoromnzAzTCiMz/POen FMCrdUy7ClWLdwevfTeKlTsfdTxSYskRGg78ri7uNJKOD6VqHj7sWegRg0Q4vNMVsdGB ldzIUgB5cwIRMzz54kOP4mOG20MONPXLDaUW6k9MBpKAHWrEOT6HWIJhsTiIDw01eecV DrPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jlY+pDAUIZD4bAIHZA/b7qIXRPD3XTLuz6DS9XuCSMue8RzaC HnLhKmPMYwZKgI+eb7GBULsB2lXT3gfassn8tkk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRzmaE8xzKO2hhvNalnatuCwlPeS2tORK5BiVPf39I+Zyfq4t6SaiVKc64ZbFiYGinLl0FSntYaau7f6i+xfc= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d888:: with SMTP id u8mr17837848edq.210.1604353861565; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 13:51:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Allison Mankin Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 16:50:49 -0500 Message-ID: To: Roger Marshall Cc: "ecrit@ietf.org" , "Murray S. Kucherawy" , Barry Leiba , Randall Gellens Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000003442505b326be33" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Adoption question: Adopt ID as new ECRIT draft? X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 21:51:05 -0000 --00000000000003442505b326be33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, ECRIT and Randall, As of October 31, we saw only support for adopting Draft: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt And draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00.txt has been approved for adoption. Please continue to comment in this thread and we will try to WGLC this document around November 16, 2020. Allison and Roger. On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 14:59, Roger Marshall wrote: > There is a new Internet Draft (Randall Gellens, author) that changes the > policy of a LoST Location Profile registry from Standards Action to > Specification Required. This is being proposed in order to make it > possible for NENA to add values. > > > > The chairs are asking for working group adoption for this draft. > > > > Please let the chairs know if there is any objection to adopting this as > an ECRIT work group draft by 10/31/2020. > > > Draft: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.t= xt > > > > Registry url: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/lost-location-profiles/lost-location-pro= files.xhtml > > > > > -roger marshall, ECRIT co-chair > NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This email, including attachments, may contain > information which is confidential, proprietary, attorney-client privilege= d > and / or controlled under U.S. export laws and regulations and may be > restricted from disclosure by applicable State and Federal law. Nothing i= n > this email shall create any legal binding agreement between the parties > unless expressly stated herein and provided by an authorized representati= ve > of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. or its subsidiaries. If you are not t= he > intended recipient of this message, be advised that any dissemination, > distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly > prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us > immediately by return email and permanently delete all copies of the > original email and any attached documentation from any computer or other > media. > --00000000000003442505b326be33 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi, ECRIT and Randall,

As of Octob= er 31, we saw only support for adopting Draft:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt
And draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00.txt has= been approved for adoption.=C2=A0 Please continue to comment in this threa= d and we will try to WGLC this document around November 16, 2020.
<= br>
Allison and Roger.



On Fri, 16 Oc= t 2020 at 14:59, Roger Marshall <roger.marshall@comtechtel.com> wrote:

There is a new Internet Draft (Randall Gellens, auth= or) that changes the policy of a LoST Location Profile registry from Standa= rds Action to Specification Required.=C2=A0 This is being proposed in order= to make it possible for NENA to add values.

=C2=A0

The chairs are asking for working group adoption for= this draft.=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Please let the chairs know if there is any objection= to adopting this as an ECRIT work group draft by 10/31/2020.=


Draft:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-pr= ofile-registry-policy-01.txt


Registry url:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/lost-l= ocation-profiles/lost-location-profiles.xhtml

=C2=A0

-roger marshall, ECRIT co-chair

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This email, including attachments, may contain informa= tion which is confidential, proprietary, attorney-client privileged and / o= r controlled under U.S. export laws and regulations and may be restricted f= rom disclosure by applicable State and Federal law. Nothing in this email shall create any legal binding agre= ement between the parties unless expressly stated herein and provided by an= authorized representative of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. or its subsi= diaries. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be advised that any dissemination, distribution= , or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you rec= eived this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email a= nd permanently delete all copies of the original email and any attached documentation from any computer or = other media.
--00000000000003442505b326be33-- From nobody Mon Nov 2 14:01:05 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED823A1238 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:01:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rJSjfrU-ui2a for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:01:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FBD3A12BA for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:00:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [169.254.178.235] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:00:58 -0800 From: "Randall Gellens" To: "Allison Mankin" Cc: "Roger Marshall" , ecrit@ietf.org, "Murray S. Kucherawy" , "Barry Leiba" Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:00:57 -0800 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673) Message-ID: <223AD368-F01D-4AC2-A29B-83EE961A9A90@coretechnologyconsulting.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_B22BEF83-4C2D-4011-88EC-FA34C6A012AF_=" Embedded-HTML: [{"HTML":[549, 5421], "plain":[218, 3389], "uuid":"8590A830-3C00-4562-A5A9-1F3111D4AEFD"}] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Adoption question: Adopt ID as new ECRIT draft? X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:01:04 -0000 --=_MailMate_B22BEF83-4C2D-4011-88EC-FA34C6A012AF_= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Do you mean not start the WGLC until November 16th? Considering how = short and simple the document is, I suggest starting WGLC now, and = ending on the 16th. --Randall On 2 Nov 2020, at 13:50, Allison Mankin wrote: > Hi, ECRIT and Randall, > > As of October 31, we saw only support for adopting Draft: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01= =2Etxt > > > And draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00.txt has been > approved for adoption. Please continue to comment in this thread and = > we > will try to WGLC this document around November 16, 2020. > > Allison and Roger. > > > > On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 14:59, Roger Marshall = > > wrote: > >> There is a new Internet Draft (Randall Gellens, author) that changes = >> the >> policy of a LoST Location Profile registry from Standards Action to >> Specification Required. This is being proposed in order to make it >> possible for NENA to add values. >> >> >> >> The chairs are asking for working group adoption for this draft. >> >> >> >> Please let the chairs know if there is any objection to adopting this = >> as >> an ECRIT work group draft by 10/31/2020. >> >> >> Draft: >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-0= 1.txt >> >> >> >> Registry url: >> >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/lost-location-profiles/lost-location-= profiles.xhtml >> >> >> >> >> -roger marshall, ECRIT co-chair >> NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This email, including attachments, may contain >> information which is confidential, proprietary, attorney-client = >> privileged >> and / or controlled under U.S. export laws and regulations and may be >> restricted from disclosure by applicable State and Federal law. = >> Nothing in >> this email shall create any legal binding agreement between the = >> parties >> unless expressly stated herein and provided by an authorized = >> representative >> of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. or its subsidiaries. If you are = >> not the >> intended recipient of this message, be advised that any = >> dissemination, >> distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly >> prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us >> immediately by return email and permanently delete all copies of the >> original email and any attached documentation from any computer or = >> other >> media. >> --=_MailMate_B22BEF83-4C2D-4011-88EC-FA34C6A012AF_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<= p dir=3D"auto">Do you mean not start the WGLC until November 16th? Consi= dering how short and simple the document is, I suggest starting WGLC now,= and ending on the 16th.

--Randall

On 2 Nov 2020, at 13:50, Allison Mankin wrote:

Hi, ECRIT and Randall,

As of= October 31, we saw only support for adopting Draft:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-= ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt

And draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-r= egistry-policy-00.txt has been approved for adoption.=C2=A0 Please contin= ue to comment in this thread and we will try to WGLC this document around= November 16, 2020.

Allison and Roger.



On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 14:59, Roger Marshall &= lt;rog= er.marshall@comtechtel.com> wrote:

There is a new Internet Draft (Randall Gellens, au= thor) that changes the policy of a LoST Location Profile registry from St= andards Action to Specification Required.=C2=A0 This is being proposed in= order to make it possible for NENA to add values.

=C2=A0

The chairs are asking for working group adoption f= or this draft.=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Please let the chairs know if there is any objecti= on to adopting this as an ECRIT work group draft by 10/31/2020.=


Draft:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-= ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt


Registry url:
https://www.iana.org/assign= ments/lost-location-profiles/lost-location-profiles.xhtml

=C2=A0

-roger marshall, ECRIT co-chair

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This email, including attachments, may contain infor= mation which is confidential, proprietary, attorney-client privileged and= / or controlled under U.S. export laws and regulations and may be restri= cted from disclosure by applicable State and Federal law. Nothing in this email shall create any legal binding ag= reement between the parties unless expressly stated herein and provided b= y an authorized representative of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. or its= subsidiaries. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be advised that any dissemination, distributi= on, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you= received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e= mail and permanently delete all copies of the original email and any attached documentation from any computer o= r other media.
--=_MailMate_B22BEF83-4C2D-4011-88EC-FA34C6A012AF_=-- From nobody Mon Nov 2 15:04:25 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A613A126B for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:04:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.997 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DDcReVuvOhzh for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:04:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com (mail-qt1-x832.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 214733A125E for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:04:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id n63so4907392qte.4 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 15:04:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YtMmorKA7k1kBsYLeACSXLfulIhHoqSNWTtaPfcTbSc=; b=KCAAfJl9gkIRQvCJfvsuPuCAW+BqNTAqLWJCsWWvPe7YKwoafqN5HLf8k2aq9vqJrf ucv9ojdedZRDqpeSE2lJKYx6og5dBZ4WbYA0wjhYSJZsuCEWeiZdrbCxRf3Y8hKVSiZc UHYIIqrJSxplNB5gCiaEO1bl9jvX4QmQFh/wjhwCCjuGjNMtsM3ORKi5bowGsGvrWcBI 8bPxv5pVP/wm/3r18mbu/G/0TXj06ll1iDRuXyd9bvakE9e64dp8m40DchuFjdpeHunX RTAcfqVlCobgRwFHHlxlnRcnGjQXB571BSyP2osyRbst5UUdNlTF7EB4PbbkRA2Mh13h Ikfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YtMmorKA7k1kBsYLeACSXLfulIhHoqSNWTtaPfcTbSc=; b=He5sT0qUrQrQAYCKC7XwNT6OPBvpn6oErpvf6M7i8/PgTynI58CjNlyaQWW5sE3lI+ k7c1bqnHBer4aGyBtysUZ3nsmFExrzeJTrqqRlqlpRhPXrJ7sQU5IFE1VC07oHyShyP4 WpLodPupsS7x+qkoRENgDO696S8v2x2l0JMSQqQL3IsR5HyIqQTRaFL+EfdB/PZ+g+Wm YbwnAFiU4Z4WnauWIGZwMlWv2myPlLXDfLC38GE1bWVIhtzKkhxhzzCY+GXojAIZTiad AsZwJxHEz/GtPOK/d0mCmBF8bK8akO4O+ZLfbJjeKnh3FhVPLlutBlyA66ZrrerzEbiS YYHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Dnpr19RupOXtT+OSrO9uwi7CwVNjJDTZg7xbXQayBD+Zm7igE I0umtjB5NhHoWQVOQvOkQXxZwwSTHru6jFcLo/U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZYVzXzNtpJbLbdaI0V/wVjOrRTLzcZxVQzlTKoOA9bPkEk2dgI/REQxPrU4bGhzkMW3eqbvqjir0Fe3U6/Zg= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7b92:: with SMTP id p18mr6764636qtu.105.1604358261079; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 15:04:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <223AD368-F01D-4AC2-A29B-83EE961A9A90@coretechnologyconsulting.com> In-Reply-To: <223AD368-F01D-4AC2-A29B-83EE961A9A90@coretechnologyconsulting.com> From: Az Mankin Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 18:04:09 -0500 Message-ID: To: Randall Gellens Cc: Allison Mankin , ecrit@ietf.org, Barry Leiba Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003e82d405b327c4c5" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Adoption question: Adopt ID as new ECRIT draft? X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 23:04:24 -0000 --0000000000003e82d405b327c4c5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mis-typing by me. I meant we start a two-week WGLC now, to end 11/16. Too much multi-tasking. But also, have you addressed the comments from the reviewers on this thread already. Due to multi-tasking, I also haven't checked that yet. Allison On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 5:01 PM Randall Gellens < rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com> wrote: > Do you mean not start the WGLC until November 16th? Considering how short > and simple the document is, I suggest starting WGLC now, and ending on th= e > 16th. > > --Randall > > On 2 Nov 2020, at 13:50, Allison Mankin wrote: > > Hi, ECRIT and Randall, > > As of October 31, we saw only support for adopting Draft: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit > -location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt > > > And draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00.txt has been > approved for adoption. Please continue to comment in this thread and we > will try to WGLC this document around November 16, 2020. > > Allison and Roger. > > > > On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 14:59, Roger Marshall < > roger.marshall@comtechtel.com> wrote: > >> There is a new Internet Draft (Randall Gellens, author) that changes the >> policy of a LoST Location Profile registry from Standards Action to >> Specification Required. This is being proposed in order to make it >> possible for NENA to add values. >> >> >> >> The chairs are asking for working group adoption for this draft. >> >> >> >> Please let the chairs know if there is any objection to adopting this as >> an ECRIT work group draft by 10/31/2020. >> >> >> Draft: >> >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.= txt >> >> >> >> Registry url: >> >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/lost-location-profiles/lost-location-pr= ofiles.xhtml >> >> >> >> >> -roger marshall, ECRIT co-chair >> NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This email, including attachments, may contain >> information which is confidential, proprietary, attorney-client privileg= ed >> and / or controlled under U.S. export laws and regulations and may be >> restricted from disclosure by applicable State and Federal law. Nothing = in >> this email shall create any legal binding agreement between the parties >> unless expressly stated herein and provided by an authorized representat= ive >> of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. or its subsidiaries. If you are not = the >> intended recipient of this message, be advised that any dissemination, >> distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly >> prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us >> immediately by return email and permanently delete all copies of the >> original email and any attached documentation from any computer or other >> media. >> > _______________________________________________ > Ecrit mailing list > Ecrit@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit > --0000000000003e82d405b327c4c5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mis-typing by me.=C2=A0 I meant we start a two-week W= GLC now, to end 11/16.=C2=A0 Too much multi-tasking.=C2=A0 But also, have y= ou addressed the comments from the reviewers on this thread already.=C2=A0 = Due to multi-tasking, I also haven't checked that yet.

Allison

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 5:01 PM Randall Gellens &l= t;rg+ietf@coretec= hnologyconsulting.com> wrote:

Do you mean not start the WGLC until November 16th? Consideri= ng how short and simple the document is, I suggest starting WGLC now, and e= nding on the 16th.

--Randall

On 2 Nov 2020, at 13:50, Allison Mankin wrote:

Hi, ECRIT = and Randall,

As of October 31, we saw only support for= adopting Draft:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt
And draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00.txt has= been approved for adoption.=C2=A0 Please continue to comment in this threa= d and we will try to WGLC this document around November 16, 2020.
<= br>
Allison and Roger.



On Fri, 16 Oc= t 2020 at 14:59, Roger Marshall <roger.marshall@comtechtel.com> wrote:

There is a new Internet Draft (Randall Gellens, auth= or) that changes the policy of a LoST Location Profile registry from Standa= rds Action to Specification Required.=C2=A0 This is being proposed in order= to make it possible for NENA to add values.

=C2=A0

The chairs are asking for working group adoption for= this draft.=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Please let the chairs know if there is any objection= to adopting this as an ECRIT work group draft by 10/31/2020.=


Draft:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-pr= ofile-registry-policy-01.txt


Registry url:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/lost-l= ocation-profiles/lost-location-profiles.xhtml

=C2=A0

-roger marshall, ECRIT co-chair

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This email, including attachments, may contain informa= tion which is confidential, proprietary, attorney-client privileged and / o= r controlled under U.S. export laws and regulations and may be restricted f= rom disclosure by applicable State and Federal law. Nothing in this email shall create any legal binding agre= ement between the parties unless expressly stated herein and provided by an= authorized representative of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. or its subsi= diaries. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be advised that any dissemination, distribution= , or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you rec= eived this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email a= nd permanently delete all copies of the original email and any attached documentation from any computer or = other media.
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
--0000000000003e82d405b327c4c5-- From nobody Mon Nov 2 15:32:06 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80AE3A129D for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:32:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MRTqn9UtZQA3 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:32:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568433A129C for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:32:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [169.254.178.235] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:32:02 -0800 From: "Randall Gellens" To: "Az Mankin" Cc: "Allison Mankin" , ecrit@ietf.org, "Barry Leiba" Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 15:32:01 -0800 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673) Message-ID: <9D105EFA-A224-4E07-BCAC-69C776095035@coretechnologyconsulting.com> In-Reply-To: References: <223AD368-F01D-4AC2-A29B-83EE961A9A90@coretechnologyconsulting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_26DD9E15-6A12-4BBB-A946-CAB4C0546910_=" Embedded-HTML: [{"HTML":[669, 7148], "plain":[338, 4194], "uuid":"7766770E-BFBA-42C8-877E-37D287DEEE8C"}] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Adoption question: Adopt ID as new ECRIT draft? X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 23:32:05 -0000 --=_MailMate_26DD9E15-6A12-4BBB-A946-CAB4C0546910_= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, Allison, that's what I was hoping. And yes, I did address the = comments (from Ted and Guy) in the draft-ietf-ecrit- version posted this = morning. I do have one more edit I made just to tweak an editorial = issue with how the bullets were worded, that hasn't been posted yet. --Randall On 2 Nov 2020, at 15:04, Az Mankin wrote: > Mis-typing by me. I meant we start a two-week WGLC now, to end 11/16. = > Too > much multi-tasking. But also, have you addressed the comments from = > the > reviewers on this thread already. Due to multi-tasking, I also = > haven't > checked that yet. > > Allison > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 5:01 PM Randall Gellens < > rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com> wrote: > >> Do you mean not start the WGLC until November 16th? Considering how = >> short >> and simple the document is, I suggest starting WGLC now, and ending = >> on the >> 16th. >> >> --Randall >> >> On 2 Nov 2020, at 13:50, Allison Mankin wrote: >> >> Hi, ECRIT and Randall, >> >> As of October 31, we saw only support for adopting Draft: >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit >> -location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt >> >> >> And draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00.txt has been >> approved for adoption. Please continue to comment in this thread and = >> we >> will try to WGLC this document around November 16, 2020. >> >> Allison and Roger. >> >> >> >> On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 14:59, Roger Marshall < >> roger.marshall@comtechtel.com> wrote: >> >>> There is a new Internet Draft (Randall Gellens, author) that changes = >>> the >>> policy of a LoST Location Profile registry from Standards Action to >>> Specification Required. This is being proposed in order to make it >>> possible for NENA to add values. >>> >>> >>> >>> The chairs are asking for working group adoption for this draft. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please let the chairs know if there is any objection to adopting = >>> this as >>> an ECRIT work group draft by 10/31/2020. >>> >>> >>> Draft: >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-= 01.txt >>> >>> >>> >>> Registry url: >>> >>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/lost-location-profiles/lost-location= -profiles.xhtml >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -roger marshall, ECRIT co-chair >>> NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This email, including attachments, may contain >>> information which is confidential, proprietary, attorney-client = >>> privileged >>> and / or controlled under U.S. export laws and regulations and may = >>> be >>> restricted from disclosure by applicable State and Federal law. = >>> Nothing in >>> this email shall create any legal binding agreement between the = >>> parties >>> unless expressly stated herein and provided by an authorized = >>> representative >>> of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. or its subsidiaries. If you are = >>> not the >>> intended recipient of this message, be advised that any = >>> dissemination, >>> distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly >>> prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us >>> immediately by return email and permanently delete all copies of the >>> original email and any attached documentation from any computer or = >>> other >>> media. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ecrit mailing list >> Ecrit@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit >> --=_MailMate_26DD9E15-6A12-4BBB-A946-CAB4C0546910_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<= p dir=3D"auto">Thanks, Allison, that's what I was hoping. And yes, I did= address the comments (from Ted and Guy) in the draft-ietf-ecrit- version= posted this morning. I do have one more edit I made just to tweak an ed= itorial issue with how the bullets were worded, that hasn't been posted y= et.

--Randall

On 2 Nov 2020, at 15:04, Az Mankin wrote:

Mis-typing by me.=C2=A0 I meant we start a two-week W= GLC now, to end 11/16.=C2=A0 Too much multi-tasking.=C2=A0 But also, have= you addressed the comments from the reviewers on this thread already.=C2= =A0 Due to multi-tasking, I also haven't checked that yet.
=
Allison

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 5:01 PM Randall = Gellens <rg+= ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com> wrote:
<= p dir=3D"auto">Do you mean not start the WGLC until November 16th? Consi= dering how short and simple the document is, I suggest starting WGLC now,= and ending on the 16th.

--Randall

On 2 Nov 2020, at 13:50, Allison Mankin wrote:

Hi= , ECRIT and Randall,

As of October 31, we saw on= ly support for adopting Draft:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-= ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt

And draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-r= egistry-policy-00.txt has been approved for adoption.=C2=A0 Please contin= ue to comment in this thread and we will try to WGLC this document around= November 16, 2020.

Allison and Roger.



On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 14:59, Roger Marshall &= lt;rog= er.marshall@comtechtel.com> wrote:

There is a new Internet Draft (Randall Gellens, au= thor) that changes the policy of a LoST Location Profile registry from St= andards Action to Specification Required.=C2=A0 This is being proposed in= order to make it possible for NENA to add values.

=C2=A0

The chairs are asking for working group adoption f= or this draft.=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Please let the chairs know if there is any objecti= on to adopting this as an ECRIT work group draft by 10/31/2020.=


Draft:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-= ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt


Registry url:
https://www.iana.org/assign= ments/lost-location-profiles/lost-location-profiles.xhtml

=C2=A0

-roger marshall, ECRIT co-chair

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This email, including attachments, may contain infor= mation which is confidential, proprietary, attorney-client privileged and= / or controlled under U.S. export laws and regulations and may be restri= cted from disclosure by applicable State and Federal law. Nothing in this email shall create any legal binding ag= reement between the parties unless expressly stated herein and provided b= y an authorized representative of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. or its= subsidiaries. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be advised that any dissemination, distributi= on, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you= received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e= mail and permanently delete all copies of the original email and any attached documentation from any computer o= r other media.
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
--=_MailMate_26DD9E15-6A12-4BBB-A946-CAB4C0546910_=-- From nobody Mon Nov 2 15:38:19 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880403A157E for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:38:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.997 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJ9euAzXxhIt for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:38:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA373A14CD for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:37:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id 12so9281688qkl.8 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 15:37:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UxgJ4WJuwNrkwg8QqvSHDPe4lV0xCZ2zNgm/fg/RHw4=; b=Vnw8z6cE+XafNfEeEU7R9L4dlOOwGwTjF2nLibaOuvtS7CARjqlFNNGeStRkOYUGPY gjX81YVzzeo8R23lZSG3b+Tmkftxc1bQWUTwfXXZZOVqIvURw/ibPxj9610JaiY6uR77 UhY1dheB3qWqKjOPAtg0neQXE71+vZvf52ovKL8kVP02R056fPKPQkXclmXLYdvegKbs PbcKkSXlXHcU/8e4uJWGRa6vBXk6il2e+BD7ho5m9bgXxJujXqVU6ZTF9AneMhgbHz0e u2jgm4ccmele2hE/GfZ3zcagkZHIhQFfDuFW312jRi+Cg1o/wzQpQMLPxWpCeim04iT/ 3HaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UxgJ4WJuwNrkwg8QqvSHDPe4lV0xCZ2zNgm/fg/RHw4=; b=ekX9EHKuIV2Frg9Os9cz4icM7jx0RO8h5KQQ99DDFcIIcPPKGcLfnESa/Ow6AG8777 nZh5uJ23IckLH1wpoZ1RVhAR9HGHQTxyE1W9a22ovCJvA26v6clRaKp0iGt+QykWhy5O vhVLCtrYJ4rsB8BaWBFCg+/0sIYaLy6Wmb+9LefcDFTTkkww57d04/HRbP3OatNNjRsM VSvQLViqwTIu98xs1Jcm12OhgGshXVQa9pbwpyst+bIIWM0dnx1vJcVkF1EOw3bbni6b UjiPZ83dVpu41djIeGfPh0rzjIO5VZVBMZxQ7XjbPbIueyTCr4ytFEm6rV/O8v8YbcJB QqFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5337gr58OxRoThWtqtlR10r7zdQ0/jRM7F25uAAv8tgXS0O0WfpP J9VAQPVjDkokIoBRz3COC5tNlouaIcyRAvPa2mo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfoXMmheHC7aY34V2LPEWIJXpTW/MgxO0ui2NL2TGAoXKG5dfd4y73wSQSdJIJhoS0wUVxohoXLnW21qfnUQs= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a74f:: with SMTP id q76mr10955365qke.344.1604360252019; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 15:37:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <223AD368-F01D-4AC2-A29B-83EE961A9A90@coretechnologyconsulting.com> <9D105EFA-A224-4E07-BCAC-69C776095035@coretechnologyconsulting.com> In-Reply-To: <9D105EFA-A224-4E07-BCAC-69C776095035@coretechnologyconsulting.com> From: Az Mankin Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 18:37:20 -0500 Message-ID: To: Randall Gellens Cc: Allison Mankin , ecrit@ietf.org, Barry Leiba Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e9da4705b3283a28" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Adoption question: Adopt ID as new ECRIT draft? X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 23:38:18 -0000 --000000000000e9da4705b3283a28 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Got it. On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 6:32 PM Randall Gellens < rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com> wrote: > Thanks, Allison, that's what I was hoping. And yes, I did address the > comments (from Ted and Guy) in the draft-ietf-ecrit- version posted this > morning. I do have one more edit I made just to tweak an editorial issue > with how the bullets were worded, that hasn't been posted yet. > > --Randall > > On 2 Nov 2020, at 15:04, Az Mankin wrote: > > Mis-typing by me. I meant we start a two-week WGLC now, to end 11/16. > Too much multi-tasking. But also, have you addressed the comments from t= he > reviewers on this thread already. Due to multi-tasking, I also haven't > checked that yet. > > Allison > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 5:01 PM Randall Gellens < > rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com> wrote: > >> Do you mean not start the WGLC until November 16th? Considering how shor= t >> and simple the document is, I suggest starting WGLC now, and ending on t= he >> 16th. >> >> --Randall >> >> On 2 Nov 2020, at 13:50, Allison Mankin wrote: >> >> Hi, ECRIT and Randall, >> >> As of October 31, we saw only support for adopting Draft: >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit >> -location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt >> >> >> And draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00.txt has been >> approved for adoption. Please continue to comment in this thread and we >> will try to WGLC this document around November 16, 2020. >> >> Allison and Roger. >> >> >> >> On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 14:59, Roger Marshall < >> roger.marshall@comtechtel.com> wrote: >> >>> There is a new Internet Draft (Randall Gellens, author) that changes th= e >>> policy of a LoST Location Profile registry from Standards Action to >>> Specification Required. This is being proposed in order to make it >>> possible for NENA to add values. >>> >>> >>> >>> The chairs are asking for working group adoption for this draft. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please let the chairs know if there is any objection to adopting this a= s >>> an ECRIT work group draft by 10/31/2020. >>> >>> >>> Draft: >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01= .txt >>> >>> >>> >>> Registry url: >>> >>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/lost-location-profiles/lost-location-p= rofiles.xhtml >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -roger marshall, ECRIT co-chair >>> NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This email, including attachments, may contain >>> information which is confidential, proprietary, attorney-client privile= ged >>> and / or controlled under U.S. export laws and regulations and may be >>> restricted from disclosure by applicable State and Federal law. Nothing= in >>> this email shall create any legal binding agreement between the parties >>> unless expressly stated herein and provided by an authorized representa= tive >>> of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. or its subsidiaries. If you are not= the >>> intended recipient of this message, be advised that any dissemination, >>> distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly >>> prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us >>> immediately by return email and permanently delete all copies of the >>> original email and any attached documentation from any computer or othe= r >>> media. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ecrit mailing list >> Ecrit@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit >> > --000000000000e9da4705b3283a28 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Got it.

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 6:32 PM Randall Gellen= s <rg+ietf@cor= etechnologyconsulting.com> wrote:

Thanks, Allison, that's what I was hoping. And yes, I did= address the comments (from Ted and Guy) in the draft-ietf-ecrit- version p= osted this morning. I do have one more edit I made just to tweak an editor= ial issue with how the bullets were worded, that hasn't been posted yet= .

--Randall

On 2 Nov 2020, at 15:04, Az Mankin wrote:

Mis-ty= ping by me.=C2=A0 I meant we start a two-week WGLC now, to end 11/16.=C2=A0= Too much multi-tasking.=C2=A0 But also, have you addressed the comments fr= om the reviewers on this thread already.=C2=A0 Due to multi-tasking, I also= haven't checked that yet.

Allison

On= Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 5:01 PM Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@coretechnologycon= sulting.com> wrote:

Do you mean not start the WGLC until November 16th? Consideri= ng how short and simple the document is, I suggest starting WGLC now, and e= nding on the 16th.

--Randall

On 2 Nov 2020, at 13:50, Allison Mankin wrote:

Hi, ECRIT and Randall,

As of October= 31, we saw only support for adopting Draft:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt
And draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00.txt has= been approved for adoption.=C2=A0 Please continue to comment in this threa= d and we will try to WGLC this document around November 16, 2020.
<= br>
Allison and Roger.



On Fri, 16 Oc= t 2020 at 14:59, Roger Marshall <roger.marshall@comtechtel.com> wrote:

There is a new Internet Draft (Randall Gellens, auth= or) that changes the policy of a LoST Location Profile registry from Standa= rds Action to Specification Required.=C2=A0 This is being proposed in order= to make it possible for NENA to add values.

=C2=A0

The chairs are asking for working group adoption for= this draft.=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Please let the chairs know if there is any objection= to adopting this as an ECRIT work group draft by 10/31/2020.=


Draft:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ecrit-location-pr= ofile-registry-policy-01.txt


Registry url:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/lost-l= ocation-profiles/lost-location-profiles.xhtml

=C2=A0

-roger marshall, ECRIT co-chair

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This email, including attachments, may contain informa= tion which is confidential, proprietary, attorney-client privileged and / o= r controlled under U.S. export laws and regulations and may be restricted f= rom disclosure by applicable State and Federal law. Nothing in this email shall create any legal binding agre= ement between the parties unless expressly stated herein and provided by an= authorized representative of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. or its subsi= diaries. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be advised that any dissemination, distribution= , or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you rec= eived this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email a= nd permanently delete all copies of the original email and any attached documentation from any computer or = other media.
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
--000000000000e9da4705b3283a28-- From nobody Wed Nov 4 21:11:44 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6ECA3A16C0 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 21:11:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sP4X-dqNqPFv for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 21:11:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vk1-xa32.google.com (mail-vk1-xa32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A6F63A16BF for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 21:11:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vk1-xa32.google.com with SMTP id m184so91884vkb.9 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 21:11:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0Nkg8C8vDoM5kuJcGJz9OHNI7WFCap7mYzOOWISz3DY=; b=IvrjqxtTmUs/9Vs+h57ZHwab0gRoukBg1Nu5Fu4WNEX9umbFMr/uRy2bziLrO4VViK iarc2gl9KKEHJYuTs2MeVeDXM8v65kjL/SOOYA2jFtmY+h4NraiPrByr25joBK8F1yLs LJdFYUNsKFzAJE084kwDNaAJmLXxCPKQPXZUBr1r1fd/r4dC6zxga0a4AF3slXZJjC5s RB4CGFQmlEnGjjUSDYR5KQ7P48R7drLfnofjPJnJN2CcG5WJDRrDSa0HEAGMjXyqXTQa nmMe2C3eojfnK6D8ncZmZ5F5kWNMYpLm3pqZ1G6JYXco0RAPCTtAQg4q6BUKlssxi0vH yJGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0Nkg8C8vDoM5kuJcGJz9OHNI7WFCap7mYzOOWISz3DY=; b=L+PGlI1/k3i5b7nfYTZbrL4aReK/+0JNYLC9YfsEiC3p4wIzIhXsG1O+hmXE7GILBJ JlctUYpWMd3/KgRiE4B6mJtcEfQtYU1t1oguURm98P/WiNwzbOQQQJcRQ2Ru2Ig1JcaL cF6W0Rv9gmO0+Yoyf1hbsDz5DhXd0fpblB/GFhLIufaL8cQ6cO0u+r0XOfTio9cN8L4V HF+a6V5HMnnl6GJv2pGZI8IEzFyAeE3DKkAeKboDWMRQJVXNl1/rDR8MfDA753dluMhP 5U0JYCiIklI+RwF9IwVEnlm4AaOzN5QExALXB1IAVl3cjnvr53KRnr0IWEm0T+qgHe0Z ZDOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533/QC2p4FMvtrYsZeyJWrLN7t7P6/1sp6e+0bWDBDHXCoc8cnsm mW5KBG4HMvUBQRHnaRE0B0+mWofeeM+qLzP32MHraUbzPlX9uQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrJjH1WvnxfV/TPszmR60XTLgfy+82aqjJfAsJ9vuerMbhMZwbVEOoyv2UuYQbnJy6zB7FT/wfxulqvWmeWAI= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:3655:: with SMTP id d82mr376170vka.22.1604553100295; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 21:11:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 21:11:27 -0800 Message-ID: To: ecrit@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000091032a05b355211e" Archived-At: Subject: [Ecrit] Designated experts for "SIP AlertMsg-Error Codes" X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 05:11:43 -0000 --00000000000091032a05b355211e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi ECRIT, RFC 8876 created a new IANA registry called "SIP AlertMsg-Error Codes", which needs a Designated Expert assigned. Did the working group have anyone in particular in mind, or are there any volunteers to be appointed into that role? -MSK, ART AD --00000000000091032a05b355211e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi ECRIT,

RFC 8876 created a= new IANA registry called=C2=A0"SIP AlertMsg-Error Codes", which = needs a Designated Expert assigned.=C2=A0 Did the working group have anyone= in particular in mind, or are there any volunteers to be appointed into th= at role?

-MSK, ART AD
--00000000000091032a05b355211e-- From nobody Thu Nov 5 06:49:43 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931D13A12CD for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 06:49:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.888 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=brianrosen-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5p-DHQyOD4D5 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 06:49:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 425053A0A3B for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 06:48:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com with SMTP id w5so769846qvn.12 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 06:48:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brianrosen-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Xw1Fjkya3RtSFxpjHvnP1uQUJxdxZSz7J730H8FChS4=; b=suZHksjEcLBE/5dERuemp2XgFHlaGlfd1qsSYeygHuwtcNqRPM6XFmIuRR1/1TML+R f4T8uX1ZI6p3ULCbt6YCqTe58+BGQq2PmOvcnIDl3Ky6a1LCPMkgI6fOdPTzLU83W/wo 19oHUcOSUCbcpZKNRToeUcqepNEY9a6N5r1VHy2fmYDY9W0mPIZEX1QhesKF2R2dUzVi XDuuzInZI6d6iCJnmRSuj3zjhl8TMy7Sg5DNUl5zG9R3LJPw/wHTi4zhhZCa3mrTuQWP 3rcIxqDWPRSFKskMNIcgWEbCyk/ZOzQjzjHYppVfK1SeUe7j6WPNEYTq36FfC6xjt7iV LqOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Xw1Fjkya3RtSFxpjHvnP1uQUJxdxZSz7J730H8FChS4=; b=AcXu73SoZAmbfnviR01g+Oovr3VjV4RfP9nWmTE0B+dUPup5imHreG+PxMYHmARpvW CQjVCmgsNmJtP3YY8gmPnfcGDm2Qn0V04+AsGwY/qUUQ/FXfPWJR2lRopPwuJOySf2IT nPmQk0PS3dTiwAG859dS6R5Ht68GYK5ZDstjG5t1HbcU+Ea+V1/RIyzULzal4gPVzecS 9qrU9EuUw40uqIcvp2Lw2O3WkqRIrmrWQO3XzYfVB1bQ4cIPUEQTYtDJRrE4SEA6KmKV KMfm3mTkWAyC8FM7d24yZxG0PGs4110ML+tZEdjtTs8MohYsytAdfMlDMcPQ/EtBce1a XjGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531CEbP1u6NBy3l51uMgYtMbOZ0TsCPk/o+ejBPuP4hWPGpNXORA w2RCBleEl53sIE7r+BGyD4BFbg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzJDRv2jK6/ZKtDZG7xfSZAv7XGFC7ZEDXEBHZP+54QjFpShIbnjUQTztzgOXcinORxOiPJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:fac6:: with SMTP id p6mr2363342qvo.5.1604587738364; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 06:48:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from brians-mbp-2871.lan ([24.154.119.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n81sm1172550qke.99.2020.11.05.06.48.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Nov 2020 06:48:57 -0800 (PST) From: Brian Rosen Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5951DF79-FFA0-47E9-9C4D-75063890C1C4" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 09:48:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: Cc: ecrit@ietf.org To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Designated experts for "SIP AlertMsg-Error Codes" X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 14:49:42 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_5951DF79-FFA0-47E9-9C4D-75063890C1C4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I will volunteer > On Nov 5, 2020, at 12:11 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy = wrote: >=20 > RFC 8876 --Apple-Mail=_5951DF79-FFA0-47E9-9C4D-75063890C1C4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii I will volunteer

On Nov 5, 2020, at 12:11 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:

RFC 8876

--Apple-Mail=_5951DF79-FFA0-47E9-9C4D-75063890C1C4-- From nobody Wed Nov 18 09:19:19 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@ietf.org Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E713A0CE7; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:19:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: ecrit@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.23.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ecrit@ietf.org Message-ID: <160571995310.24166.9886707076273787716@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:19:13 -0800 Archived-At: Subject: [Ecrit] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:19:13 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies WG of the IETF. Title : Changing the LoST Location Profile Registry Policy Author : Randall Gellens Filename : draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt Pages : 4 Date : 2020-11-18 Abstract: This document changes the policy of the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Location Profile registry established by RFC5222 from Standards Action to Specification Required. This allows standards development organizations (SDOs) other than the IETF to add new values. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Nov 18 11:10:20 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5CD3A09D3 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:10:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.099 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FORGED_RELAY_MUA_TO_MX=3.999, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5_OMrSd8rVba for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:10:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91AB3A09D1 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:10:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [99.111.97.181] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:10:29 -0800 From: "Randall Gellens" To: ecrit@ietf.org Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:10:16 -0800 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673) Message-ID: <827E1F8C-D7B2-413E-9F20-B43FFB5645B7@randy.pensive.org> In-Reply-To: <160571995310.24166.9886707076273787716@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <160571995310.24166.9886707076273787716@ietfa.amsl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Ecrit] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:10:19 -0000 The only changes are some minor editorial tweaks in the IANA bullets. --Randall On 18 Nov 2020, at 9:19, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts = > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Emergency Context Resolution with = > Internet Technologies WG of the IETF. > > Title : Changing the LoST Location Profile Registry = > Policy > Author : Randall Gellens > Filename : = > draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt > Pages : 4 > Date : 2020-11-18 > > Abstract: > This document changes the policy of the Location-to-Service > Translation (LoST) Location Profile registry established by RFC5222 > from Standards Action to Specification Required. This allows > standards development organizations (SDOs) other than the IETF to = > add > new values. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-regi= stry-policy/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-= policy-01 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile= -registry-policy-01 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-r= egistry-policy-01 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of = > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Ecrit mailing list > Ecrit@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit