From nobody Tue Nov 24 13:36:14 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ehip@ietf.org Delivered-To: ehip@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717291A8AB9; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:27:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: "IETF Announcement List" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151124212746.16286.90918.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:27:46 -0800 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:36:13 -0800 Cc: ted.ietf@gmail.com, ehip@ietf.org Subject: [Ehip] New Non-WG Mailing List: Ehip -- Discuss methods to protect email senders and receivers from disclosure of email headers to observers. X-BeenThere: ehip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: "Discuss methods to protect email senders and receivers from disclosure of email headers to observers." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:27:46 -0000 A new IETF non-working group email list has been created. List address: ehip@ietf.org Archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=ehip To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ehip Purpose: This non-working group mailing list will discuss methods to protect email senders and receivers from disclosure of email headers to observers. For additional information, please contact the list administrators. From nobody Sat Nov 28 11:16:34 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ehip@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ehip@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A31E1B345F for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:16:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.278 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O0myoJnUu7vI for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:16:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com (mail-vk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 305AB1B345E for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:16:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by vkay187 with SMTP id y187so82908257vka.3 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:16:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tLJjsNMSZbm2lyK4HRzBo5bBMF3NvncUKyzkAFDOSTE=; b=aZQcSiBZey9Dglu4CkIvb1/ehlbiLnaIhgo9NEq6TAby90c3gGuMvMGF5PFSWG9eli KzioBPFolNpaADt+UQIb/itOdgqe2US2gCQv9SKDjHA9EKjNwWswAZ/9RvZD21ghdNzX ndmVuIE9D+kqbKeVNMcIC1PHrLBIOr4ZILp0a/IrWFWb88O1s5hzEnfMrONzijz0v68d OFo62Bc54zQsFtncxvq0QpR9F4nrqpA0EfUMQzUegG8ZJnADVHTVVbMfJFcqLARFBmOx zPmtclfhPIo3Ei+wO9p5olgfMhktt8StSSyc56uHC2Mqp8n8nbKiK/UFy8N/7RVmjY5S HMng== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.140.199 with SMTP id o190mr47489760vkd.63.1448738188212; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:16:28 -0800 (PST) Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com Received: by 10.31.182.135 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:16:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:16:28 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mtRxXDtMGcBS44c48XKGqjSfymw Message-ID: From: Barry Leiba To: ehip@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Subject: [Ehip] "ehip" and "shutup" mailing lists X-BeenThere: ehip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discuss methods to protect email senders and receivers from disclosure of email headers to observers." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 19:16:33 -0000 "ehip" subscribers: We created two similar lists recently, based on two different requests. The "shutup" list was created for the discussion of a charter, while the ehip list was created for some pre-charter discussion. We should figure out whether there are really two things to do here, or whether it's really one, and we should keep the discussion in one place and get rid of the other list. There's some discussion started on the "shutup" list . I suggest that subscribers to the "ehip" list go there and see if that charter does (or can be altered to) meet the needs that this list was set up for. Barry, ART AD