From list-owner-entmib-outgoing@domohead.cisco.com Tue Jan 18 05:49:15 2000 Received: from domohead.cisco.com (domohead.cisco.com [171.69.2.97]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA27592 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 05:49:15 -0500 (EST) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id AAA12782 for Entmib-outgoing; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:41:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id AAA12777 for mailto-entmib@domohead.cisco.com; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:41:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from kickme.cisco.com (kickme.cisco.com [198.92.30.42]) by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA12773 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:40:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pasteur.cisco.com (pasteur.cisco.com [171.69.43.89]) by kickme.cisco.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA14205 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:38:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from proxy3.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pasteur.cisco.com (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id AAA17428 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:46:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.noc.ntt.co.jp (mail1.noc.ntt.co.jp [210.163.32.53]) by proxy3.cisco.com with SMTP (MailShield v1.5); Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:40:33 -0800 Received: from indigo.hq.west.ntt.co.jp (indigo.hq.west.ntt.co.jp) by mail1.noc.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3/NOC-MAIL1) id RAA25808 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:45:22 +0900 (JST) Received: from inetsv02.plan.bch.west.ntt.co.jp (plum.hq.west.ntt.co.jp [10.56.1.13]) by indigo.hq.west.ntt.co.jp (8.8.8/3.7W00011412) with ESMTP id RAA02457 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:44:54 +0900 (JST) Received: from 5012709 (dhcp113-o-02.eng.bch.west.ntt.co.jp [10.56.56.113]) by inetsv02.plan.bch.west.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W/mx-plan) with SMTP id RAA04196 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:45:06 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <4.0.2-J.20000118174757.00e13ba0@mx.plan> X-Sender: t.niiyama (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.2-J Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:50:02 +0900 To: entmib@cisco.com From: takeshi niiyama Subject: What's object? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SMTP-HELO: mail1.noc.ntt.co.jp X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: t.niiyama@bch.west.ntt.co.jp X-SMAP-Received-From: outside X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: mail1.noc.ntt.co.jp [210.163.32.53] Sender: owner-entmib@cisco.com Precedence: bulk What's a object in the ENTITY MIB instead of ProcessorRam in the CHASSIS MIB? From list-owner-entmib-outgoing@domohead.cisco.com Tue Jan 18 17:31:54 2000 Received: from domohead.cisco.com (domohead.cisco.com [171.69.2.97]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA06781 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:31:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA14538 for Entmib-outgoing; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:09:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA14533 for mailto-entmib@domohead.cisco.com; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:08:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from sj-mailhub-2.cisco.com (sj-mailhub-2.cisco.com [171.69.43.88]) by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA14529 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:08:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from popcorn.cisco.com (popcorn.cisco.com [171.69.198.195]) by sj-mailhub-2.cisco.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA01046 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from cisco.com (cls-pc.cisco.com [171.69.200.42]) by popcorn.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.2-SunOS.5.5.1.sun4/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA24078; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:12:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3884C92A.A096DC37@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:12:26 -0800 From: Cliff Sojourner Organization: Cisco Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: takeshi niiyama CC: entmib@cisco.com Subject: Re: What's object? References: <4.0.2-J.20000118174757.00e13ba0@mx.plan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-entmib@cisco.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hello Niiyama-san, there is no object in RFC 2737 (the latest) ENTITY-MIB that represents ProcessorRam. There is an informal proposal for some entity-based memory objects MIB floating around at Cisco but it is not being actively worked on. I do not know if other vendors have entity-based memory MIB objects. for the time being, you are safe using old-cisco-chassis-mib objects. Cliff takeshi niiyama wrote: > > What's a object in the ENTITY MIB instead of ProcessorRam in the CHASSIS MIB? -- Cliff Sojourner, Cisco Systems Inc. cls@cisco.com (408) 527-7637 170 W. Tasman Drive, SJ CA 95134 bldg H2/cube E2-7 English muffins aren't.