Subject: [Extra] Call for discussion sieve-fcc and reject

From: Bron Gondwana <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:46:22 +0800

This is call for discussion about the sieve fcc draft:

https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-00.txt

There was debate about whether :fcc should be allowed on reject.  From
the document itself:
Open Issues

   o  Should :fcc be allowed with reject/ereject?

   o  Should there be a separate capability string for each action that      uses :fcc (e.g. "vacation-fcc")?

Please reply with your opinions on either of these.  As a listed co-
author (though Ken did all the work) I will reply with my personal
opinions in a moment (switching hats!)
Bron.

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd
  [email-masked]