Subject: Re: [Fecframe] WGLC - draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs-01

From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:50:21 -0800

The document reads well. Mostly editorial comments:

Intro: I think ALC and NORM have to be spelled out for completeness.
Section 3.1: Why not refer to 6363 for all definitions and use the exact wording from 6363. Alternatively, just remove the text and simply refer to 6363.
I also think figure 1 should be identical to figure 2 in 6363. Even slight modifications could be confusing to readers.
Section 4.3: missing " after "Group of Pictures (GOP) of an H.264 flow.
Section 5.1.1.2: Says "Strict (S) flag", you mean mandatory?
fssi = E:1400,S:0,m:8 should be "fssi=E:1400,S:0,m:8"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Greg Shepherd
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:15 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Fecframe] WGLC - draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs-01
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs/
> 
> Please read and provide feedback as we're so close to finishing up this WG.
> 
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> Fecframe mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe