Subject: RE: [Forces-protocol] T in TLV ?

From: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 18:22:57 -0700

Weiming
 
I have tried to answer your comment below in another email that I just
sent out regarding defining T in TLV.
I hope that helps. Let me know if you have any other questions.
 
regards
Hormuzd

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked]
[mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Weiming Wang
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 2:35 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Fw: [Forces-protocol] T in TLV ?

Hormuzd,
 
One more thing I have to mention is, the scheme you used in the add
route example for T (T= LFBattr / FEattri ) will result in local
meaning, while the plan I proposed ( T=Add/Del/Update...+
LFBattr/FEattri ) actually can have global meaning. : -)
 
Cheers,
Weiming