2009 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:46:09 -0400 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: mailing list down MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The mailing list will be down for maintenance tomorrow (15th) between the hours of 9am and 1pm US Eastern time. cheers, jamal 2009 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:52:34 +0900 From: Kentaro Ogawa Subject: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-05] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings to the list, This is the update for the SCTP-TML draft. It includes the feedbacks from of the interoperability test. Here are the links: HTML: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-05 Text: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-05.txt Regards, Kentaro Ogawa. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-05 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:46:15 -0700 (PDT) From: IETF I-D Submission Tool To: ogawa.kentaro@lab.ntt.co.jp CC: hadi@mojatatu.com A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-05.txt has been successfuly submitted by Kentaro Ogawa and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-ietf-forces-sctptml Revision: 05 Title: SCTP based TML (Transport Mapping Layer) for ForCES protocol Creation_date: 2009-08-11 WG ID: forces Number_of_pages: 28 Abstract: This document defines the SCTP based TML (Transport Mapping Layer) for the ForCES protocol. It explains the rationale for choosing the SCTP (Stream Control Transmission Protocol) [RFC4960] and also describes how this TML addresses all the requirements described in [RFC3654] and the ForCES protocol [FE-PROTO] draft. The IETF Secretariat. 2009 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:08:28 -0400 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: WG LC: SCTP draft Comments: cc: Kentaro Ogawa MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is a WG last call for the SCTP draft. This draft has been around for a while, therefore this LC will be short and ends on August 20th. Please review and send your comments. cheers, jamal ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kentaro Ogawa Date: Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:52 PM Subject: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-05] To: FORCES@peach.ease.lsoft.com Greetings to the list, This is the update for the SCTP-TML draft. It includes the feedbacks from of the interoperability test. Here are the links: HTML: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-05 Text: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-05.txt Regards, Kentaro Ogawa. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-05 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:46:15 -0700 (PDT) From: IETF I-D Submission Tool To: ogawa.kentaro@lab.ntt.co.jp CC: hadi@mojatatu.com A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-05.txt has been successfuly submitted by Kentaro Ogawa and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0draft-ietf-forces-sctptml Revision: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A005 Title: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 SCTP based TML (Transport Mapping Layer) for For= CES protocol Creation_date: =A0 2009-08-11 WG ID: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 forces Number_of_pages: 28 Abstract: This document defines the SCTP based TML (Transport Mapping Layer) for the ForCES protocol. =A0It explains the rationale for choosing the SCTP (Stream Control Transmission Protocol) [RFC4960] and also describes how this TML addresses all the requirements described in [RFC3654] and the ForCES protocol [FE-PROTO] draft. The IETF Secretariat. 2009 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:55:55 +0300 From: Haleplidis Evangelos Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-forces-interoperability-03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01CA1799.149B5600" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CA1799.149B5600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings to the list, > -----Original Message----- > From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org] > Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 7:09 PM > To: ehalep@ece.upatras.gr > Cc: ogawa.kentaro@lab.ntt.co.jp; carly.wang@huawei.com; > chuanhuang_li@pop.zjgsu.edu.cn > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-forces- > interoperability-03 > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-forces-interoperability-03.txt has > been successfuly submitted by Evangelos Haleplidis and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Filename: draft-ietf-forces-interoperability > Revision: 03 > Title: ForCES Interoperability Draft > Creation_date: 2009-08-07 > WG ID: forces > Number_of_pages: 34 > > Abstract: > This document describes the details of the interoperability test of > the Forward and Control Element Separation (ForCES) protocol that took > place in the University of Patras in Rio, Greece, 15 and 16 July 2009. > This informational draft provided necessary information, for all > parties who wish to participate in the interoperability test. > > This update also includes the results of the test. > > > > The IETF Secretariat. > This is the final update for the interoperability draft. It includes the results of the interoperability test. Here are the links: HTML: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-forces-interoperability-03 Text: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-interoperability-03.tx t Regards, Evangelos Haleplidis. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CA1799.149B5600 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Greetings to the = list,

 

> -----Original = Message-----

> From: IETF I-D = Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org]

> Sent: Friday, August 07, = 2009 7:09 PM

> To: = ehalep@ece.upatras.gr

> Cc: ogawa.kentaro@lab.ntt.co.jp; carly.wang@huawei.com;

> = chuanhuang_li@pop.zjgsu.edu.cn

> Subject: New Version = Notification for draft-ietf-forces-

> = interoperability-03

>

>

> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-forces-interoperability-03.txt has

> been successfuly = submitted by Evangelos Haleplidis and posted to the

> IETF = repository.

>

> Filename:=20 draft-ietf-forces-interoperability

> Revision: = 03

> = Title:          ForCES Interoperability Draft

> Creation_date:  = 2009-08-07

> WG = ID:          = forces

> Number_of_pages: = 34

>

> = Abstract:

> This document describes = the details of the interoperability test of

> the Forward and Control = Element Separation (ForCES) protocol that took

> place in the University = of Patras in Rio, Greece, 15 and 16 July 2009. 

> This informational draft = provided necessary information, for all

> parties who wish to = participate in the interoperability test.

>

> This update also = includes the results of the test.

>

>

>

> The IETF = Secretariat.

>

 

This is the final update for = the interoperability draft. It includes the results of the interoperability = test.

 

Here are the = links:

 

HTML: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-forces-interoperabilit= y-03

Text: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-intero= perability-03.txt

 

Regards,

Evangelos Haleplidis.

 

------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CA1799.149B5600-- 2009 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:42:48 +0800 From: "carly.wang" Subject: Re: WG LC: Applicability draft Comments: To: Jamal Hadi Salim , "Crouch, Alan" Comments: cc: Avri Doria , "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" , Kentaro Ogawa MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT OK!I agree with you ,Alan! Carly ----- Original Message ----- From: "Crouch, Alan" To: "Jamal Hadi Salim" ; Cc: "wangxinping" ; "Kentaro Ogawa" ; "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" ; "Avri Doria" Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 10:36 PM Subject: RE: WG LC: Applicability draft Looks great! Nice work by all involved. I think it reads very well. One nit-pick comment below - since 100K routes and 100MBit Ethernet is rather out of date :) , how about the suggested text edit below? Alan Latest text >For example, sending a full routing table of 110K routes is reasonable over a 100Mbit Ethernet >interconnect, but could be non-trivial over a lower-bandwidth link Proposed change "For example, sending a full routing table is reasonable over a high bandwidth link, but could be non-trivial over a lower-bandwidth link." -----Original Message----- From: Jamal Hadi Salim [mailto:hadi@mojatatu.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 5:41 AM To: FORCES@peach.ease.lsoft.com Cc: wangxinping; Crouch, Alan; Kentaro Ogawa; Khosravi, Hormuzd M; Avri Doria Subject: Re: WG LC: Applicability draft The url for the draft is: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-forces-applicability-06.txt And i have been reminded i need to give a time limit. The LC ends in two weeks on 18th august. cheers, jamal On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > folks, > > I would like to make a 2 week WG last call on the applicability draft. > > Please read/review and comment so we can fix anything that doesnt > look reasonable so we can have a better draft. This draft has undergone > a good number of changes since we it was last released. > > cheers, > jamal > 2009 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:41:23 -0400 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: WG LC: Applicability draft Comments: cc: wangxinping , "Crouch, Alan" , Kentaro Ogawa , "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" , Avri Doria MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The url for the draft is: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-forces-applicability-06.txt And i have been reminded i need to give a time limit. The LC ends in two weeks on 18th august. cheers, jamal On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > folks, > > I would like to make a 2 week WG last call on the applicability draft. > > Please read/review and comment so we can fix anything that doesnt > look reasonable so we can have a better draft. This draft has undergone > a good number of changes since we it was last released. > > cheers, > jamal > 2009 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:11:37 -0400 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: WG LC: Applicability draft Comments: cc: wangxinping , "Crouch, Alan" , Kentaro Ogawa , "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" , Avri Doria MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit folks, I would like to make a 2 week WG last call on the applicability draft. Please read/review and comment so we can fix anything that doesnt look reasonable so we can have a better draft. This draft has undergone a good number of changes since we it was last released. cheers, jamal 2009 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:36:21 -0700 From: "Crouch, Alan" Subject: Re: WG LC: Applicability draft Comments: To: Jamal Hadi Salim Comments: cc: wangxinping , Kentaro Ogawa , "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" , Avri Doria Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Looks great! Nice work by all involved. I think it reads very well. One nit-pick comment below - since 100K route= s and 100MBit Ethernet is rather out of date :) , how about the suggested t= ext edit below? Alan Latest text >For example, sending a full routing table of 110K routes is reasonable ove= r a 100Mbit Ethernet >interconnect, but could be non-trivial over a lower-bandwidth link Proposed change "For example, sending a full routing table is reasonable over a high bandwi= dth link, but could be non-trivial over a lower-bandwidth link." -----Original Message----- From: Jamal Hadi Salim [mailto:hadi@mojatatu.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 5:41 AM To: FORCES@peach.ease.lsoft.com Cc: wangxinping; Crouch, Alan; Kentaro Ogawa; Khosravi, Hormuzd M; Avri Dor= ia Subject: Re: WG LC: Applicability draft The url for the draft is: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-forces-applicability-06.txt And i have been reminded i need to give a time limit. The LC ends in two weeks on 18th august. cheers, jamal On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > folks, > > I would like to make a 2 week WG last call on the applicability draft. > > Please read/review and comment so we can fix anything that doesnt > look reasonable so we can have a better draft. This draft has undergone > a good number of changes since we it was last released. > > cheers, > jamal >