Subject: [Hipsec] Fwd: Packages are good [Re: Allocating RFC numbers at time of approval]

From: Pekka Nikander <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:01:45 +0200

FYI, from WG chairs list, snipped to contain only the most relevant  
part.

--Pekka

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Brian E Carpenter <[email-masked]>
> Date: September 21, 2005 16:37:56 GMT+02:00
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: Packages are good [Re: Allocating RFC numbers at time of  
> approval]
>
> <snip>
>
> When a WG is developing a set of linked drafts,
> sending them for IESG review as a package is (when it's
> possible) a Good Thing. It allows everybody who reviews
> them to do so as a package, it allows issues to be resolved
> as a package, and it minimizes reference dependencies
> blocking the RFC Editor. And it may even allow them to have
> consecutive RFC numbers.
>
>     Brian

<snip>

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec