Subject: [Hipsec] FW: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis Request to change one reference from normative to informative

From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 07:19:17 +0000

For information.

Only one positive reply from the HIP WG about this change, so, let’s go forward and allow the publication of RFC4423-bis and the NAT traversal.

You may also have noticed that HIP-DEX has been sent back to the WG as 3 IESG evaluations were not enough to clear all the DISCUSS. At the bare minimum, the IESG expects a change in the intended status to ‘experimental’ and more actual/accurate/recent evaluation of the CPU/battery/memory impact of forfeiting forward secrecy.

Regards

-éric

From: Eric Vyncke <[email-masked]>
Date: Friday, 2 April 2021 at 09:14
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Cc: Robert Moskowitz <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, Gonzalo Camarillo <[email-masked]>, Lars Eggert <[email-masked]>
Subject: Request to change one reference from normative to informative

Dear RFC Editor,

After consultation with the IESG, the authors, and the HIP WG, I request a change in draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-20, which is currently in the state MISSREF. The reference to draft-ietf-hip-dex MUST be informative and no longer normative.

This change better suits the type of reference and should also move C386 forward.

Thank you in advance,

Regards

-éric