From stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Fri Apr 27 03:47:26 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB83021F87B4 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 03:47:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmyBc5q5s22w for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 03:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.scss.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F220321F87B1 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 03:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECC9171471 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:47:25 +0100 (IST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1335523644; bh=WNUFcEg+Z1fezR n39ek1Y+mGIF19oZcwIUXMP5f2GX0=; b=z6T8mGWE9jUTVuQDx48KaPbjkrE67S 5W/YmOvAxum2wRL8HFBlGuZFcHkHqSy7hmZn8L4HQ85zQRi6hH7wTUEEEn4aFVFi lu1cYc5Rqw8Bp4cgfNX1tXXgxe5YWO+CjbUKd7pzCfft6aG9anfxRTiYfzs0FIbb NrPLUuLvYbFMTAlA+iZDG+VIiKYrdnPqwrpbTggZDVtqBvosECoZoBPpZs9PpUrr xEjryiRvoPByK7foMiyttiNuajvEeiYsUpOoJbysdO1KW6uQCbt1UhNz6jbt++Y7 tQCSA+UsjeADniRuCEpRnwj0xu8+h59rHmygvRBAbkCJBEfM1KOrVG4Q== X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id x+x-xno2rsr8 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:47:24 +0100 (IST) Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFED4171503 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:47:24 +0100 (IST) Message-ID: <4F9A793E.6000704@cs.tcd.ie> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:47:26 +0100 From: Stephen Farrell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120423 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "http-auth@ietf.org" References: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> In-Reply-To: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [http-auth] Fwd: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: HTTP authentication methods List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:47:27 -0000 FYI. I do hope folks here are busy writing documents. Are you? (Feel free to respond off-list if you prefer.) S. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:28:46 +0000 Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:28:06 +1000 From: Mark Nottingham To: HTTP Working Group Just a reminder that we're still accepting proposals for: 1. HTTP/2.0 2. New HTTP authentication schemes As per our charter . So far, we've received the following proposals applicable to HTTP/2.0: But none yet for authentication schemes: As communicated in Paris, the deadline for proposals is 15 June, 2012. It's fine if your proposal isn't complete, but we do need to have a good sense of it by then, for discussion. Regards, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ From stpeter@stpeter.im Mon Apr 30 07:29:31 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90CC21F8638 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:29:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ahjSkQP0Nbav for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A38621F8637 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [107.16.139.250] (unknown [209.116.57.2]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B95E540058 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:44:22 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4F9EA1C9.7080900@stpeter.im> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:29:29 -0700 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: http-auth@ietf.org References: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> In-Reply-To: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [http-auth] Fwd: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: HTTP authentication methods List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:29:31 -0000 FYI. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:28:46 +0000 Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:28:06 +1000 From: Mark Nottingham To: HTTP Working Group Just a reminder that we're still accepting proposals for: 1. HTTP/2.0 2. New HTTP authentication schemes As per our charter . So far, we've received the following proposals applicable to HTTP/2.0: But none yet for authentication schemes: As communicated in Paris, the deadline for proposals is 15 June, 2012. It's fine if your proposal isn't complete, but we do need to have a good sense of it by then, for discussion. Regards, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ From nico@cryptonector.com Mon Apr 30 16:18:13 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0180921F8766 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:18:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.006 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ceHlAd9sR2Ec for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:18:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a31.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcagg.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB4221F8763 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a31.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a31.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA42202022 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:18:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc: content-type; q=dns; s=cryptonector.com; b=RS40TGg1Plgg3dPIxAjuR 5z/UNIezz6q6yA7bq2F8rwqi+LLfIbJCF4dKKJwWrdOu+qHs8rHtLBfrl+LzIGjJ yoL6G16WMWyEkPvyF8IBMcKuKuHc0kErR1r2UPty54thUXAodytdu4X7rAOv+/4X GiioldDRim0UH62Lkd/n7M= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=hWQOPi1hPZDyC6EyBw3/ jkAsV24=; b=PC9vP12rxKCsFIqZ1jgB3tIsHpWiP7z5+3SIBDLlffnygpOLCnRf gZmj5HuBJZ9qKRoIIiTc1qQcb2YiDtQzZkqpLCPVSvCHYH0YgrForzpWjh6qyA5b 1ZyufO5h6yJIWrlZxsFA6jXQMoLjIJEZjYy10j+Czj9WT10PPdA1li8= Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a31.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 669A9202018 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so1038978pbc.31 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:18:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.237.8 with SMTP id uy8mr5837980pbc.55.1335827887098; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.28.6 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:18:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F9A793E.6000704@cs.tcd.ie> References: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> <4F9A793E.6000704@cs.tcd.ie> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:18:07 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: Stephen Farrell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "http-auth@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [http-auth] Fwd: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: HTTP authentication methods List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:18:13 -0000 On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > FYI. I do hope folks here are busy writing documents. > > Are you? (Feel free to respond off-list if you prefer.) Where are these proposals to be submitted, and what is the deadline? I have something a bit short of a proposal, more like a simple classification scheme for possible proposals plus a list of possible proposals. Hopefully my imagination will help me think of enough possible proposals to make this complete enough to be helpful. Some of the proposals I have in mind are proposals that I would actually like to make, but before I do that I want to have an idea of what is feasible, and that's where classification comes in: it should help us determine which classes of solutions are desirable and/or feasible. Nico -- From stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Mon Apr 30 16:35:13 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CE921E810B for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:35:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.361 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.361 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.238, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WPO+Zf6EGq2p for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.scss.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A348E21E8041 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC81A1714F1; Tue, 1 May 2012 00:35:11 +0100 (IST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1335828911; bh=/omEyadnCbmURa 2SStdhY75q2cu3axUhFTSxA0yWgCw=; b=uC91NfRUH8B+gNOBTvsLejSLOXLkr5 t3gb1zRLni+4hmjxSvehx7tuz/QVuALfdYeEHuA/kTD+RtVORQ1IkXeuRHIzW5eE 2AwNTc0wyFqx48183GaDOgLrPlN1TdhhihDUaW8w1fPMXcasmn/mwp6/gN9S4hNt v1tVcOESruBQkeJ3IrqQ70ETIAKMh+23eRXSWe1MqTe7XNT8cw2C2N8yrlXfPuVV SCNgujenjFysNc97ufDEYeROE5FCX3+/KjBK8C3uR606/SXrCFctYwObu69a7ckz vZLPob2RiXo1/jBWIBcL+u/Z3Bl1jIOTdJhJ7Igc/k1IA0H0tBR0DPWw== X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id Z-zjxsVn2LfJ; Tue, 1 May 2012 00:35:11 +0100 (IST) Received: from [10.87.48.9] (unknown [86.46.25.92]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49ADC171476; Tue, 1 May 2012 00:35:11 +0100 (IST) Message-ID: <4F9F21AE.5000904@cs.tcd.ie> Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 00:35:10 +0100 From: Stephen Farrell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120424 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nico Williams References: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> <4F9A793E.6000704@cs.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "http-auth@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [http-auth] Fwd: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: HTTP authentication methods List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:35:13 -0000 On 05/01/2012 12:18 AM, Nico Williams wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Stephen Farrell > wrote: >> >> FYI. I do hope folks here are busy writing documents. >> >> Are you? (Feel free to respond off-list if you prefer.) > > Where are these proposals to be submitted, and what is the deadline? As in the mail I forwarded: deadline in mid-June; plan is you write your I-D, call it draft-{your name}-httpbis-{proposal name}, add it to the wiki at [1] and get ready to defend/sell your ideas on the httpbis list. Not sure how best to handle things that aren't quite fully baked but I'd guess getting in early to give yourself time to iterate might be useful. Or, it might turn folks off, hard to tell. I think scoping questions would best be sent to the httpbis list. (Some others have done that today.) But please also recall - as we said in Paris and on various lists, if there are serious proposals that are not adopted by the httpbis wg, Sean and I (with the httpbis chair and Apps ADs) will discuss how those can be developed in the SEC area, most likely to produce some experimental RFCs. So, if that matters to you, effort devoted here on something reasonable won't be wasted just because the httpbis WG don't adopt your thing. S. [1] http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/HttpAuthProposals > > I have something a bit short of a proposal, more like a simple > classification scheme for possible proposals plus a list of possible > proposals. Hopefully my imagination will help me think of enough > possible proposals to make this complete enough to be helpful. Some > of the proposals I have in mind are proposals that I would actually > like to make, but before I do that I want to have an idea of what is > feasible, and that's where classification comes in: it should help us > determine which classes of solutions are desirable and/or feasible. > > Nico > -- > > From y.oiwa@aist.go.jp Mon Apr 30 18:36:17 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E81721E80F4 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:36:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KqqUUwe0SA9S for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na3sys010aog112.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog112.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E88921E8011 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iy0-f178.google.com ([209.85.210.178]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob112.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT58+D5Wr1cjlDAgcTXtYZeMDCwQGR10D@postini.com; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:36:16 PDT Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so6103390iak.23 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:36:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aist.go.jp; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9VoPQC+YrKkqJRUVZpBTaiPEPp65ZHe5dr/aDCK36Oo=; b=MXs4xX7ZgmukHf0J/nvOsTNh0GqkY5O8DmOPYVlEx9a83kVyUqmJbJoZVCk/KMKH2N FzGmbHf+xGziJUfBVd2KxBF0cBOKj7jnMMcvpWNDzMRggvxxl+Ib44d8l9XDbz3Imrm1 hT6N2vWCLmaS4ofg8o+j+Mu5D24ib8ymOKtyk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=9VoPQC+YrKkqJRUVZpBTaiPEPp65ZHe5dr/aDCK36Oo=; b=f4cwDHpbN4iJ9z+AdaFagXMqDNeVJttp97mLjnBTg4dDtdr0BXRcAjCd2lpW4qjU3u 4cqtG5cT69c6l8mQ22yD/S5wtP2SE97ZVQkA9wLpzsPeW6IRl5J+KpwKd8HRh3LBI8SH jAq9gUs1ihWg0VZ0NBfgAmwDOY7HEcZ1+BKbpr5bXNGHjzsrlgGT7EGuI3f4+6rLJB+2 pYC72ct58FiCbYg4AHULhzUHv2bBDAm5HPToFsUmTClDIuqQVrE5+YjaPlatChbNWKf3 3DQSqBkQZpAyr5A232a16QAj4SypmW1HKiFNtUJihhUSFy7G8bk7DdTcrmQ2lW3AKskf yjGw== Received: by 10.50.217.230 with SMTP id pb6mr318635igc.1.1335836175308; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:36:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.99.34 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:35:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F9EA1C9.7080900@stpeter.im> References: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> <4F9EA1C9.7080900@stpeter.im> From: Yutaka OIWA Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 10:35:55 +0900 Message-ID: To: Peter Saint-Andre , stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkuYHrohdU7lrBg3lzuhTIzXxiXSa9y/zAvrBOLKX3j5qypqjVhy0FRqJZwLa67MHoB6tAI Cc: http-auth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [http-auth] Fwd: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: HTTP authentication methods List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 01:36:17 -0000 Dear Peter and Stephen, Thank you very much. I'm preparing revised documents for my proposals. I hope I can submit them in a few days. # My current plan is to submit a revised draft # under current individual name and rename it after a while. 2012/4/30 Peter Saint-Andre : > FYI. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication > Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:28:46 +0000 > Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org > Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:28:06 +1000 > From: Mark Nottingham > To: HTTP Working Group > > Just a reminder that we're still accepting proposals for: > > 1. HTTP/2.0 > 2. New HTTP authentication schemes > > As per our charter . > > So far, we've received the following proposals applicable to HTTP/2.0: > =A0 > > But none yet for authentication schemes: > =A0 > > As communicated in Paris, the deadline for proposals is 15 June, 2012. > It's fine if your proposal isn't complete, but we do need to have a > good sense of it by then, for discussion. > > Regards, > > -- > Mark Nottingham =A0 http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > http-auth mailing list > http-auth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth --=20 Yutaka OIWA, Ph.D. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Leader, Software Reliability = Research Group =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Research Institu= te for Secure Systems (RISEC) =A0 =A0National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AI= ST) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Mail addresses: , OpenPGP: id[440546B5] fp[7C9F 723A 7559 3246 229D =A03139 8677 9BD2 4405 46= B5]