Subject: [http-extensions] Reasonable Assurances and H2C (#148)

From: HTTP issue updates <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:13:20 -0800

Brought up in LC, <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email-masked]>.

1. Examples contain h2c, although this document implies that's not allowed

2. Examples should clarify that even on the same host, by default we don't allow h2c

3. Do we need to define "reasonable assurances" more tightly, e.g., by requiring something to update this document?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/148