Subject: Re: [http-extensions] Policy for Key parameter registry (#106)

From: HTTP issue updates <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 20:36:49 -0800

I think IETF Review is sufficient. Its purpose is "that the document and proposed assignment will be reviewed by the IESG and appropriate IETF WGs (or experts, if suitable working groups no longer exist) to ensure that the proposed assignment will not negatively impact interoperability or otherwise extend IETF protocols in an inappropriate or damaging manner."

... which sounds about right.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/106#issuecomment-191056705