Subject: [httpwg/http-extensions] Try to explain and justify the use of the absolute form in HTTP/1.1 (#257)

From: HTTP issue updates <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 22:52:26 -0700

Based on the discussion on-list, the requirement to use the absolute form is a little hard.  This tries to justify it on the basis that the secure server is acting as a proxy.  Maybe that's dishonest, but I think that it's accurate.  I would rather finagle this than have an experimental document update a standards-track one.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/257

-- Commit Summary --

  * Fix examples
  * Try to explain and justify the use of the absolute form in HTTP/1.1

-- File Changes --

    M draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding.md (19)
    M draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption.md (10)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/257.patch
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/257.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/257