Subject: [httpwg/http-extensions] Any room for 6648 (#456)

From: HTTP issue updates <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:43:06 -0800

bcp56bis says

> In particular, if a header field is specific to an application, an identifier for that application SHOULD form a prefix to the header field name, separated by a “-“.

This might tempered by a reference to RFC 6648 so that people don't get the mistaken impression that prefixing is a universal good.  The important qualification here is that the header field is specific to that application, which probably needs emphasis.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/456