From Olivier.Seveur@exane.com Mon Feb 7 08:02:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hubmib@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: hubmib@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169AF3A6E10 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:02:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3i9V8FDMR-pI for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:02:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail6.exane.com (mail6.exane.com [195.13.36.55]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933B83A6DD5 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:02:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail6.exane.com (mail6.exane.com [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (MailServerExane-9) with SMTP id E9F91F80A4 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:02:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from spl-nothu-002.ad.exane.com (spl-nothu-002 [10.176.12.1]) by mail6.exane.com (MailServerExane-9) with ESMTP id E1754F802D for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:02:22 +0100 (CET) To: hubmib@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005 Message-ID: <16827_1297094542_4D50178E_16827_328808_1_OFF0D436C4.51F41B1B-ONC1257830.00579FCD-C1257830.00581CE0@exane.com> From: Olivier Seveur Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:02:21 +0100 X-MIMETrack: S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on Olivier Seveur/Info/Paris/Exane(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 07/02/2011 17:02:25, Serialize by Notes Client on Olivier Seveur/Info/Paris/Exane(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 07/02/2011 17:02:25, Serialize complete at 07/02/2011 17:02:25, S/MIME Sign failed at 07/02/2011 17:02:25: Cl? chiffr?e introuvable, Serialize by Router on spl-nothu-002/Exane(Release 8.5.1|September 28, 2009) at 02/07/2011 05:02:22 PM, Serialize complete at 02/07/2011 05:02:22 PM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00581CDEC1257830_=" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:08:35 -0800 Subject: [Hubmib] Correlation betwen two MIB X-BeenThere: hubmib@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Ethernet Interfaces an Hub MIB WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 08:22:16 -0000 Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --=_alternative 00581CDEC1257830_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi, I'm a SNMP administrator and i tried to found a link between two MIB: POWER ETHERNET MIB and IF-MIB. I use pethPsePortTable in the PEM and ifTable in the IF-MIB But i cannot found common index between them. I found some link where ou explain some way to do it, but it not working Can you give me some advice I thanks you a lot Regards Seveur Olivier 01.44.95.41.26 ___________________________________ The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the internet .Therefore EXANE cannot be considered responsible for the contents. If you are not the intended recipient of this message ,please delete it and notify the sender. This message is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments Although it may contain some elements from publications produced by Exane's research department ,this message is not research. Please consult our web site for important disclaimers and disclosures concerning Exane's research (http://www.exane.com) ___________________________________ --=_alternative 00581CDEC1257830_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Hi,


I'm a SNMP administrator and i tried to found a link between two MIB: POWER ETHERNET MIB and IF-MIB.


I use pethPsePortTable  in the PEM  and ifTable in the IF-MIB


But i cannot found common index between them.


I found some link where ou explain some way to do it, but it not working


Can you give me some advice


I thanks you a lot

Regards



Seveur Olivier
01.44.95.41.26
        ___________________________________

The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the internet .Therefore EXANE cannot be considered responsible for the contents.
If you are not the intended recipient of this  message ,please delete it and notify the sender.

This message is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments
Although it may contain some elements from publications produced by Exane's research department ,this message is not research.
Please consult our web site for important disclaimers and disclosures concerning Exane's research  (http://www.exane.com)
        ___________________________________
--=_alternative 00581CDEC1257830_=-- From dromasca@avaya.com Thu Feb 10 09:49:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hubmib@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: hubmib@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD4A3A6A4E for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:49:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.327 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.271, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kUpid9yVSAXf for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:49:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB15C3A69DA for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:49:00 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AikBAHCzU03GmAcF/2dsb2JhbACCS5RCjl1zoSgCmRuFXASPRQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,451,1291611600"; d="scan'208,217";a="58518024" Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2011 12:48:55 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,451,1291611600"; d="scan'208,217";a="580843684" Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2011 12:48:54 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBC94A.C261F723" Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:48:42 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <16827_1297094542_4D50178E_16827_328808_1_OFF0D436C4.51F41B1B-ONC1257830.00579FCD-C1257830.00581CE0@exane.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Hubmib] Correlation betwen two MIB Thread-Index: AcvHstk9sGbUEo2PQgW5Tthz7foAbQBlu1Kg References: <16827_1297094542_4D50178E_16827_328808_1_OFF0D436C4.51F41B1B-ONC1257830.00579FCD-C1257830.00581CE0@exane.com> From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" To: "Olivier Seveur" , Subject: Re: [Hubmib] Correlation betwen two MIB X-BeenThere: hubmib@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Ethernet Interfaces an Hub MIB WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:49:02 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBC94A.C261F723 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Olivier, =20 The Ethernet MIB modules did not consider that each port needs to be modeled as an ifEntry.=20 =20 There is a way to map these however (or at least one I know) but it's not very easy.=20 =20 If you support the Entity MIB as per RFC 4133 you can define two entries in the entAliasMappingEntry corresponding to the same entPhysicalIndex that designates the port. Then the entAliasLogicalIndexOrZero objects in the two rows would point to the entries in the pethPsePortTable and ifTable respectively. See the DESCRIPTION clause of entAliasMappingIdentifier in RFC 4133 for an example. =20 I hope this helps.=20 =20 Regards, =20 Dan =20 =20 ________________________________ From: hubmib-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hubmib-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Seveur Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 6:02 PM To: hubmib@ietf.org Subject: [Hubmib] Correlation betwen two MIB =09 =09 Hi,=20 =09 =09 I'm a SNMP administrator and i tried to found a link between two MIB: POWER ETHERNET MIB and IF-MIB.=20 =09 =09 I use pethPsePortTable in the PEM and ifTable in the IF-MIB=20 =09 =09 But i cannot found common index between them.=20 =09 =09 I found some link where ou explain some way to do it, but it not working=20 =09 =09 Can you give me some advice=20 =09 =09 I thanks you a lot=20 =09 Regards=20 =09 =09 =09 Seveur Olivier 01.44.95.41.26 ___________________________________ =09 The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the internet .Therefore EXANE cannot be considered responsible for the contents. If you are not the intended recipient of this message ,please delete it and notify the sender. =09 This message is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments Although it may contain some elements from publications produced by Exane's research department ,this message is not research. Please consult our web site for important disclaimers and disclosures concerning Exane's research (http://www.exane.com) ___________________________________ ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBC94A.C261F723 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi=20 Olivier,
 
The=20 Ethernet MIB modules did not consider that each port needs to be modeled = as an=20 ifEntry.
 
There=20 is a way to map these however (or at least one I know) but it's not very = easy.=20
 
If you support the Entity MIB as per RFC 4133 you can define = two entries=20 in the entAliasMappingEntry corresponding to the same entPhysicalIndex = that=20 designates the port. Then the entAliasLogicalIndexOrZero objects in the = two rows=20 would point to the entries in the pethPsePortTable and ifTable = respectively. See=20 the DESCRIPTION clause of entAliasMappingIdentifier in RFC 4133 for an=20 example.
 
I hope=20 this helps. 
 
Regards,
 
Dan
 
 

From: hubmib-bounces@ietf.org=20 [mailto:hubmib-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Olivier=20 Seveur
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 6:02 PM
To: = hubmib@ietf.org
Subject: [Hubmib] Correlation betwen two=20 MIB


Hi, =


I'm a SNMP administrator and i tried to = found a link=20 between two MIB: POWER ETHERNET MIB and IF-MIB. =


I use pethPsePortTable  in the = PEM=20  and ifTable in the IF-MIB


But i cannot found common index between them. =


I found some link where = ou explain=20 some way to do it, but it not working


Can you give me some advice


I thanks you a lot

Regards



Seveur Olivier
01.44.95.41.26
        =
___________________________________

The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the internet =
.Therefore EXANE cannot be considered responsible for the contents.
If you are not the intended recipient of this  message ,please delete it =
and notify the sender.

This message is provided for information purposes only and should not be =
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or =
related financial instruments
Although it may contain some elements from publications produced by =
Exane's research department ,this message is not research.
Please consult our web site for important disclaimers and disclosures =
concerning Exane's research  (http://www.exane.com)
        ___________________________________
------_=_NextPart_001_01CBC94A.C261F723--