From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Mon Feb 4 09:58:33 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id JAA24347 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 09:58:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:11:43 +0000 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:24:16 +0000 Received: from odin.ietf.org by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:21:26 +0000 Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA19863; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 07:21:23 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200202041221.HAA19863@ietf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" To: IETF-Announce:; Cc: idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Reply-to: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idmr-igmp-mrdisc-08.txt Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 07:21:22 -0500 Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Multicast Routing Working Group of the IETF. Title : IGMP Multicast Router Discovery Author(s) : S. Biswas, B. Cain, B. Haberman Filename : draft-ietf-idmr-igmp-mrdisc-08.txt Pages : 15 Date : 01-Feb-02 The concept of IGMP snooping requires the ability to identify the location of multicast routers. Since IGMP snooping is not standardized, there are many mechanisms in use to identify the multicast routers. However, this scenario can lead to interoperability issues between multicast routers and layer-2 switches from different vendors. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idmr-igmp-mrdisc-08.txt To remove yourself from the IETF Announcement list, send a message to ietf-announce-request with the word unsubscribe in the body of the message. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then "get draft-ietf-idmr-igmp-mrdisc-08.txt". A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail. Send a message to: mailserv@ietf.org. In the body type: "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idmr-igmp-mrdisc-08.txt". NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on how to manipulate these messages. Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess" --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; access-type="mail-server"; server="mailserv@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <20020201164420.I-D@ietf.org> ENCODING mime FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idmr-igmp-mrdisc-08.txt --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-idmr-igmp-mrdisc-08.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <20020201164420.I-D@ietf.org> --OtherAccess-- --NextPart-- From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Tue Feb 12 17:53:00 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id RAA00105 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:53:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:16:25 +0000 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:16:18 +0000 Received: from Thor.Adtech-Inc.COM by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:13:16 +0000 Received: from apollo.adtech-inc.com (apollo.adtech-inc.com [10.12.0.17]) by Thor.Adtech-Inc.COM (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g1CMDEf28104 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:13:14 -1000 (HST) Received: by apollo.adtech-inc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1VHA23PT>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:19:15 -1000 Message-ID: <8AC36D3167EED41184C800508BD95405021317E2@apollo.adtech-inc.com> From: "Singh, Gurpreet" To: "'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk'" Subject: IGMP version 3 -- IGMP version 2 state diagram Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:19:09 -1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Hi I am going though the RFC 2236 IGMP version 2 and IGMP version 3 drafts. One of the key differences between version 2 and version 3 is that version 3 provides support for source filtering. Other than that Leave message in version 2 can be considered as TO_IN ( {} ) message in version 3 (basically means transit to Include state and source list is empty). Keeping this differences in mind would the IGMP version 2 (RFC 2236) host and router state diagrams be still applicable to IGMP version 3 ? Thanks Gurpreet From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Wed Feb 13 01:50:32 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id BAA12734 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 01:50:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:03:43 +0000 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:03:33 +0000 Received: from drawbridge.ascend.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:00:32 +0000 Received: from fw-ext.ascend.com (fw-ext [198.4.92.5]) by drawbridge.ascend.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id VAA22952; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 21:59:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from russet.ascend.com by fw-ext.ascend.com via smtpd (for drawbridge.ascend.com [198.4.92.1]) with SMTP; 13 Feb 2002 05:59:29 UT Received: from wopr.eng.ascend.com (wopr.eng.ascend.com [206.65.212.178]) by russet.ascend.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA21375; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 21:59:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from india.ascend.com (h135-254-196-198.outland.lucent.com [135.254.196.198]) by wopr.eng.ascend.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA22523; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 21:59:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ascend.com (tulalip.india.ascend.com [135.254.196.41]) by india.ascend.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA12092; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:29:56 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <3C6A0038.94876029@ascend.com> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:27:12 +0530 From: Srivatsan S Reply-To: srivatsan@lucent.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.6 i86pc) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Singh, Gurpreet" CC: "'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk'" Subject: Re: IGMP version 3 -- IGMP version 2 state diagram References: <8AC36D3167EED41184C800508BD95405021317E2@apollo.adtech-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gurpreet, On a broad perspective, the state diagrams are applicable. But, there are a lot of internal states in IGMPv3 due to its complexity. Thanks, Srivatsan "Singh, Gurpreet" wrote: > > Hi > > I am going though the RFC 2236 IGMP version 2 and IGMP version 3 drafts. > One of the key differences between version 2 and version 3 is that version 3 > provides support for source filtering. Other than that Leave message in > version 2 can be considered as TO_IN ( {} ) message in version 3 (basically > means transit to Include state and source list is empty). > > Keeping this differences in mind would the IGMP version 2 (RFC 2236) host > and router state diagrams be still applicable to IGMP version 3 ? > > Thanks > > Gurpreet -- Srivatsan S Email: srivatsan@lucent.com Phone: 91-80-8520261 Extn 6506 Bangalore, India. From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Wed Feb 13 11:52:15 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id LAA11362 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:52:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:23:48 +0000 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:23:42 +0000 Received: from Thor.Adtech-Inc.COM by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:20:39 +0000 Received: from apollo.adtech-inc.com (apollo.adtech-inc.com [10.12.0.17]) by Thor.Adtech-Inc.COM (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g1DGKWf28498 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:20:36 -1000 (HST) Received: by apollo.adtech-inc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1VHA2PZJ>; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:26:33 -1000 Message-ID: <8AC36D3167EED41184C800508BD95405021317E5@apollo.adtech-inc.com> From: "Singh, Gurpreet" To: "'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk'" Subject: IGMP version 3 deployment Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:26:32 -1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Hi Is there any approx. timeline when the IGMP v3 will become an RFC. Also other than Cisco are there any vendors currently supporting IGMPv3 ? Thanks Gurpreet From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Wed Feb 13 14:10:42 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id OAA17740 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:10:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:37:56 +0000 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:37:49 +0000 Received: from natint.juniper.net by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:34:47 +0000 Received: from maroon.jnpr.net (maroon.jnpr.net [172.24.244.36]) by merlot.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g1DIYi602437; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:34:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lenny@juniper.net) Received: from localhost (lenny@localhost) by maroon.jnpr.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g1DIYi408283; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:34:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lenny@juniper.net) X-Authentication-Warning: maroon.jnpr.net: lenny owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:34:44 -0800 (PST) From: Leonard Giuliano X-X-Sender: To: "Singh, Gurpreet" cc: "'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk'" Subject: Re: IGMP version 3 deployment In-Reply-To: <8AC36D3167EED41184C800508BD95405021317E5@apollo.adtech-inc.com> Message-ID: <20020213103333.M8146-100000@maroon.jnpr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk IGMPv3 has been supported in JUNOS since 4.4. -Lenny On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Singh, Gurpreet wrote: *>Hi *> *> Is there any approx. timeline when the IGMP v3 will become an RFC. Also *>other than Cisco are there any vendors *> currently supporting IGMPv3 ? *> *>Thanks *> *>Gurpreet *> From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Mon Feb 25 00:10:24 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id AAA22474 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:10:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 04:22:10 +0000 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 04:22:01 +0000 Received: from drawbridge.ascend.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 04:18:44 +0000 Received: from fw-ext.ascend.com (fw-ext [198.4.92.5]) by drawbridge.ascend.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id UAA00400 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:18:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from russet.ascend.com by fw-ext.ascend.com via smtpd (for drawbridge.ascend.com [198.4.92.1]) with SMTP; 25 Feb 2002 04:18:42 UT Received: from wopr.eng.ascend.com (wopr.eng.ascend.com [206.65.212.178]) by russet.ascend.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA26047 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:18:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from india.ascend.com (h135-254-196-198.outland.lucent.com [135.254.196.198]) by wopr.eng.ascend.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA05354 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:17:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from ascend.com (tulalip.india.ascend.com [135.254.196.41]) by india.ascend.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA06488 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:44:30 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <3C79BA26.AAC72B2F@ascend.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:44:30 +0530 From: Srivatsan S Reply-To: srivatsan@lucent.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.6 i86pc) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk'" Subject: Post script version of RFC 2362(PIM-SM) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Can somebody point me to the Post Script version of the RFC 2362(PIM-SM). I am not able to get the figures on the basis of which explanations have been done in the RFC 2362. Thanks In Advance, Srivatsan From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Mon Feb 25 01:32:22 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id BAA23206 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 01:32:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 05:47:28 +0000 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 05:47:17 +0000 Received: from cnxt10002.conexant.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 05:43:59 +0000 Received: by XOVER.dedham.mindspeed.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:42:31 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Ramalingam, Swaminathan" To: "'srivatsan@lucent.com'" Cc: "'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk'" Subject: RE: Post script version of RFC 2362(PIM-SM) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:43:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk here is a pointer: http://netweb.usc.edu/pim/ >-----Original Message----- >From: Srivatsan S [mailto:srivatsa@ascend.com] >Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:45 AM >To: 'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk' >Subject: Post script version of RFC 2362(PIM-SM) > > >Hi, > > Can somebody point me to the Post Script version of the >RFC 2362(PIM-SM). I am not able to get the figures on the >basis of which explanations have been done in the RFC 2362. > >Thanks In Advance, >Srivatsan > From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Mon Feb 25 02:38:21 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id CAA01637 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 02:38:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:46:08 +0000 Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:45:59 +0000 Received: from cnxt10002.conexant.com by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:42:41 +0000 Received: by XOVER.dedham.mindspeed.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 01:40:22 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Ramalingam, Swaminathan" To: "'srivatsan@lucent.com'" , Mark Handley Cc: "Ramalingam, Swaminathan" , "'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk'" Subject: RE: Post script version of RFC 2362(PIM-SM) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 01:41:33 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk To new comers to IDMR ,(are there really :-), there is PIM working group http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pim-charter.html As Mark said, refer to the new one. Thanks, Swami >-----Original Message----- >From: Srivatsan S [mailto:srivatsa@ascend.com] >Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:55 AM >To: Mark Handley >Cc: Ramalingam, Swaminathan; 'srivatsan@lucent.com'; >'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk' >Subject: Re: Post script version of RFC 2362(PIM-SM) > > >Thanks to all those who replied. Yes, I am referring to the latest >draft. > >Thanks, >Srivatsan > >Mark Handley wrote: >> >> >here is a pointer: >> > >> > http://netweb.usc.edu/pim/ >> >> Unless you're consulting RFC 2362 for historical reasons, you'd be >> much better to consult the current PIM-SM Internet Draft. RFC 2362 >> has a lot of problems. >> >> Cheers, >> Mark >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >> >>From: Srivatsan S [mailto:srivatsa@ascend.com] >> >>Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:45 AM >> >>To: 'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk' >> >>Subject: Post script version of RFC 2362(PIM-SM) >> >> >> >> >> >>Hi, >> >> >> >> Can somebody point me to the Post Script version of the >> >>RFC 2362(PIM-SM). I am not able to get the figures on the >> >>basis of which explanations have been done in the RFC 2362. >> >> >> >>Thanks In Advance, >> >>Srivatsan >> >> > >-- >Srivatsan S >Email: srivatsan@lucent.com >Phone: 91-80-8520261 Extn 6506 >Bangalore, India. > From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Mon Feb 25 02:38:43 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id CAA01651 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 02:38:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:36:24 +0000 Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:36:13 +0000 Received: from drawbridge.ascend.com by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:32:55 +0000 Received: from fw-ext.ascend.com (fw-ext [198.4.92.5]) by drawbridge.ascend.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id WAA01234; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:29:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from russet.ascend.com by fw-ext.ascend.com via smtpd (for drawbridge.ascend.com [198.4.92.1]) with SMTP; 25 Feb 2002 06:29:08 UT Received: from wopr.eng.ascend.com (wopr.eng.ascend.com [206.65.212.178]) by russet.ascend.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA04522; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:28:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from india.ascend.com (h135-254-196-198.outland.lucent.com [135.254.196.198]) by wopr.eng.ascend.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA08066; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:28:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ascend.com (tulalip.india.ascend.com [135.254.196.41]) by india.ascend.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA13573; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:54:58 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <3C79D8B9.897CD2F6@ascend.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:54:57 +0530 From: Srivatsan S Reply-To: srivatsan@lucent.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.6 i86pc) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Handley CC: "Ramalingam, Swaminathan" , "'srivatsan@lucent.com'" , "'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk'" Subject: Re: Post script version of RFC 2362(PIM-SM) References: <72869.1014618074@vulture.icir.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks to all those who replied. Yes, I am referring to the latest draft. Thanks, Srivatsan Mark Handley wrote: > > >here is a pointer: > > > > http://netweb.usc.edu/pim/ > > Unless you're consulting RFC 2362 for historical reasons, you'd be > much better to consult the current PIM-SM Internet Draft. RFC 2362 > has a lot of problems. > > Cheers, > Mark > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Srivatsan S [mailto:srivatsa@ascend.com] > >>Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:45 AM > >>To: 'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk' > >>Subject: Post script version of RFC 2362(PIM-SM) > >> > >> > >>Hi, > >> > >> Can somebody point me to the Post Script version of the > >>RFC 2362(PIM-SM). I am not able to get the figures on the > >>basis of which explanations have been done in the RFC 2362. > >> > >>Thanks In Advance, > >>Srivatsan > >> -- Srivatsan S Email: srivatsan@lucent.com Phone: 91-80-8520261 Extn 6506 Bangalore, India. From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Mon Feb 25 08:52:50 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id IAA10086 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:52:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:23:54 +0000 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:25:02 +0000 Received: from usc.edu by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:21:37 +0000 Received: from ceng.usc.edu (helmy@ceng.usc.edu [128.125.72.78]) by usc.edu (8.9.3.1/8.9.3/usc) with ESMTP id WAA24958; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:22:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (helmy@localhost) by ceng.usc.edu (8.9.3.1/8.9.3/usc) with ESMTP id WAA09053; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:22:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:22:14 -0800 (PST) From: helmy To: srivatsan cc: "'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk'" Subject: Re: Post script version of RFC 2362(PIM-SM) In-Reply-To: <3C79BA26.AAC72B2F@ascend.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Hi, You can obtain the post script version with the figures from the PIM web site: catarina.usc.edu/pim Regards, -Ahmed > Hi, > > Can somebody point me to the Post Script version of the > RFC 2362(PIM-SM). I am not able to get the figures on the > basis of which explanations have been done in the RFC 2362. > > Thanks In Advance, > Srivatsan > From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Mon Feb 25 08:52:59 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id IAA10098 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:52:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:23:07 +0000 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:24:45 +0000 Received: from adsl-63-196-11-253.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 06:21:25 +0000 Received: from vulture.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vulture.icir.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g1P6LEl72871; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:21:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjh@vulture.icir.org) From: Mark Handley X-Organisation: ACIRI To: "Ramalingam, Swaminathan" cc: "'srivatsan@lucent.com'" , "'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk'" Subject: Re: Post script version of RFC 2362(PIM-SM) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:43:56 EST." Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:21:14 -0800 Message-ID: <72869.1014618074@vulture.icir.org> Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk >here is a pointer: > > http://netweb.usc.edu/pim/ Unless you're consulting RFC 2362 for historical reasons, you'd be much better to consult the current PIM-SM Internet Draft. RFC 2362 has a lot of problems. Cheers, Mark >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Srivatsan S [mailto:srivatsa@ascend.com] >>Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:45 AM >>To: 'idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk' >>Subject: Post script version of RFC 2362(PIM-SM) >> >> >>Hi, >> >> Can somebody point me to the Post Script version of the >>RFC 2362(PIM-SM). I am not able to get the figures on the >>basis of which explanations have been done in the RFC 2362. >> >>Thanks In Advance, >>Srivatsan >> From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Wed Feb 27 09:43:23 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id JAA24886 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:43:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 13:40:56 +0000 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:42:02 +0000 Received: from f19.law10.hotmail.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:38:41 +0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:38:40 -0800 Received: from 128.114.63.101 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:38:39 GMT X-Originating-IP: [128.114.63.101] From: "Ajay D. Bharadwaj" To: idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Subject: CBT simulation Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:38:39 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2002 23:38:40.0015 (UTC) FILETIME=[B80209F0:01C1BF1E] Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Hi, I'm a CE graduate student at the University of California, Santa Cruz. I'm trying to run some simulations using ns-2 to compare the performance of a protocol with that of CBT. I have so far been unable to simulate CBT in ns. I'll be grateful if you could give some tips on running CBT simulations using ns-2, or if you could give me contacts of students who have already done this. Thanks and regards, Ajay Ajay Bharadwaj CE UCSC _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Thu Feb 28 10:18:28 2002 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id KAA27732 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:18:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:39:11 +0000 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:39:04 +0000 Received: from 202.54.124.178 by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:35:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 14629 invoked by uid 510); 28 Feb 2002 07:16:57 -0000 Date: 28 Feb 2002 07:16:57 -0000 Message-ID: <20020228071657.14627.qmail@mailFA9.rediffmail.com> Received: from unknown (211.51.23.101) by rediffmail.com via HTTP; 28 Feb 2002 07:16:57 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: gampu katwa Reply-To: gampu katwa To: idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Subject: DVMRP Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Hi, I am going theough , unable to understand the concept of Source Network Aggregation(section 3.4.1). can anybody throw more light on this topic?? regards, gamp