From k_johnson101@yahoo.co.uk Mon Aug 2 12:39:10 2004 Received: from web50102.mail.yahoo.com (web50102.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.30]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id MAA17620 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 12:39:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20040802163841.39219.qmail@web50102.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [196.25.253.13] by web50102.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:38:41 BST Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:38:41 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?khumalo=20johnson?= Subject: FUND TRANSFER / I NEED TO DO THIS BUSINESS WITH YOU PERSONALLY. To: k_johnson101@yahoo.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-334728065-1091464721=:37831" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --0-334728065-1091464721=:37831 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit FROM KHUMALO JOHNSON, EMAIL: k_johnson101@yahoo.co.uk TELE: 27 73 50 494 72 KEEP AS CONFIDENTIAL I am a staff of bank in Africa. I will give you the name of my bank and other important information if I receive a positive reply from you. For security reasons I cannot disclose my full identity to you now until I am sure of your cooperation. I work in the operations dept where I serve as account officer to numerous customers. One of the customers whom I worked as his account officer was a wealthy diamond merchant from neighboring Sierra Leone. He lost his family in the war. He was lucky to escape alive and came to this country with his wealth intact. Unfortunately he died last year. Because this man was good to me when he was alive, I took it uponmyself to travel to his country last month, to see if I could locate any of his close relations . On reaching there I discovered that his only surviving uncle died a few months back. I sponsored this trip on my own and nobody in the bank knew I was undertaking the journey so I did not present any official report of my findings in South Africa. Now there are two things I could do with regards to the dead mans money. First, as his accounts officer, I could formally notify the bank authorities that the man is dead and has no next of kin. In this case the money would be forfeited to the government after some time. As a matter of fact this is the proper thing I am supposed to do. Another thing I can do is to arrange for someone else, a foreigner, to act as the next of kin of the late man so that he will claim the money. This is the option that I can do to help anybody and myself since the money actually is public fund due to the fact that my friend was a close lly to the late brutal military president that looted government treasury and that is why I have chosen to do it. I want you to be my partner. All you would have to do is act as the next of kin of the dead man and the whole money in the account will be transferred to your account. As the accounts officer to the late man, I have all the necessary documents that you will require to claim the money in the account. The total money in the account is USD17 million. Your share will be 30% which is USD5,100,000. My own share will be 69%, which is USD11,730,000. We shall keep 1% which is USD170,000 for expenses. Reach me immediately by mail so that I can give you further details.Also provide me your direct tel/fax to reach you. Yours truly, KHUMALO JOHNSON. --------------------------------- ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! --0-334728065-1091464721=:37831 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
FROM KHUMALO JOHNSON,
TELE:  27 73 50 494 72
                                                   KEEP AS CONFIDENTIAL
                                                  
               I am a staff of bank in Africa. I will give you the name of my bank and other important information if I receive a positive reply from you. For security reasons I cannot disclose my full identity to you now until I am sure of your cooperation. I work in the operations dept where I serve as account officer to numerous customers. One of the customers whom I worked as his account officer was a wealthy diamond merchant from neighboring Sierra Leone. He lost his family in the war. He was lucky to escape alive and came to this country with his wealth intact. Unfortunately he died last year.
 
Because this man was good to me when he was alive, I took it uponmyself to travel to his country last month, to see if I could locate any of his close relations . On reaching there I discovered that his only surviving uncle died a few months back. I sponsored this trip on my own and nobody in the bank knew I was undertaking the journey so I did not present any official report of my findings in South Africa.

Now there are two things I could do with regards to the dead mans
money. First, as his accounts officer, I could formally notify the bank authorities that the man is dead and has no next of kin. In this case the money would be forfeited to the government after some time. As a matter of fact this is the proper thing I am supposed to do.
Another thing I can do is to arrange for someone else, a foreigner, to
act as the next of kin of the late man so that he will claim the money. This is the option that I can do to help anybody and myself since the money actually is public fund due to the fact that my friend was a close
lly to the late brutal military president that looted government treasury and that is why I have chosen to do it. I want you to be my partner. All you would have to do is act as the next of kin of the dead man and the whole money in the account will be transferred to your  account. As the accounts officer to the late man, I have all the necessary documents that you will require to claim the money in the account.
 
The total money in the account is USD17 million. Your share will be 30% which is USD5,100,000. My own share will be 69%, which is USD11,730,000. We shall keep 1% which is USD170,000 for expenses. Reach me immediately by mail so that I can give you further details.Also provide me your direct tel/fax to reach you.
Yours truly,
KHUMALO JOHNSON.

ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! --0-334728065-1091464721=:37831-- From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Wed Aug 4 07:43:07 2004 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id HAA28500 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 07:43:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:01:21 +0100 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:01:02 +0100 Received: from vscan-b.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with UK SMTP id ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:03:07 +0100 Received: from alc250.alcatel.be ([195.207.101.250] helo=bt0g2p.god.bel.alcatel.be) by vscan-b.ucl.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BsJXp-0004JF-0A for idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 12:02:53 +0100 Received: from alcatel.be (bt0s5h.sh.bel.alcatel.be [138.203.191.83]) by bt0g2p.god.bel.alcatel.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i74AwRIa026277 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:58:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4110C243.2040108@alcatel.be> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:02:27 +0200 From: Koen Vermeulen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Subject: IGMP checksum question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 X-UCL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the UCL Helpdesk, helpdesk@ucl.ac.uk for more information X-UCL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UCL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, required 5, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-MailScanner-From: koen.vermeulen@alcatel.be Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, In RFC3376 (IGMPv3) is stated that the IGMP checksum is calculated over the whole IGMP packet, which is the total length of the IP payload. Using the full length of the IP payload makes sense according to me because there exists no length field in the IGMP header. During testing I however saw some tools which have a different way of calculating the checksum. I recently saw a tool which sometimes pads the IP packet to 64 bytes (don't ask me why this is done) and instead of calculating the checksum over the full IP payload, it only calculates this checksum over the length of the IGMP information inside the IP packet. I initially thought this was a bug of the tool, but when I was sending these packets to the ethereal tool, I could see that ethereal interpreted this checksum as correct. Is there anyone who is also having some experience with this kind of problem and knows which approached is followed in the 'world'? Thanks, Koen From akinbassan@enel.net Fri Aug 6 02:22:27 2004 Received: from mail1.enel.net (mail1.enel.net [64.251.4.240]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA04756 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 02:22:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:53:32 -0400 Message-Id: <200408050953.AA1110835506@mail1.enel.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Akin Bassan" Reply-To: X-Sender: To: Subject: REQUEST FOR BUSINESS RELATION X-Mailer: DR.AKIN BASSAN NIGERIAN NATIONAL PETROLEUM CORPORRATION LAGOS NIGERIA TEL 234-8034701685 Dear Sir, REQUEST FOR BUSINESS RELATION I got your address and necessary information from the Nigerian-online-business directory as I picked a keen interest for a business relationship. I am a director with the Budget and Planning Department in Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Lagos. We, the members of the Tenders' Board in collaboration with the contract Appraisal Director in this corporation over inflated the contract value(TURN AROUND MAINTENANCE (TAM) OF THE TWO OF THE SOUTHERN REFINERIES) awarded in 1997 to an expatriate firm with the consideration of 10% commission agreement on the total contract value. This contract has been completely executed and the contractor has been paid all the phases instalment system agreed on, remaining US$31Million. This US$31 million represent 10% contract value commission we demanded. However, we ask for your hand in relationship by your providing all necessary assistance for the fund to be paid into your account. We hereby solicit your account number where the fund will be remitted into since it is not possible for us to claim it here in Nigeria, it is our intention to invest some part of it in your business (if you accept ) and other viable companies with your advice, some part would be used in the purchase of finished products from your country for sale in Nigeria while the balance you would help us to put in a fiduciary or trust account. If this business offer interest you, we agree to give you a commission of 30%of the money, 10% will be set aside for any miscellaneous expenses any party may incur during the process of the transfer. Some part of the 60% which is our share will used for the importation of your products while the remaining may be kept for any other investment you may advice. All modalities to effect the transfer of the fund has been worked out and there is absolutely no risk involved, IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT THIS BUSINESS IS ABSOLUTELY CONFIDENTIAL AS WE ARE STILL WORKING WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. It is pertinent also, to note at this point that importation of your product will be continual, hence if this business transaction is successful and in completion (i.e. when the money gets to your account) we shall have a face to face meeting for closer deliberation because we will resign from the government services to private business. If you are interested, reply to me by my Telephone and email number given above. You have to enclose details of telephone and fax number easy communication, name of your bank, phone fax telex number and account numbers where this money will be lodge. Please, if there is any other information, I will let you know and you have question you are free to ask me. Yours Faithfully. DR.AKIN BASSAN. From owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Wed Aug 18 14:49:47 2004 Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk (pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.8.208]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id OAA28727 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:49:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk via Local Delivery channel id ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:05:33 +0100 Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by pan2.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:05:30 +0100 Received: from vscan-b.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with UK SMTP id ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:07:44 +0100 Received: from mail-dark.research.att.com ([192.20.225.112] helo=mail-yellow.research.att.com) by vscan-b.ucl.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BxUpM-0004um-8k for idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:06:24 +0100 Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD4EA7BB0; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:06:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by windsor.research.att.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.5) id i7II6Mc02180; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200408181806.i7II6Mc02180@windsor.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: koen.vermeulen@alcatel.be Subject: Re: IGMP checksum question Cc: idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:06:21 -0700 From: Bill Fenner Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.6d/makemail 2.10 X-UCL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the UCL Helpdesk, helpdesk@ucl.ac.uk for more information X-UCL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UCL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, required 5, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-MailScanner-From: fenner@research.att.com Sender: owner-idmr@cs.ucl.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Are you sure the IP length is extended, or are you just seeing padding in layer 2? I've never seen an implementation that calculates the checksum (either for transmitting or receiving) over a subset of the IP length. Bill