From idwg-public-request@semper.org Mon Mar 3 13:42:59 2003 Received: from www.opencard.org (www.opencard.org [195.176.20.76]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA06942 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:42:58 -0500 (EST) Received: by www.opencard.org (Postfix, from userid 503) id 34055348D6; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:48:54 +0100 (CET) Old-Return-Path: Delivered-To: semper-idwg-public@opencard.org Message-Id: <200302281409.h1SE9DK14139@intrepid.cynicus.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: idwg-public@zurich.ibm.com Cc: anewton@ecotroph.net, smb@research.att.com Subject: Re: XML Schema -vs- XML DTD In-Reply-To: <200302211838.h1LIc8K22292@intrepid.cynicus.net> Comments: reply to message from "David A. Curry" dated Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:38:08 EST Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:09:13 -0500 From: "David A. Curry" X-Originalarrivaltime: 28 Feb 2003 14:09:20.0996 (UTC) FILETIME=[FD3FA240:01C2DF32] Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: idwg-public@semper.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/580 X-Loop: idwg-public@semper.org Precedence: list Resent-Sender: idwg-public-request@semper.org Resent-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:48:54 +0100 (CET) Well, Having heard two replies in favor and none against, we will take Andy Newton up on his offer to provide an XML Schema for the IDMEF. Look for an updated Internet-Draft in the late April/early May time frame. --Dave >>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, David A. Curry, identified as "David" below, wrote: David> As those of you who've been in the group for a long time know, we've David> always sort of had this vague "sometime later" goal to move away David> from the XML DTD representation of IDMEF and toward an XML Schema David> representation. David> There are some good reasons for using an XML Schema over an XML DTD David> such as better support for data types (which we kind of allude to in David> the drafts), proper support for name spaces, and other things. (See David> the list archives for more.) David> Anyway, we have received an offer from Andy Newton to create an XML David> Schema for the IDMEF, which we could then integrate into the draft David> as a replacement for existing the XML DTD. This would mean another David> version of the draft, and that version would be delayed until sometime David> in April because of Andy's schedule. David> Or, we can move forward with the draft we have. David> If you have an opinion on this, please voice it to the list no later David> than Wednesday, Feb. 26th. David> --Dave From idwg-public-request@semper.org Mon Mar 3 14:32:55 2003 Received: from www.opencard.org (www.opencard.org [195.176.20.76]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA09103 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:32:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by www.opencard.org (Postfix, from userid 503) id 05082348D6; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 20:38:54 +0100 (CET) Old-Return-Path: Delivered-To: semper-idwg-public@opencard.org Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:34:11 -0800 From: Mike Erlinger To: intrusion detection wg Subject: 56th IETF & WG Status Message-Id: <20030303193411.GA21329@cs.hmc.edu> Reply-To: mike@cs.hmc.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Originalarrivaltime: 03 Mar 2003 19:34:15.0609 (UTC) FILETIME=[E02EC290:01C2E1BB] Resent-Message-ID: Resent-From: idwg-public@semper.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/581 X-Loop: idwg-public@semper.org Precedence: list Resent-Sender: idwg-public-request@semper.org Resent-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 20:38:54 +0100 (CET) Hi all We will NOT be meeting at the 56th IETF. As I think everyone knows, the IESG has reviewed all 4 of our documents. With the result that all, but the IDMEF document, are in the RFC editor queue. There will be another IDMEF draft which will move to a schema from the current DTD. There are also a couple of other IESG issues related to IDMEF which can be handled at the same time. mike -- Mike Erlinger, Professor and Chair Computer Science www: http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~mike email: mike@cs.hmc.edu smail: Computer Science Dept., Harvey Mudd College, 301 E. 12th Street, Claremont, CA, 91711 909-621-8912, FAX: 909-607-8364