From ietf-message-headers-bounces@ietf.org Mon Mar 06 22:01:43 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGSSE-00041n-SB; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:01:42 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGSSD-00041c-1P for ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:01:41 -0500 Received: from scmailgw1.scop.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.251.194]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGSSB-0005F9-Cb for ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:01:41 -0500 Received: from scmse2.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmse2 [133.2.253.17]) by scmailgw1.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id k2731Wu12549; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:01:32 +0900 (JST) Received: from (133.2.210.1) by scmse2.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp via smtp id 6764_ae268f22_ad86_11da_88aa_0014221f2a2d; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:01:31 +0900 Received: from EBOSHIIWA.it.aoyama.ac.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k272xrUl013976; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:00:52 +0900 Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20060307114718.04611c00@localhost> X-Sender: duerst@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6J Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 11:57:54 +0900 To: ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org From: Martin Duerst Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 4adaf050708fb13be3316a9eee889caa Cc: Bruce Lilly Subject: [Ietf-message-headers] Inquiry: registration of "body" from mailto: URI X-BeenThere: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion list for header fields used in Internet messaging applications." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ietf-message-headers-bounces@ietf.org The mailto: URI uses a query syntax to indicate the values of various email headers. There is one special case, namely that a header field name of 'body' does not indicate an actual header field, but gives the text that should go into the body of the (prototype) message. Bruce Lilly suggested that, in order to avoid that anybody else would define a header field named 'body' in the future, this header field should be duly registered with IANA. (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2005Apr/0002). I think this is a very good idea. I have prepared a registration template in my draft-duerst-mailto-bis (unfortunately, that part didn't make it into the -02.txt version I submitted yesterday). Because the situation is a bit special, I would like to get your expert feedback. The registration template currently looks as follows: Header field name: Body Applicable protocol: none Status: reserved Author/Change controller: IETF Specification document(s): Internet-Draft draft-duerst-mailto-bis-03.txt (Note to RFC Editor: Replace this with RFC YYYY (RFC number of this specification)) Related information: This registration serves to reserve the header field name 'Body' for use only in mailto: URIs and in similar situations where the body of a message has to be given an explicit name. Regards, Martin. _______________________________________________ Ietf-message-headers mailing list Ietf-message-headers@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers From ietf-message-headers-bounces@ietf.org Sat Mar 11 04:21:02 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FI0HW-0008IL-54; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:21:02 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FI0HV-0008GE-3L for ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:21:01 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FI0HT-0005h8-Ji for ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:21:01 -0500 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FI0HQ-0006fC-NI for ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:20:56 +0100 Received: from pd9fba8fe.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.251.168.254]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:20:56 +0100 Received: from nobody by pd9fba8fe.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:20:56 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org From: Frank Ellermann Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 05:45:16 +0100 Organization: Lines: 16 Message-ID: <440FB2DC.7CB7@xyzzy.claranet.de> References: <6.0.0.20.2.20060307114718.04611c00@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9fba8fe.dip0.t-ipconnect.de X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U) X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370 Cc: Subject: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: Inquiry: registration of "body" from mailto: URI X-BeenThere: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion list for header fields used in Internet messaging applications." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ietf-message-headers-bounces@ietf.org Martin Duerst wrote: > Applicable protocol: > none At least mail. Maybe unnecessary to reserve it for say http, but with news2mail gateways I'm not sure. Gateway operators can manage, and there's of course no news header field "body". > Specification document(s): > Internet-Draft draft-duerst-mailto-bis-03.txt It's already "reserved" (implicitly) in RfC 2368, no need to wait for 2368bis. Bye, Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf-message-headers mailing list Ietf-message-headers@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers