
From nobody Sun Oct 14 21:31:08 2018
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F3D128CF3 for <ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 21:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=WWm/9G2/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Wyb9z+Q5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WN4WCc-H2_Kr for <ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 21:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66905127598 for <ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 21:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56DC6E4 for <ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:31:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:31:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :message-id:date:to; s=fm3; bh=b2L0cKwyAzTyNQPHY7r7yVSV0Do4BPtcB r6rAQw2rVo=; b=WWm/9G2/jdssFQsuQ9c5Y3Suorx0tg2j3Hy+ef0wBc303ZO/h xdjrDFbJLC8VPq49lq8ZvpdmE4iGBx6VSxDhVPpShkoR5RLUMFOrtyIfYYnt3Fio ZezRAmgkY49fR92rH8e1HZlrU7MVJYncbS9HyXIe25vUOpsfrp7DefUFwB9Bktbf cMWygmY5fx9hhhQGbkkcsBe9XmRu753EdEMA4R4eDXA6tUt/Fe1nAd/T08lRrHg/ FBEdGvAwCU+zYwcNJ5V7GU59yyscleFVuXg5pdy/DjUltQZBqND9jJwW8VRjqOw4 fD25Km3WY2PInvBCVQ4qbMKks+Pwsa+2//fMw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=b2L0cK wyAzTyNQPHY7r7yVSV0Do4BPtcBr6rAQw2rVo=; b=Wyb9z+Q5ohu70bGQ3ioqOp 5dhfKVz1LyXklP4w3utx+yA1TBNEky3PVGQ4JUpYNTQmxmrqRy4fm3RVAh9SKxH2 Y4oLHlAaKdeYNXQoZpBxqIPCWrxNooStvwEo1T1mDHGa/A41AhElvFIQ/+rvFGyN MkqswxCJRH7mNxzS19Qin73vJbFh9ssNRwk8/rZF8DN6uYLSFFw9JU1+HZit1inM EW6rF0DKskG2HznwU/8mlD6uTLGNg/+ZN+tlc333dfPjq6oavo3m4OtsVMeFksB4 7rPSeGzkio/rKMQQO5S4v7cibrPsYgoCWSVDt8yjugmpBubR45a/umhCJl0tDcOA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:AxjEW5rH9kqtWB-bnNiW45JEmeD_2OfbN1KheqtZLACy4jbQYfma5Q>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:AxjEW-gVOBbubFuwEhVL85q6DU-EeVopAS0qOEQs-GpxuIrv3TaRsA> <xmx:AxjEW8YsMM_OWeJ5gODE9_tuU2NSv3FGO6huskg1MEyfgDqMChoelg> <xmx:AxjEW_kEtzxGk14w7gSISghD1Mqn3hzXwUNM-xX_FGiqG9J5R0r4jQ> <xmx:AxjEWyiWa1Wl5tVf3RTXjiQzi0TLMYhGEm0fyRMjTcgKCZK1WU_fBA> <xmx:AxjEWxRlD4fn35M7LYpVkBzRGSeMzV8uOiWCHyCmVaGQwvVQk5flLQ> <xmx:BRjEW1Px277hT326xHmmey22RP-6m0xkECd-XDYmJ8cwypiD0oE-fg>
Received: from attitudadjuster.mnot.net (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E475BE479F for <ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:30:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.39\))
Message-Id: <B502C5C6-22AC-43B8-80A1-C69173DFBD0A@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:30:55 +1100
To: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-message-headers/ngv6EIWfWjJCIR3ilxDn8OEH38w>
Subject: [Ietf-message-headers] Registration update: Content-MD5
X-BeenThere: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for header fields used in Internet messaging applications." <ietf-message-headers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-message-headers>,  <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-message-headers/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers>,  <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 04:31:07 -0000

As discussed on the HTTP Working Group mailing list [1], we'd like to =
update the registry entry for Content-MD5 in HTTP.

Proposed template:

Header name: Content-MD5
Protocol: http
Status: obsoleted
Reference: RFC2616 (obsoleted by RFC7231, Appendix B)

Cheers,

1.  https://www.w3.org/mid/C94E5914-F5F0-46D0-BABB-D42EE45DF10D@mnot.net


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/


From nobody Tue Oct 16 00:39:11 2018
Return-Path: <gk@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BBE12D4EB for <ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MfkiRIaPS-sg for <ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay16.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay16.mail.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5CB412D4EA for <ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp6.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.206]) by relay16.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1gCJwW-0001zE-sH; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:39:05 +0100
Received: from gklyne38.plus.com ([81.174.129.24] helo=sasharissa.local) by smtp6.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1gCJwW-0007Ki-Ks; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:39:04 +0100
Message-ID: <5BC59599.3000501@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:39:05 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
References: <B502C5C6-22AC-43B8-80A1-C69173DFBD0A@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <B502C5C6-22AC-43B8-80A1-C69173DFBD0A@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
X-Oxmail-Spam-Status: score=0.0 tests=none
X-Oxmail-Spam-Level: /
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-message-headers/NU7Z0dLhVsJk8oF0pJxtKAxyV74>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Registration update: Content-MD5
X-BeenThere: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for header fields used in Internet messaging applications." <ietf-message-headers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-message-headers>,  <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-message-headers/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers>,  <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:39:10 -0000

Just to be clear, this is just use with HTTP that's being obsoleted?

It's also registered as a MIME header.  The reason for obsoleting per RFC7231 
appears to be inconsistent HTTP implementations, so I guess that doesn't apply 
to MIME/email?

#g
--

On 15/10/2018 05:30, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> As discussed on the HTTP Working Group mailing list [1], we'd like to update the registry entry for Content-MD5 in HTTP.
>
> Proposed template:
>
> Header name: Content-MD5
> Protocol: http
> Status: obsoleted
> Reference: RFC2616 (obsoleted by RFC7231, Appendix B)
>
> Cheers,
>
> 1.  https://www.w3.org/mid/C94E5914-F5F0-46D0-BABB-D42EE45DF10D@mnot.net
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-message-headers mailing list
> Ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers
>


From nobody Tue Oct 16 15:54:16 2018
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED99130E5A for <ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=FROrfh3e; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=i6eoL+gq
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rOUuJkf5C79p for <ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4057130E37 for <ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7F82201E; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:54:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:54:11 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=+ 9sq/NaZ0Hvp1D2zYGd4kXBGDELetkHdIFcQp6gaolI=; b=FROrfh3eun4lEpRpU dnA9vF6plUUuNttb32QKk6Hd+wgXpvGjKCrzgT4vMh6SvTNrOY9df1GWaGxIR7dV mNPNEXd2m8dxcbFzrNQqs5Yyp7n4PkgSDl9+cWhTUzyfPiEnxyKVpMBP64w3fUVL ld8p3OA8kGk/NSvL9xSmZE3N1dexN2j3gOwsMhtL4MTsOoh51iDIp3qtVM3tiAUf IlIHl4suwB+DV8qSYVbqdCcu9N8kA4XiB7jdjAylzBMyeAKFS35/pOpzLh+3A96G vYTi9EFYjEVCI0pzgyF8oQClqKUPYfm/j1WUdOwxXM5JPFleX2m4CAGQ/BjFCZXe fpVMw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=+9sq/NaZ0Hvp1D2zYGd4kXBGDELetkHdIFcQp6gao lI=; b=i6eoL+gq6Gw1XZswFGCgzXH65+2euh1pTY0m3FmQUWhIQ+ewDdW5O4eg/ oXHU/Y0zl7bK9mrVbXXEe1wK+v3bWJmOZODDhzIO8xXXWF3rqwb/3e7Q75z8CW55 D++agRAqlx8d8+SVWXoACdlLUH/NMykK4uRNS4gHv6Uk9HF4T6Cku2vlRvGgcdS0 lHU7ljvUML/2wdeQpxSLVo22SELK1kTK6Adh1bH4wWhoXbEZbP6UhtvmQPCd3HxD 90/ecDsYt4LnieQ83QifomYTpp+2OCOvEM3Syhg35L6jCt2J1RaXP5baY4cgdtAm jxDb4KzwvmJKUysPd//Yx5wpkYRtQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:EmzGWxLscGwAklFaH5qh0124e27TsWgTpnv1p__hEcy_pCMsuTTc7A>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:EmzGW3308hEDNrvnj-srAahyDeCwCfrQWez8c2-VcToofpQfAqvWOQ> <xmx:EmzGW8qnnltPcASLjyJ5nkZezyjB98DRUl0FN0jSy1Shl8RJVP-gLA> <xmx:EmzGW1EZDtnVG-Swns22tSpTNFXxbjaKtHY8kpQHmHPm5KdDGLLLkg> <xmx:EmzGW-5uoLdiGRPqlQN1sBm8omK-bZuinZ-xmDFik4UIDjcTqVZizg> <xmx:EmzGWzAASHHIQCdsr4YE4MRle5WQWh1KVT5JJR7_FAv59-Q1NuQyPw> <xmx:E2zGW3msON7zah5VJk6gHQ_Ccz1mrLqH2t922NsORJaQqzA6sdJrJQ>
Received: from attitudadjuster.mnot.net (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 09F69E4074; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:54:08 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.39\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <5BC59599.3000501@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:54:08 +1100
Cc: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AF4445EE-5D21-4FF7-95AB-96B773DA583B@mnot.net>
References: <B502C5C6-22AC-43B8-80A1-C69173DFBD0A@mnot.net> <5BC59599.3000501@ninebynine.org>
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-message-headers/9XX4eIx9dgt_Mb24KHxMFImi76g>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Registration update: Content-MD5
X-BeenThere: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for header fields used in Internet messaging applications." <ietf-message-headers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-message-headers>,  <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-message-headers/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers>,  <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 22:54:15 -0000

> On 16 Oct 2018, at 6:39 pm, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> wrote:
>=20
> Just to be clear, this is just use with HTTP that's being obsoleted?

Yes -- the protocol field is just "http".

> It's also registered as a MIME header.  The reason for obsoleting per =
RFC7231 appears to be inconsistent HTTP implementations, so I guess that =
doesn't apply to MIME/email?

I have no idea.

Cheers,

>=20
> #g
> --
>=20
> On 15/10/2018 05:30, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> As discussed on the HTTP Working Group mailing list [1], we'd like to =
update the registry entry for Content-MD5 in HTTP.
>>=20
>> Proposed template:
>>=20
>> Header name: Content-MD5
>> Protocol: http
>> Status: obsoleted
>> Reference: RFC2616 (obsoleted by RFC7231, Appendix B)
>>=20
>> Cheers,
>>=20
>> 1.  =
https://www.w3.org/mid/C94E5914-F5F0-46D0-BABB-D42EE45DF10D@mnot.net
>>=20
>>=20
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf-message-headers mailing list
>> Ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers
>>=20

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

