From ima-bounces@ietf.org  Fri Oct  3 11:23:50 2008
Return-Path: <ima-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ima-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ima-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFE728C156;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2008 11:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ima@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071AB28C142
	for <ima@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  3 Oct 2008 11:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id SbiPB1l0jr8P for <ima@core3.amsl.com>;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2008 11:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919C428C140
	for <ima@ietf.org>; Fri,  3 Oct 2008 11:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0859939E40A;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2008 20:23:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Yvtzw0-Vts-I; Fri,  3 Oct 2008 20:23:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.19.26.165] (216-239-45-4.google.com [216.239.45.4])
	by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56C8239E3F7;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2008 20:23:21 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <48E66339.5080409@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:23:53 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chris.newman@sun.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000204040500030008060502"
Cc: EAI WG <ima@ietf.org>, Lisa Dusseault <ldusseault@commerce.net>
Subject: [EAI] Request to publish draft-ietf-eai-downgrade-09 as Experimental
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>,
	<mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>,
	<mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ima-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ima-bounces@ietf.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000204040500030008060502
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Enclosed is the writeup for the request to advance the document

  draft-ietf-eai-downgrade-09

to Experimental status.
Please process appropriately.

             Harald Alvestrand, WG chair


--------------000204040500030008060502
Content-Type: text/plain;
 name="downgrade-writeup.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="downgrade-writeup.txt"

Document writeup for draft-ietf-eai-downgrade-09, destined for Experimental
status


(February 1, 2007 template)

   (1.a)  Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?  Has the
          Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
          document and, in particular, does he or she believe this
          version is ready for forwarding to the IESG for publication?

	  Harald Alvestrand. Yes.

   (1.b)  Has the document had adequate review both from key WG members
          and from key non-WG members?  Does the Document Shepherd have
          any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that
          have been performed?

	  Yes. No.

   (1.c)  Does the Document Shepherd have concerns that the document
          needs more review from a particular or broader perspective,
          e.g., security, operational complexity, someone familiar with
          AAA, internationalization or XML?

	  No.

   (1.d)  Does the Document Shepherd have any specific concerns or
          issues with this document that the Responsible Area Director
          and/or the IESG should be aware of?  For example, perhaps he
          or she is uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or
          has concerns whether there really is a need for it.  In any
          event, if the WG has discussed those issues and has indicated
          that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those
          concerns here.  Has an IPR disclosure related to this document
          been filed?  If so, please include a reference to the
          disclosure and summarize the WG discussion and conclusion on
          this issue.

	  No.

   (1.e)  How solid is the WG consensus behind this document?  Does it
          represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with
          others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and
          agree with it?

	  Solid.
	  There is some worry about the handling of header fields
	  containing URIs if someone introduces IRIs in them, but the
	  WG decided that it was not appropriate to try to solve this
	  problem at this time.

   (1.f)  Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme
          discontent?  If so, please summarise the areas of conflict in
          separate email messages to the Responsible Area Director.  (It
          should be in a separate email because this questionnaire is
          entered into the ID Tracker.)

	  No.

   (1.g)  Has the Document Shepherd personally verified that the
          document satisfies all ID nits?  (See
          http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html and
          http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/).  Boilerplate checks are
          not enough; this check needs to be thorough.  Has the document
          met all formal review criteria it needs to, such as the MIB
          Doctor, media type and URI type reviews?

	  Yes.
	  The draft refers to RFC 2821 and 2822, which were obsoleted
	  a few days ago; this can be fixed at the RFC Editor stage, we
	  do not know of any problem with referring to the newer RFCs.

   (1.h)  Has the document split its references into normative and
          informative?  Are there normative references to documents that
          are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear
          state?  If such normative references exist, what is the
          strategy for their completion?  Are there normative references
          that are downward references, as described in [RFC3967]?  If
          so, list these downward references to support the Area
          Director in the Last Call procedure for them [RFC3967].

	  Yes.

   (1.i)  Has the Document Shepherd verified that the document IANA
          consideration section exists and is consistent with the body
          of the document?  If the document specifies protocol
          extensions, are reservations requested in appropriate IANA
          registries?  Are the IANA registries clearly identified?  If
          the document creates a new registry, does it define the
          proposed initial contents of the registry and an allocation
          procedure for future registrations?  Does it suggest a
          reasonable name for the new registry?  See [RFC2434].  If the
          document describes an Expert Review process has Shepherd
          conferred with the Responsible Area Director so that the IESG
          can appoint the needed Expert during the IESG Evaluation?

	  Yes.
	  The document contains experimental entries for the header
	  registry (RFC 3864), which does not have a review procedure.

   (1.j)  Has the Document Shepherd verified that sections of the
          document that are written in a formal language, such as XML
          code, BNF rules, MIB definitions, etc., validate correctly in
          an automated checker?

	  Yes. Section 5 contains some parts that look like ABNF, but
	  should be considered as pseudocode; otherwise, the specification
	  is believed to be in valid ABNF.

   (1.k)  The IESG approval announcement includes a Document
          Announcement Write-Up.  Please provide such a Document
          Announcement Write-Up?  Recent examples can be found in the
          "Action" announcements for approved documents.  The approval
          announcement contains the following sections:

          Technical Summary
	     This document specifies a downgrading procedure for
	     messages that are extended according to the EAI UTF8SMTP
	     extension, when these are being sent to a recipient MTA
	     that does not support the UTF8SMTP extension.

          Working Group Summary
	     The WG came to consensus on this document.

          Document Quality
	     The document has been reviewed in the WG.


(end)

--------------000204040500030008060502
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima

--------------000204040500030008060502--


From ima-bounces@ietf.org  Fri Oct  3 11:24:20 2008
Return-Path: <ima-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ima-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ima-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A9728C191;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2008 11:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ima@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6982928C191
	for <ima@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  3 Oct 2008 11:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id aBMKc9J4wjbM for <ima@core3.amsl.com>;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2008 11:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8E028C17D
	for <ima@ietf.org>; Fri,  3 Oct 2008 11:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6472F39E40A
	for <ima@ietf.org>; Fri,  3 Oct 2008 20:24:05 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id lavcBaiXvx4P for <ima@ietf.org>;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2008 20:24:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.19.26.165] (216-239-45-4.google.com [216.239.45.4])
	by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFEC939E3F7
	for <ima@ietf.org>; Fri,  3 Oct 2008 20:24:04 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <48E66364.3050709@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:24:36 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: EAI WG <ima@ietf.org>
References: <48D53D8E.5090601@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <48D53D8E.5090601@alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: [EAI] WG LAST CALL for draft-ietf-eai-downgrade-09
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>,
	<mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>,
	<mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ima-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ima-bounces@ietf.org

Since this Last Call has expired, and I have seen no comments, I have 
sent the request for publication to the IESG.

Thank you all!

                Harald Alvestrand

Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> This is the (hopefully final) Last Call for draft-ietf-eai-downgrade.
>
> We had an earlier Last call on version -07, from June 17 to July 1; in 
> accordance with IETF tradition, this Last Call is ONE WEEK long, and is 
> intended ONLY to measure:
>
> - Whether the group is satisified with the resolution of comments raised 
> during the first WG Last Call (none were raised on the list, but one 
> issue was raised in Dublin)
> - Whether the group is satisfied with other changes that have occured 
> between the -07 and the -09 version.
>
> As usual:
> - if you wish to raise an issue with the document, send a mail to the WG 
> list with the word "ISSUE:" in the subject line. If you wish to raise 
> two issues, send two messages.
> - if you have editorial comments to make, please send them directly to 
> the authors and to the WG chairs.
>
> This Last Call ends on SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2008, at 12:00 GMT. After 
> this date, and after resolution of any issues raised, the document will 
> be forwarded to the IESG for publication.
>
>                        Harald, for the chairs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IMA mailing list
> IMA@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima
>
>   

_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima


From ima-bounces@ietf.org  Fri Oct 17 00:45:10 2008
Return-Path: <ima-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ima-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ima-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F8428C0CE;
	Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ima@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ima@core3.amsl.com
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0)
	id 7C03B3A6921; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20081017074504.7C03B3A6921@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ima@ietf.org
Subject: [EAI] I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>,
	<mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>,
	<mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ima-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ima-bounces@ietf.org


--NextPart

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Email Address Internationalization Working Group of the IETF.


	Title           : Displaying Downgraded Messages for Email Address Internationalization
	Author(s)       : K. Fujiwara
	Filename        : draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-00.txt
	Pages           : 14
	Date            : 2008-10-16

This document describes how to display downgraded messages which
originally contain internationalized E-mail addresses or
internationalized header fields.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-00.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.

--NextPart
Content-Type: Message/External-body;
	name="draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-00.txt";
	site="ftp.ietf.org";
	access-type="anon-ftp";
	directory="internet-drafts"

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-ID: <2008-10-17003735.I-D@ietf.org>


--NextPart
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima

--NextPart--


From ima-bounces@ietf.org  Mon Oct 20 20:41:53 2008
Return-Path: <ima-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ima-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ima-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91003A67DF;
	Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ima@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0263A67DF
	for <ima@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <FfK0pUNYzBdw>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Duplicate header field: "Message-ID"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.043
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.043 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753,
	MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id FfK0pUNYzBdw for <ima@core3.amsl.com>;
	Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [159.226.7.146])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D5483A67C0
	for <ima@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (eyou send program); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:43:03 +0800
Message-ID: <424560583.01965@cnnic.cn>
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: yaojk@cnnic.cn
Received: from unknown (HELO yaojk) (218.241.111.35)
	by 159.226.7.146 with SMTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:43:03 +0800
Message-ID: <005c01c9332f$1cbdf3a0$606df1da@yaojk>
From: "YAO Jiankang" <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: <ima@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:42:59 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005A_01C93372.2AC4AAF0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Subject: [EAI] Fw: I-D Action:draft-yao-eai-deployment-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>,
	<mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>,
	<mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ima-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ima-bounces@ietf.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C93372.2AC4AAF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C93372.2AC4AAF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	name="draft-yao-eai-deployment-00.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="draft-yao-eai-deployment-00.txt"

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-ID: <2008-10-20201857.I-D@ietf.org>


------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C93372.2AC4AAF0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima

------=_NextPart_000_005A_01C93372.2AC4AAF0--




