From nobody Thu Jun 22 21:18:00 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57DE126CC4 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:17:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KxSKlUoC2bQW for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-it0-x22b.google.com (mail-it0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C9C2126C23 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-it0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id m47so2128683iti.0 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:17:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vFCa2j9/QpMKOLigX78wIdoxG5gc72GW4NMnmLFvnXA=; b=J9cxj/LZkc99Swa+c7c2Nfj69pVESk8+gqGkd+CadtJsilgTYbu50ViXVKF0+D6Yzw AVgiaJJDT1hDJIV/3jUtd/J/KCD+Zlr+SO0ajpAimpwfUUro7g3lrHbfq5FZKOkFaCUR rIJNoTUoMmo5qqBuWXMxGjMMjjNqtI+o5chtqKcKVtV4dmfLNHEhcwoUVmKdSS1OjMMq phivyv1EsJ9tUuLvWg4lXWGlWBgO1SDDXMsCXQGwqpvgAnofFxb2EOmFSuDgW5FGCKQ8 PAvsEIXqm8RmlYjTCTO1LkH6ZOAT+sLPZzRsepwQH/OS5ZvMvwfzLXBql/mVu5uVfPC2 9K8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vFCa2j9/QpMKOLigX78wIdoxG5gc72GW4NMnmLFvnXA=; b=Gu9XpSKrv+XgBnBopuV7PWKvDVLKOLlMJI2mKMa9jotqvhSjHTAA8kUsYjYh5owGei d7TyaxnEeMe0k1YFv7JQiZxdTkbGfeQm64qNSZGxBQmGBaym18SrqMQ7G6WARnI+6/by P6HTeq/1OiLG9I7ayP4W5a46hj9LDLjLgfaePYW1vOhB2Kxyp6gwFlFrqa5+n9ceiY32 TYOORWwTKEd+Y7ag/RhdzPezfMaDMXPJ7YNw4EHbdtjhGFqH0DhjYuUgRG5eIx8pJXqC zv7SiX9r2NzswjFs7unDqmBPRNWnZHvFFCCYw9mjN1kQ66CpX77GAnRi42vnkygCoHZg tIaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxpaxfVSivZARMSirDzssLjaUuR5NNrJLxqseetvPYPs+nBiFPJ rQGnSCHURKmQSsPjkPJ9mcjMmIHq2g== X-Received: by 10.36.16.211 with SMTP id 202mr5251203ity.2.1498191476527; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:17:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.34.20 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:17:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Abdallah B Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 06:17:56 +0200 Message-ID: To: imap5@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144b174c395fe055298e265" Archived-At: Subject: [imap5] Ability to manage rejected messages X-BeenThere: imap5@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 04:17:59 -0000 --001a1144b174c395fe055298e265 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, In the most common email clients there is the ability to filter undesired messages. Filtering is good but i think the client should inform the mail server that all the messages from the server are now marked as undesirable in the client side. This way, the server will be able to mark this client as blacklisted and be able to not send more messages. Sorry poor english. --001a1144b174c395fe055298e265 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

In the most common email clients th= ere is the ability to filter undesired messages. Filtering is good but i th= ink the client should inform the mail server that all the messages from the= server are now marked as undesirable in the client side. This way, the ser= ver will be able to mark this client as blacklisted and be able to not send= more messages.

Sorry poor english.
--001a1144b174c395fe055298e265-- From nobody Fri Jun 23 14:11:16 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5111294F8 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QOax0VrTBdsZ for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ot0-x234.google.com (mail-ot0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4C361294DC for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot0-x234.google.com with SMTP id y47so39498087oty.0 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TnzQNGd/9PxdiHvMVm1Psk0Y3ceOxLTFNhYJlTzMRvQ=; b=sZ2QF0Pvg6BfVe9y3BKzOnz5ulBveuTH6Cw7BKjJQBoJvZTJyLveT/x6b1LcubVWkt RFw4zjhEjGQrO6SLM0xompuyFXfiXliRUfgmKQncA4miqfyNL19CucgIs4IGoo5fxjcZ AcRJTIh+yUchpQnp5qs6MxBfa9xqgENi+jvcTdYP5oGQ6DbFUXufCtUwwRDzX/0Yyxv1 OpNulDcAoIyM6Q1rBHQ3WTqhGWBI0IzenF4pG+Mx1hxjaMABClpeBM8r8EU6LFIxQ61t wbWiEN3FbcVPBN0eIKgok2omUyePsv4+8xnpWuCxnsUet/c2wplHpUXz+HPHR9kgokLc ZR0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TnzQNGd/9PxdiHvMVm1Psk0Y3ceOxLTFNhYJlTzMRvQ=; b=CB2RTxqrnAxpc47Wuv49HfEKteWe6GV0BU/CdYSq1rDfKvV9DSv9nMuv0qMYPPjpNM 4nVTuRWEZ+6vEWiT6sZrKVs60X8r8u+8Efp3ZJVIToTN7aMs4JJpMF0ciP+Xp0oW/ZCS liaMuRvz1O6nJ6s8c5Q4rz4lTWvjKUxrcSpIz1td2vXwBN8t3ZvhrjK8cv2iakqXVdnx 4D5CqTN1GCgHNu/K5j3VNTjYbqvLHMEf83/6PU16okRWewY5UoK/FrTjtNpWbspPE2ml ZVU3gmeZe+pAoto7/lfkZ6yDsjSyPTFvPNa2Rr/dac8/WP5S7uWUP8wIblWveO8nSfD/ 51Eg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzBsT6wshFx9qO+RZUkKdME5I6v7sowE70otJTE1UWleBThjMr/ AQeKC/o2/kVJmiunzRz/W45yWGbC7Sd1 X-Received: by 10.157.47.193 with SMTP id b1mr4798957otd.78.1498252272034; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.68.42 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Brandon Long Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:11 -0700 Message-ID: To: Abdallah B Cc: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113dcc0675ed1e0552a70ae0" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [imap5] Ability to manage rejected messages X-BeenThere: imap5@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 21:11:15 -0000 --001a113dcc0675ed1e0552a70ae0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Do you mean like the $Junk/$NotJunk/$Phishing keywords in the iana registry? https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-keywords/imap-keywords.xhtml#imap-keywords-1 Brandon On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Abdallah B wrote: > Hi, > > In the most common email clients there is the ability to filter undesired > messages. Filtering is good but i think the client should inform the mail > server that all the messages from the server are now marked as undesirable > in the client side. This way, the server will be able to mark this client > as blacklisted and be able to not send more messages. > > Sorry poor english. > > _______________________________________________ > imap5 mailing list > imap5@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5 > > --001a113dcc0675ed1e0552a70ae0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Do you mean like the $Junk/$NotJunk/$Phishing keywords in = the iana registry?


<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Abdallah B <= bahassinea@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

In the most common email clients = there is the ability to filter undesired messages. Filtering is good but i = think the client should inform the mail server that all the messages from t= he server are now marked as undesirable in the client side. This way, the s= erver will be able to mark this client as blacklisted and be able to not se= nd more messages.

Sorry poor english.

_______________________________________________
imap5 mailing list
imap5@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5


--001a113dcc0675ed1e0552a70ae0--