From ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org Tue Feb 4 06:40:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80551A00FD for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:40:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HDkg0jvPYdEj; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:40:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EE31A00E2; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:40:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: qresync-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis@tools.ietf.org, imapext@Ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.0.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140204144052.1916.27357.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 06:40:52 -0800 From: IETF Secretariat Subject: [imapext] ID Tracker State Update Notice: X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 14:40:53 -0000 IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/ From ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org Tue Feb 4 11:05:13 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7861A01CD for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 11:05:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RkX9iQAe4v_E; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 11:05:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A0D1A01AB; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 11:05:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: qresync-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis@tools.ietf.org, imapext@Ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.0.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140204190512.30654.44418.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:05:12 -0800 From: IETF Secretariat Subject: [imapext] ID Tracker State Update Notice: X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:05:14 -0000 IANA review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/ From nobody Thu Feb 20 02:15:45 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67BE1A0072; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:15:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.549 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UdZHswtUpK6l; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:15:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF8A1A007C; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:15:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1392891332; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=UlF2ujBCSpBZ2NSeUk/mZyKg92A1ReCR0thqKHRbWP8=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=wLnyoJtjgKFeN6kjeDhk4rq9LgKYHpan88wNHpCiO6LHPcoSy85yLZnqUoXWZ3eHaR/4P9 aYYcOdG302Ubud1gQmWwMQvm5T74IxJjoitD4tNu0QDd19UZvo8DRt1fwDpiMjPOJj+7bT fLrtetVdZb43ytxJdlXbtN2+eMiQFwY=; Received: from [192.168.0.12] (cpc5-nmal20-2-0-cust24.19-2.cable.virginm.net [92.234.84.25]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:15:32 +0000 X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING From: Alexey Melnikov X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B511) In-Reply-To: <20140220062324.13174.11399.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:19:16 +0000 Message-Id: <783B80AD-8253-4FEB-AC72-6D04A6EB7A06@isode.com> References: <20140220062324.13174.11399.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: Spencer Dawkins MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/wvNuZTlOSvAkOJ-lgHbgL0X3sdA Cc: "qresync-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , The IESG , "imapext@Ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [imapext] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:15:43 -0000 Hi Spencer, > On 20 Feb 2014, at 06:23, "Spencer Dawkins" wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >=20 > This is a question, not a request for a text change. >=20 > In section 4. Long Command Lines (Update to RFC 2683), does this work > because the only implementations using command lines longer than 1000 > bytes are using them to implement this spec? It is possible to hit this limit when a client not using CONDSTORE/QRESYNC i= ssues a SEARCH and then reformats the result of the SEARCH as a parameter to= FETCH, COPY or MOVE (e.g. in order to perform "move all matching messages t= o another mailbox" operation). In my experience client just don't check leng= ths of message sets. But CONDSTORE/QRESYNC are the prime reason for extending the limit, as the u= pdated SELECT command includes a possibly long set of UIDs as a parameter.=20= > I wasn't completely comfortable updating RFC 2683 in a document that's > mostly defining new extensions, wondering if that update would be visible > enough to implementers who weren't reading this spec. I'm just majing > sure I'm wrong about that ... The update would be marked with Updates boilerplate header, that should be g= ood enough. At least I always check this header when implementing IETF stuff= ;). Best Regards, Alexey= From nobody Thu Feb 20 11:07:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AC61A021B for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:07:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.898 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, BODY_URI_ONLY=0.001, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QYgZ-GDh_plp; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:07:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622C31A0199; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:07:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: qresync-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis@tools.ietf.org, imapext@Ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.0.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140220190702.508.12799.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:07:02 -0800 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/q0abM_ojME76gpJJ6y2-6o5WyAw Subject: [imapext] ID Tracker State Update Notice: X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:07:08 -0000 IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/ From nobody Sat Feb 22 08:27:25 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CD21A0263; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:23:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.898 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XFaNX47w4vv6; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:23:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57191A0346; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:23:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Spencer Dawkins" To: The IESG X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.0.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140220062324.13174.11399.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:23:24 -0800 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/LY9qgFxOJHzWvoSBYhiiSYNAGjE X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:27:23 -0800 Cc: qresync-chairs@tools.ietf.org, imapext@Ietf.org, draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis@tools.ietf.org Subject: [imapext] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 06:23:27 -0000 Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a question, not a request for a text change. In section 4. Long Command Lines (Update to RFC 2683), does this work because the only implementations using command lines longer than 1000 bytes are using them to implement this spec? I wasn't completely comfortable updating RFC 2683 in a document that's mostly defining new extensions, wondering if that update would be visible enough to implementers who weren't reading this spec. I'm just majing sure I'm wrong about that ... From nobody Mon Feb 24 09:34:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD631A0249 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:34:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8dplumJkmQG; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:33:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6DA1A01E4; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:33:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: qresync-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis@tools.ietf.org, imapext@Ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.0.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140224173356.19209.46248.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:33:56 -0800 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/IFtXeW7Ec4dd5bq3pnKILCLM0dA Subject: [imapext] ID Tracker State Update Notice: X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:34:00 -0000 IESG has approved the document and state has been changed to Approved-announcement sent ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/ From nobody Mon Feb 24 09:34:06 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C344D1A0189; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:34:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qVIT1PbVTqhm; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:34:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC481A023F; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:33:56 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.0.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140224173356.19209.63631.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:33:56 -0800 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/ptrADB9IgjT7762m0-WlCW2C2xk Cc: qresync chair , qresync mailing list , RFC Editor Subject: [imapext] Protocol Action: 'IMAP Extensions for Conditional STORE Operation or Quick Flag Changes Resynchronization (CONDSTORE) and Quick Mailbox Resynchronization (QRESYNC)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10.txt) X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:34:03 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'IMAP Extensions for Conditional STORE Operation or Quick Flag Changes Resynchronization (CONDSTORE) and Quick Mailbox Resynchronization (QRESYNC)' (draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the IMAP QRESYNC Extension Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Barry Leiba and Pete Resnick. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/ Technical Summary This document rolls together two sets of changes, one for CONDSTORE and one for QRESYNC, for the IMAP protocol. Errata have been addressed, as well as a small number of technical issues with the existing RFCs 4551 and 5162. The document is intended to obsolete both documents. Its status should be Proposed Standard, although it should be possible to elevate it relatively soon. Review and Consensus Along with the shepherd, several implementors reviewed the document and came to consensus. This discussion caught an issue relating to mod-sequence-value. More than rough consensus exists, and this is a fairly uncontroversial document. An apps directorate review was performed. All issues were resolved. There is a downref from this document to RFC 2683, which provides commonly accepted IMAP implementation recommendations. This document updates the recommendation about line-length limits. Personnel Eliot Lear is the shepherd. Barry Leiba is the responsible Area Director. From nobody Mon Feb 24 13:57:17 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803D01A02BF; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:57:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.278 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nEBL54nawE6J; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:57:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ve0-x22f.google.com (mail-ve0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEC31A02B5; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:57:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ve0-f175.google.com with SMTP id oy12so2034232veb.20 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:57:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MKu2GZR9OcjDlvHb1vjcymsiKwufF20bkvyzJFuDTHU=; b=RFIQ1u1+VcomhSwK41DR56RTznLgA6oombSTVgDvoh/7EV9NykZctMsvUndNBk93vL 2q0ZWZbzM7Y2Lvwb9OwARd4SgvaWTZDgnvj0NkVAf1LOPL7Me6XlJwgvR1rdS3LR2d1v HmNCu0Jg5IFAvRhwlG/nncZJztTR4twmXmDIKV7hZkS7w5j2JVL/NLcu7B10Cq4zYOVa 9rWNctaW4LIFcLWUyECW7GpsW2QIVv5XHZ8oOkhVDjsXTT704704hXtFrCcHUf0f91vT 5JmUe9Rw7qZkz6JqqMZHWlW35jORVhfzAp63KtRk/I9B1yZ/C3WPB2CXFOSmVSXQp1hV 3tQQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.89.4 with SMTP id c4mr2001333vcm.53.1393279034221; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:57:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.19.104 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:57:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140224173356.19209.63631.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <20140224173356.19209.63631.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:57:14 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: G9tnV1SuxJVE1KE3hQu6Ta1rWuM Message-ID: From: Barry Leiba To: The IESG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/IQ7lJ9cPWwnW0UVAa8o8QnDcy3E Cc: qresync chair , qresync mailing list , IETF-Announce , RFC Editor Subject: Re: [imapext] Protocol Action: 'IMAP Extensions for Conditional STORE Operation or Quick Flag Changes Resynchronization (CONDSTORE) and Quick Mailbox Resynchronization (QRESYNC)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10.txt) X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:57:16 -0000 > The IESG has approved the following document: > - 'IMAP Extensions for Conditional STORE Operation or Quick Flag Changes > Resynchronization (CONDSTORE) and Quick Mailbox Resynchronization > (QRESYNC)' > (draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10.txt) as Proposed Standard > > This document is the product of the IMAP QRESYNC Extension Working Group. Congratulations and thanks for getting this done, everyone. The working group will remain officially active until the RFC is published, for the unlikely case where something comes up during AUTH48 (final RFC Editor editing and author approval) that needs to be discussed with the working group. Barry