From nobody Wed Apr 20 17:01:40 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: imapext@ietf.org Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1657212EDEC; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:01:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Suresh Krishnan" To: "The IESG" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.19.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160421000136.831.9572.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:01:36 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis@ietf.org, imapapnd-chairs@ietf.org, Barry Leiba , sm+ietf@elandsys.com, imapext@ietf.org Subject: [imapext] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04 X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:01:36 -0000 Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis/ There are no remarks associated with this position. From nobody Tue Apr 26 08:38:28 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: imapext@ietf.org Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E030612D1BE; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:40:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.19.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160425174046.28320.18381.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:40:46 -0700 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:38:27 -0700 Cc: ben@nostrum.com, imapapnd-chairs@ietf.org, S Moonesamy , draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis@ietf.org, The IESG , imapext@ietf.org, Barry Leiba , rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [imapext] Protocol Action: 'IMAP4 non-synchronizing literals' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04.txt) X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:40:47 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'IMAP4 non-synchronizing literals' (draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the IMAP APPEND Extensions Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alexey Melnikov, Ben Campbell and Alissa Cooper. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis/ Technical Summary The document specifies two IMAP extensions: LITERAL+ and LITERAL-. LITERAL+ allows the alternate form of literals in all IMAP commands. LITERAL- is the same as LITERAL+, but disallows the alternate form of literals unless they are 4096 bytes or less. This replaces RFC 2088, which originally defined LITERAL+ as Proposed Standard. Review and Consensus The document was reviewed by the Imapapnd Working Group. There was a small number of participants interested in the draft. There was WG Consensus on the IMAP4 non-synchronizing literals document. Personnel S. Moonesamy is the Document Shepherd for this document. Ben Campbell is the Responsible Area Director.