
From nobody Mon Oct  4 16:18:49 2021
Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A636F3A0CD0; Mon,  4 Oct 2021 16:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xXgCxyKDUovC; Mon,  4 Oct 2021 16:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE563A0CC6; Mon,  4 Oct 2021 16:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id y197so22224101iof.11; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 16:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;  h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=trmDjgOV7MStDZ4qPvlMEbeF23N5OctNUfhrf+A4Gu4=; b=V5N76uFYHq6GNe1g9IuRP6P5FAXio2O0HfkGuRo/WsLS21KjQ6cPBMO1SJivC2aGUW w6LtRg5Opp7Ka26wl6CFT2Rdq5+JZAsoCCBwI4AeXFklbPZ6JgWy75A/zA3bgWQPpQ1d FDFj2TJ+jh3RFDU7ZwJDOT+Sch0LDc+tmbakzr2MjRFhNhCAHVdwAXsJG532AWBqGf6a 00VFr9E/c84a6bOSN76EQ+50dbTd/SV1Cjf/lwuAOF47Xcwg9NyJjFcTH1juPLZ/BMO6 /8din66qCEHg+XTw9AbgEWBgFOQgYgp06J6HwoBqccj2dofX5HecUYaQLIjN9Iq4DI43 zm3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=trmDjgOV7MStDZ4qPvlMEbeF23N5OctNUfhrf+A4Gu4=; b=FbtM6O/VkDgHmMa02rMsWM7XDtqpPRaCbX/1HpMMEc7T3aJJ3zzHHuLEPEc0u17qpE 0det5AhsJNkXfiRnQyc10TeUjTq8/0Yz/53WpBoP8hxAG1M1g7L5K6VPkGOvP2vVeDM7 kC7ScbJ9rVYWW1lt9EszkJCYmufwAcgtmHHGKz4xD9gomGukwV947nsHUXmY8TBJliXi DGujweuYtbk45Y0qLmXIZtmGc6I7fanUKjtMYDsayX9c48DtPYaRziHDpPIErG8Uy0kp RIXS8KPAjeFIBiC+hzSDOaTPTvT5WHjIdRTDbBdIsGbTWpgjv9axsHucbDhRmlc2xgFq G2oA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530NQHWLwatJMsLhLMpuuSKxfMd/Yr4dvDHZTYyWhbhn9RtJy4HQ LGF0EJB/MOQS4gX+gf/ICufys2d3xlhMcQ5hAxIWmqDxItU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQODr8jErt5yoVXoQRkiT1cUFsvkI0AtrhujbFeqx69tsQTgXPd5PqumTlaGBmiMAhL3tcTAftYP7uet31JBc=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:cd17:: with SMTP id g23mr13262474jaq.29.1633389521008;  Mon, 04 Oct 2021 16:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 19:18:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEGzTuSuQcpw082uQFTSbUHw1ixJQNCXz62f=e1r9ocG2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: int-dir@ietf.org, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses.all@ietf.org, cbor-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/6Ox8iEBMqXkUoC2aUEF3wi4-c5g>
Subject: [Int-dir] iNTDIR Review of draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-09
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 23:18:47 -0000

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for
<draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-09.txt>. These comments were
written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors.
Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like
they would treat comments from any other IETF contributor and resolve
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received.
For more details on the INT Directorate, see
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

Based on my review if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document
as NO OBJECTION.

This is a simple document specifying new CBOR tags 54 and 52 for IPv6
and IPv4 where each can be used to encode an address, a prefix, or an
interface (the IP address of the interface plus the local netmask) by
clever use of the encoding of the content of the tag. The document
also deprecates CBOR tags 260 and 261 which were previously intended
for this use.

The following are issues I found with this document that SHOULD be
resolved before publication:

  According to this document, there currently exists a method for
  encoding 48- and 64-bit MAC addresses using CBOR tag 260 but that
  method will be deprecated. Shouldn't the draft preserve some
  non-deprecated way of encoding MAC addresses?

The following are minor issues with the document:

  I think it would be useful for readers not familiar with CBOR to
  include a sentence such as the following somewhere near the
  beginning of the document: "CBOR tag numbers are given as decimal
  numbers."

  This document does not believe in the Oxford comma, but I believe in
  it as does the RFC Editor so they can be added now or in RFC
  editing.

  I think the wording of the first paragraph could be improved. Also,
  while it gives a reason for deprecating tag 261, it does not give
  any reason for deprecating tag 260. Here is my quick attempt at a
  possible re-wording:
OLD
   [RFC8949] defines a number of CBOR Tags for common items.  Tags 260
   and 261 were later defined through IANA [IANA.cbor-tags].  These tags
   cover addresses (260), and prefixes (261).  Tag 260 distinguishes
   between IPv6, IPv4 and Ethernet through the length of the byte string
   only.  Tag 261 was not documented well enough to be used.
NEW
   [RFC8949] defines a number of CBOR Tags for common items. Tags 260
   and 261 were later defined in drafts listed with IANA
   [IANA.cbor-tags]. These tags were intended to cover addresses (260)
   and prefixes (261). Tag 260 distinguishes between IPv6, IPv4, and
   MAC [RFC7042] addresses only through the length of the byte string
   making it impossible, for example, to drop trailing zeros in the
   encoding of IP addresses. Tag 261 was not documented well enough to
   be used.

  Three times: "to be used" -> "for use"

  In Section 6, should the "recommended" in the first sentence be in
  all capital letters?

  I would delete all occurrences of "Note that " except for the one
  in the boilerplate :-)

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com


From nobody Fri Oct 15 06:44:36 2021
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DDB3A084B; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Pascal Thubert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <int-dir@ietf.org>
Cc: bess@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.39.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <163430546454.7338.3215808111601421989@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:44:24 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/xKrcDAmk8iNZtCorsod1KeRjWtY>
Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:44:25 -0000

Reviewer: Pascal Thubert
Review result: Ready with Issues

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir/reviewrequest/15116/

Intdir Review draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09.  These comments were written primarily
for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors.  Document editors and
shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments
from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last
Call comments that have been received.  For more details on the INT
Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.

I find the document to be well written but would benefit for clarification of
what IR is (pro/con vs multicast tree, which node does what) at the very
beginning. Overall I think the draft is ready with nits for publication.

High level: I'm curious about link scope IPv6 multicast packets. I understand
that MLDv2 is forwarded following regular IR procedures. Isn't that the case
for all link scope IPv6 multicast (FF02::/16) ?

 [Page 2] The introduction uses IR as if the reader new what it is before hand.
 Maybe a bit more explanantion could help. Also, a simple fig illustrating NVE
 PE etc would help figure what is and does what, in particular what to expect
 from an IR function.

 Page 5 : define PMSI, e.g., copy the terminology from
 draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates

 Page 3 : "The Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route (RT-3) and its PMSI
 Tunnel Attribute’s (PTA) general format used in [RFC7432] are shown below:"

Unclear whether the below is the original format in RFC 7432 or the variation
instantiated for this document, which flags are already defined and which are
added by this spec.

For flags added for this spec to an existing field, it would make sense to add
that the flag positions are "suggested to IANA"?

Also, a figref would be nice as opposed to "below:"

"This document defines the use of 4 bits of this Flags field:"
It would be helpful to confirm the intuition that the bits are counted 0 to 7
left to right.

"MUST be set to an IP address of the PE that should be": strange construct.
The effect of the "MUST" appears destroyed by the "should".

"                  The Tunnel Identifier and
Next-Hop SHOULD be set to the same IP address as the
Originating Router’s IP address when the NVE/PE originates the
route. The Next-Hop address is referred to as the AR-IP and
SHOULD be different than the IR-IP for a given PE/NVE."
What are the consequences of not obeying those SHOULD?
Please explain there when/why the node uses both IR-IP and AR-IP. Some text here
would prepare for the reasons which can be inferred from behavior in page 11/12
but are not explicitly given.

Fig 1: please indicate the ACs

Page 11: " An AR-REPLICATOR will follow a data path implementation compatible
   with the following rules:" Should that be a MUST?

Page 13:"In case of a failure on the selected AR-REPLICATOR, another
          AR-REPLICATOR will be selected" is that a SHOULD or a "MUST if
          available"?

Page 13: "When an AR-REPLICATOR is selected, the AR-LEAF MUST send all
          the BM packets to that AR-REPLICATOR " contradicts
          "An AR-LEAF MAY select more than one AR-REPLICATOR and do
          either per-flow or per-BD load balancing."
          I guess it should say that the multicast packets are load-balanced
          across of the selected ARs using unicast underlay encapsulation.

Section 6:

Maybe indicate what the selective method does (build 2 hops trees) and the
consequence (failure if an AR prevents the AR Leaves attached to it to send and
receive multicast traffic till it's attached to a new AR.

Page 15  "Figure 1 is also used to describe the selective AR solution, however
   in this section we consider NVE2 as one more AR-LEAF for BD-1. ":
   please make that a new figure 2

page 17: "A Selective AR-REPLICATOR data path implementation will be compatible
   with the following rules: " MUST again? reword maybe?




From nobody Mon Oct 18 13:47:29 2021
Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A5A3A0899 for <int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it.uc3m.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JQXIjJ0SRRBe for <int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 128C73A0888 for <int-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id y12so4533537eda.4 for <int-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it.uc3m.es; s=google;  h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=emwhY8qsJ64vqRKHCdw8RVz3vdvCBEloPrxcliBXbo8=; b=gphK1y6vSyJyNUWvQDDmNTYu2Pi4dVeGdfCBjQ574icw35mWFYEHOzxqytAueO234Q cfQSpY4n22gktKjS9rc4ZT9U+lJKHOVB02dxOQPJer5aVGnyfZc6dHPOZ0Ta2+Yok2Tc yKagEj1SFUP3WL21ozQ2C4A1m9FUckjGNTeT+lzPvMQqrAiS3MQI+rNfztwre5+/7sqF 9YLO/MmxUXi3kIWhU/0+tLcZoTUMd84rbP25A0s1KbMkK6Ii55srneqNgOJViqx4Ahot VN7t9Bio8t1bGxR3+qjmi39v2S3kZWSWlpduGrIQOvNvR6CXG8Nfpf4R5/wIehSBcr+o KEsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=emwhY8qsJ64vqRKHCdw8RVz3vdvCBEloPrxcliBXbo8=; b=sPnXWuIEFn5ixrKEGYVLHkriF588AX36adafhIaYIlcQcyCYw1sQ3930diUjTf6OU0 Z4iXVcOCyIqmRMhMvufE3fFHt9JovI/+GxHkmArKYKljbjAPEBv20Hde6gSMhdi2GZyN /dXE2F4a6xFp36ADatQzKU6KTqx4vf/euC7BtHQsAjS0gW3WtXSISFcUmAIuj0n+DGla 9LC6eilpgvSjRGvqp4uwM5qprv209Agl+Rxr2Kp0xNXhZGdAE6N6twQ0LGqZ1xJEUd7q e77fWytC/C638ReBvzUKGOA+fCUOCF1lKz+uWhvZuXdb2tZXmnPy7Cr9UYYJPmzdLN0S BhYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vBAN5z4G+5y936lu00d6Aff1r1Be2wXyPza+c93wS9o+eYF/1 jYfYSHPQHJSr3sjQZ/ppkLytMfdl3ChQg9Vz7Y0BepA8fRBJiw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz63WBsPKDEukRZnYV4wiJxJjFIg8jiJ85toKLVlwAoJga0Jq/jEkOg+HIoejXIaWUJ3rmV2OrZ9lni/j9D5AI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5384:: with SMTP id g4mr31756602ejo.27.1634590028518;  Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 22:46:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CALypLp8DSqJvL=znBA68La_WmoO=as_9n2R94FxNKCzpXFvtxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<int-dir@ietf.org>" <int-dir@ietf.org>
Cc: Bernie Volz <bevolz@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000000fa1405cea6a680"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/LOGWRf8nOxplLoCXQqRpHUCFtkg>
Subject: [Int-dir] Directorates Guidelines and weekly e-mail update
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:47:21 -0000

--00000000000000fa1405cea6a680
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Dear Int-dir members,

As a helpful reference for reviewers, please check the Directorates
Guidelines available at
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/iesg/wiki/DirectoratesGuidelines

As a new practice, we will send weekly e-mail summaries of the status of
the reviews (assignments, next in the queue, etc). We hope you find this
information useful.

Thanks!

Carlos and Bernie

-- 
CARLOS J. BERNARDOS https://www.it.uc3m.es/cjbc/
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/CacharREDando/
5Growth project: https://5growth.eu/

--00000000000000fa1405cea6a680
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Dear Int-dir members,<div><br></div><div>As a helpful refe=
rence for reviewers, please check the=C2=A0Directorates Guidelines availabl=
e at=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://trac.ietf.org/trac/iesg/wiki/DirectoratesGuide=
lines">https://trac.ietf.org/trac/iesg/wiki/DirectoratesGuidelines</a></div=
><div><br></div><div>As a new practice, we will send weekly e-mail summarie=
s of the status=C2=A0of the reviews (assignments, next in the queue, etc). =
We hope you find this information useful.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks!<=
/div><div><br></div><div>Carlos and Bernie</div><div><br></div><div>-- <br>=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signatur=
e"><div dir=3D"ltr">CARLOS J. BERNARDOS=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://www.it.uc3m=
.es/cjbc/" target=3D"_blank">https://www.it.uc3m.es/cjbc/</a><br>Universida=
d Carlos III de Madrid<div><div>YouTube channel:=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://ww=
w.youtube.com/CacharREDando/" target=3D"_blank">https://www.youtube.com/Cac=
harREDando/</a></div></div><div>5Growth project:=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://5g=
rowth.eu/" target=3D"_blank">https://5growth.eu/</a></div></div></div></div=
></div>

--00000000000000fa1405cea6a680--


From nobody Mon Oct 18 13:55:48 2021
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB223A0BDC for <int-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <int-dir@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.39.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bevolz@gmail.com, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, Carlos Bernardos <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Message-ID: <163459054485.10495.14678779836700119641@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:55:45 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/Iht9dEITHDZYkrw5zHgjit1cXic>
Subject: [Int-dir] Open review assignments in intdir
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:55:46 -0000

Hi all,

The following reviewers have assignments:

For telechat 2021-10-21

Reviewer               LC end     Draft
Suresh Krishnan        2021-09-07 draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-13 
Charles Perkins        2021-09-07 draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11 

Last calls:

Reviewer               LC end     Draft
Donald Eastlake        2021-09-22 draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-11 
Suresh Krishnan        2021-09-07 draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-13 
Charles Perkins        2021-09-07 draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11 

Next in the reviewer rotation:

  Ron Bonica
  Zhen Cao
  Tim Chown
  Jean-Michel Combes
  Donald Eastlake
  Brian Haberman
  Wassim Haddad
  Bob Halley
  Bob Hinden
  Sheng Jiang

As a helpful reference for reviewers, please check the Directorates Guidelines available at:
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/iesg/wiki/DirectoratesGuidelines

Reviews must include the following boilerplate text in the comments sent:

"I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>."
For INT Area documents, reviewers must provide a recommendation if the document is ready to go to Last Call and therefore be forwarded to the IESG.

For non-INT Area document, the reviewer must give a recommendation as to how the INT ADs are to complete the ballot on the document and the reason for that recommendation. See https://www.ietf.org/iesg/voting-procedures.html.

Comments provided MUST be in the order of significance (i.e., those issues that are serious and must be fixed (i.e., DISCUSS level issues) MUST be first).

While comments on minor issues (typos, etc.) are welcome, they should be last.

A template review response might be:

-8-<- BEGIN TEMPLATE -8-<-
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

[INT Area documents] Based on my review, the document [IS, IS NOT] ready to go to IETF Last Call and therefore [CAN, CANNOT] be forwarded to the IESG

[Non-INT Area documents] Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as [YES, NO OBJECTION, DISCUSS, RETURN TO WG (ABSTAIN)].

<If DISCUSS or ABSTAIN> I have the following DISCUSS/ABSTAIN level issues:

The following are other issues I found with this document that SHOULD be corrected before publication:

The following are minor issues (typos, misspelling, minor text improvements) with the document:

-8-<- END TEMPLATE -8-<-


From nobody Wed Oct 20 00:20:29 2021
Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B6C3A0DCE; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=giE4vWZn; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=LWm0I0/O
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pkfmMm4O0l3l; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CFD03A0DC3; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6742; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1634714420; x=1635924020; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=xqZJBKBw7w+GOoL5G+H/GvqE7qwb5CyZuqo4uWb6IKg=; b=giE4vWZnlwJ35rtXzkrLmBb8ZZ55V13SDHEy54KPO3dxvqvmueEOf7Hc NR7vm/LwdD/spZZDYXpIz8CEMEA4mc/6ZxQ0WuA2PMJ46akmX7hFTdafm QojtcF8jtxlOWvMjsB9FfVyGYjBMiXRmvNvAhwhQjEQfi+RyCzDDyvL3a 4=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?A9a23=3APtAwGx8bgQ72wf9uWD/oyV9kXcBvk771JQUSr?= =?us-ascii?q?JEgjuEGfqei+sHkO0rSrbVogUTSVIrWo/RDl6LNsq/mVGBBhPTJsH0LfJFWE?= =?us-ascii?q?RNQj8IQkl8rAdWODgvwK/u5JyA/Fd5JAVli+XzzOENJGcH4MlvVpHD67TMbF?= =?us-ascii?q?hjlcwRvIeGgEY/JhMPx3Oe3qPXu?=
IronPort-Data: =?us-ascii?q?A9a23=3AJIU1iKjxOqcKDln7YSdtWeK8X161vRIKZh0uj?= =?us-ascii?q?C45NGQN5FlHY01jehtvWmuCb6qDN2fxKt9zbYW39UJQ6p7Tm9VrSgc6+CA9R?= =?us-ascii?q?SNjpJueD7x1DKtf0wB+jyH7ockOA/w2MrEsF+hpCC+DzvuRGuK59yAljfvQH?= =?us-ascii?q?uOU5NPsY0ideyc1EE/Ntjo78wIJqtYAbemRW2thi/uryyHsEAfNNwpPD44hw?= =?us-ascii?q?/nrRCWDExjFkGhwUlQWPZintbJF/pUfJMp3yaqZdxMUTmTId9NWSdovzJnhl?= =?us-ascii?q?o/Y1w0mBtXgmbHhfwhbBLXTJgOJzHFRXsBOgDAb+Xd0ifl9ZaFaMBsK49mKt?= =?us-ascii?q?4gZJNFluIKhTwwqM4XHmf8WVF9TFCQW0ahuqOKYeSnv7J3Np6HBWz62qxl0N?= =?us-ascii?q?2k8MJYD0ud6HW8I8uYXQBgBdBmNm6e3za61D+Nhnd9mIdfzOsYYom1hyDDLA?= =?us-ascii?q?PpjQIqFSqHOzd5VwDl2gdpBdd7fYdZcZTt1RBXNfxMJPU0YYK/SNs/AamLXa?= =?us-ascii?q?TZUrheeorA6pjmVxw1q27+rO93QEuFmjP59xi6wzl8qNUygXXn27OCi9Ac?= =?us-ascii?q?=3D?=
IronPort-HdrOrdr: =?us-ascii?q?A9a23=3AnqS7w6BgmkGgDWvlHej6sseALOsnbusQ8z?= =?us-ascii?q?AXPh9KKCC9I/b3qynxppsmPEfP+UkssHFJo6HmBEEZKUmstqKdkrNhQ4tKOz?= =?us-ascii?q?OW+ldATbsSrbcKpgeBJ8SQzJ8n6U4NSdkaNDS0NykHsS+Y2nj8Lz9D+qj8zE?= =?us-ascii?q?nAv463pB0BIXAIGsNdBkVCe3um+yZNNW977O8CZeKhD7181kOdkBosH6CGL0?= =?us-ascii?q?hAe9KGi8zAlZrgbxJDLQUg8hOygTSh76O/OwSE3z8FOgk/hYsKwCzgqUjU96?= =?us-ascii?q?+ju/a0xlv3zGnI9albn9Pn159qGNGMsM4IMT/h4zzYI7iJGofy+gzdktvfsG?= =?us-ascii?q?rCo+O8+CvI+P4DsU85S1vF+CcFHTOQjQrGpUWSlWNwykGT0PARDAhKe/apw7?= =?us-ascii?q?gpLScwLyEbzYBBOGUh5RPGi3MfN2KzoMy2jeK4JC1Chw66p2EvnvUUiGEaWY?= =?us-ascii?q?wCaKVJpYha509NFowcdRiKp7zPPdMeQf003swmPW9yrkqp91VH0ZipRDA+Dx?= =?us-ascii?q?2GSk8Ntoic1CVXhmlwyw8dyNYElnkN+ZohQ90cjt60c5hAhfVLVIsbfKh9DO?= =?us-ascii?q?AOTY++DXHMWwvFNCaXLU78HK8KNnrRo9r84akz5uutZJsUpaFC1qjpQRddry?= =?us-ascii?q?o/akjuAcqB0NlC9Q3MWny0WXD3xsRX9/FCy/fBrXrQQGa+oXUV4r2dStkkc7?= =?us-ascii?q?nmsseISdpr6qXYXB7T8K5yrnrDZ6U=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DfBgDcwW9h/5FdJa1agQmBWYFRUQd?= =?us-ascii?q?3WjcxhEeDRwOFOYgNmnWBLoElA1QLAQEBDQEBKg0KBAEBhQACF4I2AiU0CQ4?= =?us-ascii?q?BAgQBAQESAQEFAQEBAgEGBIERE4VoDYZDAgEDAQEQEREMAQEjCQsBDwIBCBo?= =?us-ascii?q?CJgICAiULFRACBAENBRsHgk8BglUDLwEOoXEBgToCih96gTGBAYIIAQEGBAS?= =?us-ascii?q?BNgETQYJ/GII1AwaBECqDBoQXhnknHIFJRIEUAScMEIJnPoJjAQEDgV0XgwE?= =?us-ascii?q?3gi6MKy0+ODIEHRIJGxQOLgskGTMZAQMaBgseAZIIg1epCAqDMYpKjkWFZgU?= =?us-ascii?q?sg2qLb5dDlS9cH4xQlB2EaQIEAgQFAg4BAQaBYTuBWXAVOyoBggoBATJRGQ+?= =?us-ascii?q?SEoUUhUp0OAIGAQoBAQMJj34BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,166,1631577600"; d="scan'208";a="857098596"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 20 Oct 2021 07:20:12 +0000
Received: from mail.cisco.com (xbe-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.17]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 19K7K5FG031530 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:20:12 GMT
Received: from xfe-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.250) by xbe-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 02:20:11 -0500
Received: from xfe-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.121) by xfe-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 02:20:10 -0500
Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xfe-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 02:20:10 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GBfQflcQNJHJ9dFwmZ7lYREAMzwGGRGyOxFGnJaAMjugWyYxl9kix2B3y0d9GojnJPfs4RZQNDSaokUigQg2RI8hzg4gJdWSRMNPv+KhULWi9fM8N08+QwQzBB/nKF2+J8OTS1Nd1xvHMVnTkD8P5Ks2Q8hQNZbe5g1jayl8TV1PBMJ9unxsWUjgmarSYj8HnsEY98PIuSdSZ07sM0za65pS/EYVt4CDfgYSR0aGlT7pW+KiyhvR6N3zuhrhPxjWRnmp2i2ix1Z6QvrJAIeLwLq4z/TQJGnmQt+VNvXi/oxJKbARZ8lRLlRbcJ0zML2vph/DAbkr831xhnrgLOP6hw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=xqZJBKBw7w+GOoL5G+H/GvqE7qwb5CyZuqo4uWb6IKg=; b=Jt4uMTw0qC3bFfdR+ibVwmC2KslXE0u6mgNc/fR/8AIz1UPhvRcLPKbrvMNnp//phTgZ1z5IZQacq6JVsDDEyrPLm0QZtwo8Ana07usWxsdDP/mlpcXezs6ePT4ixS3bExe3EzHua9JyvDoJX3QoUmBRAZC8aczZCTuj4UGLAhV41Yxo1qSBdyTIu6RDXi0ZyXdcC8E+84Ey/dMhOaTmS1dL68ph7toMbM5bFn3Zl5wu7wZnZxmpGwGLVqp37QKL/SB1UI6HAGDMH+xBExVSdgeQbFHp1933b3CDpbqqHPlZTO6zFqh8oIYb6+cq+6w2VAMGOHNI8qKVxYhSt2JO9g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com;  s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xqZJBKBw7w+GOoL5G+H/GvqE7qwb5CyZuqo4uWb6IKg=; b=LWm0I0/OdDHQK1qBt862qmw5MNoHA5C+ZvLqDQOloxR+gY/incbE+kTut/W1LUyv/WFzeVOyLemcev2ivbG5iM43ZP8dYXa7PfmG9ZyowsT2Ip6SHM5qZbrcSN2AyiqSjtnabyMy1ht1I/lxDBQL8IXDf4mKrHXOVtALfo8Pcyo=
Received: from PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:42::21) by PH0PR11MB5127.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:3c::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4608.16; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:20:09 +0000
Received: from PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::fd55:3032:c8df:edad]) by PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::fd55:3032:c8df:edad%3]) with mapi id 15.20.4608.018; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:20:09 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir.all@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
Thread-Index: AQHXwcrSdDO4HEx2EkqjW9XUH7BTlavbo8MA
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:20:09 +0000
Message-ID: <2FF8AEAD-C835-4775-967B-974BD1779E6C@cisco.com>
References: <163430546454.7338.3215808111601421989@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <163430546454.7338.3215808111601421989@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.54.21101001
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 19ec1953-37f2-47ef-82a2-08d9939a0c91
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PH0PR11MB5127:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <PH0PR11MB512753CA33A385269D288F8BA9BE9@PH0PR11MB5127.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(366004)(316002)(54906003)(2906002)(508600001)(76116006)(6506007)(110136005)(4326008)(66446008)(86362001)(38100700002)(6486002)(450100002)(36756003)(5660300002)(966005)(33656002)(83380400001)(66574015)(66476007)(71200400001)(8676002)(8936002)(64756008)(91956017)(66946007)(122000001)(66556008)(6512007)(186003)(38070700005)(2616005)(45980500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: =?utf-8?B?WWxEZW1BemNsUGNtNTNRSDd3YldWRDJFb2ZVcHVUcjBkb0dPVEttUVQrZzVj?= =?utf-8?B?T09ZSVFKV01Pd3FDb29RN0VYUXB4YlZHQVE3OGwyRUZ4WFNDV3dJU3FOaDFN?= =?utf-8?B?R1BLZmdqUDhCQm40M1I3ZFFJcDYwL1pmWFo0OVZmRkVjendCd2YwWWhFUHJM?= =?utf-8?B?Tmh5VWxzYmpDdk9xY0QxUXZiaWlTbitxV1RrNE9UOWNpbXV4ZUttSWlVbzJn?= =?utf-8?B?T1NyWm5BZXZNUkhFT1ZPTExlQi9jMnJTajBVYUV1RTVhcTJ4RkRJSEtVRW9R?= =?utf-8?B?eC9zbEx3RHlZNmxzb0xyY2ZTbGlBWkNVYktmNlRyOGloZlU0aUQ5bnBjZ0V4?= =?utf-8?B?VW5hZFF3OGJlZnpQUGw2cUNPdnNZejlGdlZSM3BTQWhGVG4wcFR4YkwzdWYz?= =?utf-8?B?QThaanBIUUovanRIdC9LRXIvOXFIT0w1M1Nwc1prSW5xWmREVjRqR3NSMVlh?= =?utf-8?B?N2ZhMllWSE1FWm4waGtmZy9CNXVIN0pHQUluVUtVdTBIRUhHM0d1RUgxN3N3?= =?utf-8?B?RXJ0Y2djN1phdm13NHREYWE2azRRM3Qrc3JPb2l6WFJOZXN1Z1p1K3ZFZ202?= =?utf-8?B?eGtuZlk5Rm45VUFQSjVmZnFSalZOUTBtb3NNLzNCT3dPQVhCTUJNTk4xZGtL?= =?utf-8?B?a0FwQTdrMDg1dmNSNlRiRjhRWDFaYmZpaElHU2VGWHlycWx2RUsxbnBEQjB0?= =?utf-8?B?Vlc5L3NsZWYwVDNzM0NyNXpzOXRyeW9rWE5ic2piMi85UWNVazg5ZlBKL01a?= =?utf-8?B?WGhPWkVCbS85cDBtWXJUa0F3aVRxaWtCTmxTK0YxVzBTbmZvUUgrOVpHZWFm?= =?utf-8?B?dExQNk5NY012aDBmYjZYMEFtMDZGQUlleGg5OUw4VTZxTDBHRUxnWHoxcEFl?= =?utf-8?B?NjlobzRtU25FbUNIOXVFU1hsUFV1YjJWSS9GaVhKanovc0VyV3FaTFlzSHJw?= =?utf-8?B?VEhYSFZxRWY0dldqNVhnWExYYURCVllJKzVEVVpIOFV2aFBhMUlpVWptb2xl?= =?utf-8?B?NHBsKzhpb0NDVmpHc0JuTm5mYW9VMmRxOWxtMlVnUW9wM3dGSkJwZlJFaXRi?= =?utf-8?B?SjVvb2FpLzR2MURETTM1UmUxYU44RHJwalhWZG9VYlZ6SmtZVUZUZExRTjVX?= =?utf-8?B?NWU2OUJFY21wbWkzRmpvbXVxUEQ4bHFnUWM1WHQ5d1ZEUndobGNtTkZiY2c0?= =?utf-8?B?cDZtZ1lRczYrTDF2bVNFZWxSMEh4eUlvYTNheVJSQVk0UExvall0TW14Ujdx?= =?utf-8?B?RHFpalM0Vkg5UkxXU3JDSlJiSHNmMzJuQTBDeElhaDV2OWd2Yi9pNVIyMytH?= =?utf-8?B?NkVieHpFVlNBcmhUdENVRGVCZ2I5Y24wZUJwUXIzMmF2U3BoYTR4bmNrSzhF?= =?utf-8?B?K21RMW9IdlBSNEhGVnkySVhGY21FSUx6VVhUenNZYVl5dUJ0cExyYW15N3BD?= =?utf-8?B?ZlVvT1REYTByTnV0djhLRjNGOXd1c0g0dzFleldVbFJ1UHpuSkdHNGU3eTBm?= =?utf-8?B?bzE4aHVrRHAvTUNlRE0wUzNBYVliRWQ4clU5R09QR3hIL0hxWG1jRlNNUXJ6?= =?utf-8?B?RFVPMG9vZnQwMzdxaHhoOG90bDJ6c1BpejNUS3RxbGMydGUwTEZzbit2WElj?= =?utf-8?B?ZFprM2xMTnRndmVkYS93dnFvV3M2eHBhK3ZiclRyay80NXhuc0lvZzFESloz?= =?utf-8?B?YndLNGxCa1R3c1ExQmZ3eEhXdjA1b2VHNTJCdVp4OHdRYmtOQms4M1BDaktt?= =?utf-8?B?TXZoQ2xqQndEV2NQNHFTcTdOa3kxQ21GZ3dlWW1QSjQ4RXBPZlZRditFa29Z?= =?utf-8?B?TE5VS2M4bWMvREN3dXUwM0tqUGxHNy80SnY3VkM1MXRzZ3BJdzVPdU5JL0pN?= =?utf-8?Q?jrSTZ+R9hytEu?=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <A5B7912D8F9EE943B816EB7A9F9285A7@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 19ec1953-37f2-47ef-82a2-08d9939a0c91
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Oct 2021 07:20:09.3132 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: A+jsZFb6YBKrwjqK5RevsnkSLMDbafYzNdQVNaZsLhQROHd2HazYtcjEV4HxdUcdSm8arcQlVqNREOg4lHSKng==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH0PR11MB5127
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.17, xbe-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/-jee7acyg1z0Mw5k86423YqjDK4>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:20:26 -0000
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From nobody Sun Oct 24 15:15:16 2021
Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B18A3A07AA; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 15:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fG_Y31U0jpjY; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 15:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:fff0:65::8:228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 396523A07B2; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 15:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41E9D8B8; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 22:15:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.138]) by soverin.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1635113706; bh=yh+CP+HxCKtGbV4qSwoZ8a3JajHOYXdm5wGpTSEUUxA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:From; b=aITcHNVoBlwSp9QEJUu6WmznOdsoY2uKqXR2JoJJ6GYSA5/u/rqQtZmP6aCgLzyGE uz+ClgguvINO1LGuNZeRLnsIawET+TkcYGTrYEXgnBkQaDbRiEc3zlKwRhZyGU4vAt pdk8CfF2E6ceN/A/vIGt63x3rPuGAIWterbakOuPH1MxxKPYxeirzaOlG3eEGRIexQ 9VqEeKuNhvNGD2zy3P15IDtQuwEHMNuAg+PQOdBC09xBWYqnwkY5VRYIBPBSqUIIY7 pT6GMhyszGCEG0Q69CbX5ZuvQ6nDjdwK7g78/pe8WQwk/U5hsYpy5dy3cbPM3XMqea 2u/SCCC0D5P8g==
Message-ID: <080828d8-fd4e-f2af-899f-fe6e3e27944c@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:15:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: int-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance@ietf.org
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/uScnvLjeOoyIZxnpoeuLns7kEVc>
Subject: [Int-dir] late int-dir review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 22:15:15 -0000

Intdir Review draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-19

Note: The review is sent directly to the int-dir mailing list and the
authors.  Due to the late submission of the review, it was not
possible to submit it via datatracker.

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for
draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-19.  These comments were
written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors.
Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like
they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received.
For more details on the INT Directorate, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.

Overall, I find the document well written and understandable.  I only
have questions on clarifications and think the draft is ready with
nits for publication.

In Section 1.1, there is some confusion on my part (and I see from
another reviewer too) with the comment: "maint" is used as an
abbreviation for "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0".  Is
"abbreviation" the right word for the association of the "maint"
prefix with the namespace?

Section 3.3 and further, the values for the OPTIONAL "lang" attribute
are define in RFC 5646/ISO 639-1?  Maybe be explicit about this?

Best,

-- Benno Overeinder


From nobody Mon Oct 25 04:58:33 2021
Return-Path: <jkolker@godaddy.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1663E3A0CDD; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 04:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1RU9OinTGGqk; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 04:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12on2120.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.243.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E46B43A0DCA; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 04:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LHem5eFzJOALN7KP7iB2l/hEwM6T9Sa3HCZsdP+ocvrKZRsZIaTSVNOYCFqCeDSVKEkIflkJKs/KHrwAv6aZVDlj8NeWQ49tZTwfic2/EBihiEjahfXGWV1NCnhOEncE47UaYXIEQEhWxjgEnKYICxDX2T2XZDPul4BLE4xnox/cYfcQ9F7QfpKx2SBnXLG2VBHrTyBRkVy1bquYys9F1Ps9osLA7OBpmujtu1Yzr2h9mUMrjeekOewfKLvyYg+CnTWiFKxbyesLwcfUXSl0w4R+m1qudgGZZkQGkm/W46VNYkp1KaAIcW0PRLY6njrIXdipkaXGo/cZR97MpvQowA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=hz95xn2s43EG7C7P50rwQQGOMmZwY/2iyVco4ySJkGE=; b=Fb6SEKfDH72Cp5+5YyTM2djeNmr4aZ/MKhBhgQRdFZgY4dN+gucpw9kx1ZWqCACblvGhoD2vk8p/ZsIhFDt+N7a7GVCpwY0fpc/iKAiz1W0WqH6SvvIFZN/HDhNG8OQPWoKJBpdbNGwvi8OPyitRE0LxX4Ay3gpB+1u5NGswgkE1gvUNbXS6q8lCOVcjgLMFxzH/yCTW2r7yNyosqqpmzfBm5psOLQPVHBQg5bumpMTptPvWrMApUUjhdruFobgormypif8CQe6/Zdcy+8/mrlTrn3SaKrPPndYMdmW1F3hLB5rLt1JNgOClIMS9lyoJCxAnfmHBRg8lx7LOoHqimg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=godaddy.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=godaddy.com; dkim=pass header.d=godaddy.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-secureservernet-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hz95xn2s43EG7C7P50rwQQGOMmZwY/2iyVco4ySJkGE=; b=Pl6LPOqSh3RQhYZwaDSImDu72tr5mzu36AN9bBD4H0j/ZT/S52ZMvT3RA1APHXsrriYAUOBy7zTCRU2hspZUeYAbujx4Hi8rlcHmjesKD7lYTKgcqosyKI5rIe+UISYMlorKGnIIcHbZ7ErXeMUIkKuUSJ6P0p8ZDe79GNr1NOo=
Received: from CH2PR02MB6357.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:7::16) by CH0PR02MB7977.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:102::8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4628.16; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:58:06 +0000
Received: from CH2PR02MB6357.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3530:8950:2938:3fa1]) by CH2PR02MB6357.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3530:8950:2938:3fa1%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4628.020; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:58:06 +0000
From: Jody Kolker <jkolker@godaddy.com>
To: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: late int-dir review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance
Thread-Index: AQHXySSpH9GjJV4Xv0Sr92B0lNbTo6vjm43g
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:58:05 +0000
Message-ID: <CH2PR02MB6357BC80F72C0899CCAD9867BF839@CH2PR02MB6357.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <080828d8-fd4e-f2af-899f-fe6e3e27944c@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <080828d8-fd4e-f2af-899f-fe6e3e27944c@NLnetLabs.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
authentication-results: NLnetLabs.nl; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;NLnetLabs.nl; dmarc=none action=none header.from=godaddy.com;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 89d6d7a4-09f3-4ef8-bb7d-08d997aeb49f
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CH0PR02MB7977:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CH0PR02MB79774A3A1F1ACCA38BB6ED85BF839@CH0PR02MB7977.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;  IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CH2PR02MB6357.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE;  SFS:(4636009)(366004)(38100700002)(8936002)(71200400001)(2906002)(45080400002)(53546011)(86362001)(83380400001)(52536014)(110136005)(33656002)(9686003)(66574015)(316002)(6506007)(66556008)(66476007)(7696005)(66446008)(64756008)(38070700005)(5660300002)(76116006)(186003)(508600001)(966005)(26005)(55016002)(8676002)(122000001)(66946007)(10090945008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; 
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: =?us-ascii?Q?ws0vBpiBZYuEnOolzP1xlA5RDjBjBzbXNPlN43aMWrHSZqauMkgxKRiISquA?= =?us-ascii?Q?N70drkmQLcMRF7U61OedcJ278vr1s0uVISxb5hgz0R/7fIw0a+h59DgnQxGM?= =?us-ascii?Q?xFOxVQ9wwP/QhK6IHZQAN6hdLej826GS/nj4fFZsiii16PGKXQ8Ol4sQ4Z7o?= =?us-ascii?Q?jNwZYxuQIeSSHoy5BtRX2QoKHdZfCvCfccww72xU/d1LAzmmSN7vus9k9QAp?= =?us-ascii?Q?IihUzOcCiapbp7kRsibiRlBHPhNnHKs6P4jfgAZcjWjEg1KkXBI84ll2My5i?= =?us-ascii?Q?hwf/Wr0xszVaUEf3GRkcNzjRDSPe36k219mOe6DM03rNHc/4HtchEgGX34wx?= =?us-ascii?Q?jdEhAG/PtHj8ZdlwDen2xfgCD9W3fJSopLKJ4mLct/+h6r1FyrQYuq+Q+p6/?= =?us-ascii?Q?tPdJt5s2pnohFDKqeCZtXkzekZKeacOD/lALMBWEde6uA7yzNisHLdpC0KZO?= =?us-ascii?Q?lWlS89K0ilwI+o9Hnrqd9IEt7YG1wDDyEMlsXevlq6nWw4XsbQ+8qzBlUEHs?= =?us-ascii?Q?s4rWGaoy4ndhJbPYpngt+ZQcADrgbSgUkAlFnrfTVjzQyGhrriVAN7Csgw3H?= =?us-ascii?Q?O9YLveG5P7Dx4vZPKqvFUxmoC/8aepFUiNWEE9rj8QWIDeAWwDl99SX0d1sZ?= =?us-ascii?Q?Le/OOiM/330R49reZYAK+T5eFDllpizUqxTMNRz6qWn7WhaU95aOlTUDIbP7?= =?us-ascii?Q?BX1DA866lyHKp+9hsLkVeqK8srpa/KSukerRr/Chbqta2KTk8LLHc9jm9EF8?= =?us-ascii?Q?LaK/4AtQDSD5EdRmZikr9CjOdrqHPj2b/cH1tG+ZViRSvuwVnHhiDzoXc5/5?= =?us-ascii?Q?fogqA002OiUW33vvyMJ994DMBG9Zsl4NwzEfSiI/oq8dDIYTmwYXR544d/ID?= =?us-ascii?Q?nUkWZNZRxxr2h5vnh1VbENE9a+4Uv2BoBR6TVOYjzIVz8OY6+TPxQIZf64SH?= =?us-ascii?Q?SERJGeVa98KkkXvjVE6HdHxc6+o1llijdOFOW2+/E46Jm2Sq8CSbZoCTJM+w?= =?us-ascii?Q?ctnybz4eUE3t0Lvn1s2XGc/jaVpyhJRPpAknHQmNtVemlEDaJQxu847D+rTN?= =?us-ascii?Q?STHItDb3cZrCh8XiX6DCxJDRdk5lt+nn74BJgAWnCcFQQqIzRqb1w5m+oYOq?= =?us-ascii?Q?OG0NDPu5Epp1MoIzzj4Xo+bDecacSSQUOwOe7nh9MXE6rDrVTZGHSc/oJ9F1?= =?us-ascii?Q?ULdeJ5gz4ihaUtUqS4fM/vtS2wf3lZkGnIrCKlUuK3+aXytO9TcUXp+t/eUB?= =?us-ascii?Q?iIwt3QTZ2RRiKT+AlUwn/EZbyd4tPkp14AUYC0njJ939E99//9fxalcYQn30?= =?us-ascii?Q?RPOz7nzIgvlwq4m3y8LHPXc2lctJZqa7gjOV1sxOzmEUpqrUE+had8gLOv5e?= =?us-ascii?Q?od5hiLDmWuc6LLZILGa2wOT3xJ0IvbH/nYTMkD1XXtSNgacMO4KRelWfvFGy?= =?us-ascii?Q?Gknw14o6ZbPPSK1B9lztItelNHF5rXWiykPtpV8ITmm6PbiJuNdpmSzFGxwB?= =?us-ascii?Q?9m/nciy4cY+ThTqFiABudiEs7156t9DpFBF9c18Yu1TTdeF9/kNVjTRq5U1A?= =?us-ascii?Q?KruM0DclBSPdUbRYLH4Zv6xw5n9YirVEseYifIzzoDB9SYqq8aOxmGyluhQT?= =?us-ascii?Q?Yw=3D=3D?=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: godaddy.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CH2PR02MB6357.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 89d6d7a4-09f3-4ef8-bb7d-08d997aeb49f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Oct 2021 11:58:05.9566 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d5f1622b-14a3-45a6-b069-003f8dc4851f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 0cnyKhFJYjMvv2ao3fURSJVSKoyAH6E0atYJjJkckbHRxOMOizNs4c5sSkB8IrgTg4pMOTVXTd3g8hAhOFm/rQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CH0PR02MB7977
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/59udUulsf96vgI4PNFURSfKcgio>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] late int-dir review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:58:29 -0000

Hi Beeno,

Thanks for your review of the draft.  We will remove the abbreviation from =
section 1.1 and replace the paragraph with:

Original:
   "maint" is used as an abbreviation for "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:
   maintenance-1.0". The XML namespace prefix "maint" is used, but
   implementations MUST NOT depend on it. Instead, they are to employ a
   proper namespace-aware XML parser and serializer to interpret and
   output the XML documents.

New:
The XML namespace prefix "maint" is used for the namespace
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0", but implementations
 MUST NOT depend on it and instead employ a proper namespace-aware XML
 parser and serializer to interpret and output the XML documents.


We will also address the reference of 5646 in the maint:id paragraph:

Original:
<maint:id>
      The server unique identifier for the maintenance event with the
      OPTIONAL "name" attribute that includes a human-readable name of
      the event. The server unique identifier SHALL NOT be changed if
      the event is updated or deleted. When the "name" attribute is set,
      the OPTIONAL "lang" attribute MAY be present to identify the
      language if the negotiated value is something other than the
      default value of "en" (English).

New:
<maint:id>
      The server unique identifier for the maintenance event with the
      OPTIONAL "name" attribute that includes a human-readable name of
      the event. The server unique identifier SHALL NOT be changed if
      the event is updated or deleted. When the "name" attribute is set,
      the OPTIONAL "lang" attribute, per the language
      structure in [RFC5646], MAY be present to identify the
      language if the negotiated value is something other than the
      default value of "en" (English).

We will also add the Normative Reference:

   [RFC5646]  Phillips, A., Ed. and M. Davis, Ed., "Tags for Identifying
              Languages", BCP 47, RFC 5646, DOI 10.17487/RFC5646,
              September 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5646>.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Jody Kolker.


-----Original Message-----
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>=20
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 5:15 PM
To: int-dir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance@ietf.org
Subject: late int-dir review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance

[Some people who received this message don't often get email from benno@nln=
etlabs.nl. Learn why this is important at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIde=
ntification.]

Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links o=
r open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is =
safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@.



Intdir Review draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-19

Note: The review is sent directly to the int-dir mailing list and the autho=
rs.  Due to the late submission of the review, it was not possible to submi=
t it via datatracker.

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-regext-epp-registr=
y-maintenance-19.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of=
 the Internet Area Directors.
Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they=
 would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them alo=
ng with any other Last Call comments that have been received.
For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://nam10.safelinks.protec=
tion.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fgroup%2Fintdir=
%2Fabout%2F&amp;data=3D04%7C01%7Cjkolker%40godaddy.com%7C678435050217456e78=
dd08d9973bc255%7Cd5f1622b14a345a6b069003f8dc4851f%7C0%7C0%7C637707105338035=
288%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1=
haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=3DfmzvJGLzr8VpaMypy%2B3vOCc8ogZ1gQI1vC=
cw8ZwVvYw%3D&amp;reserved=3D0.

Overall, I find the document well written and understandable.  I only have =
questions on clarifications and think the draft is ready with nits for publ=
ication.

In Section 1.1, there is some confusion on my part (and I see from another =
reviewer too) with the comment: "maint" is used as an abbreviation for "urn=
:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0".  Is "abbreviation" the right word=
 for the association of the "maint"
prefix with the namespace?

Section 3.3 and further, the values for the OPTIONAL "lang" attribute are d=
efine in RFC 5646/ISO 639-1?  Maybe be explicit about this?

Best,

-- Benno Overeinder


From nobody Mon Oct 25 05:09:57 2021
Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C50C3A0877; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kOogStD5CwWV; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [116.202.126.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3D103A0856; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F324E3; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:09:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.142]) by soverin.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1635163780; bh=oyKjTWbtdUAOHqsbpwDMjIRQV9kW2vgGnXo5fDdbsyY=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=XhqjF4OiXc64nfKiM32neY/ahHKLCm0a8SgIc17HgvRi1xlCFeVOflHpMbL8+QnJm 5mkUUmGdD0PVBxGLHn/3EedQ243aLegvo1bMlXlRlZMKUQevTMSuiMUxIJ7UvmCrZz bD3oEgXJwGNnb0eT1ceO0Yt8luUdW4gQBx5a1fWwnBjOThE1mVU/rlwAQ08fJEX9Zu Hpn8UozWzLwNWmvIRylBhysQgKb8g5gtQjjty1bMZTAGNRsvOX+c470rVhgt/N/iXL MaPkut3eihnBQi/87FELE7mKxqqJSelVSbKqpEiajtXKbY0f0ueX929TzQkKokXpgm wBfyF7MDES9kg==
Message-ID: <ddd7a7a8-cc6d-d387-284b-7f32e3b9bd91@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:09:38 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Jody Kolker <jkolker@godaddy.com>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>,  "draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance@ietf.org>
References: <080828d8-fd4e-f2af-899f-fe6e3e27944c@NLnetLabs.nl> <CH2PR02MB6357BC80F72C0899CCAD9867BF839@CH2PR02MB6357.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <CH2PR02MB6357BC80F72C0899CCAD9867BF839@CH2PR02MB6357.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/32yt11C8jajsHdP2vjNSkBI1IhQ>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] late int-dir review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:09:55 -0000

Hi Jody,

Thanks for your reply.  Your changes cover all my feedback.

Best regards,

-- Benno


On 25/10/2021 13:58, Jody Kolker wrote:
> Hi Beeno,
> 
> Thanks for your review of the draft.  We will remove the abbreviation from section 1.1 and replace the paragraph with:
> 
> Original:
>     "maint" is used as an abbreviation for "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:
>     maintenance-1.0". The XML namespace prefix "maint" is used, but
>     implementations MUST NOT depend on it. Instead, they are to employ a
>     proper namespace-aware XML parser and serializer to interpret and
>     output the XML documents.
> 
> New:
> The XML namespace prefix "maint" is used for the namespace
> "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0", but implementations
>   MUST NOT depend on it and instead employ a proper namespace-aware XML
>   parser and serializer to interpret and output the XML documents.
> 
> 
> We will also address the reference of 5646 in the maint:id paragraph:
> 
> Original:
> <maint:id>
>        The server unique identifier for the maintenance event with the
>        OPTIONAL "name" attribute that includes a human-readable name of
>        the event. The server unique identifier SHALL NOT be changed if
>        the event is updated or deleted. When the "name" attribute is set,
>        the OPTIONAL "lang" attribute MAY be present to identify the
>        language if the negotiated value is something other than the
>        default value of "en" (English).
> 
> New:
> <maint:id>
>        The server unique identifier for the maintenance event with the
>        OPTIONAL "name" attribute that includes a human-readable name of
>        the event. The server unique identifier SHALL NOT be changed if
>        the event is updated or deleted. When the "name" attribute is set,
>        the OPTIONAL "lang" attribute, per the language
>        structure in [RFC5646], MAY be present to identify the
>        language if the negotiated value is something other than the
>        default value of "en" (English).
> 
> We will also add the Normative Reference:
> 
>     [RFC5646]  Phillips, A., Ed. and M. Davis, Ed., "Tags for Identifying
>                Languages", BCP 47, RFC 5646, DOI 10.17487/RFC5646,
>                September 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5646>.
> 
> Please let us know if you have any questions.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jody Kolker.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 5:15 PM
> To: int-dir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance@ietf.org
> Subject: late int-dir review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance
> 
> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from benno@nlnetlabs.nl. Learn why this is important at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.]
> 
> Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@.
> 
> 
> 
> Intdir Review draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-19
> 
> Note: The review is sent directly to the int-dir mailing list and the authors.  Due to the late submission of the review, it was not possible to submit it via datatracker.
> 
> I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-19.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors.
> Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received.
> For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fgroup%2Fintdir%2Fabout%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjkolker%40godaddy.com%7C678435050217456e78dd08d9973bc255%7Cd5f1622b14a345a6b069003f8dc4851f%7C0%7C0%7C637707105338035288%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=fmzvJGLzr8VpaMypy%2B3vOCc8ogZ1gQI1vCcw8ZwVvYw%3D&amp;reserved=0.
> 
> Overall, I find the document well written and understandable.  I only have questions on clarifications and think the draft is ready with nits for publication.
> 
> In Section 1.1, there is some confusion on my part (and I see from another reviewer too) with the comment: "maint" is used as an abbreviation for "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0".  Is "abbreviation" the right word for the association of the "maint"
> prefix with the namespace?
> 
> Section 3.3 and further, the values for the OPTIONAL "lang" attribute are define in RFC 5646/ISO 639-1?  Maybe be explicit about this?
> 
> Best,
> 
> -- Benno Overeinder
> 

-- 
Benno J. Overeinder
NLnet Labs
https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/


From nobody Mon Oct 25 14:45:20 2021
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5196B3A0FAE for <int-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <int-dir@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.39.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bevolz@gmail.com, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, Carlos Bernardos <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Message-ID: <163519830922.9261.18398054210199996912@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:45:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/rrsaZNIXp483Yo3S04OqUassqR4>
Subject: [Int-dir] Open review assignments in intdir
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 21:45:16 -0000

Hi all,

The following reviewers have assignments:

For telechat 2021-10-28

Reviewer               LC end     Draft
Ron Bonica             2021-09-03 draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13 
Suresh Krishnan        2021-09-07 draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-14 

Last calls:

Reviewer               LC end     Draft
Ron Bonica             2021-09-03 draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13 
Suresh Krishnan        2021-09-07 draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-14 
Charles Perkins        2021-09-07 draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11 

Next in the reviewer rotation:

  Zhen Cao
  Tim Chown
  Jean-Michel Combes
  Donald Eastlake
  Brian Haberman
  Wassim Haddad
  Bob Halley
  Bob Hinden
  Sheng Jiang
  Tatuya Jinmei

As a helpful reference for reviewers, please check the Directorates Guidelines available at:
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/iesg/wiki/DirectoratesGuidelines

Reviews must include the following boilerplate text in the comments sent:

"I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>."
For INT Area documents, reviewers must provide a recommendation if the document is ready to go to Last Call and therefore be forwarded to the IESG.

For non-INT Area document, the reviewer must give a recommendation as to how the INT ADs are to complete the ballot on the document and the reason for that recommendation. See https://www.ietf.org/iesg/voting-procedures.html.

Comments provided MUST be in the order of significance (i.e., those issues that are serious and must be fixed (i.e., DISCUSS level issues) MUST be first).

While comments on minor issues (typos, etc.) are welcome, they should be last.

A template review response might be:

-8-<- BEGIN TEMPLATE -8-<-
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

[INT Area documents] Based on my review, the document [IS, IS NOT] ready to go to IETF Last Call and therefore [CAN, CANNOT] be forwarded to the IESG

[Non-INT Area documents] Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as [YES, NO OBJECTION, DISCUSS, RETURN TO WG (ABSTAIN)].

<If DISCUSS or ABSTAIN> I have the following DISCUSS/ABSTAIN level issues:

The following are other issues I found with this document that SHOULD be corrected before publication:

The following are minor issues (typos, misspelling, minor text improvements) with the document:

-8-<- END TEMPLATE -8-<-


From nobody Tue Oct 26 07:31:58 2021
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49203A120B; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ron Bonica via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <int-dir@ietf.org>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.39.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <163525871173.1030.16161392292757402668@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:31:51 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/Aa6jbKquM9LTRHUzDtiERoygTnU>
Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:31:52 -0000

Reviewer: Ron Bonica
Review result: Ready

Looks well thought out. No glaring problems.


