Subject: Re: [ippm] REG:draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-01.txt

From: Sudhin Jacob <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:01:27 +0000

Hi Vinayak,

Let me thank you for the comments. It is much appreciated. Kindly see my answers inline.

Regards,
Sudhin

-----Original Message-----
From: Vinayak Hegde [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:21 AM
To: Sudhin Jacob <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: REG:draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-01.txt

Hi Sudhin,

Comments follow:

1. There seems to problem with the formatting of Table of Contents in the text version. (looking at https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-01.txt). also it seems that tehere were some diagrams but they are missing. Not sure bt the formatting looks a little off.

Sudhin>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will be taken care in next version of the draft.

2. Overall the draft looks good but you should add a small glooary / terminology section that metnions what you mean exactly by "Core network" or "Backbone traffic". While the definitions are commonly understood, when you have a specification you should explicitly define terms or refer to a draft that does. This helps when someone who is not familiar with the draft / area can read and understand easily.

Sudhin>>>>>>>>>>>>We will add those terms in Terminology section. 

Also when you post on the list make sure you add a link to the draft.
Thats is a fast way to get people to read (a click away).

Sudhin>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sure 

Regards
Vinayak

Regards
Vinayak