Subject: Re: iSCSI: More draft-06 comments

From: [email-masked]
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 09:37:58 +0300

This has been done.

Julo

Steve Senum <[email-masked]> on 07-06-2001 01:58:27

Please respond to Steve Senum <[email-masked]>

To:   [email-masked]
cc:
Subject:  Re: iSCSI: More draft-06 comments

Matt Wakeley wrote:
>
> [email-masked] wrote:
>
> > ++++ although this text has no ambiguity there is still a raging debate
> > between the proponents of an always explicit response (Matt and - in
some
> > covoluted form Steph - and those like Steve Senum who whould like a
hiatus
> > signaling a default.  The current text let you set none by default.
This
> > can be changed by removing the "  and MAY be selected by omission... "
+++
>
> I would like the "and MAY be selected by omission..." removed.

If the "NotUnderstood" response exists, I would also like to see
the option of not sending a response of key:none removed.

Steve Senum