Return-Path: X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) id gB2K74c09847 for ips-outgoing; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:07:04 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: ece.cmu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu using -f Received: from hotmail.com (f166.pav2.hotmail.com [64.4.37.166]) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id gB2K6xH09838 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:07:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:06:54 -0800 Received: from 208.54.20.242 by pv2fd.pav2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 20:06:53 GMT X-Originating-IP: [208.54.20.242] From: "Bernard Aboba" To: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: iSCSI security status Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 12:06:53 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2002 20:06:54.0227 (UTC) FILETIME=[5C04E630:01C29A3E] Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu Precedence: bulk We have received comments from the IESG on the IPS security draft, including some NITs. I've attempted to address these comments with an -18 strawman available at: http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/IPS/draft-ietf-ips-security-18.txt If people could look this over, that would be helpful. In particular, I'd like to make sure that this version is not somehow out of sync with the changes introduced in iscsi-19 (including section number changes). There is one issue that is not addressed in the strawman, which is a request for another Appendix summarizing the IPsec profiles for the protocols. Do people think this would be helpful? _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail