Return-Path: <owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu>
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Return-Path: <owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) id h06ITDw08792
	for ips-outgoing; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:29:13 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: ece.cmu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu using -f
Received: from d12lmsgate-3.de.ibm.com (d12lmsgate-3.de.ibm.com [194.196.100.236])
	by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h06ITBW08782;
	Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:29:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from d12relay02.de.ibm.com (d12relay02.de.ibm.com [9.165.215.23])
	by d12lmsgate-3.de.ibm.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h06IT4MP010260;
	Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:29:04 +0100
Received: from d10ml001.telaviv.ibm.com (d10ml001.telaviv.ibm.com [9.148.216.55])
	by d12relay02.de.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.4) with ESMTP id h06IT4qb209532;
	Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:29:04 +0100
In-Reply-To: <003a01c2b585$d3355200$6403a8c0@ivvt2dxrc11>
To: <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>
Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu, owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: iSCSI: Implicit Termination of Tasks
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0 September 26, 2002
From: "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <OF1C96951B.8274B342-ONC2256CA6.006459DC-C2256CA6.00658915@telaviv.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:29:01 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D10ML001/10/M/IBM(Release 5.0.9a |January 7, 2002) at
 06/01/2003 20:29:03,
	Serialize complete at 06/01/2003 20:29:03
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00648D79C2256CA6_="
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Precedence: bulk

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 00648D79C2256CA6_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

there are no ordering issues in case d. The termination is "brutal" - the 
whole session disappear. In the other cases
some ordering side effects must be considered.

Julo



"Eddy Quicksall" <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com> 
Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
06/01/03 15:16
Please respond to
<Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>


To
<ips@ece.cmu.edu>
cc

Subject
iSCSI: Implicit Termination of Tasks






There are two sections titled Implicit Termination of Tasks but they are 
slightly different. Which is correct?
 
Section 6.5 lists 4 items but section 10.14.5 only lists two.
 
If 6.5 is correct, why is item D not included in the unit attention? SAM-3 
says:
 
5.7.2 When a SCSI initiator port aborts its own tasks
When a SCSI initiator port causes its own task(s) to be aborted, no 
notification that the task(s) have been aborted
shall be returned to the SCSI initiator port other than the completion 
response for the command or task
management function action that caused the task(s) to be aborted and 
notification(s) associated with related
effects of the action (e.g., a reset unit attention condition).
 
Eddy

--=_alternative 00648D79C2256CA6_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">there are no ordering issues in case
d. The termination is &quot;brutal&quot; - the whole session disappear.
In the other cases</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">some ordering side effects must be considered.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Julo</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>&quot;Eddy Quicksall&quot;
&lt;Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com&gt;</b> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">06/01/03 15:16</font>
<table border>
<tr valign=top>
<td bgcolor=white>
<div align=center><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to<br>
&lt;Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com&gt;</font></div></table>
<br>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td valign=top><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&lt;ips@ece.cmu.edu&gt;</font>
<tr>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td valign=top>
<tr>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td valign=top><font size=1 face="sans-serif">iSCSI: Implicit Termination
of Tasks</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">There are two sections titled Implicit Termination
of Tasks but they are slightly different. Which is correct?</font>
<br><font size=3>&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">Section 6.5 lists 4 items but section 10.14.5
only lists two.</font>
<br><font size=3>&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">If 6.5 is correct, why is item D not included
in the unit attention? SAM-3 says:</font>
<br><font size=3>&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial"><b>5.7.2 When a SCSI initiator port aborts
its own tasks</b></font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">When a SCSI initiator port causes its own
task(s) to be aborted, no notification that the task(s) have been aborted</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">shall be returned to the SCSI initiator port
other than the completion response for the command or task</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">management function action that caused the
task(s) to be aborted and notification(s) associated with related</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">effects of the action (e.g., a reset unit
attention condition).</font>
<br><font size=3>&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">Eddy</font>
<br>
--=_alternative 00648D79C2256CA6_=--