Return-Path: <owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu>
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Return-Path: <owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) id h1LHnBb10175
	for ips-outgoing; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:49:11 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: ece.cmu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu using -f
Received: from d12lmsgate-2.de.ibm.com (d12lmsgate-2.de.ibm.com [194.196.100.235])
	by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h1LHn2W10156;
	Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:49:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from d12relay02.de.ibm.com (d12relay02.de.ibm.com [9.165.215.23])
	by d12lmsgate-2.de.ibm.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h1LHmpWT053674;
	Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:48:52 +0100
Received: from d10ml001.telaviv.ibm.com (d10ml001.telaviv.ibm.com [9.148.216.55])
	by d12relay02.de.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.5) with ESMTP id h1LHmpcP195044;
	Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:48:51 +0100
In-Reply-To: <B80BB115B1994D4BABC1B81FFFA1CAC71A858A@rtpexc01.hq.netapp.com>
To: "Sankar, Ranga" <Ranga.Sankar@netapp.com>
Cc: "Wysochanski, David" <David.Wysochanski@netapp.com>, ips@ece.cmu.edu,
   owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: iSCSI: version number
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.1 February 07, 2003
From: "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <OF7A686645.5A62EBCA-ONC2256CD4.005D6B72-C2256CD4.0061DA6B@telaviv.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:48:48 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D10ML001/10/M/IBM(Release 5.0.9a |January 7, 2002) at
 21/02/2003 19:48:51,
	Serialize complete at 21/02/2003 19:48:51
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005D9B93C2256CD4_="
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Precedence: bulk

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 005D9B93C2256CD4_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

There is no strong reason - it is only that all the people that have asked 
for this vocally in the past are now silent.
And if they keep being silent then it will stay at 0.

Julo



"Sankar, Ranga" <Ranga.Sankar@netapp.com> 
Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
21/02/03 00:22

To
<ips@ece.cmu.edu>
cc
Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, "Wysochanski, David" 
<David.Wysochanski@netapp.com>
Subject
Re: iSCSI: version number






  
Could we leave the version number as 0? Is there a strong reason to make 
this 1? 
-ranga 
"Robert D. Russell" <rdr@io.iol.unh.edu> 
20/02/03 16:59 
 To Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL 
cc ips@ece.cmu.edu 
Subject iSCSI: version number 
 
  


Julian: 
Now that draft 20 has been accepted as an IETF standard, 
shouldn't the version number in section 10.12.4 be changed 
to 0x01? 
Thanks 
Bob Russell 
InterOperability Lab 
University of New Hampshire 
rdr@iol.unh.edu 
603-862-3774 

--=_alternative 005D9B93C2256CD4_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">There is no strong reason - it is only
that all the people that have asked for this vocally in the past are now
silent.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">And if they keep being silent then it
will stay at 0.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Julo</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>&quot;Sankar, Ranga&quot;
&lt;Ranga.Sankar@netapp.com&gt;</b> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">21/02/03 00:22</font>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td valign=top><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&lt;ips@ece.cmu.edu&gt;</font>
<tr>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td valign=top><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL,
&quot;Wysochanski, David&quot; &lt;David.Wysochanski@netapp.com&gt;</font>
<tr>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td valign=top><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: iSCSI: version number</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">&nbsp;</font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=2 face="Arial">Could we leave the version number as 0? Is
there a strong reason to make this 1?</font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=2 face="Arial">-ranga</font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=2 face="Arial">&quot;Robert D. Russell&quot; &lt;rdr@io.iol.unh.edu&gt;
<br>
20/02/03 16:59 <br>
 To Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL &nbsp;<br>
cc ips@ece.cmu.edu &nbsp;<br>
Subject iSCSI: version number </font>
<p><font size=2 face="Arial">&nbsp; </font>
<p><font size=2 face="Arial">&nbsp;</font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=3><br>
</font>
<p><font size=2 face="Arial">Julian:</font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=2 face="Arial">Now that draft 20 has been accepted as an
IETF standard,</font><font size=3> </font><font size=2 face="Arial"><br>
shouldn't the version number in section 10.12.4 be changed</font><font size=3>
</font><font size=2 face="Arial"><br>
to 0x01?</font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=2 face="Arial">Thanks</font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=2 face="Arial">Bob Russell</font><font size=3> </font><font size=2 face="Arial"><br>
InterOperability Lab</font><font size=3> </font><font size=2 face="Arial"><br>
University of New Hampshire</font><font size=3> </font><font size=2 face="Arial"><br>
rdr@iol.unh.edu</font><font size=3> </font><font size=2 face="Arial"><br>
603-862-3774</font><font size=3> </font>
<p>
--=_alternative 005D9B93C2256CD4_=--