Return-Path: <owner-ips-outgoing@ece.cmu.edu>
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Return-Path: <owner-ips-outgoing@ece.cmu.edu>
Received: from hazard.ece.cmu.edu (HAZARD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.24])
	by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h46JUm304289
	for <ipsml@ece.cmu.edu>; Tue, 6 May 2003 15:30:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953)
	id 7E13462; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27])
	by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E888963; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix)
	id 4A20A8960; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hazard.ece.cmu.edu (HAZARD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.24])
	by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3979088FE
	for <ips-outgoing@sos.ece.cmu.edu>; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix)
	id EE90073; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953)
	id D142563; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27])
	by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732A273
	for <ips-outgoing@ece.cmu.edu>; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 363)
	id 447C48963; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:23 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: ips@sos.ece.cmu.edu
Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu (BACHE.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.23])
	by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D5588FE
	for <ips@sos.ece.cmu.edu>; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix)
	id 005FE68; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:21 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Received: by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953)
	id D504972; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lion.ninthwonder.com (lion.ninthwonder.com [151.199.66.147])
	by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D35768
	for <ips@ece.cmu.edu>; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by lion.ninthwonder.com (Postfix, from userid 1021)
	id D853F30706; Tue,  6 May 2003 15:30:07 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 19:29:51 +0000 (UTC)
From: wrstuden@wasabisystems.com
X-X-Sender: wrstuden@neverwinter.home-net.icnt.net
To: Eddy Quicksall <eddy_quicksall@ivivity.com>
Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: RE: iSCSI: clearing SCSI objects
In-Reply-To: <AEC4671C8179D61194DE0002B328BDD26A7D35@ATLOPS>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.53.0305060052210.502@neverwinter.home-net.icnt.net>
References: <AEC4671C8179D61194DE0002B328BDD26A7D35@ATLOPS>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-37.2 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,NO_REAL_NAME,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	      USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)

On Mon, 5 May 2003, Eddy Quicksall wrote:

> If you have persistent reserves, you will lose them.
>
> Keeping them around in the absence of persistent reserves is for full
> compliance and it is easy to do.

You're talking too crypticly. Please use full paragraphs and use fewer
pronouns. Also, how do persistent reserves fit into this? I'm talking just
about UAs (to handle something that can more effectively be handled in the
initiator)..

Take care,

Bill
