Return-Path: <owner-ips-outgoing@ece.cmu.edu>
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Return-Path: <owner-ips-outgoing@ece.cmu.edu>
Received: from osgood.ece.cmu.edu (OSGOOD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.25])
	by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h46McJ317529
	for <ipsml@ece.cmu.edu>; Tue, 6 May 2003 18:38:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953)
	id 2076D82; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:38:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27])
	by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 619616B; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:38:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix)
	id 94DD58969; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:38:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hazard.ece.cmu.edu (HAZARD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.24])
	by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898078963
	for <ips-outgoing@sos.ece.cmu.edu>; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:38:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix)
	id 733F573; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:38:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953)
	id 5DBEF79; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:38:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27])
	by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337D575
	for <ips-outgoing@ece.cmu.edu>; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:37:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 363)
	id 2382B896A; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:37:57 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: ips@sos.ece.cmu.edu
Received: from osgood.ece.cmu.edu (OSGOOD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.25])
	by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8722F8963
	for <ips@sos.ece.cmu.edu>; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:37:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix)
	id 70AD46B; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:37:55 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953)
	id 519456F; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:37:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lion.ninthwonder.com (lion.ninthwonder.com [151.199.66.147])
	by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCDC6B
	for <ips@ece.cmu.edu>; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:37:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by lion.ninthwonder.com (Postfix, from userid 1021)
	id 322CC30706; Tue,  6 May 2003 18:37:54 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 22:37:37 +0000 (UTC)
From: wrstuden@wasabisystems.com
X-X-Sender: wrstuden@neverwinter.home-net.icnt.net
To: Eddy Quicksall <eddy_quicksall@ivivity.com>
Cc: "David Black (Black_David@emc.com)" <Black_David@emc.com>, ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: RE: iSCSI: clearing SCSI objects
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.53.0305052223520.502@neverwinter.home-net.icnt.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.53.0305062236340.753@neverwinter.home-net.icnt.net>
References: <AEC4671C8179D61194DE0002B328BDD26A7C68@ATLOPS>
 <Pine.NEB.4.53.0305052223520.502@neverwinter.home-net.icnt.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-37.2 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,NO_REAL_NAME,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	      USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)

On Mon, 5 May 2003 wrstuden@wasabisystems.com wrote:

> On Sun, 4 May 2003, Eddy Quicksall wrote:
>
> > David,
> >
> > I'm wondering what other targets are doing about this. Was it thought about
> > during the design phase?
>
> Our (Wasabi's) target isn't going to do this, unless there is a strong
> indication that it's needed/required for certification. I see no real
> reason to do this as it's not conveying any value.

Let me clarify. If we are keeping state about a nexus, we'll of course
report the nexus loss. We just aren't going to keep state about all nexi,
only those that have persistent registrations.

Take care,

Bill