Return-Path: X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0 Return-Path: Received: from hazard.ece.cmu.edu (HAZARD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.24]) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h4EHFI312470 for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:15:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 8F28A83; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:15:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27]) by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8167A; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:15:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id 8C535894A; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:14:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hazard.ece.cmu.edu (HAZARD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.24]) by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73ABA8944 for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:14:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id 54C3773; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:14:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 39A837A; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:14:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27]) by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BA473 for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:14:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 363) id 9E881894F; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:14:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ips@sos.ece.cmu.edu Received: from hazard.ece.cmu.edu (HAZARD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.24]) by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1CF8944 for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:14:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id 2826673; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:14:51 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: ips@ece.cmu.edu Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 0D41F7A; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:14:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail3.microsoft.com (mail3.microsoft.com [131.107.3.123]) by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D77273 for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 13:14:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from INET-VRS-03.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.5.27]) by mail3.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6624); Wed, 14 May 2003 10:14:51 -0700 Received: from 157.54.6.150 by INET-VRS-03.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 14 May 2003 10:14:51 -0700 Received: from RED-IMC-04.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.2.168]) by inet-hub-05.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 14 May 2003 10:14:50 -0700 Received: from win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.0.84]) by RED-IMC-04.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 14 May 2003 10:14:50 -0700 Received: from WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.12.81]) by win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3788.0); Wed, 14 May 2003 10:14:50 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6851.8 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [iSCSI] CmdSN for Text Command Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 10:14:48 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [iSCSI] CmdSN for Text Command thread-index: AcMUIlKRDs66+Jc8TwqXvL+ks4LjqQGGOBCA From: "Lakshmi Ramasubramanian" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 May 2003 17:14:50.0382 (UTC) FILETIME=[53DC6AE0:01C31A3C] Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01 version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) Section 10.10.4 Target Transfer Tag (Text Request) says that if F bit is set to 0 in Text Response, initiator must send an empty text command so that the target can send the next text response. Should the initiator use the original CmdSN when it sends the empty text command or should it use the next CmdSN (Assuming Immediate Bit is NOT set in any of the Text Command PDUs)? Thanks! -lakshmi