Return-Path: X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0 Return-Path: Received: from osgood.ece.cmu.edu (OSGOOD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.25]) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h4EIRH318951 for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:27:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 191A380; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:27:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27]) by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827426E; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:27:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id 7EF268950; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:27:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from osgood.ece.cmu.edu (OSGOOD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.25]) by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AE3894F for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:27:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id 573886E; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:27:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 2C60380; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:27:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27]) by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16346E for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:27:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 363) id 7A4E48952; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:27:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ips@sos.ece.cmu.edu Received: from osgood.ece.cmu.edu (OSGOOD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.25]) by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D861A894F for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:26:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id 72F177A; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:26:58 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: ips@ece.cmu.edu Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 43DF96E; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:26:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.ivivity.com (unknown [64.238.111.99]) by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601B77A for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:26:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ATLOPS with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <2CY0S6LD>; Wed, 14 May 2003 14:26:57 -0400 Message-ID: From: Eddy Quicksall To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian , ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: RE: [iSCSI] CmdSN for Text Command Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 13:25:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,ORIGINAL_MESSAGE version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) I don't think the empty text command is to be treated like a new command. I think they are talking about what paragraph 10.10.3 is calling "a sequence of text requests and responses". Eddy -----Original Message----- From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian [mailto:nramas@windows.microsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 1:15 PM To: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: [iSCSI] CmdSN for Text Command Section 10.10.4 Target Transfer Tag (Text Request) says that if F bit is set to 0 in Text Response, initiator must send an empty text command so that the target can send the next text response. Should the initiator use the original CmdSN when it sends the empty text command or should it use the next CmdSN (Assuming Immediate Bit is NOT set in any of the Text Command PDUs)? Thanks! -lakshmi