Subject: Re: [Ips] target/initiator device

From: "Eddy Quicksall" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 14:15:33 -0400

Thanks, my error. I re-read it and it does not require the target and initiator ports to have identical names.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Julian Satran 
  To: Eddy Quicksall 
  Cc: [email-masked] 
  Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 3:26 AM
  Subject: Re: [Ips] target/initiator device

  Eddy, 

  Bassically iSCSI is using SAM2 as reference. However the name types for iSCSI initiator and target are not different. 
  And since SAM3 has separate initiator port and target port in a combined device the same iSCSI name CAN be used for naming both ports using the iSCSI naming conventions for ports. 

  Julo 

        "Eddy Quicksall" <[email-masked]> 
        Sent by: [email-masked] 
        01/07/2005 21:43 
       To <[email-masked]>  
              cc  
              Subject [Ips] target/initiator device 

  How does iSCSI work as a target/initiator device? i.e., iSCSI has different types of names for the initiator and target names but paragraph 4.7.3 in SAM 3 appears to need a common name between the two. 
    
  Eddy_______________________________________________
  Ips mailing list
  [email-masked]
  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips