From isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org Wed Oct 18 07:47:38 2006
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ga9sd-0001M3-Pm; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:46:39 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GXOcq-0002Ue-UC; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:56 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GXOcp-00061R-Kt; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:56 -0400
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159])
	by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2006 16:54:56 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,291,1157342400"; 
	d="scan'208"; a="106444498:sNHT55489544"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13])
	by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	k9AKstH2028978; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:55 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com
	[64.102.31.102])
	by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k9AKstDM015060; 
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by
	xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:54 -0400
Received: from [10.82.224.123] ([10.82.224.123]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:54 -0400
Message-ID: <452C089D.5090204@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:53 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Ward <dward@cisco.com>
References: <C12AE018.896F0%dward@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C12AE018.896F0%dward@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2006 20:54:54.0609 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[567C5010:01C6ECAE]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=2059; t=1160513695; x=1161377695;
	c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001;
	h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
	d=cisco.com; i=acee@cisco.com; z=From:Acee=20Lindem=20<acee@cisco.com>
	|Subject:Re=3A=20[Fwd=3A=20[mpls]=20WG=20Last=20Call=20on=20draft-ietf-mpls-numbe
	r-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt] |To:David=20Ward=20<dward@cisco.com>;
	X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dv8FxVGcUsEpRLhXR761boAs862s=3D;
	b=QJ1sviq7MVNhCYU5bxpKj4tv/KlTZ8+YKRghSOBTQQYUykKBZd1IN2tmWlha/nsWBCy+RbS7
	R5llvhUS3aVwWXTPh4E9ua5xJt684co3y0JncErBWCR+FYp5Nuokecqc;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com; header.From=acee@cisco.com;
	dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; ); 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 41c17b4b16d1eedaa8395c26e9a251c4
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:46:38 -0400
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, isis-wg@ietf.org,
	Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>, ospf@ietf.org,
	Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
Subject: [Isis-wg] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on
	draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org

I've reviewed the subject document and don't have any comments on it
from the perspective of the OSPF WG. However, I have the following
comments as a member of the routing directorate (copying JP):

   1. Why the cryptic sub-TLV name? RFC 3630 doesn't define short
       cryptic names for sub-TLVs so I don't really see why you've defined
       NB-0-BW-LSP? Why not just call it the Unconstrained LSP Count 
sub-TLV?
       Or at least come up with a better short name :^),  e.g. 
BW-0-LSP-CNT.
   2. How did you arrive at 19 for the suggFrom isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org Wed Oct 18 07:47:38 2006
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ga9sd-0001M3-Pm; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:46:39 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GXOcq-0002Ue-UC; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:56 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GXOcp-00061R-Kt; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:56 -0400
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159])
	by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2006 16:54:56 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,291,1157342400"; 
	d="scan'208"; a="106444498:sNHT55489544"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13])
	by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	k9AKstH2028978; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:55 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com
	[64.102.31.102])
	by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k9AKstDM015060; 
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by
	xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:54 -0400
Received: from [10.82.224.123] ([10.82.224.123]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:54 -0400
Message-ID: <452C089D.5090204@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:53 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Ward <dward@cisco.com>
References: <C12AE018.896F0%dward@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C12AE018.896F0%dward@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2006 20:54:54.0609 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[567C5010:01C6ECAE]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=2059; t=1160513695; x=1161377695;
	c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001;
	h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
	d=cisco.com; i=acee@cisco.com; z=From:Acee=20Lindem=20<acee@cisco.com>
	|Subject:Re=3A=20[Fwd=3A=20[mpls]=20WG=20Last=20Call=20on=20draft-ietf-mpls-numbe
	r-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt] |To:David=20Ward=20<dward@cisco.com>;
	X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dv8FxVGcUsEpRLhXR761boAs862s=3D;
	b=QJ1sviq7MVNhCYU5bxpKj4tv/KlTZ8+YKRghSOBTQQYUykKBZd1IN2tmWlha/nsWBCy+RbS7
	R5llvhUS3aVwWXTPh4E9ua5xJt684co3y0JncErBWCR+FYp5Nuokecqc;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com; header.From=acee@cisco.com;
	dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; ); 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 41c17b4b16d1eedaa8395c26e9a251c4
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:46:38 -0400
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, isis-wg@ietf.org,
	Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>, ospf@ietf.org,
	Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
Subject: [Isis-wg] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on
	draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org

I've reviewed the subject document and don't have any comments on it
from the perspective of the OSPF WG. However, I have the following
comments as a member of the routing directorate (copying JP):

   1. Why the cryptic sub-TLV name? RFC 3630 doesn't define short
       cryptic names for sub-TLVs so I don't really see why you've defined
       NB-0-BW-LSP? Why not just call it the Unconstrained LSP Count 
sub-TLV?
       Or at least come up with a better short name :^),  e.g. 
BW-0-LSP-CNT.
   2. How did you arrive at 19 for the suggested value for the sub-TLV 
type? I checked
       IANA and 18 is the next available. I may be missing a document 
though.
   3. Do  you want to reserve a value (e.g., 0xffffffff) to indicate no 
unconstrained
       LSPs are to traverse a given link.
   4. Nit - in section 4, replace "OSPF LSA" with "OSPF LSAs" and "ISIS LSP"
       with "ISIS LSPs".

Thanks,
Acee
   
             

David Ward wrote:
> Do you want our WG to review? Co-Last Call (as we have for other WG that
> affect our protocol)? Do you have a desired date for end of last call from
> the IGPs?
>
> Thanks
>
> -DWard
>
>
> On 9/4/06 5:01 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se> wrote:
>
>   
>> All,
>>
>> the MPLS working group want to notify the ospf and is-s
>> working groups, as well as the routing directorate that
>> we are currently doing a wg last call on
>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt.
>>
>> Loa and George
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt
>> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:08:10 +0200
>> From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
>> Organization: Acreo AB
>> To: mpls@ietf.org
>>
>> Working Group,
>>
>> this initiates a two week working group last call on
>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt
>>
>> The wg last call ends on September 17.
>>
>> Please send comments to the working group mailing list and/or
>> the working group chairs.
>>
>> /Loa and George
>>     
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

From isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org Wed Oct 18 07:47:38 2006
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ga9se-0001M8-1d; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:46:40 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GXOl0-0006Xq-Ok; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:22 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GXOkz-00070W-Ff; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:22 -0400
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159])
	by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2006 14:03:21 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,291,1157353200"; 
	d="scan'208"; a="45564425:sNHT75748880"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12])
	by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	k9AL3LPF000622; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:21 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com
	[64.102.31.102])
	by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k9AL3LYJ008944; 
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by
	xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:20 -0400
Received: from [10.82.224.123] ([10.82.224.123]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:20 -0400
Message-ID: <452C0A97.5010501@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:19 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
References: <C12AE018.896F0%dward@cisco.com> <452C089D.5090204@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <452C089D.5090204@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2006 21:03:20.0622 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[8417C4E0:01C6ECAF]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=2379; t=1160514201; x=1161378201;
	c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001;
	h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
	d=cisco.com; i=acee@cisco.com; z=From:Acee=20Lindem=20<acee@cisco.com>
	|Subject:Re=3A=20[Fwd=3A=20[mpls]=20WG=20Last=20Call=20on=20draft-ietf-mpls-numbe
	r-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
	|To:Jean=20Philippe=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com>;
	X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dv8FxVGcUsEpRLhXR761boAs862s=3D;
	b=TUgN47ymFlXgFDkDPsX1S+iKcFCAh4v20rW/pWiBWOQ348OqpV7YkPJD0YG8fPIqC+8t38vq
	wm1rWxcnTIpq4J+35c7Sested value for the sub-TLV 
type? I checked
       IANA and 18 is the next available. I may be missing a document 
though.
   3. Do  you want to reserve a value (e.g., 0xffffffff) to indicate no 
unconstrained
       LSPs are to traverse a given link.
   4. Nit - in section 4, replace "OSPF LSA" with "OSPF LSAs" and "ISIS LSP"
       with "ISIS LSPs".

Thanks,
Acee
   
             

David Ward wrote:
> Do you want our WG to review? Co-Last Call (as we have for other WG that
> affect our protocol)? Do you have a desired date for end of last call from
> the IGPs?
>
> Thanks
>
> -DWard
>
>
> On 9/4/06 5:01 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se> wrote:
>
>   
>> All,
>>
>> the MPLS working group want to notify the ospf and is-s
>> working groups, as well as the routing directorate that
>> we are currently doing a wg last call on
>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt.
>>
>> Loa and George
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt
>> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:08:10 +0200
>> From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
>> Organization: Acreo AB
>> To: mpls@ietf.org
>>
>> Working Group,
>>
>> this initiates a two week working group last call on
>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt
>>
>> The wg last call ends on September 17.
>>
>> Please send comments to the working group mailing list and/or
>> the working group chairs.
>>
>> /Loa and George
>>     
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

From isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org Wed Oct 18 07:47:38 2006
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ga9se-0001M8-1d; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:46:40 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GXOl0-0006Xq-Ok; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:22 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GXOkz-00070W-Ff; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:22 -0400
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159])
	by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2006 14:03:21 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,291,1157353200"; 
	d="scan'208"; a="45564425:sNHT75748880"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12])
	by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	k9AL3LPF000622; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:21 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com
	[64.102.31.102])
	by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k9AL3LYJ008944; 
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by
	xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:20 -0400
Received: from [10.82.224.123] ([10.82.224.123]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:20 -0400
Message-ID: <452C0A97.5010501@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:03:19 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
References: <C12AE018.896F0%dward@cisco.com> <452C089D.5090204@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <452C089D.5090204@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2006 21:03:20.0622 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[8417C4E0:01C6ECAF]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=2379; t=1160514201; x=1161378201;
	c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001;
	h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
	d=cisco.com; i=acee@cisco.com; z=From:Acee=20Lindem=20<acee@cisco.com>
	|Subject:Re=3A=20[Fwd=3A=20[mpls]=20WG=20Last=20Call=20on=20draft-ietf-mpls-numbe
	r-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
	|To:Jean=20Philippe=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com>;
	X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dv8FxVGcUsEpRLhXR761boAs862s=3D;
	b=TUgN47ymFlXgFDkDPsX1S+iKcFCAh4v20rW/pWiBWOQ348OqpV7YkPJD0YG8fPIqC+8t38vq
	wm1rWxcnTIpq4J+35c7S0IUOaRO4afS6AtQwjKQNb1gzj5zT2oZd+TPj;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com; header.From=acee@cisco.com;
	dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; ); 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b280b4db656c3ca28dd62e5e0b03daa8
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:46:38 -0400
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, isis-wg@ietf.org,
	ospf@ietf.org, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
Subject: [Isis-wg] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on
	draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org

JP,

One more comment - Please write the document so that it can
apply to OSPFv3 TE as well. The existing draft can be an informative
reference (draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-07.txt)

Thanks,
Acee

Acee Lindem wrote:
> I've reviewed the subject document and don't have any comments on it
> from the perspective of the OSPF WG. However, I have the following
> comments as a member of the routing directorate (copying JP):
>
>   1. Why the cryptic sub-TLV name? RFC 3630 doesn't define short
>       cryptic names for sub-TLVs so I don't really see why you've defined
>       NB-0-BW-LSP? Why not just call it the Unconstrained LSP Count 
> sub-TLV?
>       Or at least come up with a better short name :^),  e.g. 
> BW-0-LSP-CNT.
>   2. How did you arrive at 19 for the suggested value for the sub-TLV 
> type? I checked
>       IANA and 18 is the next available. I may be missing a document 
> though.
>   3. Do  you want to reserve a value (e.g., 0xffffffff) to indicate no 
> unconstrained
>       LSPs are to traverse a given link.
>   4. Nit - in section 4, replace "OSPF LSA" with "OSPF LSAs" and "ISIS 
> LSP"
>       with "ISIS LSPs".
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>              
> David Ward wrote:
>> Do you want our WG to review? Co-Last Call (as we have for other WG that
>> affect our protocol)? Do you have a desired date for end of last call 
>> from
>> the IGPs?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -DWard
>>
>>
>> On 9/4/06 5:01 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se> wrote:
>>
>>  
>>> All,
>>>
>>> the MPLS working group want to notify the ospf and is-s
>>> working groups, as well as the routing directorate that
>>> we are currently doing a wg last call on
>>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt.
>>>
>>> Loa and George
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: [mpls] WG Last Call on 
>>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt
>>> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:08:10 +0200
>>> From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
>>> Organization: Acreo AB
>>> To: mpls@ietf.org
>>>
>>> Working Group,
>>>
>>> this initiates a two week working group last call on
>>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt
>>>
>>> The wg last call ends on September 17.
>>>
>>> Please send comments to the working group mailing list and/or
>>> the working group chairs.
>>>
>>> /Loa and George
>>>     
>>
>>   
>
>

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg





0IUOaRO4afS6AtQwjKQNb1gzj5zT2oZd+TPj;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com; header.From=acee@cisco.com;
	dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; ); 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b280b4db656c3ca28dd62e5e0b03daa8
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:46:38 -0400
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, isis-wg@ietf.org,
	ospf@ietf.org, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
Subject: [Isis-wg] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on
	draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org

JP,

One more comment - Please write the document so that it can
apply to OSPFv3 TE as well. The existing draft can be an informative
reference (draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-07.txt)

Thanks,
Acee

Acee Lindem wrote:
> I've reviewed the subject document and don't have any comments on it
> from the perspective of the OSPF WG. However, I have the following
> comments as a member of the routing directorate (copying JP):
>
>   1. Why the cryptic sub-TLV name? RFC 3630 doesn't define short
>       cryptic names for sub-TLVs so I don't really see why you've defined
>       NB-0-BW-LSP? Why not just call it the Unconstrained LSP Count 
> sub-TLV?
>       Or at least come up with a better short name :^),  e.g. 
> BW-0-LSP-CNT.
>   2. How did you arrive at 19 for the suggested value for the sub-TLV 
> type? I checked
>       IANA and 18 is the next available. I may be missing a document 
> though.
>   3. Do  you want to reserve a value (e.g., 0xffffffff) to indicate no 
> unconstrained
>       LSPs are to traverse a given link.
>   4. Nit - in section 4, replace "OSPF LSA" with "OSPF LSAs" and "ISIS 
> LSP"
>       with "ISIS LSPs".
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>              
> David Ward wrote:
>> Do you want our WG to review? Co-Last Call (as we have for other WG that
>> affect our protocol)? Do you have a desired date for end of last call 
>> from
>> the IGPs?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -DWard
>>
>>
>> On 9/4/06 5:01 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se> wrote:
>>
>>  
>>> All,
>>>
>>> the MPLS working group want to notify the ospf and is-s
>>> working groups, as well as the routing directorate that
>>> we are currently doing a wg last call on
>>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt.
>>>
>>> Loa and George
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: [mpls] WG Last Call on 
>>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt
>>> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:08:10 +0200
>>> From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
>>> Organization: Acreo AB
>>> To: mpls@ietf.org
>>>
>>> Working Group,
>>>
>>> this initiates a two week working group last call on
>>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt
>>>
>>> The wg last call ends on September 17.
>>>
>>> Please send comments to the working group mailing list and/or
>>> the working group chairs.
>>>
>>> /Loa and George
>>>     
>>
>>   
>
>

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg





From isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org Wed Oct 18 07:59:08 2006
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaA4R-0003Sq-Fw; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:58:51 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaA4Q-0003Se-Bj; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:58:50 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaA4O-0000Yf-Vo; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:58:50 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-7.cisco.com ([171.68.10.88])
	by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2006 04:58:48 -0700
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137])
	by sj-dkim-7.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	k9IBwl2W012877; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:58:47 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com
	[128.107.191.100])
	by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k9IBwhbF027672;
	Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by
	xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:58:43 -0700
Received: from [172.16.6.19] ([10.21.144.251]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:58:42 -0700
In-Reply-To: <452C0A97.5010501@cisco.com>
References: <C12AE018.896F0%dward@cisco.com> <452C089D.5090204@cisco.com>
	<452C0A97.5010501@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <614CB204-756D-4FF4-8B70-453755EEC8B0@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on
	draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:58:42 -0400
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2006 11:58:42.0809 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[C1E73690:01C6F2AC]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=2717; t=1161172727; x=1162036727;
	c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim7002;
	h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
	d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com;
	z=From:JP=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com>
	|Subject:Re=3A=20[Isis-wg]=20Re=3A=20[Fwd=3A=20[mpls]=20WG=20Last=20Call=20on=20d
	raft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt];
	X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3D3K9s1Dqh68mGdh5nghD5CSU9Fy8=3D;
	b=RPsJjrqbGVC+UPwGU4gcT9IV7eOmWmJhKFJNmHy7GFed7jGh5/kdKv+2kY0CE6qyd77gVWoF
	EcBAB/80gcwy8o/IzJx9+LPf9MM1pH12IKCX2gGpqR+LDErw2DyGcICs;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-7.cisco.com; header.From=jvasseur@cisco.com;
	dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; ); 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5011df3e2a27abcc044eaa15befcaa87
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org,
	Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>, isis-wg@ietf.org, ospf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Acee,

On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:

> JP,
>
> One more comment - Please write the document so that it can
> apply to OSPFv3 TE as well. The existing draft can be an informative
> reference (draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-07.txt)
>

Will do.

Thanks.

JP.

> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> Acee Lindem wrote:
>> I've reviewed the subject document and don't have any comments on it
>> from the perspective of the OSPF WG. However, I have the following
>> comments as a member of the routing directorate (copying JP):
>>
>>   1. Why the cryptic sub-TLV name? RFC 3630 doesn't define short
>>       cryptic names for sub-TLVs so I don't really see why you've  
>> defined
>>       NB-0-BW-LSP? Why not just call it the Unconstrained LSP  
>> Count sub-TLV?
>>       Or at least come up with a better short name :^),  e.g. BW-0- 
>> LSP-CNT.
>>   2. How did you arrive at 19 for the suggested value for the sub- 
>> TLV type? I checked
>>       IANA and 18 is the next available. I may be missing a  
>> document though.
>>   3. Do  you want to reserve a value (e.g., 0xffffffff) to  
>> indicate no unconstrained
>>       LSPs are to traverse a given link.
>>   4. Nit - in section 4, replace "OSPF LSA" with "OSPF LSAs" and  
>> "ISIS LSP"
>>       with "ISIS LSPs".
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>              David Ward wrote:
>>> Do you want our WG to review? Co-Last Call (as we have for other  
>>> WG that
>>> affect our protocol)? Do you have a desired date for end of last  
>>> call from
>>> the IGPs?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> -DWard
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/4/06 5:01 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> the MPLS working group want to notify the ospf and is-s
>>>> working groups, as well as the routing directorate that
>>>> we are currently doing a wg last call on
>>>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt.
>>>>
>>>> Loa and George
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te- 
>>>> lsps-02.txt
>>>> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:08:10 +0200
>>>> From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
>>>> Organization: Acreo AB
>>>> To: mpls@ietf.org
>>>>
>>>> Working Group,
>>>>
>>>> this initiates a two week working group last call on
>>>> draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt
>>>>
>>>> The wg last call ends on September 17.
>>>>
>>>> Please send comments to the working group mailing list and/or
>>>> the working group chairs.
>>>>
>>>> /Loa and George
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg



From akstccambsmnsdgs@cambs.com Thu Oct 19 07:58:59 2006
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaWY6-0002b9-Vp; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:58:58 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org)
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaWV8-0003ln-Ir; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:55:54 -0400
Received: from zc044183.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([221.119.44.183] helo=ZC044062.ppp.dion.ne.jp)
	by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaWV4-0004Uv-Tp; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:55:52 -0400
Received: from 63.251.171.166 (HELO m1.dnsix.com)
     by lists.ietf.org with esmtp (9J407Y6GB W7322X)
     id EREGNX-S53PIO-XZ
     for isis-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2006 11:55:50 -0540
From: "Robbie Schmitt" <akstccambsmnsdgs@cambs.com>
To: <isis-archive@lists.ietf.org>
Subject: Feel healthy
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2006 11:55:50 -0540
Message-ID: <01c6f375$85cc4dc0$6c822ecf@akstccambsmnsdgs>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2741.2600
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25

Hi Edna, hope I hit your correct email adress.
I was going to mention about these incredible opportunities
for future prosperity.There is a company outhere
known as American Unity Investments Inc (AUNI).
This one as you can see is climbing, but by just looking at it
I can tell it's gonna explode.So you do have a window to digg in
while it's still in it's low.I got a few shares of mine and made
5K. So what a hey, go ahead and do the same make some money while
it's there.

I hope it was a helper.I'll email you later this week.

Krystal.

an attachment as this she might have sufficient charms; and though she did not suppose lydia to be
entered the library, "oh! mr. bennet, you are wanted immediately; we are all in an uproar. you must



From isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org Thu Oct 19 10:48:42 2006
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaZBU-0002eC-Ne; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:47:48 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaZBR-0002Xd-DC; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:47:45 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129]
	helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org)
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaZBR-0005B9-BX; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:47:45 -0400
Received: from ns3.neustar.com ([156.154.24.138])
	by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaZBP-0001Yx-34; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:47:45 -0400
Received: from stiedprstage1.ietf.org (stiedprstage1.va.neustar.com
	[10.31.47.10]) by ns3.neustar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD464175DE;
	Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:47:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ietf by stiedprstage1.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaZAu-00069i-E3; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:47:12 -0400
X-test-idtracker: no
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <E1GaZAu-00069i-E3@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:47:12 -0400
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: [Isis-wg] Last Call: 'IS-IS Extensions for Advertising Router 
 Information' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-isis-caps) 
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: iesg@ietf.org
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org

The IESG has received a request from the IS-IS for IP Internets WG to 
consider the following document:

- 'IS-IS Extensions for Advertising Router Information '
   <draft-ietf-isis-caps-06.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2006-11-02.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-caps-06.txt


_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg



From isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org Thu Oct 19 10:48:55 2006
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaZCZ-0004kh-CE; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:48:55 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaZ9m-0000kD-06; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:46:02 -0400
Received: from ns1.neustar.com ([2001:503:c779:1a::9c9a:108a])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaZ9g-00043v-Pi; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:46:00 -0400
Received: from stiedprstage1.ietf.org (stiedprstage1.va.neustar.com
	[10.31.47.10]) by ns1.neustar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5BA26E17;
	Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:45:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ietf by stiedprstage1.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaZ9g-00067c-LS; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:45:56 -0400
X-test-idtracker: no
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <E1GaZ9g-00067c-LS@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:45:56 -0400
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: [Isis-wg] Last Call: 'A Policy Control Mechanism is IS-IS Using 
 Administrative Tags' to Proposed Standard 
 (draft-ietf-isis-admin-tags) 
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: iesg@ietf.org
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org

The IESG has received a request from the IS-IS for IP Internets WG to 
consider the following document:

- 'A Policy Control Mechanism is IS-IS Using Administrative Tags '
   <draft-ietf-isis-admin-tags-03.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2006-11-02.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-admin-tags-03.txt


_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg



From isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org Fri Oct 20 15:51:13 2006
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gb0Np-0006Cd-TV; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:50:21 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gb0Nh-0005vN-AC; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:50:13 -0400
Received: from ns1.neustar.com ([2001:503:c779:1a::9c9a:108a])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gb0NV-00013L-S6; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:50:13 -0400
Received: from stiedprstage1.ietf.org (stiedprstage1.va.neustar.com
	[10.31.47.10]) by ns1.neustar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEDF26E53;
	Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:50:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ietf by stiedprstage1.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gb0NV-0001tN-MJ; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:50:01 -0400
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart"
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Message-Id: <E1Gb0NV-0001tN-MJ@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:50:01 -0400
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: b280b4db656c3ca28dd62e5e0b03daa8
Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: [Isis-wg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-isis-link-attr-02.txt 
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org

--NextPart

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
directories.
This draft is a work item of the IS-IS for IP Internets Working Group of the IETF.

	Title		: Definition of an IS-IS Link Attribute sub-TLV
	Author(s)	: J. Vasseur, S. Previdi
	Filename	: draft-ietf-isis-link-attr-02.txt
	Pages		: 5
	Date		: 2006-10-20
	
This document defines a sub-TLV called "Link-attributes" carried 
   within the TLV 22 and used to flood some link characteristics.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-link-attr-02.txt

To remove yourself from the I-D Announcement list, send a message to 
i-d-announce-request@ietf.org with the word unsubscribe in the body of 
the message. 
You can also visit https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/I-D-announce 
to change your subscription settings.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the 
username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After 
logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then 
"get draft-ietf-isis-link-attr-02.txt".

A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html 
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt

Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail.

Send a message to:
	mailserv@ietf.org.
In the body type:
	"FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-link-attr-02.txt".
	
NOTE:	The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in
	MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility.  To use this
	feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE"
	command.  To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or
	a MIME-compliant mail reader.  Different MIME-compliant mail readers
	exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
	"multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split
	up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on
	how to manipulate these messages.

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.

--NextPart
Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess"

--OtherAccess
Content-Type: Message/External-body; access-type="mail-server";
	server="mailserv@ietf.org"

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-ID: <2006-10-20122745.I-D@ietf.org>

ENCODING mime
FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-link-attr-02.txt

--OtherAccess
Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-isis-link-attr-02.txt";
	site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp";
	directory="internet-drafts"

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-ID: <2006-10-20122745.I-D@ietf.org>


--OtherAccess--

--NextPart
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

--NextPart--





From isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org Sat Oct 21 08:31:43 2006
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GbFzN-0003RW-12; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:30:09 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GbFzK-0003Qq-T0; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:30:06 -0400
Received: from mail1.noc.data.net.uk ([80.68.34.48])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GbFzH-0004lX-Fb; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:30:06 -0400
Received: from 57-99.dsl.data.net.uk ([80.68.57.99]
	helo=cortex.aria-networks.com)
	by mail1.noc.data.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2)
	id 1GbFzS-0000p4-00; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:30:14 +0100
Received: from your029b8cecfe ([217.158.132.35] RDNS failed) by
	cortex.aria-networks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:29:59 +0100
Message-ID: <0cd701c6f50c$990f3080$540110ac@your029b8cecfe>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <isis-wg@ietf.org>,
	<ospf@ietf.org>,
	<mpls@lists.ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:22:25 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Oct 2006 12:30:01.0382 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[A0DBF460:01C6F50C]
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
Cc: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>,
	routing-discussion@ietf.org
Subject: [Isis-wg] CCAMP Working group last call on
	draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt 
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org

Heads up.

The CCAMP working group is holding a working group last call on this draft.

Your input is invited.

Please send comments direct to the CCAMP mailing list or to the WG chairs 
(Deborah and/or me) if you are not subscribed to CCAMP.

Thanks,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:34 AM
Subject: Working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt


> This starts a two week working group last on 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt
>
> Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list by 12 midnight UK time 
> on Monday 30th October
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian and Deborah 



_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg



From isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org Sat Oct 21 08:49:17 2006
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GbGHq-00066r-Rm; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:49:14 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GbGHo-00065q-Mc; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:49:12 -0400
Received: from mail1.noc.data.net.uk ([80.68.34.48])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GbGHl-0008GN-Jb; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:49:12 -0400
Received: from 57-99.dsl.data.net.uk ([80.68.57.99]
	helo=cortex.aria-networks.com)
	by mail1.noc.data.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2)
	id 1GbGHq-0003Ma-00; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:49:14 +0100
Received: from your029b8cecfe ([217.158.132.35] RDNS failed) by
	cortex.aria-networks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:48:59 +0100
Message-ID: <0cfb01c6f50f$45521680$540110ac@your029b8cecfe>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <isis-wg@ietf.org>,
	<ospf@ietf.org>,
	<mpls@lists.ietf.org>
References: <0cd701c6f50c$990f3080$540110ac@your029b8cecfe>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:48:41 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Oct 2006 12:49:00.0505 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[47D45490:01C6F50F]
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 92df29fa99cf13e554b84c8374345c17
Cc: routing-discussion@ietf.org
Subject: [Isis-wg] Re: CCAMP Working group last call
	ondraft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt 
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

Since clicking on the URL may not be a function available to all of you, 
here is the abstract of the I-D.

Cheers,
Adrian

Abstract

   It is highly desired in several cases, to take into account Traffic
   Engineering (TE) node capabilities during Multi Protocol Label
   Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineered Label Switched Path (TE-LSP)
   selection, such as for instance the capability to act as a branch
   Label Switching Router (LSR) of a Point-To-MultiPoint (P2MP) LSP.
   This requires advertising these capabilities within the Interior
   Gateway Protocol (IGP). For that purpose, this document specifies
   Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) and Intermediate System-Intermediate
   System (IS-IS) traffic engineering extensions for the advertisement
   of control plane and data plane traffic engineering node
   capabilities.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <isis-wg@ietf.org>; <ospf@ietf.org>; <mpls@lists.ietf.org>
Cc: <routing-discussion@ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 1:22 PM
Subject: [OSPF] CCAMP Working group last call 
ondraft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt


> Heads up.
>
> The CCAMP working group is holding a working group last call on this 
> draft.
>
> Your input is invited.
>
> Please send comments direct to the CCAMP mailing list or to the WG chairs 
> (Deborah and/or me) if you are not subscribed to CCAMP.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:34 AM
> Subject: Working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt
>
>
>> This starts a two week working group last on 
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt
>>
>> Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list by 12 midnight UK 
>> time on Monday 30th October
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Adrian and Deborah
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>
> 



_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg



From isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org Sun Oct 22 02:38:04 2006
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GbWx0-0001ZG-0g; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 02:36:50 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GbWwy-0001Yz-0R; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 02:36:48 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GbWwv-0004ia-EC; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 02:36:47 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195])
	by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2006 23:36:44 -0700
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238])
	by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	k9M6aiV7029544; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:36:44 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com
	[128.107.191.100])
	by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k9M6aiW4001925;
	Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xmb-sjc-222.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.106]) by
	xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:36:44 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Isis-wg] CCAMP Working group last call
	ondraft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt 
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:36:42 -0700
Message-ID: <AE36820147909644AD2A7CA014B1FB520280F959@xmb-sjc-222.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] CCAMP Working group last call
	ondraft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt 
Thread-Index: Acb1DSpF4zoRNfWVS4+Sz26C3QSaHQAlAJrg
From: "Les Ginsberg \(ginsberg\)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, <isis-wg@ietf.org>, <ospf@ietf.org>,
	<mpls@lists.ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2006 06:36:44.0022 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[70A94160:01C6F5A4]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=3311; t=1161499004; x=1162363004;
	c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002;
	h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
	d=cisco.com; i=ginsberg@cisco.com;
	z=From:=22Les=20Ginsberg=20\(ginsberg\)=22=20<ginsberg@cisco.com>
	|Subject:RE=3A=20[Isis-wg]=20CCAMP=20Working=20group=20last=20call=20ondraft-ietf
	-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt=20;
	X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3D5FSl2d6szlJU4Wx+V6QnZRHeV0g=3D;
	b=QEm1WabRNZSq1oQRvsYd31IxjyOBzdAlnhwLVk11Vl/0J8RPs508qFaDpHdPCIUptWyIgYdP
	oToSXhbR/pTomykczffuZECu/wIYyvjerm3cybZEU5i1MwVhpMwLV5Bs;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3.cisco.com; header.From=ginsberg@cisco.com;
	dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; ); 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e1b0e72ff1bbd457ceef31828f216a86
Cc: routing-discussion@ietf.org, "Brungard, Deborah A,
	ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>,
	<mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org

In regards to the IS-IS definitions, there is (again - sorry JP...)
confusion in the use of the terms TLV and subTLV.

For example, in Section 2 it states:

<snip>
A new TLV is defined for ISIS and OSPF: the TE Node Capability=20
   Descriptor TLV, to be carried within:=20
        - The ISIS Capability TLV ([ISIS-CAP]) for ISIS...
<end snip>

If the information is carried within another TLV, then it is clearly
subTLV information - the difference between the two is more than
terminology since it impacts both the encoding and the scope of the
identifiers which are assigned.

Section 4.2 then goes on to discuss:

"The format of the IS-IS TE Node Capability TLV" - which is, as pointed
out above, actually a subTLV.

And then goes on to define "subsubTLVs" (which are incorrectly called
subTLVs).

As "subsubTLVs" are new to IS-IS encoding some discussion of this added
level of hierarchy is required. However, I think it might also be fair
to entertain the possibility that the "TE Node Capability subTLV" be
deleted and the "subsubTLVs" defined in the subsections of 4.2 be
defined more directly as subTLVs of the IS-IS CAPs TLV. This is possible
because as currently defined, the "TE Node Capability subTLV" has no
information at the subTLV level - it is simply a container for the
subsubTLV information. This would allow for a more efficient encoding
without any loss of functionality.

Whatever the resolution, all the text relating to this must be reworded
to be consistent and accurate.

I would also prefer that the wording of the following sentence in
Section 5.2:

"An empty TE Node Capability Descriptor MUST be discarded."

be changed to

"An empty TE Node Capability Descriptor MUST be ignored."

The term "discard" suggests that a router which leaks a CAP TLV
containing TE node capability information might be required to modify
the contents of that TLV - which is something to be avoided.

   Les

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk]
> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 5:22 AM
> To: isis-wg@ietf.org; ospf@ietf.org; mpls@lists.ietf.org
> Cc: Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS; routing-discussion@ietf.org
> Subject: [Isis-wg] CCAMP Working group last call
ondraft-ietf-ccamp-te-
> node-cap-02.txt
>=20
> Heads up.
>=20
> The CCAMP working group is holding a working group last call on this
> draft.
>=20
> Your input is invited.
>=20
> Please send comments direct to the CCAMP mailing list or to the WG
chairs
> (Deborah and/or me) if you are not subscribed to CCAMP.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:34 AM
> Subject: Working group last call on
draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt
>=20
>=20
> > This starts a two week working group last on
> >
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt
> >
> > Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list by 12 midnight
UK
> time
> > on Monday 30th October
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian and Deborah
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg



From akstcfreefrmnsdgs@freefr.net Fri Oct 27 06:31:33 2006
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GdOzs-0000tx-92; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:31:33 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org)
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GdOzs-0005VA-76; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:31:32 -0400
Received: from [203.134.195.81] (helo=freddie.bcentralhost.com)
	by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GdOzq-0003me-Dm; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:31:32 -0400
Received: from 213.186.35.50 (HELO mxb.ovh.net)
     by lists.ietf.org with esmtp (N1R0KK80R XTQKS)
     id 9PLVFF-U8FS1I-DC
     for isis-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2006 10:31:30 -0330
Message-ID: <01c6f9b3$11311790$6c822ecf@akstcfreefrmnsdgs>
From: "Katy Haines" <KatyHaines@freefr.net>
To: <isis-archive@lists.ietf.org>
Subject: mischio marble Monterey cypress
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2006 10:31:30 -0330
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="windows-1250";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200
X-Spam-Score: 3.9 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: 0f1ff0b0158b41ac6b9548d0972cdd31

believing her indifferent is certain-but i will venture to say that my investigation and decisions are not"sometimes. one must speak a little, you know. it would look odd to be entirely silent for half




From akstcgranbymnsdgs@granby.net Sun Oct 29 14:41:34 2006
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeGXG-0004Ia-5H
	for isis-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:41:34 -0500
Received: from arennes-351-1-72-215.w86-199.abo.wanadoo.fr ([86.199.98.215])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeGX9-00062M-Lu
	for isis-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:41:34 -0500
Received: from 205.151.205.142 (HELO mx-in-01.citenet.net)
     by lists.ietf.org with esmtp (64LZ2YFX26K CD9O)
     id BEYCJC-YBJEY1-JL
     for isis-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2006 19:41:28 -0060
Message-ID: <01c6fb92$39e4c9d0$6c822ecf@akstcgranbymnsdgs>
From: "Rebekah Summers" <RebekahSummers@granby.net>
To: <isis-archive@lists.ietf.org>
Subject: Orang benua new-made
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2006 19:41:28 -0060
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4963.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4963.1700
X-Spam-Score: 4.2 (++++)
X-Scan-Signature: 0f1ff0b0158b41ac6b9548d0972cdd31

"pray let me hear what you have to accuse him of," cried colonel fitzwilliam. "i should like toelizabeth, on her side, had much to do. she wanted to ascertain the feelings of each of her




From bcgadbbeb@cargobookit.com Sun Oct 29 18:19:12 2006
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeJvs-0001ue-5T
	for isis-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:19:12 -0500
Received: from 20158231175.user.veloxzone.com.br ([201.58.231.175])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeJv3-0002xV-N0
	for isis-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:19:12 -0500
Message-ID: <662161c806041yyijssqwyjv3rsc03mmmjbqy7k364g8@iris1.directnic.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2006 22:18:22 +0180
From: "Rudy Lawson" <bcgadbbeb@cargobookit.com>
To: isis-archive@lists.ietf.org
Subject: Financial careers in the U.S. 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam: Not detected
X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081

magnetic personality--the ability to win the confidence of others. Heupon as one whose common sense could unquestionably be trusted in allfinancier, though he was marked out to be a moderately successful one.eagerly.at a profit. His bank was the Third National of Philadelphia, located in

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FlowerLand International is looking for responsible    
candidate.  
  
The corporation:  
  
FlowerLand International is an American trading company.  
We specialize in all kinds of flowers and decorative greenery that can be used for home    
or office. We are not a MLM corporation nor any similarity.  
You are never required to buy nor invest anything to work with Flowerland International.   
  
CAREER POSITION:  
  
This is an entry level opportunity in the field of financial services.  
  
MAIN ADVANTAGES:  
  
- Really High Wages.  
- Ability to work at home.  
- Flexible shedule.  
- No sign up fees, no investment is required.  
- All expenses such as phone calls, webtraffic, etc will be fully covered by our   
company.  
- Illness\Disability friendly team.  
  
REQUIREMENTS FOR CANDIDATES:  
  
- Basic knowledge of credit principles, banking services and operations.  
- Ability to work on multiple projects simultaneously along with meeting deadlines.  
- Ability to work independently or in a team environment.  
- Having no problem with the Law.   
- Having a cellular phone.   
- Having a deep desire to achieve business success.   
  
DEGREE:  
  
No degree required.  
  
HOW TO Apply:  
Please send your resume to our personnel manager.  
It must be mailed in a TXT, DOC, RTF or PDF format.   

Please write to the following email: dobjectse@yahoo.com  

=================================================



From akstchelpdesksolutionsmnsdgs@helpdesksolutions.com Mon Oct 30 14:12:47 2006
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GecYx-0007XK-FA
	for isis-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:12:47 -0500
Received: from cpe-24-208-75-250.neb.res.rr.com ([24.208.75.250] helo=your-us67pi6luv.neb.rr.com)
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GecYv-0005nx-Ok
	for isis-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:12:47 -0500
Received: from 198.185.2.69 (HELO mx1.business.mindspring.com)
     by lists.ietf.org with esmtp (ZA6LSZTVUVYL EPJK33)
     id 4UCW0I-PGOQ60-YB
     for isis-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2006 19:12:24 +0360
Date:	Mon, 30 Nov 2006 19:12:24 +0360
From:	"Nathaniel Doty" <NathanielDoty@helpdesksolutions.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Business
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <233919162.17546801669988@thebat.net>
To: isis-archive@lists.ietf.org
Subject: opponent colors theory oil paint
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=Windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: Not detected
X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8eae9af85e4fcfe76f325e38493bf4

between darcy and his companion. the perpetual commendations of the lady, either on hisand the man whom she could not bear to speak of the day before was now high in her good graces.



