Subject: Re: [its] ITS Charter Discussion

From: "Liushucheng (Will)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 03:12:12 +0000

Hi Folks,

As an contributor in both IETF ipv6 related WGs and ETSI ISG IP6, as well as a previous researcher in IOT. I’m pretty interested in the point below and would like to see this WG formed to solve related issues.
> - Why is IPv6 needed?
>    — Explain why some traffic will not use IPv6
>    — Explain why other traffic will use IPv6

Regards,
Will (Shucheng LIU)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Russ Housley <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: 2016-04-25 20:59 GMT+08:00
Subject: [its] ITS Charter Discussion
To: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>

Carlos and I had a telephone conversation with our Area Director for this group, Suresh Krishnan.  The result of the discussion was some pretty clear and pragmatic suggestions about the charter.

The suggestion is that the ITS WG have only two deliverables in the initial charter.  Once these two documents are delivered to the IESG, then the group can recharter to tackle other things.

An Informational RFC that covers:
 - What is ITS?
    — Explain V2V, V2I, and so on
 - Why is IPv6 needed?
    — Explain why some traffic will not use IPv6
    — Explain why other traffic will use IPv6
 - Problem statement
 - Use-cases
 - Security considerations
 - Privacy considerations

A Standards-Track RFC that covers:
 - IPv6 over DSRC

Russ
_______________________________________________
its mailing list
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its