From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Tue Feb 1 09:49:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796733A6DF1; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:49:23 -0800 (PST) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Duplicate header field: "From" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.514 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.514 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.085, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x+i4rU24C4Gp; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:49:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7623A6E80; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:49:22 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Subject: Document Action: 'VPLS Interoperability with CE Bridges' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop-06.txt) X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.11 From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Subject: Document Action: 'VPLS Interoperability with CE Bridges' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop-06.txt) Message-ID: <20110201174922.22610.38856.idtracker@localhost> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:49:22 -0800 Cc: l2vpn mailing list , l2vpn chair , Internet Architecture Board , RFC Editor X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:49:23 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'VPLS Interoperability with CE Bridges' (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop-06.txt) as an Informational RFC This document is the product of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Stewart Bryant and Adrian Farrel. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop/ Technical Summary When CE devices are IEEE bridges, then there are certain issues and challenges that need to be accounted for in a VPLS network. The majority of these issues have currently been addressed in the IEEE 802.1ad standard for provider bridges and they need to be addressed for VPLS networks as well. This draft discusses these issues and wherever possible, the recommended solutions to these issues. Working Group Summary This document has been reviewed by carriers and experts in the L2VPN WG and there are no outstanding issues. Document Quality This document was reviewed by the L2VPN chairs and Mark Townsley. Personnel Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Shane Amante (shane@castlepoint.net) Who is the Responsible Area Director? Stewart Bryant From nick.delregno@verizon.com Wed Feb 2 05:40:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B82B3A6BF8; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 05:40:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.516 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DFs9RlqHoMDT; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 05:39:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from ashesmtp01.verizonbusiness.com (ashesmtp01.verizonbusiness.com [198.4.8.163]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4133A6BAB; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 05:39:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from pdcismtp02.vzbi.com ([unknown] [166.40.77.70]) by firewall.verizonbusiness.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0LFZ001VDSS68890@firewall.verizonbusiness.com>; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:43:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pdcismtp02.vzbi.com ([unknown] [127.0.0.1]) by pdcismtp02.vzbi.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with SMTP id <0LFZ00J2NSS6FA00@pdcismtp02.vzbi.com>; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:43:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ASHSRV142.mcilink.com ([unknown] [153.39.68.168]) by pdcismtp02.vzbi.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0LFZ00JCMSS6E400@pdcismtp02.vzbi.com>; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:43:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ASHEVS008.mcilink.com ([153.39.69.129]) by ASHSRV142.mcilink.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:43:18 +0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBC2DF.25B422D5" Subject: REMINDER: PW / VCCV User Implementation Survey Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:43:20 +0000 Message-id: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA2060600067709F5@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> In-reply-to: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060005DB543A@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-topic: REMINDER: PW / VCCV User Implementation Survey Thread-index: Act8YpSEMMoOD4/+SCeRBwpsUYLmAgTfklMQDL9wpzA= References: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060005AE91E1@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060005DB543A@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> From: "Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)" To: pwe3 , mpls@ietf.org, l2vpn@ietf.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2011 13:43:18.0431 (UTC) FILETIME=[262F22F0:01CBC2DF] X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:40:05 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBC2DF.25B422D5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Folks, we still only have 6 responses to the VCCV User Survey. Time is running out. The deadline for submissions is February 25th. =20 It is important that we get as many participants as possible to ensure fair representation in any future PW Control Word and VCCV related work in the PWE3 working group. =20 Thanks, Nick =20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =20 All: =20 Per the direction of the PWE3 working group, beginning in IETF77 and reinforced in IETF78, the PWE3 working group is conducting a Service Provider implementation survey related to: =20 - Pseudowire Encapsulations - Control Word Support - Control Word Use - VCCV Control Channel Support - VCCV Control Channel Use =20 http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/pwe3 =20 This is a short survey directed toward Service Providers who currently operate networks using any of the defined PWE3 encapsulations. The results of this survey will be used to determine the direction of the Control Word support in current and future encapsulations as well as solutions to VCCV interoperability challenges. =20 We sincerely urge all service providers to participate. We ask that all equipment providers encourage participation by their Service Provider customers. The more feedback we receive, the better view of the existing network we can have on which to base going-forward direction. =20 If you have any questions, regarding the survey, especially of a technical nature, please contact me. If you have non-technical questions, feel free to reach out to the PWE3 WG chairs and myself. =20 The results of the survey will be aggregated and shared at a high level. No low-level details of network implementations will be shared. All participant's responses will remain private, if not anonymous. =20 All responses will require a valid email address to help ensure the survey's validity. =20 Thanks, Nick =20 Christopher N. "Nick" DelRegno, PMTS CNT, Ethernet Network Architecture & Design 400 International Pkwy Richardson, TX 75081 Tel: 972-729-3411 Email: Nick.DelRegno@verizon.com =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBC2DF.25B422D5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Folks, we = still only have 6 responses to the VCCV User Survey.  Time is = running out.  The deadline for submissions is February = 25th.

 

It is = important that we get as many participants as possible to ensure fair = representation in any future PW Control Word and VCCV related work in = the PWE3 working group.

 

Thanks,

Nick

 

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

 

All:

 

Per the = direction of the PWE3 working group, beginning in IETF77 and reinforced = in IETF78, the PWE3 working group is conducting a Service Provider = implementation survey related to:

 

-          = Pseudowire Encapsulations

-          = Control Word Support

-          = Control Word Use

-          = VCCV Control Channel Support

-          = VCCV Control Channel Use

 

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s= /pwe3

 

This is a short survey directed toward Service = Providers who currently operate networks using any of the defined PWE3 = encapsulations.  The results of this survey will be used to = determine the direction of the Control Word support in current and = future encapsulations as well as solutions to VCCV interoperability = challenges.

 

We sincerely urge all service providers to = participate.  We ask that all equipment providers encourage = participation by their Service Provider customers.  The more = feedback we receive, the better view of the existing network we can have = on which to base going-forward direction.

 

If you have = any questions, regarding the survey, especially of a technical nature, = please contact me.  If you have non-technical questions, feel free = to reach out to the PWE3 WG chairs and myself.

 

The results = of the survey will be aggregated and shared at a high level.  No = low-level details of network implementations will be shared.  All = participant’s responses will remain private, if not = anonymous.

 

All responses will require a valid email address to = help ensure the survey’s validity.

 

Thanks,

Nick

 

Christopher N. “Nick” DelRegno, = PMTS

CNT, Ethernet Network Architecture & = Design

400 International Pkwy

Richardson, TX  = 75081

Tel:  972-729-3411

Email:  = Nick.DelRegno@verizon.com

 

------_=_NextPart_001_01CBC2DF.25B422D5-- From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Wed Feb 2 14:03:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831693A687A; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:03:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.519 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d0k+h8Z+iz+d; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:03:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590C03A6DFF; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:03:09 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Subject: Document Action: 'VPLS Interoperability with CE Bridges' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop-06.txt) X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.12 Message-ID: <20110202220309.29341.60305.idtracker@localhost> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:03:09 -0800 Cc: l2vpn mailing list , l2vpn chair , Internet Architecture Board , RFC Editor X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:03:10 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'VPLS Interoperability with CE Bridges' (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop-06.txt) as an Informational RFC This document is the product of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Stewart Bryant and Adrian Farrel. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop/ Technical Summary When CE devices are IEEE bridges, then there are certain issues and challenges that need to be accounted for in a VPLS network. The majority of these issues have currently been addressed in the IEEE 802.1ad standard for provider bridges and they need to be addressed for VPLS networks as well. This draft discusses these issues and wherever possible, the recommended solutions to these issues. Working Group Summary This document has been reviewed by carriers and experts in the L2VPN WG and there are no outstanding issues. Document Quality This document was reviewed by the L2VPN chairs and Mark Townsley. Personnel Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Shane Amante (shane@castlepoint.net) Who is the Responsible Area Director? Stewart Bryant From giles.heron@gmail.com Fri Feb 4 11:29:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FE43A69CF for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:29:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XudOL0wjpOaP for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:29:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-px0-f172.google.com (mail-px0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCE63A6952 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:29:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by pxi6 with SMTP id 6so567631pxi.31 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:33:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cyPvIiGEB4+FBVHvLWHS6k7yv5qAUv/lxdBy/YHG7v4=; b=fJX/ju3pawynm5qVDYyCGeot+F4dKikq5Cijv8bZqhbAzhmsZQTLuR2XBov+qnSAuH tMMX8Zxc0itvsCWUc13qfJTbfe71b/Z6zURSceb7Id6m6pwEOPA3//K1Bk1P4atqpq5R RXQ5IlFpRXvgHtqt9a1y/6NZegar9mrrQeSW8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=EaPA7MQWqpmA7kvrf8qC1YkZYyTeifAcN3V8o3U9B6Xc5gEp4vp1a+xqnBOpSTKxUr 06Lwv6fm5Wy3gh+7mT8pjqU7Td/3UTxWo5BT6+boP/m5cYrl2cB2WO96GNu1+0sCJHn1 4NItLM4PYwKY6Ml8peyN3PHiqaxMwQQx1AfJA= Received: by 10.142.104.10 with SMTP id b10mr12178990wfc.37.1296848001778; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:33:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [171.70.247.143] (dhcp-171-70-247-143.cisco.com [171.70.247.143]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x35sm1382210wfd.1.2011.02.04.11.33.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:33:19 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.28.0.101117 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:34:13 +0000 Subject: Re: draft-delord-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten as WG draft? From: Giles Heron To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: draft-delord-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten as WG draft? Thread-Index: AcuxkXh8TBwnRONDYUWm9DiwG0eKqATEQgEU In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: "frederic.jounay@orange-ftgroup.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:29:57 -0000 Hi everyone, There seems to be pretty good consensus on the WG list that this draft should be adopted by the WG. Having said that discussion of the draft was noteable by its absence during the period of the poll. We have decided to adopt the draft as a WG doc, but would ask that people please read the draft and post any comments to the list before the next IETF. Thanks. Nabil & Giles On 11/01/2011 13:14, "Giles Heron" wrote: > This is a poll to ask if: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delord-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-03 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Please reply "accept" or "do not accept" to this thread. > > Please start a new thread for any technical discussions of the draft. We'd > really like to see some technical discussions :) > > We will close the poll on Tuesday 25th January 2011. > > Thanks! > > Nabil & Giles > > From Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Sun Feb 6 01:15:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593173A6AAF; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 01:15:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.393 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.393 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.206, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A2dEGihHZgjL; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 01:15:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81EA3A6896; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 01:15:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action:draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-00.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.12 Message-ID: <20110206091501.6468.11565.idtracker@localhost> Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 01:15:01 -0800 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 09:15:02 -0000 --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group of the IETF. Title : Extension to LDP-VPLS for Ethernet Broadcast and Multicast Author(s) : S. Delord, et al. Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-00.txt Pages : 20 Date : 2011-02-05 This document proposes a simple extension to LDP-VPLS to improve bandwidth efficiency for Ethernet broadcast/multicast traffic within a carrier's network. It makes use of unidirectional point-to-multipoint PseudoWires to minimise payload frame duplication on physical links. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-00.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-00.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2011-02-06010154.I-D@ietf.org> --NextPart-- From prvs=9023182bdf=edwin.mallette@bhnis.com Fri Feb 11 13:04:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306663A6A5A for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:04:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ET0ssnjaHYi for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:04:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.mybrighthouse.com (MX3.mybrighthouse.com [209.16.122.105]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217D53A6A53 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:04:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (mx3 [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.mybrighthouse.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id p1BL1g42032303; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:05:11 -0500 Received: from cntpaowa1.corp.local ([10.225.4.5]) by mx3.mybrighthouse.com with ESMTP id udc5f0568-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:05:11 -0500 Received: from CNEMAIL.corp.local ([10.225.1.130]) by cntpaowa1.corp.local ([10.225.4.5]) with mapi; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:05:11 -0500 From: "Mallette, Edwin" To: "Key, Raymond W" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:05:09 -0500 Subject: Re: draft-key-l2vpn-vpls-etree-reqt-02 Thread-Topic: draft-key-l2vpn-vpls-etree-reqt-02 Thread-Index: AcvKL17DyBzwK26cQYq/Vp7OiphA7A== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E1127C0F8537@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C97B0E41641Eedwinmallettebhniscom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102110120 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "lmartini@cisco.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:04:59 -0000 --_000_C97B0E41641Eedwinmallettebhniscom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Raymond and Luca, I'm interested in the response to this as well. Cheers! Ed From: "Key, Raymond W" > Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:52:21 -0500 To: "lmartini@cisco.com" > Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" > Subject: draft-key-l2vpn-vpls-etree-reqt-02 Hi Luca, I read the IETF79 Beijing L2VPN minutes http://tools.ietf.org/wg/l2vpn/minutes?item=3Dminutes79.html and would like to continue the discussion re the captioned on the list. Extract from the minutes, under (7) Requirements for MEF E-Tree Support in = VPLS : -Luca: Can you explain what does not work in the current solution? We can = use BGP Auto Discovery & configuration to achieve what you want. . . . . -Giles: Need to take discussion to the list. (To Luca): perhaps you can do= cument how the current solution already solves this problem to kick off tha= t discussion on the list? Would you be able to elaborate on how the current solution already solves t= his problem? Thanks, Raymond Key ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is privile= ged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not th= e intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately b= y return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it. --_000_C97B0E41641Eedwinmallettebhniscom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Raymond and Luca,

I'm interested in the response to this as well.

Cheers!

Ed

From: "Key, Raymond W" &l= t;Raymond.Key@team.telstra.= com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:52:21 -05= 00
To: "lmartini@cisco.com" <lmartini@cisco.com>
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2v= pn@ietf.org>
Subject: draft-key-l2vpn-vpls-etree= -reqt-02

Hi Luca,
 
I read the IETF79 Beijing L2VPN minutes
and would like to continue the discussion re the captioned on the list= .
 
Extract from the minutes, under (7) Requirements for MEF E-Tree Suppor= t in VPLS :
-Luca: Can you explain what does not work in the current solution?&nbs= p; We can use BGP Auto Discovery & configuration to achieve what you wa= nt.
. . . .
-Giles: Need to take discussion to the list.  (To Luca): perhaps = you can document how the current solution already solves this problem to ki= ck off that discussion on the list?
 
Would you be able to elaborate on how the current solution already sol= ves this problem?
 
Thanks,
Raymond Key
 
 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This= e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwi= se protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this= e-mail, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it.
 --_000_C97B0E41641Eedwinmallettebhniscom_-- From nick.delregno@verizon.com Mon Feb 14 07:40:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474653A6D6E; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:40:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.184 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tNCgWhrVkdRd; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:40:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ashesmtp03.verizonbusiness.com (ashesmtp03.verizonbusiness.com [198.4.8.167]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0483A6D45; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:40:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from pdcismtp03.vzbi.com ([unknown] [166.40.77.73]) by firewall.verizonbusiness.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0LGM003LU67G7A70@firewall.verizonbusiness.com>; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:40:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pdcismtp03.vzbi.com ([unknown] [127.0.0.1]) by pdcismtp03.vzbi.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with SMTP id <0LGM00BA067GEC00@pdcismtp03.vzbi.com>; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:40:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ASHSRV142.mcilink.com ([unknown] [153.39.68.168]) by pdcismtp03.vzbi.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0LGM00B0L67GGO00@pdcismtp03.vzbi.com>; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:40:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ASHEVS008.mcilink.com ([153.39.69.129]) by ASHSRV142.mcilink.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:40:28 +0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBCC5D.80927EF2" Subject: PW/VCCV Survey Ending Soon! Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:40:25 +0000 Message-id: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA2060600069340AD@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> In-reply-to: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA2060600067709F5@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-topic: PW/VCCV Survey Ending Soon! Thread-index: Act8YpSEMMoOD4/+SCeRBwpsUYLmAgTfklMQDL9wpzACX6Nw8A== X-Priority: 1 Priority: Urgent Importance: high References: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060005AE91E1@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060005DB543A@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA2060600067709F5@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> From: "Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)" To: pwe3 , mpls@ietf.org, l2vpn@ietf.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2011 15:40:28.0007 (UTC) FILETIME=[81184F70:01CBCC5D] X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:40:11 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBCC5D.80927EF2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We now have 9 valid responses to the VCCV User Survey. Time is running out. The deadline for submissions is February 25th. So we have 11 days and counting. =20 It is important that we get as many participants as possible to ensure fair representation in any future PW Control Word and VCCV related work in the PWE3 working group. =20 I will be presenting the results of the PW/VCCV survey in the form of a draft for IETF 80 in Prague. =20 Thanks, Nick =20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =20 All: =20 Per the direction of the PWE3 working group, beginning in IETF77 and reinforced in IETF78, the PWE3 working group is conducting a Service Provider implementation survey related to: =20 - Pseudowire Encapsulations - Control Word Support - Control Word Use - VCCV Control Channel Support - VCCV Control Channel Use =20 http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/pwe3 =20 This is a short survey directed toward Service Providers who currently operate networks using any of the defined PWE3 encapsulations. The results of this survey will be used to determine the direction of the Control Word support in current and future encapsulations as well as solutions to VCCV interoperability challenges. =20 We sincerely urge all service providers to participate. We ask that all equipment providers encourage participation by their Service Provider customers. The more feedback we receive, the better view of the existing network we can have on which to base going-forward direction. =20 If you have any questions, regarding the survey, especially of a technical nature, please contact me. If you have non-technical questions, feel free to reach out to the PWE3 WG chairs and myself. =20 The results of the survey will be aggregated and shared at a high level. No low-level details of network implementations will be shared. All participant's responses will remain private, if not anonymous. =20 All responses will require a valid email address to help ensure the survey's validity. =20 Thanks, Nick =20 Christopher N. "Nick" DelRegno, PMTS CNT, Ethernet Network Architecture & Design 400 International Pkwy Richardson, TX 75081 Tel: 972-729-3411 Email: Nick.DelRegno@verizon.com =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBCC5D.80927EF2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We now have 9 valid responses to the VCCV = User Survey.  Time is running out.  The deadline for = submissions is February 25th.  So we have 11 days and = counting.

 

It is = important that we get as many participants as possible to ensure fair = representation in any future PW Control Word and VCCV related work in = the PWE3 working group.

 

I will be presenting the = results of the PW/VCCV survey in the form of a draft for IETF 80 in = Prague.

 

Thanks,

Nick

 

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

 

All:

 

Per the = direction of the PWE3 working group, beginning in IETF77 and reinforced = in IETF78, the PWE3 working group is conducting a Service Provider = implementation survey related to:

 

-          = Pseudowire Encapsulations

-          = Control Word Support

-          = Control Word Use

-          = VCCV Control Channel Support

-          = VCCV Control Channel Use

 

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s= /pwe3

 

This is a short survey directed toward Service = Providers who currently operate networks using any of the defined PWE3 = encapsulations.  The results of this survey will be used to = determine the direction of the Control Word support in current and = future encapsulations as well as solutions to VCCV interoperability = challenges.

 

We sincerely urge all service providers to = participate.  We ask that all equipment providers encourage = participation by their Service Provider customers.  The more = feedback we receive, the better view of the existing network we can have = on which to base going-forward direction.

 

If you have = any questions, regarding the survey, especially of a technical nature, = please contact me.  If you have non-technical questions, feel free = to reach out to the PWE3 WG chairs and myself.

 

The results = of the survey will be aggregated and shared at a high level.  No = low-level details of network implementations will be shared.  All = participant’s responses will remain private, if not = anonymous.

 

All responses will require a valid email address to = help ensure the survey’s validity.

 

Thanks,

Nick

 

Christopher N. “Nick” DelRegno, = PMTS

CNT, Ethernet Network Architecture & = Design

400 International Pkwy

Richardson, TX  = 75081

Tel:  972-729-3411

Email:  = Nick.DelRegno@verizon.com

 

------_=_NextPart_001_01CBCC5D.80927EF2-- From simon.delord@gmail.com Wed Feb 16 01:31:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505FE3A6DDA for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:31:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jcZg7qanreYm for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:31:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169253A6D63 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so1284820fxm.31 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:31:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CBpcH9oFuPNuT8PAhcuI7hI1+tJw4pe3sY0oSDO9NOs=; b=szRzpyG7upe7HnMt41VaDfMgb9dGCIiyqxAP9v1A5mdT0UcgJvc76EvY82zj83o/08 imtoQ0ZL21Yl891P+XRE0VXb5cAw7vfobUaBk2/pVztn/XvZLCPBQ44GGV8+xwTwtAKY Mq9Afk3VOv1D3AwBV34/dAPLNfYVA+NmHGqkY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=YMfWOyrJGclKyXUKi2sfbvl0u4rOfPUVSmfF89RndUJfVUDYoUp4SJF/2HI+RalxZ8 LnNu+dK0oxmkJ3rPi+fWmj4isnUD+lF7le8j/y3D9K/drUbSHvA+hpo58x8kOUa0ghO1 wsOnufDBcrTG9KKmUcWJGj83G4dP8nlAcI1Nk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.83.11 with SMTP id d11mr444982fal.37.1297848718323; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:31:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.144.137 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:31:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:31:58 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: draft-delord-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten as WG draft? From: Simon Delord To: l2vpn@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a549d3fc90049c62f3dc Cc: "frederic.jounay@orange-ftgroup.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:31:32 -0000 --20cf3054a549d3fc90049c62f3dc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear L2VPN WG members, we have now updated the draft, which is available at http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-00.txt Comments on the list or to the authors are welcome. Thanks, Simon 2011/2/5 Giles Heron > Hi everyone, > > There seems to be pretty good consensus on the WG list that this draft > should be adopted by the WG. > > Having said that discussion of the draft was noteable by its absence during > the period of the poll. > > We have decided to adopt the draft as a WG doc, but would ask that people > please read the draft and post any comments to the list before the next > IETF. > > Thanks. > > Nabil & Giles > > On 11/01/2011 13:14, "Giles Heron" wrote: > > > This is a poll to ask if: > > > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delord-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-03 > > > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > > > Please reply "accept" or "do not accept" to this thread. > > > > Please start a new thread for any technical discussions of the draft. > We'd > > really like to see some technical discussions :) > > > > We will close the poll on Tuesday 25th January 2011. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Nabil & Giles > > > > > > > --20cf3054a549d3fc90049c62f3dc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear L2VPN WG members,

we have now updated the draft, which is available at
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-00.txt

Comments on the list or to the authors are welcome.
Thanks,

Si= mon

2011/2/5 Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>
Hi everyone,

There seems = to be pretty good consensus on the WG list that this draft
should be ado= pted by the WG.

Having said that discussion of the draft was noteable by its absence du= ring
the period of the poll.

We have decided to adopt the draft a= s a WG doc, but would ask that people
please read the draft and post any= comments to the list before the next
IETF.

Thanks.

Nabil & Giles

On 11/01/2011 13:14, "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a poll to ask if:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delord-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-ext= en-03
>
> should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.
>
> Pleas= e reply "accept" or "do not accept" to this thread.
= >
> Please start a new thread for any technical discussions of the= draft. =A0We'd
> really like to see some technical discussions :)
>
> We wi= ll close the poll on Tuesday 25th January 2011.
>
> Thanks!
= >
> Nabil & Giles
>
>



--20cf3054a549d3fc90049c62f3dc-- From nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com Thu Feb 17 03:23:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AF93A6B6E for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 03:23:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xOS7BTRhE5FX for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 03:23:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from tpamail4.verizon.com (tpamail4.verizon.com [192.76.82.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8E43A6C87 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 03:23:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from tpaintrmemf3.verizon.com (tpaintrmemf3.verizon.com [138.83.67.58]) by tpamail4.verizon.com (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id p1HBHO30001158; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:17:30 -0500 (EST) X-AuditID: 8a53433a-b7bebae00000110d-72-4d5d0560c1db Received: from smtptpa3.verizon.com ( [138.83.71.176]) by tpaintrmemf3.verizon.com (EMF) with SMTP id 02.AD.04365.0650D5D4; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:24:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com (fldp1lumxc7hb04.verizon.com [166.68.75.83]) by smtptpa3.verizon.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id p1HBOFPX024480; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:24:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([fe80::303e:41f6:bcf4:d607]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com ([2002:a644:4b53::a644:4b53]) with mapi; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:24:15 -0500 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:24:14 -0500 Subject: L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 80 - Prague Thread-Topic: L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 80 - Prague Thread-Index: AcvOkeGOaVyb9NhWMES00dp+3+qfyg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C98269FA12956nabilnbitarverizoncom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: "Giles Heron \(giheron\)" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:23:50 -0000 --_000_C98269FA12956nabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi L2VPN WG. Please let us know if you have a time-slot request for the L2VPN session at= IETF 80 - Prague. Please, email us your request by Sunday March 13 2011 a= long with the following information: 1) Draft title 2) Presenter name 3) Requested duration Please note that priority will be given to drafts that are clearly within t= he scope of the current L2VPN charter. Additional key dates to remember are: 2011-03-07 (Monday): Internet Draft Cut-off for initial document (-00) subm= ission by 17:00 PT (01:00 Tuesday, March 8 UTC) 2011-03-14 (Monday): Internet Draft final submission cut-off by 17:00 PT (0= 1:00 Tuesday, March 15 UTC) Thanks, Giles and Nabil --_000_C98269FA12956nabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 80 - Prague Hi L2VPN WG.
Please let us know if you have a time-slot request for the L2VPN session at= IETF 80 – Prague. Please,  email us your request by Sunday Marc= h 13 2011 along with the following information:
1) Draft title
2) Presenter name
3) Requested duration

Please note that priority will be given to drafts that are clearly within t= he scope of the current L2VPN charter.

Additional key dates to remember are:
2011-03-07 (Monday): Internet Draft Cut-off for initial document (-00) subm= ission by 17:00 PT (01:00 Tuesday, March 8 UTC)
2011-03-14 (Monday): Internet Draft final submission cut-off by 17:00 PT (0= 1:00 Tuesday, March 15 UTC)

Thanks,
Giles and Nabil
 --_000_C98269FA12956nabilnbitarverizoncom_-- From nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com Mon Feb 21 10:30:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3E33A714B for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:30:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id to+MjXqP4n1w for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:30:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from sacmail4.verizon.com (sacmail4.verizon.com [192.76.84.42]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50733A7146 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:30:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from irvintrmemf1.verizon.com (irvintrmemf1.verizon.com [138.83.34.101]) by sacmail4.verizon.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id p1LIV2YU002382; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:31:18 -0500 (EST) X-AuditID: 8a532265-b7b69ae0000030db-b5-4d62af7632a2 Received: from smtptpa4.verizon.com ( [138.83.71.177]) by irvintrmemf1.verizon.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 80.CE.12507.67FA26D4; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:31:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com (fldp1lumxc7hb04.verizon.com [166.68.75.83]) by smtptpa4.verizon.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id p1LIVHvw014464; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:31:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([fe80::303e:41f6:bcf4:d607]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com ([2002:a644:4b53::a644:4b53]) with mapi; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:31:17 -0500 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:31:15 -0500 Subject: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-08.txt Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-08.txt Thread-Index: AcvR9YWrVnCYJkRc7ESrJrvX/vcvBw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C98819A312BB8nabilnbitarverizoncom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: "y.kamite@ntt.com" , Giles Heron , "lufang@cisco.com" , Rahul Aggarwal X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:30:47 -0000 --_000_C98819A312BB8nabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is the start of a two-week working group last call on the draft "Multi= cast in VPLS". The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-= mcast-08. Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group e= mail list. This WG last call will close on Tuesday March 8th, 2011. Regards, Nabil --_000_C98819A312BB8nabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-08.txt
This is the start of a two-week working group last call on the draft “= ;Multic= ast in VPLS”.
The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/= draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-08.
 
Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group e= mail list.

This WG last call will close on Tuesday March 8th, 2011.
 
Regards,
Nabil
 --_000_C98819A312BB8nabilnbitarverizoncom_-- From nick.delregno@verizon.com Mon Feb 21 10:55:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDFB3A6E09; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:55:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.995 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.995 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.603, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DNoezABpdAdE; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:55:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ashesmtp02.verizonbusiness.com (ashesmtp02.verizonbusiness.com [198.4.8.166]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5503A6E38; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:55:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from omzismtp03.vzbi.com ([unknown] [165.122.46.170]) by firewall.verizonbusiness.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0LGZ00HCWDXB6Q10@firewall.verizonbusiness.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:56:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omzismtp03.vzbi.com ([unknown] [127.0.0.1]) by omzismtp03.vzbi.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with SMTP id <0LGZ00A4KDXBXU00@omzismtp03.vzbi.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:55:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ASHSRV141.mcilink.com ([unknown] [153.39.68.167]) by omzismtp03.vzbi.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0LGZ00A6CDXAWX00@omzismtp03.vzbi.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:55:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ASHEVS008.mcilink.com ([153.39.69.129]) by ASHSRV141.mcilink.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:55:58 +0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBD1F8.F8BB3703" Subject: LAST WEEK!! PW/VCCV User Implementation Survey Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:55:54 +0000 Message-id: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060006A9D633@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> In-reply-to: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA2060600067709F5@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-topic: LAST WEEK!! PW/VCCV User Implementation Survey Thread-index: Act8YpSEMMoOD4/+SCeRBwpsUYLmAgTfklMQDL9wpzADxnTEgA== References: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060005AE91E1@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060005DB543A@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA2060600067709F5@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> From: "Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)" To: pwe3 , mpls@ietf.org, l2vpn@ietf.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2011 18:55:58.0100 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9AAB540:01CBD1F8] X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:55:21 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBD1F8.F8BB3703 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All: =20 This is the last week to participate in the PW/VCCV User Implementation Survey. The deadline for submissions is February 25th. The survey will be ended this Friday evening and the results analyzed. =20 We have 11 responses so far. =20 It is important that we get as many participants as possible to ensure fair representation in any future PW Control Word and VCCV related work in the PWE3 working group. =20 Thanks, Nick =20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =20 All: =20 Per the direction of the PWE3 working group, beginning in IETF77 and reinforced in IETF78, the PWE3 working group is conducting a Service Provider implementation survey related to: =20 - Pseudowire Encapsulations - Control Word Support - Control Word Use - VCCV Control Channel Support - VCCV Control Channel Use =20 http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/pwe3 =20 This is a short survey directed toward Service Providers who currently operate networks using any of the defined PWE3 encapsulations. The results of this survey will be used to determine the direction of the Control Word support in current and future encapsulations as well as solutions to VCCV interoperability challenges. =20 We sincerely urge all service providers to participate. We ask that all equipment providers encourage participation by their Service Provider customers. The more feedback we receive, the better view of the existing network we can have on which to base going-forward direction. =20 If you have any questions, regarding the survey, especially of a technical nature, please contact me. If you have non-technical questions, feel free to reach out to the PWE3 WG chairs and myself. =20 The results of the survey will be aggregated and shared at a high level. No low-level details of network implementations will be shared. All participant's responses will remain private, if not anonymous. =20 All responses will require a valid email address to help ensure the survey's validity. =20 Thanks, Nick =20 Christopher N. "Nick" DelRegno, PMTS CNT, Ethernet Network Architecture & Design 400 International Pkwy Richardson, TX 75081 Tel: 972-729-3411 Email: Nick.DelRegno@verizon.com =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBD1F8.F8BB3703 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All:

 

This is the = last week to participate in the PW/VCCV User Implementation = Survey.  The deadline for submissions is February 25th.  The = survey will be ended this Friday evening and the results = analyzed.

 

We have 11 responses so far.

 

It is = important that we get as many participants as possible to ensure fair = representation in any future PW Control Word and VCCV related work in = the PWE3 working group.

 

Thanks,

Nick

 

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

 

All:

 

Per the = direction of the PWE3 working group, beginning in IETF77 and reinforced = in IETF78, the PWE3 working group is conducting a Service Provider = implementation survey related to:

 

-          = Pseudowire Encapsulations

-          = Control Word Support

-          = Control Word Use

-          = VCCV Control Channel Support

-          = VCCV Control Channel Use

 

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s= /pwe3

 

This is a short survey directed toward Service = Providers who currently operate networks using any of the defined PWE3 = encapsulations.  The results of this survey will be used to = determine the direction of the Control Word support in current and = future encapsulations as well as solutions to VCCV interoperability = challenges.

 

We sincerely urge all service providers to = participate.  We ask that all equipment providers encourage = participation by their Service Provider customers.  The more = feedback we receive, the better view of the existing network we can have = on which to base going-forward direction.

 

If you have = any questions, regarding the survey, especially of a technical nature, = please contact me.  If you have non-technical questions, feel free = to reach out to the PWE3 WG chairs and myself.

 

The results = of the survey will be aggregated and shared at a high level.  No = low-level details of network implementations will be shared.  All = participant’s responses will remain private, if not = anonymous.

 

All responses will require a valid email address to = help ensure the survey’s validity.

 

Thanks,

Nick

 

Christopher N. “Nick” DelRegno, = PMTS

CNT, Ethernet Network Architecture & = Design

400 International Pkwy

Richardson, TX  = 75081

Tel:  972-729-3411

Email:  = Nick.DelRegno@verizon.com

 

------_=_NextPart_001_01CBD1F8.F8BB3703-- From nick.delregno@verizon.com Fri Feb 25 07:20:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4493A68F1; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:20:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.277 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.321, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QL4tXTjP8NWM; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:20:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from ashesmtp01.verizonbusiness.com (ashesmtp01.verizonbusiness.com [198.4.8.163]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531B33A682C; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:20:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from omzismtp02.vzbi.com ([unknown] [165.122.46.167]) by firewall.verizonbusiness.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0LH60070WINRV2A0@firewall.verizonbusiness.com>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:21:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omzismtp02.vzbi.com ([unknown] [127.0.0.1]) by omzismtp02.vzbi.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with SMTP id <0LH600M0HINR8X00@omzismtp02.vzbi.com>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:21:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ASHSRV142.mcilink.com ([unknown] [153.39.68.168]) by omzismtp02.vzbi.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.03 32bit (built May 29 2009)) with ESMTP id <0LH600MC5INR5S00@omzismtp02.vzbi.com>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:21:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ASHEVS008.mcilink.com ([153.39.69.129]) by ASHSRV142.mcilink.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:21:27 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBD4FF.AB5ADCFF" X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: LAST CHANCE!! PW/VCCV User Implementation Survey Closes Today @ 5PM CST Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:21:19 +0000 Message-id: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060006B14EB7@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> In-reply-to: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060006A9D633@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-topic: LAST CHANCE!! PW/VCCV User Implementation Survey Closes Today @ 5PM CST Thread-index: Act8YpSEMMoOD4/+SCeRBwpsUYLmAgTfklMQDL9wpzADxnTEgADBYkhg References: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060005AE91E1@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060005DB543A@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA2060600067709F5@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060006A9D633@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> From: "Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)" To: pwe3 , mpls@ietf.org, l2vpn@ietf.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2011 15:21:27.0237 (UTC) FILETIME=[ABAFDF50:01CBD4FF] X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:20:43 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBD4FF.AB5ADCFF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All: =20 This is the last day to participate in the PW/VCCV User Implementation Survey. The survey closes today at 5PM CST. I will aggregate the responses and provide the results via a draft and presentation in Prague. =20 We have 18 responses so far. Thank you to all who have provided this valuable information! =20 Thanks, Nick =20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =20 All: =20 Per the direction of the PWE3 working group, beginning in IETF77 and reinforced in IETF78, the PWE3 working group is conducting a Service Provider implementation survey related to: =20 - Pseudowire Encapsulations - Control Word Support - Control Word Use - VCCV Control Channel Support - VCCV Control Channel Use =20 http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/pwe3 =20 This is a short survey directed toward Service Providers who currently operate networks using any of the defined PWE3 encapsulations. The results of this survey will be used to determine the direction of the Control Word support in current and future encapsulations as well as solutions to VCCV interoperability challenges. =20 We sincerely urge all service providers to participate. We ask that all equipment providers encourage participation by their Service Provider customers. The more feedback we receive, the better view of the existing network we can have on which to base going-forward direction. =20 If you have any questions, regarding the survey, especially of a technical nature, please contact me. If you have non-technical questions, feel free to reach out to the PWE3 WG chairs and myself. =20 The results of the survey will be aggregated and shared at a high level. No low-level details of network implementations will be shared. All participant's responses will remain private, if not anonymous. =20 All responses will require a valid email address to help ensure the survey's validity. =20 Thanks, Nick =20 Christopher N. "Nick" DelRegno, PMTS CNT, Ethernet Network Architecture & Design 400 International Pkwy Richardson, TX 75081 Tel: 972-729-3411 Email: Nick.DelRegno@verizon.com =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBD4FF.AB5ADCFF Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All:

 

This is the = last day to participate in the PW/VCCV User Implementation Survey.  = The survey closes today at 5PM CST.  I will aggregate the responses = and provide the results via a draft and presentation in = Prague.

 

We have 18 responses so far.  Thank you to all = who have provided this valuable information!

 

Thanks,

Nick

 

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

 

All:

 

Per the = direction of the PWE3 working group, beginning in IETF77 and reinforced = in IETF78, the PWE3 working group is conducting a Service Provider = implementation survey related to:

 

-          = Pseudowire Encapsulations

-          = Control Word Support

-          = Control Word Use

-          = VCCV Control Channel Support

-          = VCCV Control Channel Use

 

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s= /pwe3

 

This is a short survey directed toward Service = Providers who currently operate networks using any of the defined PWE3 = encapsulations.  The results of this survey will be used to = determine the direction of the Control Word support in current and = future encapsulations as well as solutions to VCCV interoperability = challenges.

 

We sincerely urge all service providers to = participate.  We ask that all equipment providers encourage = participation by their Service Provider customers.  The more = feedback we receive, the better view of the existing network we can have = on which to base going-forward direction.

 

If you have = any questions, regarding the survey, especially of a technical nature, = please contact me.  If you have non-technical questions, feel free = to reach out to the PWE3 WG chairs and myself.

 

The results = of the survey will be aggregated and shared at a high level.  No = low-level details of network implementations will be shared.  All = participant’s responses will remain private, if not = anonymous.

 

All responses will require a valid email address to = help ensure the survey’s validity.

 

Thanks,

Nick

 

Christopher N. “Nick” DelRegno, = PMTS

CNT, Ethernet Network Architecture & = Design

400 International Pkwy

Richardson, TX  = 75081

Tel:  972-729-3411

Email:  = Nick.DelRegno@verizon.com

 

------_=_NextPart_001_01CBD4FF.AB5ADCFF--