From jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com Tue Oct 1 11:58:37 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA86911E8227 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:58:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pCDalLPhX7xm for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [135.245.0.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648AE11E81AD for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r91IwSll002318 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:58:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r91IwRtS014049 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Oct 2013 20:58:28 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.70]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 20:58:28 +0200 From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: Re: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Index: AQHOvgWygdfqkebgSU6BhTy5A0Kuq5nfnXyA Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 18:58:27 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.38] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.35 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 18:58:38 -0000 Support.. -----Original Message----- From: Giles Heron Date: Monday, September 30, 2013 10:51 AM To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn >This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 > >should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > >please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October >with comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption. > >Nabil & Giles From internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed Oct 2 06:57:15 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C9721F9C68; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:57:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.506 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kJ1NWekji8XE; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B700121F84DB; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:55:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-15.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.72.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20131002135541.20697.33911.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 06:55:41 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 13:57:15 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : Multicast in VPLS Author(s) : Rahul Aggarwal Juniper Networks Yuji Kamite Luyuan Fang Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-15.txt Pages : 50 Date : 2013-10-02 Abstract: [RFC4761] and [RFC4762] describe a solution for Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) multicast that relies on the use of point-to-point or multipoint-to-point unicast Label Switched Paths (LSPs) for carrying multicast traffic. This solution has certain limitations for certain VPLS multicast traffic profiles. For example, it may result in highly non-optimal bandwidth utilization when large amount of multicast traffic is to be transported. This document describes solutions for overcoming a subset of the limitations of existing VPLS multicast solution. It describes procedures for VPLS multicast that utilize multicast trees in the service provider (SP) network. The solution described in this document allows sharing of one such multicast tree among multiple VPLS instances. Furthermore, the solution described in this document allows a single multicast tree in the SP network to carry traffic belonging only to a specified set of one or more IP multicast streams from one or more VPLS instances. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-15 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-15 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From sriganeshkini@gmail.com Wed Oct 2 15:30:51 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA7F21F967A for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:30:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w7+SBYX6XG47 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB3B21F8517 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id bj1so1666614pad.35 for ; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:28:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=b3dcTcSLmKjFHhyhtDDwQe9ilNbVi5UsLTbBghi1k54=; b=cUTca2pAjehdrZUPBtejqvVCGtSagWPA1ozxVbRiGwFWM6GZk/63LXEEw1UWoJ05p9 MHoK+ugbE2Zx6exvanksxHKpcEU8RZGc+APcvETeSobTwyh0qWltVmflWjSjXETJPcQx 77t8WuoPFbD4XRpkRhoXLjR+dxy5A+BKtFeTL3LiNpVe1lJDUsRSRxEz3GU2nAqi+GkD b/U6g9jWH+XjW63F2WyctkU64jA2jKP8uuzDOJ/d5aBZtJ4mc0AJwk0PsrVeL/YfVWXy ncW5Sc7FOSRCmlzgJLVeu1TXrbOnVZEWwUwkGxCtqkk3TY4l9uQlLO/j6a/Zns02KYe8 JA0w== X-Received: by 10.68.101.225 with SMTP id fj1mr5076265pbb.8.1380752903427; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:28:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: sriganeshkini@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.0.225 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:27:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> References: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> From: Sriganesh Kini Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:27:53 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ekqQ3xq63rVj6tfxbC3Jz6MDIW4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn To: Giles Heron Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b67328854de7304e7c99600 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 22:30:51 -0000 --047d7b67328854de7304e7c99600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Support. A few comments 1. In the title instead of 802.1aq use the more easily understandable "Shortest path bridging (802.1aq)" and be specific if it is only for the MAC mode. 2. Abstract is a very long sentence (with multiple uses of "in a way"). Break this up into shorter sentences. 3. Figure 1 is split across pages boundaries. Should be on one page. 4. Should reference to draft-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-02 should be draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn ? It also seems to be pointing to an incorrect reference [8] - Sri On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Giles Heron wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October > with comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption. > > Nabil & Giles --047d7b67328854de7304e7c99600 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Support.

A few comme= nts
1. In the title instead of 802.1aq use the more easily underst= andable "Shortest path bridging (802.1aq)" and be specific if it = is only for the MAC mode.
2. Abstract is a very long sentence (with multiple uses of "in a way&q= uot;). Break this up into shorter sentences.
3. Figure 1 is split = across pages boundaries. Should be on one page.
4. Should referenc= e to draft-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-02 should be draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn ? It also = seems to be pointing to an incorrect reference [8]

- Sri


On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Giles Heron = <giles.heron@= gmail.com> wrote:
This is a request to gauge consensus as to w= hether:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04<= br>
should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.

please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October with= comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption.

Nabil & Giles

--047d7b67328854de7304e7c99600-- From eric.gray@ericsson.com Thu Oct 3 03:28:32 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D839D21F9994 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 03:28:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id noFr+FY1Df+e for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 03:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB51021F85E0 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 03:27:39 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c618062d-b7fda8e0000024c6-58-524d46962ba2 Received: from EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.93]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id BB.E8.09414.6964D425; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 12:27:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.124]) by EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.93]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:27:34 -0400 From: Eric Gray To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Index: AQHOvgWyttWWs7hhP0mTbv8OCdXnhZniyf7g Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 10:27:33 +0000 Message-ID: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF6440326@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> References: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.134] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPrO40N98gg13TzS2eHp3BaPH42yF2 ByaPnbPusnssWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvj/PEjrAWvWSp+PfnL2sD4j7mLkZNDQsBE ouPBE3YIW0ziwr31bF2MXBxCAkcZJfr2fGWFcJYxSnzs+M0CUsUmoCFx7M5aRhBbRMBL4ub/ e2C2sICtxJSmRhaIuJ3EpYsHmCBsI4k5Z28CxTk4WARUJI58iAAJ8wp4S7TdvQFWIiRgI3Hn 5lSwIziBxrz9chzsOEagg76fWgNWwywgLnHryXwmiEMFJJbsOQ/1gKjEy8f/WCFsZYklT/az QNTrSCzY/YkNwtaWWLbwNTPEXkGJkzOfsExgFJ2FZOwsJC2zkLTMQtKygJFlFSNHaXFqWW66 kcEmRmA0HJNg093BuOel5SFGaQ4WJXHeL2+dg4QE0hNLUrNTUwtSi+KLSnNSiw8xMnFwSjUw Kgdt8DpZq8sefk17kXcf9+/nTbG2rndt+nQ2J8reC+m98TPs1m+/bR+2Pjqk2br74IddpQ5+ j+1/FsZ/bWrmez/xeMBZsZRtmq3rZ5XFq75gKbrhb5DtFvLms8KJnWJuPr3qMtySLCckA1fG /t8WsanzWXLh09qQHdO796lvmFU53c4ucXqXEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAw/E5C1QCAAA= X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 10:28:33 -0000 I support adoption of this draft by the L2VPN working group. -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 1:51 PM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October with= comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption. Nabil & Giles From marc.lasserre@alcatel-lucent.com Thu Oct 3 06:04:42 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9BD21F8AF4 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:04:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jbnnlmuAdUbN for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F8021F9C8E for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r93D1dDJ005238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:01:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r93D1dsJ003855 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:01:39 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.70]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:01:39 +0200 From: "LASSERRE, MARC (MARC)" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Index: AQHOvgWxv4OI7Q74Gk2zbzreFpvND5ni9cMw Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:01:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:04:42 -0000 Support.=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org]=20 > On Behalf Of Giles Heron > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 7:51 PM > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn >=20 > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday=20 > 14th October with comments as to its suitability, or not, for=20 > WG adoption. >=20 > Nabil & Giles= From skeesara@avaya.com Thu Oct 3 06:06:40 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CF221F9C72 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:06:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S0s47EsOqeq8 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEC821F8947 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:02:55 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkcFAN9pTVKHCzI1/2dsb2JhbABZgmYhOFKDKL4WF4EJFm0HgiUBAQEBAxIREVEEAgEIDQQEAQEDAgYdAwICAjAUAQgIAQEEEwgah1IDDwELn26KPZIfF4Epiz2COjgGgmQ1gQQDlhcFgxSFLYVthTaDJIIq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1026,1371096000"; d="scan'208";a="26417910" Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.53]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 03 Oct 2013 09:02:53 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-US1EXHC04.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.85.15]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 03 Oct 2013 08:53:32 -0400 Received: from AZ-US1EXMB01.global.avaya.com ([fe80::54fa:ed52:888e:7ca8]) by AZ-US1EXHC04.global.avaya.com ([135.11.85.15]) with mapi id 14.03.0146.000; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:02:16 -0400 From: "Keesara, Srikanth (Srikanth)" To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 Thread-Topic: WG adoption for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 Thread-Index: Ac6+B0avnpbw9+7SRhS1J29QDhaKVgCMXYpQ Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:02:16 +0000 Message-ID: <15A141A4420F4D47B1DDD139A80048CB64BD56FA@AZ-US1EXMB01.global.avaya.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.11.85.47] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 06:11:52 -0700 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:06:41 -0000 U3VwcG9ydA0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogRGF2aWQgQWxsYW4g SSBbbWFpbHRvOmRhdmlkLmkuYWxsYW5AZXJpY3Nzb24uY29tXSANClNlbnQ6IE1vbmRheSwgU2Vw dGVtYmVyIDMwLCAyMDEzIDI6MDMgUE0NClRvOiBQYXVsIFVuYmVoYWdlbjsgcGV0ZXJhc2h3b29k c21pdGhAeWFob28uY2ENCkNjOiBCcmFnZywgTmlnZWw7IExhcHVoLCBSb2dlciAoUm9nZXIpOyBG ZWR5aywgRG9uYWxkIChEb24pOyBKYW5vcyBGYXJrYXM7IFN0ZXZlbnMsIEx1ZG92aWNvIChMdWRv dmljbyk7IEtlZXNhcmEsIFNyaWthbnRoIChTcmlrYW50aCk7IER1Y2FycmUsIERpZGllciAoRGlk aWVyKQ0KU3ViamVjdDogV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gZm9yIGRyYWZ0LWFsbGFuLWwydnBuLXNwYm0tZXZw bi0wNA0KDQpISSBUaGVyZToNCg0KV2UgZmluYWxseSBoYXZlIHRoZSBjaGFpcnMgYWdyZWVpbmcg dG8gcG9sbCBmb3IgV0cgYWRvcHRpb24uIElmIHlvdSdyZSBpbiBhIHBvc2l0aW9uIHRvIG9mZmVy IHN1cHBvcnQsIHNwZWFrIG5vdyAuLi4hDQoNCi0tLUZvcndhcmRlZCBtZXNzYWdlLS0tLQ0KVGhp cyBpcyBhIHJlcXVlc3QgdG8gZ2F1Z2UgY29uc2Vuc3VzIGFzIHRvIHdoZXRoZXI6DQoNCmh0dHA6 Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWFsbGFuLWwydnBuLXNwYm0tZXZwbi0wNA0KDQpz aG91bGQgYmUgYWNjZXB0ZWQgYXMgYW4gTDJWUE4gV0cgZHJhZnQuDQoNCnBsZWFzZSByZXZpZXcg dGhlIGRyYWZ0IGFuZCByZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGJ5IE1vbmRheSAxNHRoIE9jdG9iZXIg d2l0aCBjb21tZW50cyBhcyB0byBpdHMgc3VpdGFiaWxpdHksIG9yIG5vdCwgZm9yIFdHIGFkb3B0 aW9uLg0KDQpOYWJpbCAmIEdpbGVzDQo= From matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com Thu Oct 3 06:48:24 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5531711E80AD; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:48:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Egfnq494IXZw; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF7221E805D; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r93Diifm007487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:44:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r93DihUT011842 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:44:43 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.189]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:44:43 +0200 From: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" To: Yakov Rekhter Subject: Re: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14.txt Thread-Topic: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14.txt Thread-Index: AQHOvXESP3mxn74FpEGDXCcZiCiZlpni8cQA Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:44:42 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <201309300007.r8U07ML16896@magenta.juniper.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.7.130812 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <39E86674AD3B93488991830AF122AF19@exchange.lucent.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "rtg-dir@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast@tools.ietf.org" , "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:48:24 -0000 Yakov Thanks for your responses. Please see below. On 30/09/2013 01:07, "Yakov Rekhter" wrote: >Matthew, > >> Hello, >>=20 >> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. >> The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related >> drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and >> sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide >> assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing >> Directorate, please see >> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/routing.html >>=20 >> Since IETF LC has ended for this draft, I am primarily providing >>comments t=3D >> o >> aid the ADs, and I hope the authors will also take them into >>consideration =3D >> to improve >> the readability of the draft. > >Thanks for your review and comments. > >> Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14.txt >> Reviewer: Matthew Bocci >> Review Date: 26 September 2013 >> IETF LC End Date: date-if-known >> Intended Status: Proposed Standard >>=20 >> Summary: >>=20 >> I have some minor concerns about this document that I think should >> be resolved before publication. >>=20 >> Comments: >>=20 >> The draft appears to be complete and accurate form a technical >>perspective.=3D >> However, >> the style of the draft and the density of the text make it quite >>difficult =3D >> to >> read at times. It took several passes of some sections of the document, >>and=3D >> returning >> to earlier sections, to properly follow the text. I believe this is >>because=3D >> the basic >> multicast architecture could be better-explained earlier in the draft. >>=20 >> Major Issues: >>=20 >> No major issues found. >>=20 >> Minor Issues: >>=20 >> 1) The draft contains both introductory architectural / framework >> descriptions, and more detailed specifications of the protocols required >> to efficiently support multicast in VPLS. However, the introductory >>sections >> (e.g. the overview in section 5) are presented in the form of extremely >> dense text, and while >> they seem to be trying to explain architectural concepts, they do not >>use=20 >> a single diagram to help the reader visualise the solutions in the >>draft.=20 >> In fact, the first >> figures illustrating the protocol hierarchies and relationships do not >> appear until the >> label stacks are described in Section 13 on page 43. >>=20 >> I think inserting some figures in section 5 to illustrate the >>different=20 >> multicast schemes, and also moving the data forwarding section earlier >>in=20 >> the document, would greatly help the reader. > >Wrt "inserting some figures in section 5", I would be glad to do this, >provided you elaborate a bit on what specific figures you would like >to insert. I think that it would help to add a figure to each of the bullets in section 5.1 (inclusive trees and selective trees) illustrating the architecture of each (a couple of reference models would be helpful). >=20 > >Wrt moving the data forwarding section earlier in the document, >the placement of the data forwarding section follows the structure >of rfc6513. OK, but at least it would help if you added an illustration to the two bullets I have referenced above, which shows the label stacks in each of the cases.=20 > >> 2) Cross-references in the text use the title of the referenced >>section, bu=3D >> t do not >> include a section number. Personally, I found that this made the draft >>much=3D >> more difficult >> to navigate than it should be. It would help to add section numbers to >>each=3D >> instance of >> a cross reference. > >This will be fixed as part of the RFC Editor process. OK thanks > >> Nits: >>=20 >> Abstract, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: >> s/solution/solutions > >Fixed. Thanks > >> Section 3: This section would be clearer of it was in tabular form, >> in a similar manner to other RFCs. > >I would prefer to keep it in the present form, as there are plenty >of other RFCs that have similar form. OK I guess it is a personal preference. > =20 >> You could also add short (one sentence) definitions of 'Inclusive >>Trees', '=3D >> Selective Trees', and 'Aggregation'. > >Will do. Thanks > >> Sec 4. Introduction: 3rd para: >> s/when large/when a large > >Fixed. > >> Sec 4. Introduction: 5th para: >> s/RSVP-PE/RSVP-TE > >Fixed. > >> Sec 5.2. BGP-Based VPLS Membership Auto-Discovery: 1st para: >> s/that have membership these/that have membership of these > >Fixed. > >> Sec 5.4 Advertising P-Multicast..., 2nd para: >> Grammar: The decision to bind a set of VPLS instances or customer >>multicast=3D >> group is >> local to the ingress PE matter, / The decision to bind a set of VPLS >>instan=3D >> ces or >> customer multicast groups is a local matter for the ingress PE , > >Fixed. > >> Sec 5.4 Advertising P-Multicast..., 3rd para: >> s/be included. / be included > >Fixed. > >> Section 5.5 Aggregation: >>=20 >> The following algorithm is hard to parse: >> + ((Average number of VPLS instances on a PE / Aggregation Factor) >> * number of PEs) / (Average number of P-Multicast trees that >> transit a given P router) >>=20 >> I think this could be restated in a more readable manner. Just as an >>exampl=3D >> e: >> AveVPLS NPE >> ------- X -------- >> Aggr AvePTree >>=20 >> Where: AveVPLS is the average number of VPLS instances on a PE >> Aggr is the aggregation factor >> NPE is the number of PEs >> AvePTree is the average number of P-multicast that transit a >>giv=3D >en P-router >>=20 > >Will fix. Thanks > >> Section 6: Inter-AS Inclusive P-Multicast..., 5th Paragraph >> This paragraph mentions FEC128 and FEC 129. It would be better to call >>thes=3D >> e by their >> formal names used in RFC4447 i.e. The PWid FEC and the Generalized PWid >>FEC > >Will fix. Thanks Matthew > >Yakov. > From yakov@juniper.net Thu Oct 3 08:01:27 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DBF21F90FD; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:01:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.432 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XQnQjDJBFa74; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0CE21F9926; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail55-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.252) by VA3EHSOBE011.bigfish.com (10.7.40.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:50:33 +0000 Received: from mail55-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail55-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF67D42029A; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:50:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.224.50; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:P-EMF01-SAC.jnpr.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -23 X-BigFish: VPS-23(zzbb2dI98dI1432I1418Idbf2izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz8275ch1de098h1033IL17326ah1de097h186068h1d68deh8275dhz2fh2a8h839h944hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1b2fh1fb3h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1fe8h1ff5h1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail55-va3: domain of juniper.net designates 66.129.224.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.129.224.50; envelope-from=yakov@juniper.net; helo=P-EMF01-SAC.jnpr.net ; SAC.jnpr.net ; Received: from mail55-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail55-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1380811725454892_11367; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3EHSMHS019.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.254]) by mail55-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669A04E005B; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from P-EMF01-SAC.jnpr.net (66.129.224.50) by VA3EHSMHS019.bigfish.com (10.7.99.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:48:44 +0000 Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMF01-SAC.jnpr.net (172.24.192.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:48:43 -0700 Received: from juniper.net (sapphire.juniper.net [172.17.28.108]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id r93EWwL60083; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:33:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yakov@juniper.net) Message-ID: <201310031433.r93EWwL60083@magenta.juniper.net> To: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" Subject: Re: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14.txt In-Reply-To: References: X-MH-In-Reply-To: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" message dated "Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:44:42 -0000." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <594.1380810778.1@juniper.net> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:32:58 -0700 From: Yakov Rekhter X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , Yakov Rekhter , "draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast@tools.ietf.org" , "rtg-dir@ietf.org" , "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:01:28 -0000 Matthew, > Yakov > > Thanks for your responses. Please see below. > > On 30/09/2013 01:07, "Yakov Rekhter" wrote: > > >Matthew, > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. > >> The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related > >> drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and > >> sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide > >> assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing > >> Directorate, please see > >> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/routing.html > >> > >> Since IETF LC has ended for this draft, I am primarily providing > >>comments t= > >> o > >> aid the ADs, and I hope the authors will also take them into > >>consideration = > >> to improve > >> the readability of the draft. > > > >Thanks for your review and comments. > > > >> Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14.txt > >> Reviewer: Matthew Bocci > >> Review Date: 26 September 2013 > >> IETF LC End Date: date-if-known > >> Intended Status: Proposed Standard > >> > >> Summary: > >> > >> I have some minor concerns about this document that I think should > >> be resolved before publication. > >> > >> Comments: > >> > >> The draft appears to be complete and accurate form a technical > >>perspective.= > >> However, > >> the style of the draft and the density of the text make it quite > >>difficult = > >> to > >> read at times. It took several passes of some sections of the document, > >>and= > >> returning > >> to earlier sections, to properly follow the text. I believe this is > >>because= > >> the basic > >> multicast architecture could be better-explained earlier in the draft. > >> > >> Major Issues: > >> > >> No major issues found. > >> > >> Minor Issues: > >> > >> 1) The draft contains both introductory architectural / framework > >> descriptions, and more detailed specifications of the protocols required > >> to efficiently support multicast in VPLS. However, the introductory > >>sections > >> (e.g. the overview in section 5) are presented in the form of extremely > >> dense text, and while > >> they seem to be trying to explain architectural concepts, they do not > >>use > >> a single diagram to help the reader visualise the solutions in the > >>draft. > >> In fact, the first > >> figures illustrating the protocol hierarchies and relationships do not > >> appear until the > >> label stacks are described in Section 13 on page 43. > >> > >> I think inserting some figures in section 5 to illustrate the > >>different > >> multicast schemes, and also moving the data forwarding section earlier > >>in > >> the document, would greatly help the reader. > > > >Wrt "inserting some figures in section 5", I would be glad to do this, > >provided you elaborate a bit on what specific figures you would like > >to insert. > > I think that it would help to add a figure to each of the bullets in > section 5.1 (inclusive trees and selective trees) illustrating the > architecture of each (a couple of reference models would be helpful). I am not sure I agree. In fact, the concepts of inclusive and selective trees have been "borrowed" from rfc6513/rfc6514, and neither of these RFCs have any figures that illustrate inclusive/selective trees. > > > > > > >Wrt moving the data forwarding section earlier in the document, > >the placement of the data forwarding section follows the structure > >of rfc6513. > > OK, but at least it would help if you added an illustration to the two > bullets I have referenced above, which shows the label stacks in each of > the cases. > The label stack is exactly the same for both inclusive and selective trees. Section 13 shows the label stacks for inclusive trees (both non-aggregate and aggregate), and since the label stack is the same for both inclusive and selective trees, the figures the label stack shown in these figures equally applies to both inclusive and selective trees. Would the following new text in 13.1 address your concern ? While this section shows the label stack for inclusive trees, since the label stack is exactly the same for both inclusive and selective trees, the label stack shown in this section is equally applicable to selective trees. Yakov. From martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com Fri Oct 4 02:50:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE5621F9A97 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 02:50:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.179 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.179 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3EvEKgZt7KLt for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 02:50:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3284121F958A for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 02:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r949o7Rx013820 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 04:50:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r949o6wl027056 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:50:06 +0200 Received: from [172.27.205.225] (135.239.27.40) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:50:06 +0200 Message-ID: <524E8F4D.1040504@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:50:05 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux Organization: Alcatel-Lucent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Fwd: Heads-up [Re: Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-l2l3-vpn-mcast-mib] References: <524E8E94.8040400@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <524E8E94.8040400@alcatel-lucent.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <524E8E94.8040400@alcatel-lucent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.40] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 09:50:49 -0000 Hello, for your information, and action (on the L3VPN mailing list) Thank you Martin (for the L3VPN co-chairs) -------- Message original -------- Sujet: Heads-up [Re: Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-l2l3-vpn-mcast-mib] Date : Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:47:00 +0200 De : Martin Vigoureux Organisation : Alcatel-Lucent Pour : All, we have not seen a lot of reaction to this adoption poll. We'd like to give it a second try. Please express your opinion (in favour or opposed to). Extension of the poll runs until Oct 11th. Martin (for the L3VPN co-chairs) Le 05/09/2013 16:40, thomas.morin@orange.com a écrit : > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on possible adoption of > draft-zzhang-l2l3-vpn-mcast-mib-00 [1] as a working group item. > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > > *** Note that what is proposed is that this document becomes a common > foundation for the already adopted L3VPN multicast MIB > (draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-mib) and for an L2VPN multicast MIB. Hence, the > L2VPN will be noticed and asked for feedback on the adoption of this > document. *** > > This poll runs until September 20th. > > > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details). > > ==> *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please > respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from > each author and contributor. > > If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author > or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you, > > Martin & Thomas > l3vpn chairs > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzhang-l2l3-vpn-mcast-mib-00 > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > From william.zayas@fibercrossing.net Fri Oct 4 05:34:35 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C9B21F8E40 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 05:34:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ua39n3iEQvuY for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 05:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atl4mhob18.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob18.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.58]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89F521F9A50 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 05:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.206]) by atl4mhob18.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r94CO770002623 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:24:07 -0400 Received: (qmail 29034 invoked by uid 0); 4 Oct 2013 12:24:07 -0000 X-TCPREMOTEIP: 173.79.9.217 X-Authenticated-UID: william.zayas@fibercrossing.net Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.4?) (william.zayas@fibercrossing.net@173.79.9.217) by 0 with ESMTPA; 4 Oct 2013 12:24:07 -0000 Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:24:05 -0400 Subject: RE: Fwd: Heads-up [Re: Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-l2l3-vpn-mcast-mib] Message-ID: Importance: normal From: William Zayas To: Martin Vigoureux , l2vpn@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.android.email_3708980920159930" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: William Zayas List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:34:35 -0000 ----_com.android.email_3708980920159930 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 U3VwcG9ydC7CoAoKQ2hlZXJzLgoKQmlsbAoKLS0tLS0tLS0gT3JpZ2luYWwgbWVzc2FnZSAtLS0t LS0tLQpGcm9tOiBNYXJ0aW4gVmlnb3VyZXV4IDxtYXJ0aW4udmlnb3VyZXV4QGFsY2F0ZWwtbHVj ZW50LmNvbT4gCkRhdGU6IDEwLzA0LzIwMTMgIDU6NTAgQU0gIChHTVQtMDU6MDApIApUbzogbDJ2 cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmcgClN1YmplY3Q6IEZ3ZDogSGVhZHMtdXAgW1JlOiBQb2xsIGZvciBhZG9wdGlv bjogZHJhZnQtenpoYW5nLWwybDMtdnBuLW1jYXN0LW1pYl0gCiAKSGVsbG8sCgpmb3IgeW91ciBp bmZvcm1hdGlvbiwgYW5kIGFjdGlvbiAob24gdGhlIEwzVlBOIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdCkKClRoYW5r IHlvdQoKTWFydGluCihmb3IgdGhlIEwzVlBOIGNvLWNoYWlycykKCgotLS0tLS0tLSBNZXNzYWdl IG9yaWdpbmFsIC0tLS0tLS0tClN1amV0OiBIZWFkcy11cCBbUmU6IFBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9u OiBkcmFmdC16emhhbmctbDJsMy12cG4tbWNhc3QtbWliXQpEYXRlIDogRnJpLCA0IE9jdCAyMDEz IDExOjQ3OjAwICswMjAwCkRlIDogTWFydGluIFZpZ291cmV1eCA8bWFydGluLnZpZ291cmV1eEBh bGNhdGVsLWx1Y2VudC5jb20+Ck9yZ2FuaXNhdGlvbiA6IEFsY2F0ZWwtTHVjZW50ClBvdXIgOiA8 bDN2cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmc+CgpBbGwsCgp3ZSBoYXZlIG5vdCBzZWVuIGEgbG90IG9mIHJlYWN0aW9u IHRvIHRoaXMgYWRvcHRpb24gcG9sbC4gV2UnZCBsaWtlIHRvCmdpdmUgaXQgYSBzZWNvbmQgdHJ5 LgoKUGxlYXNlIGV4cHJlc3MgeW91ciBvcGluaW9uIChpbiBmYXZvdXIgb3Igb3Bwb3NlZCB0byku CgpFeHRlbnNpb24gb2YgdGhlIHBvbGwgcnVucyB1bnRpbCBPY3QgMTF0aC4KCk1hcnRpbgooZm9y IHRoZSBMM1ZQTiBjby1jaGFpcnMpCgpMZSAwNS8wOS8yMDEzIDE2OjQwLCB0aG9tYXMubW9yaW5A b3JhbmdlLmNvbSBhIMOpY3JpdCA6Cj4gSGVsbG8gd29ya2luZyBncm91cCwKPgo+IFRoaXMgZW1h aWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsgcG9sbCBvbiBwb3NzaWJsZSBhZG9wdGlvbiBvZgo+IGRyYWZ0 LXp6aGFuZy1sMmwzLXZwbi1tY2FzdC1taWItMDAgWzFdIGFzIGEgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBpdGVt Lgo+Cj4gUGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgY29tbWVudHMgdG8gdGhlIGxpc3QgYW5kIHN0YXRlIGlmIHlvdSBz dXBwb3J0IGFkb3B0aW9uIG9yCj4gbm90IChpbiB0aGUgbGF0ZXIgY2FzZSwgcGxlYXNlIGFsc28g c3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlYXNvbnMpLgo+Cj4gKioqIE5vdGUgdGhhdCB3aGF0IGlzIHByb3Bvc2VkIGlz IHRoYXQgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBiZWNvbWVzIGEgY29tbW9uCj4gZm91bmRhdGlvbiBmb3IgdGhl IGFscmVhZHkgYWRvcHRlZCBMM1ZQTiBtdWx0aWNhc3QgTUlCCj4gKGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtbDN2cG4t bXZwbi1taWIpIGFuZCBmb3IgYW4gTDJWUE4gbXVsdGljYXN0IE1JQi4gSGVuY2UsIHRoZQo+IEwy VlBOIHdpbGwgYmUgbm90aWNlZCBhbmQgYXNrZWQgZm9yIGZlZWRiYWNrIG9uIHRoZSBhZG9wdGlv biBvZiB0aGlzCj4gZG9jdW1lbnQuICoqKgo+Cj4gVGhpcyBwb2xsIHJ1bnMgdW50aWwgU2VwdGVt YmVyIDIwdGguCj4KPgo+ICpDb2luY2lkZW50YWxseSosIHdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9y IGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQKPiBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQsIHRvIGVu c3VyZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4KPiBjb21wbGlhbmNlIHdpdGggSUVU RiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgKHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkKPiBhbmQgNTM3OCBmb3IgbW9y ZSBkZXRhaWxzKS4KPgo+ID09PiAqSWYgeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBhdXRo b3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IqIHBsZWFzZQo+IHJlc3BvbmQgdG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCB3aGV0aGVy IG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIuCj4gVGhlIGRyYWZ0IHdp bGwgbm90IGJlIGFkb3B0ZWQgdW50aWwgYSByZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZlZCBmcm9t Cj4gZWFjaCBhdXRob3IgYW5kIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLgo+Cj4gSWYgeW91IGFyZSBvbiB0aGUgTDNW UE4gV0cgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0IGJ1dCBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBhdXRob3IKPiBvciBj b250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgZXhwbGljaXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91IGFy ZSBhd2FyZSBvZgo+IGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IHlldCBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBj b25mb3JtYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuCj4KPiBUaGFuayB5b3UsCj4KPiBNYXJ0aW4gJiBU aG9tYXMKPiBsM3ZwbiBjaGFpcnMKPgo+IFsxXSBodHRwOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9k cmFmdC16emhhbmctbDJsMy12cG4tbWNhc3QtbWliLTAwCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwo+Cj4gQ2UgbWVzc2Fn ZSBldCBzZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMgcGV1dmVudCBjb250ZW5pciBkZXMgaW5mb3JtYXRpb25z IGNvbmZpZGVudGllbGxlcyBvdSBwcml2aWxlZ2llZXMgZXQgbmUgZG9pdmVudCBkb25jCj4gcGFz IGV0cmUgZGlmZnVzZXMsIGV4cGxvaXRlcyBvdSBjb3BpZXMgc2FucyBhdXRvcmlzYXRpb24uIFNp IHZvdXMgYXZleiByZWN1IGNlIG1lc3NhZ2UgcGFyIGVycmV1ciwgdmV1aWxsZXogbGUgc2lnbmFs ZXIKPiBhIGwnZXhwZWRpdGV1ciBldCBsZSBkZXRydWlyZSBhaW5zaSBxdWUgbGVzIHBpZWNlcyBq b2ludGVzLiBMZXMgbWVzc2FnZXMgZWxlY3Ryb25pcXVlcyBldGFudCBzdXNjZXB0aWJsZXMgZCdh bHRlcmF0aW9uLAo+IE9yYW5nZSBkZWNsaW5lIHRvdXRlIHJlc3BvbnNhYmlsaXRlIHNpIGNlIG1l c3NhZ2UgYSBldGUgYWx0ZXJlLCBkZWZvcm1lIG91IGZhbHNpZmllLiBNZXJjaS4KPgo+IFRoaXMg bWVzc2FnZSBhbmQgaXRzIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzIG1heSBjb250YWluIGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbCBvciBw cml2aWxlZ2VkIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIHRoYXQgbWF5IGJlIHByb3RlY3RlZCBieSBsYXc7Cj4gdGhl eSBzaG91bGQgbm90IGJlIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGVkLCB1c2VkIG9yIGNvcGllZCB3aXRob3V0IGF1dGhv cmlzYXRpb24uCj4gSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBpbiBlcnJvciwgcGxl YXNlIG5vdGlmeSB0aGUgc2VuZGVyIGFuZCBkZWxldGUgdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBpdHMgYXR0 YWNobWVudHMuCj4gQXMgZW1haWxzIG1heSBiZSBhbHRlcmVkLCBPcmFuZ2UgaXMgbm90IGxpYWJs ZSBmb3IgbWVzc2FnZXMgdGhhdCBoYXZlIGJlZW4gbW9kaWZpZWQsIGNoYW5nZWQgb3IgZmFsc2lm aWVkLgo+IFRoYW5rIHlvdS4KPgoKCgoKCg== ----_com.android.email_3708980920159930 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+PGhlYWQ+PG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0 L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9VVRGLTgiPjwvaGVhZD48Ym9keSA+U3VwcG9ydC4mbmJzcDs8ZGl2Pjxi cj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PkNoZWVycy48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PkJpbGw8L2Rpdj48 YnI+PGJyPjxicj4tLS0tLS0tLSBPcmlnaW5hbCBtZXNzYWdlIC0tLS0tLS0tPGJyPkZyb206IE1h cnRpbiBWaWdvdXJldXggJmx0O21hcnRpbi52aWdvdXJldXhAYWxjYXRlbC1sdWNlbnQuY29tJmd0 OyA8YnI+RGF0ZTogMTAvMDQvMjAxMyAgNTo1MCBBTSAgKEdNVC0wNTowMCkgPGJyPlRvOiBsMnZw bkBpZXRmLm9yZyA8YnI+U3ViamVjdDogRndkOiBIZWFkcy11cCBbUmU6IFBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0 aW9uOiBkcmFmdC16emhhbmctbDJsMy12cG4tbWNhc3QtbWliXSA8YnI+IDxicj48YnI+SGVsbG8s PGJyPjxicj5mb3IgeW91ciBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiwgYW5kIGFjdGlvbiAob24gdGhlIEwzVlBOIG1h aWxpbmcgbGlzdCk8YnI+PGJyPlRoYW5rIHlvdTxicj48YnI+TWFydGluPGJyPihmb3IgdGhlIEwz VlBOIGNvLWNoYWlycyk8YnI+PGJyPjxicj4tLS0tLS0tLSBNZXNzYWdlIG9yaWdpbmFsIC0tLS0t LS0tPGJyPlN1amV0OiBIZWFkcy11cCBbUmU6IFBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9uOiBkcmFmdC16emhh bmctbDJsMy12cG4tbWNhc3QtbWliXTxicj5EYXRlIDogRnJpLCA0IE9jdCAyMDEzIDExOjQ3OjAw ICswMjAwPGJyPkRlIDogTWFydGluIFZpZ291cmV1eCAmbHQ7bWFydGluLnZpZ291cmV1eEBhbGNh dGVsLWx1Y2VudC5jb20mZ3Q7PGJyPk9yZ2FuaXNhdGlvbiA6IEFsY2F0ZWwtTHVjZW50PGJyPlBv dXIgOiAmbHQ7bDN2cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmcmZ3Q7PGJyPjxicj5BbGwsPGJyPjxicj53ZSBoYXZlIG5v dCBzZWVuIGEgbG90IG9mIHJlYWN0aW9uIHRvIHRoaXMgYWRvcHRpb24gcG9sbC4gV2UnZCBsaWtl IHRvPGJyPmdpdmUgaXQgYSBzZWNvbmQgdHJ5Ljxicj48YnI+UGxlYXNlIGV4cHJlc3MgeW91ciBv cGluaW9uIChpbiBmYXZvdXIgb3Igb3Bwb3NlZCB0bykuPGJyPjxicj5FeHRlbnNpb24gb2YgdGhl IHBvbGwgcnVucyB1bnRpbCBPY3QgMTF0aC48YnI+PGJyPk1hcnRpbjxicj4oZm9yIHRoZSBMM1ZQ TiBjby1jaGFpcnMpPGJyPjxicj5MZSAwNS8wOS8yMDEzIDE2OjQwLCB0aG9tYXMubW9yaW5Ab3Jh bmdlLmNvbSBhIMOpY3JpdCA6PGJyPiZndDsgSGVsbG8gd29ya2luZyBncm91cCw8YnI+Jmd0Ozxi cj4mZ3Q7IFRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsgcG9sbCBvbiBwb3NzaWJsZSBhZG9w dGlvbiBvZjxicj4mZ3Q7IGRyYWZ0LXp6aGFuZy1sMmwzLXZwbi1tY2FzdC1taWItMDAgWzFdIGFz IGEgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBpdGVtLjxicj4mZ3Q7PGJyPiZndDsgUGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgY29tbWVu dHMgdG8gdGhlIGxpc3QgYW5kIHN0YXRlIGlmIHlvdSBzdXBwb3J0IGFkb3B0aW9uIG9yPGJyPiZn dDsgbm90IChpbiB0aGUgbGF0ZXIgY2FzZSwgcGxlYXNlIGFsc28gc3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlYXNvbnMp Ljxicj4mZ3Q7PGJyPiZndDsgKioqIE5vdGUgdGhhdCB3aGF0IGlzIHByb3Bvc2VkIGlzIHRoYXQg dGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBiZWNvbWVzIGEgY29tbW9uPGJyPiZndDsgZm91bmRhdGlvbiBmb3IgdGhl IGFscmVhZHkgYWRvcHRlZCBMM1ZQTiBtdWx0aWNhc3QgTUlCPGJyPiZndDsgKGRyYWZ0LWlldGYt bDN2cG4tbXZwbi1taWIpIGFuZCBmb3IgYW4gTDJWUE4gbXVsdGljYXN0IE1JQi4gSGVuY2UsIHRo ZTxicj4mZ3Q7IEwyVlBOIHdpbGwgYmUgbm90aWNlZCBhbmQgYXNrZWQgZm9yIGZlZWRiYWNrIG9u IHRoZSBhZG9wdGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzPGJyPiZndDsgZG9jdW1lbnQuICoqKjxicj4mZ3Q7PGJyPiZn dDsgVGhpcyBwb2xsIHJ1bnMgdW50aWwgU2VwdGVtYmVyIDIwdGguPGJyPiZndDs8YnI+Jmd0Ozxi cj4mZ3Q7ICpDb2luY2lkZW50YWxseSosIHdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRn ZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQ8YnI+Jmd0OyBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQsIHRvIGVuc3Vy ZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW48YnI+Jmd0OyBjb21wbGlhbmNlIHdpdGgg SUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgKHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2Njk8YnI+Jmd0OyBhbmQgNTM3 OCBmb3IgbW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzKS48YnI+Jmd0Ozxicj4mZ3Q7ID09Jmd0OyAqSWYgeW91IGFyZSBs aXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IqIHBsZWFzZTxicj4mZ3Q7 IHJlc3BvbmQgdG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFu eSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIuPGJyPiZndDsgVGhlIGRyYWZ0IHdpbGwgbm90IGJlIGFkb3B0ZWQgdW50 aWwgYSByZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZlZCBmcm9tPGJyPiZndDsgZWFjaCBhdXRob3Ig YW5kIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLjxicj4mZ3Q7PGJyPiZndDsgSWYgeW91IGFyZSBvbiB0aGUgTDNWUE4g V0cgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0IGJ1dCBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBhdXRob3I8YnI+Jmd0OyBv ciBjb250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgZXhwbGljaXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91 IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZjxicj4mZ3Q7IGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IHlldCBiZWVuIGRpc2Ns b3NlZCBpbiBjb25mb3JtYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuPGJyPiZndDs8YnI+Jmd0OyBUaGFu ayB5b3UsPGJyPiZndDs8YnI+Jmd0OyBNYXJ0aW4gJmFtcDsgVGhvbWFzPGJyPiZndDsgbDN2cG4g Y2hhaXJzPGJyPiZndDs8YnI+Jmd0OyBbMV0gaHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJh ZnQtenpoYW5nLWwybDMtdnBuLW1jYXN0LW1pYi0wMDxicj4mZ3Q7IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX188YnI+Jmd0Ozxi cj4mZ3Q7IENlIG1lc3NhZ2UgZXQgc2VzIHBpZWNlcyBqb2ludGVzIHBldXZlbnQgY29udGVuaXIg ZGVzIGluZm9ybWF0aW9ucyBjb25maWRlbnRpZWxsZXMgb3UgcHJpdmlsZWdpZWVzIGV0IG5lIGRv aXZlbnQgZG9uYzxicj4mZ3Q7IHBhcyBldHJlIGRpZmZ1c2VzLCBleHBsb2l0ZXMgb3UgY29waWVz IHNhbnMgYXV0b3Jpc2F0aW9uLiBTaSB2b3VzIGF2ZXogcmVjdSBjZSBtZXNzYWdlIHBhciBlcnJl dXIsIHZldWlsbGV6IGxlIHNpZ25hbGVyPGJyPiZndDsgYSBsJ2V4cGVkaXRldXIgZXQgbGUgZGV0 cnVpcmUgYWluc2kgcXVlIGxlcyBwaWVjZXMgam9pbnRlcy4gTGVzIG1lc3NhZ2VzIGVsZWN0cm9u aXF1ZXMgZXRhbnQgc3VzY2VwdGlibGVzIGQnYWx0ZXJhdGlvbiw8YnI+Jmd0OyBPcmFuZ2UgZGVj bGluZSB0b3V0ZSByZXNwb25zYWJpbGl0ZSBzaSBjZSBtZXNzYWdlIGEgZXRlIGFsdGVyZSwgZGVm b3JtZSBvdSBmYWxzaWZpZS4gTWVyY2kuPGJyPiZndDs8YnI+Jmd0OyBUaGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgYW5k IGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cyBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBjb25maWRlbnRpYWwgb3IgcHJpdmlsZWdlZCBp bmZvcm1hdGlvbiB0aGF0IG1heSBiZSBwcm90ZWN0ZWQgYnkgbGF3Ozxicj4mZ3Q7IHRoZXkgc2hv dWxkIG5vdCBiZSBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCwgdXNlZCBvciBjb3BpZWQgd2l0aG91dCBhdXRob3Jpc2F0 aW9uLjxicj4mZ3Q7IElmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgaW4gZXJyb3IsIHBs ZWFzZSBub3RpZnkgdGhlIHNlbmRlciBhbmQgZGVsZXRlIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBhbmQgaXRzIGF0 dGFjaG1lbnRzLjxicj4mZ3Q7IEFzIGVtYWlscyBtYXkgYmUgYWx0ZXJlZCwgT3JhbmdlIGlzIG5v dCBsaWFibGUgZm9yIG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIG1vZGlmaWVkLCBjaGFuZ2VkIG9y IGZhbHNpZmllZC48YnI+Jmd0OyBUaGFuayB5b3UuPGJyPiZndDs8YnI+PGJyPjxicj48YnI+PGJy Pjxicj48L2JvZHk+ ----_com.android.email_3708980920159930-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Fri Oct 4 14:08:12 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E264E21F9DBA; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:08:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.545 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id egcLdHimrRjo; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E5C21F918F; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:08:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20131004210811.8835.15054.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 14:08:11 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 21:08:12 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : Virtual Private Lan Services (VPLS) Management Informati= on Base Author(s) : Thomas D. Nadeau A S Kiran Koushik Rohit Mediratta Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12.txt Pages : 47 Date : 2013-10-04 Abstract: This memo defines an experimental portion of the Management Information Base for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects for modeling of Virtual Private LAN services. It needs to be used in conjunction with Pseudowire (PW) Management Information Base [RFC5601]. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com Mon Oct 7 06:50:27 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B514921E81E7 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 06:50:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IIc8Msyka9h5 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 06:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fldsmtpe02.verizon.com (fldsmtpe02.verizon.com [140.108.26.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F0521E81D9 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 06:50:05 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi01.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.143]) by fldsmtpe02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2013 13:49:40 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1050,1371081600"; d="scan'208,217";a="574588052" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb05.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB05.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.87]) by fldsmtpi01.verizon.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2013 13:49:38 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([169.254.3.234]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB05.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.87]) with mapi; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:49:37 -0400 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:49:37 -0400 Subject: [l2vpn] L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 88 - Vancouver Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 88 - Vancouver Thread-Index: Ac7DZBA1JxDhGjYnTJGgObnlQ+ONgQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CE776A94C8FF8nabilnbitarverizoncom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 13:50:28 -0000 --_000_CE776A94C8FF8nabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi L2VPN WG, If you would like to request a time-slot for the L2VPN WG session at IETF 8= 8-Vancouver, please reply to us by Sunday October 20, 2013 along with the f= ollowing information: 1) Draft title 2) Presenter name 3) Requested duration Please, make sure that the subject of you reply is: Re:[l2vpn] L2VPN Age= nda Slot Call for IETF 88 =96 Vancouver. Please note that priority will be given to drafts that are clearly within t= he scope of the current L2VPN charter. Please also note the following cutoff date for draft submission. This date = applies to new 00 drafts and updated drafts. 2013-10-21 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, inc= luding -00) by UTC 24:00, upload using IETF ID Submission Tool. The l2vpn WG session is currently scheduled for Friday November 8, 2013 11:= 20-13:30 PST. You may see the agenda at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meetin= g/88/agenda.html Thanks, Nabil and Giles --_000_CE776A94C8FF8nabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi L2VPN WG,

If you would like to request a time-slot for the L2VPN WG session at= IETF 88-Vancouver, please reply to us by Sunday October 20, 2013 along with the following information:=

1) Draft title
2) Presenter name
3) Requested duration

Please, make sure that the subject of you reply is: =    Re:[l2vpn] L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 88 =96 Vancouver.
<= div>

Please note that priority will be given to drafts that are clearly within t= he scope of the current L2VPN charter.
Please also note the following cutoff date for draft submission. This dat= e applies to new 00 drafts and updated drafts. 

2013-10= -21 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all draf= ts, including -00) by UTC 24:00, upload using IETF ID Submission Tool.


Th= e l2vpn WG session is currently scheduled for Friday November 8, 2013 11:20= -13:30 PST. You may see the agenda at https://datatracker.ietf.org/mee= ting/88/agenda.html
=

=
Thanks,
Nabil and Giles
--_000_CE776A94C8FF8nabilnbitarverizoncom_-- From amclachl@cisco.com Mon Oct 7 08:18:42 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA29021F9DAA for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:18:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jJwMd2FCm1qH for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D913811E80F1 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:18:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=884; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1381159118; x=1382368718; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=wFMjlHxQPc1vnfI6M5tuASt2R9tFrHBs0FEPMnW14TM=; b=hGbNDdWGkCOLX4o2LHgzV2fTF04H+IYAsArXaXm9NJJnWjuurqTefH1U P9am2/GCU+yhSg1Wxh20CogxvxcGBaGhoST96p4T4VVp0FegUwaCXFIaB NiHBdbbFnPjtMch2Q3YCzxid/PoTf4rYWuB7mGav/7ByYOnXyc7xYS4kh s=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsEFAAbQUlKtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4UsEagR4WbQeCJwEEOlEBKhRCJwQbh34MmRahI44IgRiDV4EEA5QkhQyQUYMkgXE5 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1050,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="269076808" Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2013 15:18:37 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r97FIbe4027919 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:18:37 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.239]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:18:37 -0500 From: "Andrew McLachlan (amclachl)" To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12 Thread-Topic: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12 Thread-Index: AQHOw3B+H7VV1bVU1UqF0DUgnFalew== Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:18:36 +0000 Message-ID: <71856D87EAE6874FB4E434D2882D12A404DB4D47@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.61.89.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 15:18:43 -0000 All We are polling for any knowledge of IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-ip= ls-12, IP-Only LAN Service (IPLS) in order to ensure that IPR has been disc= losed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378= for more details. If you are listed as a document author please respond to this email as to w= hether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be progressed until a response has been received from ea= ch author. If you are on the l2vpn WG email list, but not listed as an author for this= draft, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR tha= t has not yet been disclosed in the conformance with the IETF rules.. The draft can be found here http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls/ This poll closes on Friday October 18th 2013. Cheers Andrew, Giles, Nabil From flefauch@cisco.com Tue Oct 8 00:49:57 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91F921E811F for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 00:49:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7KqnSGnzxxQG for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 00:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7549321E8163 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 00:49:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1143; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1381218591; x=1382428191; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=zbrVIe0nB8wLtyMf61JHix8DDrPSnYVc5aqxUMRrM6M=; b=TeYAEQbfQW80yIXK5t+zMARJZct51XIrT/kG74Sy/JXm7yI0Ry9uuNWy KDzG4lGXpP1nstb+vPP7F+ZtVTCICqEgSe1t4OXoXqFrgvwNs0kUralg7 hDPfDp+iXGXvt0W4dC+j9m6HHRTnVFR6rajVg6xvSvonO2Vr/qBQYrMxF 4=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag8FAEm4U1KtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4RgzBIoEfFnSCJQEBAQMBOj8QAgEIIhQQMiUCBA4FCId4Bgy6co14gRYCMQeDH4EEA5QkhQyQUYMkgXE5 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1055,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="269404598" Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2013 07:49:51 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r987noFG020336 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 07:49:50 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.33]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 02:49:50 -0500 From: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" To: "Andrew McLachlan (amclachl)" Subject: Re: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12 Thread-Topic: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12 Thread-Index: AQHOw3B+H7VV1bVU1UqF0DUgnFale5nqwt6A Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 07:49:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <71856D87EAE6874FB4E434D2882D12A404DB4D47@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <71856D87EAE6874FB4E434D2882D12A404DB4D47@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.55.161.206] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6421B9FD91F04048B1BE74103015059B@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "Francois Le Faucheur \(flefauch\)" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 07:49:57 -0000 Hello, I am not aware of IPR applying to draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12. Francois Le Faucheur On 7 Oct 2013, at 17:18, "Andrew McLachlan (amclachl)" wrote: >=20 > All >=20 > We are polling for any knowledge of IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-= ipls-12, IP-Only LAN Service (IPLS) in order to ensure that IPR has been di= sclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 53= 78 for more details. >=20 > If you are listed as a document author please respond to this email as to= whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. >=20 > The draft will not be progressed until a response has been received from = each author. >=20 > If you are on the l2vpn WG email list, but not listed as an author for th= is draft, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR t= hat has not yet been disclosed in the conformance with the IETF rules.. >=20 > The draft can be found here > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls/ >=20 > This poll closes on Friday October 18th 2013. >=20 > Cheers >=20 > Andrew, Giles, Nabil >=20 >=20 >=20 From giheron@cisco.com Tue Oct 8 06:32:40 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BA321E815C for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 06:32:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dUtVEyzmNoiX for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 06:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2752421E818C for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 06:32:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1312; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1381239154; x=1382448754; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=bJP7lAkOumk8Gxh842DSDyxvmuCTMaksBba3FzuRTuE=; b=Ze8awfKqnJM6eio3bA+wFZGlL6sw89pSM8hnpxse1douklRI53LtQd5p rdk1VkcTT8JYd706kIEaHfQc7YB9TQGrKY/MT5MR/Pa2eSorNc9cH/+qE SaSTmwtqkBbM4/U45HuX0xWo48EIOu5aEs2VgdPhxt1eKwsmLfaev3g5H Q=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgQFAG4IVFKtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4RgzBIoEfFnSCJQEBAQMBOj8FCwIBCBgKFBAyJQIEDgUIh3gGDLpKjXmBFgIxB4MfgQQDlCSFDJBRgySBcTk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1056,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="269465338" Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2013 13:32:32 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r98DWWwI031784 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:32:32 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.47]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:32:31 -0500 From: "Giles Heron (giheron)" To: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" Subject: Re: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12 Thread-Topic: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12 Thread-Index: AQHOxCrXSjmNfpdRJUuWQfIhFGuHFQ== Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:32:32 +0000 Message-ID: <136D0A04DAA0A64881D68D8374E6E077091CEFF8@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> References: <71856D87EAE6874FB4E434D2882D12A404DB4D47@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.148.88.211] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <64AEE57DB20C0D448E954F3CE049259D@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:32:40 -0000 Likewise. Giles On 8 Oct 2013, at 08:49, Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch) wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I am not aware of IPR applying to draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12. >=20 > Francois Le Faucheur >=20 > On 7 Oct 2013, at 17:18, "Andrew McLachlan (amclachl)" > wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> All >>=20 >> We are polling for any knowledge of IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn= -ipls-12, IP-Only LAN Service (IPLS) in order to ensure that IPR has been d= isclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5= 378 for more details. >>=20 >> If you are listed as a document author please respond to this email as t= o whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. >>=20 >> The draft will not be progressed until a response has been received from= each author. >>=20 >> If you are on the l2vpn WG email list, but not listed as an author for t= his draft, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in the conformance with the IETF rules.. >>=20 >> The draft can be found here >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls/ >>=20 >> This poll closes on Friday October 18th 2013. >>=20 >> Cheers >>=20 >> Andrew, Giles, Nabil >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 From prvs=79937ca9f7=hshah@ciena.com Tue Oct 8 07:31:19 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E1321E817E for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 07:31:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.265 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ycjF6c1OCqLG for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 07:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.144.234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8009121E80A7 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 07:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0000419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r98EU7Bk030598; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 10:31:04 -0400 Received: from mdwvexchht01.ciena.com (LIN1-118-36-28.ciena.com [63.118.36.28]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1fce8tsk6b-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 08 Oct 2013 10:31:04 -0400 Received: from ONWVEXCHHT03.ciena.com (10.128.6.43) by MDWVEXCHHT01.ciena.com (10.4.156.175) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.298.1; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 10:31:02 -0400 Received: from ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com ([::1]) by ONWVEXCHHT03.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 10:31:01 -0400 From: "Shah, Himanshu" To: "Giles Heron (giheron)" , "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 10:31:00 -0400 Subject: RE: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12 Thread-Topic: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12 Thread-Index: AQHOxCrXSjmNfpdRJUuWQfIhFGuHFZnq3Zqg Message-ID: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B6773693E@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> References: <71856D87EAE6874FB4E434D2882D12A404DB4D47@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com> <136D0A04DAA0A64881D68D8374E6E077091CEFF8@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <136D0A04DAA0A64881D68D8374E6E077091CEFF8@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US, en-CA Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, en-CA X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-20204.006 X-TM-AS-Result: No--18.764600-8.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-10-08_06:2013-10-08, 2013-10-08, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1305240000 definitions=main-1310080056 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:31:19 -0000 Same here too. /himanshu -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron (giheron) Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 9:33 AM To: Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch) Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: Re: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12 Likewise. Giles On 8 Oct 2013, at 08:49, Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch) wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I am not aware of IPR applying to draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12. >=20 > Francois Le Faucheur >=20 > On 7 Oct 2013, at 17:18, "Andrew McLachlan (amclachl)" > wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> All >>=20 >> We are polling for any knowledge of IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn= -ipls-12, IP-Only LAN Service (IPLS) in order to ensure that IPR has been d= isclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5= 378 for more details. >>=20 >> If you are listed as a document author please respond to this email as t= o whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. >>=20 >> The draft will not be progressed until a response has been received from= each author. >>=20 >> If you are on the l2vpn WG email list, but not listed as an author for t= his draft, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in the conformance with the IETF rules.. >>=20 >> The draft can be found here >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls/ >>=20 >> This poll closes on Friday October 18th 2013. >>=20 >> Cheers >>=20 >> Andrew, Giles, Nabil >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 From internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue Oct 8 09:04:10 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6706021F8427; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:04:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.569 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4OcD1vlQ76ot; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3F721E8227; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:02:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-05.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20131008160157.25649.41246.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:01:57 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:04:10 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : PIM Snooping over VPLS Author(s) : Olivier Dornon Jayant Kotalwar Venu Hemige Ray Qiu Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-05.txt Pages : 40 Date : 2013-10-08 Abstract: This document describes the procedures and recommendations for VPLS PEs to facilitate replication of multicast traffic to only certain ports (behind which there are interested PIM routers and/or IGMP hosts) via PIM Snooping and PIM Proxy. With PIM Snooping, PEs passively listen to certain PIM control messages to build control and forwarding states while transparently flooding those messages. With PIM Proxy, PEs do not flood PIM Join/ Prune messages but only generate their own and send out of certain ports, based on the control states built from downstream Join/Prune messages. PIM Proxy is required when PIM Join suppression is enabled on the CE devices and useful to reduce PIM control traffic in a VPLS domain. The document also describes PIM Relay, which can be viewed as light- weight proxy, where all downstream Join/Prune messages are simply forwarded out of certain ports but not flooded to avoid triggering PIM Join suppression on CE devices. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From erosen@cisco.com Tue Oct 8 09:04:17 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094BA21E8226 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:04:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id onwzsJ9wnvQo for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6159221E821B for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:02:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=52; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1381248178; x=1382457778; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:reply-to:date:message-id; bh=ZYe9NP190sa7KdbJ9nJu7Lf29XiMKXIGL9uz/LpGBdU=; b=LGUbTIV4eE5z8KuDKb647KsjKqACzwrEtV6/Nigh9UzqHxiMGsYKWl8J OVeF9kut/5XGHLaZiqMSaiCaoVfjYxUrjQgGFUp679xVpcySolfPSynQW h2JcG755XG5CL7D0S3KOPPIZx53Vy6M+JZFTQoomstJ84E8xlUf3Qc8sP M=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1057,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="94173477" Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2013 16:02:55 +0000 Received: from erosen-linux.cisco.com (erosen-linux.cisco.com [161.44.70.34]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r98G2rn6025465 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:02:54 GMT Received: from erosen-linux (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by erosen-linux.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r98G2rts008265; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:02:53 -0400 From: Eric Rosen To: "Shah, Himanshu" Subject: Re: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-12 In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 08 Oct 2013 10:31:00 -0400. <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B6773693E@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 12:02:53 -0400 Message-ID: <8264.1381248173@erosen-linux> Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "Francois Le Faucheur \(flefauch\)" , "Giles Heron \(giheron\)" , erosen@cisco.com X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: erosen@cisco.com List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:04:17 -0000 I am not aware of any IPR applying to the draft. From prvs=7993bd532d=nbragg@ciena.com Tue Oct 8 11:03:09 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D6121E8209 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:03:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.265 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cXYrXnk7Ah+C for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:03:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.152.227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B32221E81A5 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:02:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0002317.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0002317.ppops.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r98HiXiU004599; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:02:49 -0700 Received: from mdwexght02.ciena.com (LIN1-118-36-29.ciena.com [63.118.36.29]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1fcmu28uqf-9 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 08 Oct 2013 11:02:48 -0700 Received: from ONWVEXCHHT04.ciena.com (10.128.6.44) by MDWEXGHT02.ciena.com (10.4.140.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.298.1; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:02:46 -0400 Received: from ONWVEXCHMB01.ciena.com ([10.128.6.18]) by ONWVEXCHHT04.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:02:44 -0400 From: "Bragg, Nigel" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:02:42 -0400 Subject: RE: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Index: Ac6+CmzDt/o4iBijSHiJpqMxznBKQQGRf9Cw Message-ID: References: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US, en-CA Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, en-CA X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-20206.001 X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.127400-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-10-08_08:2013-10-08, 2013-10-08, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1305240000 definitions=main-1310080087 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 18:03:12 -0000 Support. Nigel -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: 30 September 2013 18:51 To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October with= comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption. Nabil & Giles From paul.bottorff@hp.com Tue Oct 8 11:31:06 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1A421E8288 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:31:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id STvhijESsw-u for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:31:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from g1t0028.austin.hp.com (g1t0028.austin.hp.com [15.216.28.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F51C21E827D for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from G2W4316.americas.hpqcorp.net (g2w4316.austin.hp.com [16.197.9.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g1t0028.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E79101C060; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 18:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from G2W4312.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.197.24.214) by G2W4316.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.197.9.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 18:30:13 +0000 Received: from G2W2435.americas.hpqcorp.net ([169.254.5.28]) by G2W4312.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.197.24.214]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 18:30:13 +0000 From: "Bottorff, Paul (Ethernet Architect)" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Index: Ac6+CmzDZxg1Y92AGkGlF9F3ghpVygGRf9CwAADyLYA= Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 18:30:13 +0000 Message-ID: <94DA9C7F532AD946852C9C552719523916D0DD9C@G2W2435.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [15.217.50.19] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 18:31:06 -0000 Support Paul -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: 30 September 2013 18:51 To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October with= comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption. Nabil & Giles From lizho.jin@gmail.com Wed Oct 9 02:55:20 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C4C21F9D68 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 02:55:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kE1KklA0rznq for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 02:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qa0-x236.google.com (mail-qa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B3611E8118 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 02:55:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j15so187691qaq.13 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 02:55:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=klf8QL2VU3T7Z/doR6k7M0qLV25gSGIx365tuJuQa1A=; b=0NJxZCzjoXCzv03cAtaIB50Q6uGEAx/j5Iv63hf2p10tn50xU72wUV6mPqe/svWKKG O9jkxoWMvjsmJEwZqQCrUWKLT1n9zFomAO9zQogPJDvO0K8MmZ16zwkr2hDnZUQCdCIc KmEB1g1/rB2WL89T6Gyxs4GE2GsUv9XTBabuAkNW8GRfFNEGgHsGsoHcUU8cMTGz7cFi tedhq1EKnsxyL+PZ0JdYm517RiECdzZo5gXxuodr7Icchz3ZgxpCXOEFiWRIBz4Z6+ld YnMvNONAZLepzpQsFKcIB8Z5l+ABRHlTRKU2hxPT6gDJd2FrkRIfJIL5n7OuUyXhkn1K x5ew== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.70.129 with SMTP id m1mr7947845qeu.69.1381312516258; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 02:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.3.225 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 02:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.3.225 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 02:55:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3cf801cec4d5$2c247cf0$846d76d0$@gmail.com> References: <3cf801cec4d5$2c247cf0$846d76d0$@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 17:55:16 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: RE: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn From: Lizhong Jin To: giles.heron@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b4721fedb012f04e84be119 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 09:55:20 -0000 --047d7b4721fedb012f04e84be119 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Support for adoption. Lizhong ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:51:23 +0100 From: Giles Heron To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Message-ID: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October with comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption. Nabil & Giles ------------------------------ --047d7b4721fedb012f04e84be119 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,
Support for adoption.

Lizhong
------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:51:23 +0100
From: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>
To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn
Message-ID: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04

should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.

please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October
with comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption.

Nabil & Giles

------------------------------

--047d7b4721fedb012f04e84be119-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed Oct 9 23:49:03 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90FE11E813B; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 23:49:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.575 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id puSpLiULDIAO; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 23:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D568321E80C1; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 23:49:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-02.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20131010064900.30339.50728.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:49:00 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 06:49:03 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Author(s) : Yuanlong Jiang Lucy Yong Manuel Paul Frederic Jounay Florin Balus Wim Henderickx Ali Sajassi Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-02.txt Pages : 23 Date : 2013-10-09 Abstract: A generic VPLS solution for E-Tree services is proposed which uses VLANs to indicate root/leaf traffic. A VPLS Provider Edge (PE) model is illustrated as an example for the solution. In the solution, E- Tree VPLS PEs are interconnected by PWs which carry the VLAN indicating the E-Tree attribute, the MAC address based Ethernet forwarding engine and the PW work in the same way as before. A signaling mechanism for E-Tree capability and VLAN mapping negotiation is further described. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From jiangyuanlong@huawei.com Thu Oct 10 00:29:44 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58C021F9ADD for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:29:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GQQ4Uu+eWLB5 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:29:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDBC21F99CD for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AWQ87321; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 07:29:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:29:03 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.33) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:29:29 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.229]) by SZXEMA401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0146.000; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:29:18 +0800 From: Jiangyuanlong To: Giles Heron Subject: RE: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Index: AQHOxYpt70NRt45kpUq2vby3/9JIrA== Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 07:29:17 +0000 Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A6B2CA9@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.76.118] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 07:29:44 -0000 Support. Regards, Yuanlong ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:51:23 +0100 From: Giles Heron To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Message-ID: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October with= comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption. Nabil & Giles ------------------------------ From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu Oct 10 10:45:10 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2D721F8BE6; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:45:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.577 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z8YbX5VVNPIg; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA4E21F9A40; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:44:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-trill-evpn-01.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20131010174458.971.37378.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:44:58 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:45:11 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : TRILL-EVPN Author(s) : Ali Sajassi Samer Salam Nabil Bitar Sam Aldrin Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-trill-evpn-01.txt Pages : 14 Date : 2013-10-10 Abstract: This document discusses how Ethernet VPN (E-VPN) technology is used to interconnect TRILL [TRILL] networks over an MPLS/IP network, with two key characteristics: C-MAC address transparency on the hand-off point and control-plane isolation among the interconnected TRILL networks. Conventions The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-trill-evpn There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-trill-evpn-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-trill-evpn-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From sajassi@cisco.com Thu Oct 10 11:36:06 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F58D11E81B3 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:35:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NueGmtHetiYd for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8473511E81A0 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:35:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=435; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1381430104; x=1382639704; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=k89zkvavtmPpTYGUxQ1vyWDZbj/R/r5D/dI+4PhXZwM=; b=e7bsYkTpvIOTYqsd1O1rKcNrh8/HSImfq30SPoFqeKoUViwAE02yoZor ug93xxzhFYM/OX8HB0v4OTZuZ+poykaiaDExWbSZQqHxgxnnlwzrZzzXQ nX7dxBbz22FWaQDq5azQvY/OeYEhOOBi14Bs0cE8GetUA3SiQCRtSZYUd k=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjEFAOXyVlKtJXG//2dsb2JhbABZgmYhOFLBK4EjFnSCJwEEHR1RAQgiFDERJQIEARIIh2wDDwELsB8NiWuMWoI8OIMfgQQDlhyDGIsdhTaDJIIq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1074,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="270605474" Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2013 18:35:01 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9AIZ1Um014333 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:35:01 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:35:01 -0500 From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: Re: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Index: AQHOxedst/o4iBijSHiJpqMxznBKQQ== Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:34:59 +0000 Message-ID: <69670F7146898C4583F56DA9AD32F77B215BE64B@xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416 x-originating-ip: [10.128.2.83] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4E1AC40434C1264C91FBEA90EDF4CA9B@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:36:08 -0000 Support as a co-author. Cheers Ali On 9/30/13 10:51 AM, "Giles Heron" wrote: >This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 > >should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > >please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October >with comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption. > >Nabil & Giles From jdrake@juniper.net Thu Oct 10 11:48:37 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C8321F9A7E for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:48:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.265 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.666, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YfmPwKRLcb8S for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from db9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db9lp0252.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.252]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DAB11E819E for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:47:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail31-db9-R.bigfish.com (10.174.16.235) by DB9EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (10.174.14.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:47:41 +0000 Received: from mail31-db9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail31-db9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EE732029D; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:47:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -21 X-BigFish: VPS-21(zz9371I542I1432Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h1033IL17326ah1de097h186068h8275dhz2fh2a8h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1fe8h1ff5h9a9j1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail31-db9: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=jdrake@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(377454003)(51704005)(199002)(189002)(13464003)(69226001)(49866001)(47736001)(50986001)(47976001)(15202345003)(74706001)(83072001)(76576001)(81542001)(76786001)(76796001)(74316001)(33646001)(77096001)(56816003)(81342001)(54356001)(46102001)(53806001)(51856001)(74662001)(74502001)(4396001)(19580405001)(83322001)(47446002)(19580395003)(80976001)(31966008)(76482001)(81686001)(65816001)(56776001)(54316002)(85306002)(15975445006)(59766001)(74876001)(81816001)(80022001)(66066001)(63696002)(79102001)(74366001)(77982001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB142; H:BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:66.129.224.53; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Received: from mail31-db9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail31-db9 (MessageSwitch) id 1381430786661754_12010; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DB9EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (unknown [10.174.16.250]) by mail31-db9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720F22E0151; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by DB9EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (10.174.14.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:46:18 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.39.144) by BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.371.2; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:46:10 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.39.144) by BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.39.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.775.9; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:46:08 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.177]) by BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.115]) with mapi id 15.00.0775.005; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:46:08 +0000 From: John E Drake To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn Thread-Index: AQHOvgW47QFrstdLJUOJt+72l1DaGpnuVeCw Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:46:07 +0000 Message-ID: <806a92e7c7b54d458dbc4bc8fa8a0316@BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [66.129.224.53] x-forefront-prvs: 0995196AA2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:48:37 -0000 Support Yours Irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Giles Heron > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 10:51 AM > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn >=20 > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October wi= th > comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption. >=20 > Nabil & Giles From matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com Fri Oct 11 08:22:03 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280E411E81C5; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:22:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNClxX6ggXOy; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [135.245.0.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84C121E8082; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r9BFLsuZ009437 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:21:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r9BFLr6E009130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:21:53 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.189]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:21:53 +0200 From: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" To: Yakov Rekhter Subject: Re: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14.txt Thread-Topic: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14.txt Thread-Index: AQHOvXESP3mxn74FpEGDXCcZiCiZlpni8cQAgAAjUomADIk4gA== Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:21:53 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <201310031433.r93EWwL60083@magenta.juniper.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.38] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8697C3C738E4B64C9632EFBC16818C2A@exchange.lucent.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.35 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "rtg-dir@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast@tools.ietf.org" , "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:22:03 -0000 Yakov On 03/10/2013 15:32, "Yakov Rekhter" wrote: >Matthew, > >> Yakov >>=20 >> Thanks for your responses. Please see below. >>=20 >> On 30/09/2013 01:07, "Yakov Rekhter" wrote: >>=20 >> >Matthew, >> > >> >> Hello, >> >>=20 >> >> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this >>draft. >> >> The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or >>routing-related >> >> drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and >> >> sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide >> >> assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing >> >> Directorate, please see >> >> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/routing.html >> >>=20 >> >> Since IETF LC has ended for this draft, I am primarily providing >> >>comments t=3D >> >> o >> >> aid the ADs, and I hope the authors will also take them into >> >>consideration =3D >> >> to improve >> >> the readability of the draft. >> > >> >Thanks for your review and comments. >> > >> >> Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14.txt >> >> Reviewer: Matthew Bocci >> >> Review Date: 26 September 2013 >> >> IETF LC End Date: date-if-known >> >> Intended Status: Proposed Standard >> >>=20 >> >> Summary: >> >>=20 >> >> I have some minor concerns about this document that I think should >> >> be resolved before publication. >> >>=20 >> >> Comments: >> >>=20 >> >> The draft appears to be complete and accurate form a technical >> >>perspective.=3D >> >> However, >> >> the style of the draft and the density of the text make it quite >> >>difficult =3D >> >> to >> >> read at times. It took several passes of some sections of the >>document, >> >>and=3D >> >> returning >> >> to earlier sections, to properly follow the text. I believe this is >> >>because=3D >> >> the basic >> >> multicast architecture could be better-explained earlier in the >>draft. >> >>=20 >> >> Major Issues: >> >>=20 >> >> No major issues found. >> >>=20 >> >> Minor Issues: >> >>=20 >> >> 1) The draft contains both introductory architectural / framework >> >> descriptions, and more detailed specifications of the protocols >>required >> >> to efficiently support multicast in VPLS. However, the introductory >> >>sections >> >> (e.g. the overview in section 5) are presented in the form of >>extremely >> >> dense text, and while >> >> they seem to be trying to explain architectural concepts, they do not >> >>use=20 >> >> a single diagram to help the reader visualise the solutions in the >> >>draft.=20 >> >> In fact, the first >> >> figures illustrating the protocol hierarchies and relationships do >>not >> >> appear until the >> >> label stacks are described in Section 13 on page 43. >> >>=20 >> >> I think inserting some figures in section 5 to illustrate the >> >>different=20 >> >> multicast schemes, and also moving the data forwarding section >>earlier >> >>in=20 >> >> the document, would greatly help the reader. >> > >> >Wrt "inserting some figures in section 5", I would be glad to do this, >> >provided you elaborate a bit on what specific figures you would like >> >to insert. >>=20 >> I think that it would help to add a figure to each of the bullets in >> section 5.1 (inclusive trees and selective trees) illustrating the >> architecture of each (a couple of reference models would be helpful). > >I am not sure I agree. In fact, the concepts of inclusive and selective >trees have been "borrowed" from rfc6513/rfc6514, and neither of these >RFCs have any figures that illustrate inclusive/selective trees. I would certainly find it easier to read, to explain how those concepts apply in VPLS scenarios, even if the original RFCs do not use diagrams. At very least, if you have borrowed the terms, then a reference here to those RFCs would be helpful. > >>=20 >> >=20 >> > >> >Wrt moving the data forwarding section earlier in the document, >> >the placement of the data forwarding section follows the structure >> >of rfc6513. >>=20 >> OK, but at least it would help if you added an illustration to the two >> bullets I have referenced above, which shows the label stacks in each of >> the cases.=20 >>=20 > > >The label stack is exactly the same for both inclusive and selective >trees. Section 13 shows the label stacks for inclusive trees >(both non-aggregate and aggregate), and since the label stack >is the same for both inclusive and selective trees, the figures >the label stack shown in these figures equally applies to >both inclusive and selective trees. > >Would the following new text in 13.1 address your concern ? > > > While this section shows the label stack for inclusive trees, > since the label stack is exactly the same for both inclusive and > selective trees, the label stack shown in this section is equally > applicable to selective trees. OK Matthew > >Yakov. > From thomas.morin@orange.com Mon Oct 14 08:15:53 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8118921F9FAE for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:15:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.148 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BaQ2IuURFNj4 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias245.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.245]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6944521E80C9 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omfeda07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.200]) by omfeda11.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id EBD5B1B84BA for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:15:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.186]) by omfeda07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id CC35615808A for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:15:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::cc7e:e40b:42ef:164e]) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:15:32 +0200 From: To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-l2l3-vpn-mcast-mib -> adopted Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-l2l3-vpn-mcast-mib -> adopted Thread-Index: AQHOyPA52znKUpv6dU+qe6Nqmo4MGA== Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:15:32 +0000 Message-ID: <30130_1381763732_525C0A94_30130_5271_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D0766037B@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <524E8E94.8040400@alcatel-lucent.com> <524E8F4D.1040504@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <524E8F4D.1040504@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.1] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <1EC192DDBE832048AF1FB90EE5D5CB22@adroot.infra.ftgroup> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2013.10.14.112115 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:15:53 -0000 RllJLCB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGFzIGJlZW4gYWRvcHRlZCBhcyBhbiBMM1ZQTiBXRyBpdGVtLCBu b3cgDQpkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWwzdnBuLWwybDMtdnBuLW1jYXN0LW1pYi0wMCwgYXMgYSBjb21tb24g YmFzaXMgZm9yIGwyVlBOIGFuZCANCkwzVlBOIE11bHRpY2FzdCBNSUJzLg0KDQpUaGFuayB5b3Us DQoNCi1UaG9tYXMNCihmb3IgdGhlIEwzVlBOIGNvLWNoYWlycykNCg0KDQpNYXJ0aW4gVmlnb3Vy ZXV4IDoNCj4gSGVsbG8sDQo+DQo+IGZvciB5b3VyIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uLCBhbmQgYWN0aW9uIChv biB0aGUgTDNWUE4gbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0KQ0KPg0KPiBUaGFuayB5b3UNCj4NCj4gTWFydGluDQo+ IChmb3IgdGhlIEwzVlBOIGNvLWNoYWlycykNCj4NCj4NCj4gLS0tLS0tLS0gTWVzc2FnZSBvcmln aW5hbCAtLS0tLS0tLQ0KPiBTdWpldDogSGVhZHMtdXAgW1JlOiBQb2xsIGZvciBhZG9wdGlvbjog ZHJhZnQtenpoYW5nLWwybDMtdnBuLW1jYXN0LW1pYl0NCj4gRGF0ZSA6IEZyaSwgNCBPY3QgMjAx MyAxMTo0NzowMCArMDIwMA0KPiBEZSA6IE1hcnRpbiBWaWdvdXJldXggPG1hcnRpbi52aWdvdXJl dXhAYWxjYXRlbC1sdWNlbnQuY29tPg0KPiBPcmdhbmlzYXRpb24gOiBBbGNhdGVsLUx1Y2VudA0K PiBQb3VyIDogPGwzdnBuQGlldGYub3JnPg0KPg0KPiBBbGwsDQo+DQo+IHdlIGhhdmUgbm90IHNl ZW4gYSBsb3Qgb2YgcmVhY3Rpb24gdG8gdGhpcyBhZG9wdGlvbiBwb2xsLiBXZSdkIGxpa2UgdG8N Cj4gZ2l2ZSBpdCBhIHNlY29uZCB0cnkuDQo+DQo+IFBsZWFzZSBleHByZXNzIHlvdXIgb3Bpbmlv biAoaW4gZmF2b3VyIG9yIG9wcG9zZWQgdG8pLg0KPg0KPiBFeHRlbnNpb24gb2YgdGhlIHBvbGwg cnVucyB1bnRpbCBPY3QgMTF0aC4NCj4NCj4gTWFydGluDQo+IChmb3IgdGhlIEwzVlBOIGNvLWNo YWlycykNCj4NCj4gTGUgMDUvMDkvMjAxMyAxNjo0MCwgdGhvbWFzLm1vcmluQG9yYW5nZS5jb20g YSDDqWNyaXQgOg0KPj4gSGVsbG8gd29ya2luZyBncm91cCwNCj4+DQo+PiBUaGlzIGVtYWlsIHN0 YXJ0cyBhIHR3by13ZWVrIHBvbGwgb24gcG9zc2libGUgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YNCj4+IGRyYWZ0LXp6 aGFuZy1sMmwzLXZwbi1tY2FzdC1taWItMDAgWzFdIGFzIGEgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBpdGVtLg0K Pj4NCj4+IFBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ug c3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvcg0KPj4gbm90IChpbiB0aGUgbGF0ZXIgY2FzZSwgcGxlYXNlIGFs c28gc3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlYXNvbnMpLg0KPj4NCj4+ICoqKiBOb3RlIHRoYXQgd2hhdCBpcyBwcm9w b3NlZCBpcyB0aGF0IHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgYmVjb21lcyBhIGNvbW1vbg0KPj4gZm91bmRhdGlv biBmb3IgdGhlIGFscmVhZHkgYWRvcHRlZCBMM1ZQTiBtdWx0aWNhc3QgTUlCDQo+PiAoZHJhZnQt aWV0Zi1sM3Zwbi1tdnBuLW1pYikgYW5kIGZvciBhbiBMMlZQTiBtdWx0aWNhc3QgTUlCLiBIZW5j ZSwgdGhlDQo+PiBMMlZQTiB3aWxsIGJlIG5vdGljZWQgYW5kIGFza2VkIGZvciBmZWVkYmFjayBv biB0aGUgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgdGhpcw0KPj4gZG9jdW1lbnQuICoqKg0KPj4NCj4+IFRoaXMgcG9s bCBydW5zIHVudGlsIFNlcHRlbWJlciAyMHRoLg0KPj4NCj4+DQo+PiAqQ29pbmNpZGVudGFsbHkq LCB3ZSBhcmUgYWxzbyBwb2xsaW5nIGZvciBrbm93bGVkZ2Ugb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0DQo+PiBh cHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQsIHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9z ZWQgaW4NCj4+IGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAoc2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwg NDg3OSwgMzY2OQ0KPj4gYW5kIDUzNzggZm9yIG1vcmUgZGV0YWlscykuDQo+Pg0KPj4gPT0+ICpJ ZiB5b3UgYXJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhIGRvY3VtZW50IGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciogcGxl YXNlDQo+PiByZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFyZSBhd2Fy ZSBvZiBhbnkgcmVsZXZhbnQgSVBSLg0KPj4gVGhlIGRyYWZ0IHdpbGwgbm90IGJlIGFkb3B0ZWQg dW50aWwgYSByZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZlZCBmcm9tDQo+PiBlYWNoIGF1dGhvciBh bmQgY29udHJpYnV0b3IuDQo+Pg0KPj4gSWYgeW91IGFyZSBvbiB0aGUgTDNWUE4gV0cgbWFpbGlu ZyBsaXN0IGJ1dCBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBhdXRob3INCj4+IG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9y LCB0aGVuIHBsZWFzZSBleHBsaWNpdGx5IHJlc3BvbmQgb25seSBpZiB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9m DQo+PiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29uZm9ybWFu Y2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIHJ1bGVzLg0KPj4NCj4+IFRoYW5rIHlvdSwNCj4+DQo+PiBNYXJ0aW4gJiBU aG9tYXMNCj4+IGwzdnBuIGNoYWlycw0KPj4NCj4+IFsxXSBodHRwOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcv aHRtbC9kcmFmdC16emhhbmctbDJsMy12cG4tbWNhc3QtbWliLTAwDQoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwoKQ2UgbWVz c2FnZSBldCBzZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMgcGV1dmVudCBjb250ZW5pciBkZXMgaW5mb3JtYXRp b25zIGNvbmZpZGVudGllbGxlcyBvdSBwcml2aWxlZ2llZXMgZXQgbmUgZG9pdmVudCBkb25jCnBh cyBldHJlIGRpZmZ1c2VzLCBleHBsb2l0ZXMgb3UgY29waWVzIHNhbnMgYXV0b3Jpc2F0aW9uLiBT aSB2b3VzIGF2ZXogcmVjdSBjZSBtZXNzYWdlIHBhciBlcnJldXIsIHZldWlsbGV6IGxlIHNpZ25h bGVyCmEgbCdleHBlZGl0ZXVyIGV0IGxlIGRldHJ1aXJlIGFpbnNpIHF1ZSBsZXMgcGllY2VzIGpv aW50ZXMuIExlcyBtZXNzYWdlcyBlbGVjdHJvbmlxdWVzIGV0YW50IHN1c2NlcHRpYmxlcyBkJ2Fs dGVyYXRpb24sCk9yYW5nZSBkZWNsaW5lIHRvdXRlIHJlc3BvbnNhYmlsaXRlIHNpIGNlIG1lc3Nh Z2UgYSBldGUgYWx0ZXJlLCBkZWZvcm1lIG91IGZhbHNpZmllLiBNZXJjaS4KClRoaXMgbWVzc2Fn ZSBhbmQgaXRzIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzIG1heSBjb250YWluIGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbCBvciBwcml2aWxl Z2VkIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIHRoYXQgbWF5IGJlIHByb3RlY3RlZCBieSBsYXc7CnRoZXkgc2hvdWxk IG5vdCBiZSBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCwgdXNlZCBvciBjb3BpZWQgd2l0aG91dCBhdXRob3Jpc2F0aW9u LgpJZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSByZWNlaXZlZCB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGluIGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90aWZ5 IHRoZSBzZW5kZXIgYW5kIGRlbGV0ZSB0aGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgYW5kIGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cy4K QXMgZW1haWxzIG1heSBiZSBhbHRlcmVkLCBPcmFuZ2UgaXMgbm90IGxpYWJsZSBmb3IgbWVzc2Fn ZXMgdGhhdCBoYXZlIGJlZW4gbW9kaWZpZWQsIGNoYW5nZWQgb3IgZmFsc2lmaWVkLgpUaGFuayB5 b3UuCgo= From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Mon Oct 14 13:06:19 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CAC21E8105; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:06:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.422 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.422 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.178, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wiPgygKWJGE3; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E9721E8108; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Subject: Document Action: 'VPLS Interoperability with Provider Backbone Bridges' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05.txt) X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20131014200617.11527.24556.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:06:17 -0700 Cc: l2vpn mailing list , l2vpn chair , RFC Editor X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:06:19 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'VPLS Interoperability with Provider Backbone Bridges' (draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05.txt) as Informational RFC This document is the product of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Stewart Bryant and Adrian Farrel. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop/ Technical Summary This document describes different interoperability scenarios where Provider Backbone Bridge functionality is used in H-VPLS to attain better scalability. It also describes the scenarios and the mechanisms for incorporating Provider Backbone Bridge functionality within H-VPLS with existing Ethernet access and interoperability among them. Also it discusses the migration mechanisms and scenarios by which Provider Backbone Bridge functionality can be incorporated into H-VPLS with existing MPLS access. Working Group Summary This document is an L2VPN Working Group document, and has been well reviewed in the working group through multiple iterations of the draft (and it's predecessor draft). It has been essentially stable since WG adoption in January 2010. Document Quality The document is well structured and provides an exhaustive set of interoperability scenarios. Each scenario has an ASCII-art diagram and a full explanation of how the scenario operates. Personnel Document Shepherd: Giles Heron (giheron@cisco.com) Area Director: Stewart Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com) RFC Editor Note Please expand on first use VPLS - Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Please expand on first use H-VPLS - Hierarchical VPLS From internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue Oct 15 15:37:13 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1C311E8232; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:37:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.59 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.59 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lkj5OcDWsAT7; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E9521F9DBA; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:37:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req-05.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20131015223713.2136.64920.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:37:13 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:37:13 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : Requirements for Ethernet VPN (EVPN) Author(s) : Ali Sajassi Rahul Aggarwal Nabil Bitar Aldrin Isaac Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req-05.txt Pages : 15 Date : 2013-10-15 Abstract: The widespread adoption of Ethernet L2VPN services and the advent of new applications for the technology (e.g., data center interconnect) have culminated in a new set of requirements that are not readily addressable by the current Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) solution. In particular, multi-homing with all-active forwarding is not supported and there's no existing solution to leverage Multipoint-to-Multipoint (MP2MP) LSPs for optimizing the delivery of multi-destination frames. Furthermore, the provisioning of VPLS, even in the context of BGP-based auto-discovery, requires network operators to specify various network parameters on top of the access configuration. This document specifies the requirements for an Ethernet VPN (EVPN) solution which addresses the above issues. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From sajassi@cisco.com Tue Oct 15 16:07:38 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CE111E81FA for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:07:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ErqlEX9EteEE for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6319321F9DF6 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:07:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1942; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1381878439; x=1383088039; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=HD3NSq3NZtVWwjHAgfl3hjcSva4bUAK0WWwEQkNvUkE=; b=KvrgJ3DlHv76o6JAbZ8C8lqaRd814s6Q5i0aexzCgFa3/73SB+VaNDVR aBsEushGmgqOqk8raXfscMzoAe59SzJamQ4ttos0NGKI6WnSOKPqPqtxo 4iztgu7eWXd+Cl7ZAZbIypN2pzVg74uc2sxKbIzonANCRtOd02Cz2ZlyO o=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnkFAC3KXVKtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABagkMjIYEKwiqBIhZtB4IcCwEEgQsBCwEeVicEG4d+AZw5oU+PGYNXgQYDqgaDJIIp X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,503,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217";a="272552225" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2013 23:07:16 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9FN7G4X001821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:07:16 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:07:15 -0500 From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req-05.txt Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req-05.txt Thread-Index: AQHOyftJ+upnviXuUEqVLU8D3YbMjw== Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:07:15 +0000 Message-ID: <69670F7146898C4583F56DA9AD32F77B215C08DD@xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416 x-originating-ip: [10.128.2.83] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_69670F7146898C4583F56DA9AD32F77B215C08DDxmbalnx13ciscoc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:07:38 -0000 --_000_69670F7146898C4583F56DA9AD32F77B215C08DDxmbalnx13ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Folks, As you know this draft is getting ready for IESG review. As the preparation= for it, I received a few comments that I have incorporated into this rev o= f the draft. The changes to this rev can be summarized as follow: 1. The requirements are now numbered 2. Added an example in section 4.2 to clarify the text 3. Changed active/active to all-active 4. Expanded the requirements on section 6 Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Regards, Ali --_000_69670F7146898C4583F56DA9AD32F77B215C08DDxmbalnx13ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <555884CAC5008C41B8279F5850EFB954@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hi Folks,

As you know this draft is getting ready for IESG review. As the prepar= ation for it, I received a few comments that I have incorporated into this = rev of the draft. The changes to this rev can be summarized as follow:

  1. The requirements are now numbered
  2. Added an example in section 4= .2 to clarify the text
  3. Changed active/active to all-active
  4. = Expanded the requirements on section 6
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Regards,
Ali
--_000_69670F7146898C4583F56DA9AD32F77B215C08DDxmbalnx13ciscoc_-- From giles.heron@gmail.com Wed Oct 16 06:02:26 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B29421F9D69 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:02:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XRgaxeDSEXwK for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ea0-x229.google.com (mail-ea0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBF211E811B for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ea0-f169.google.com with SMTP id k11so347285eaj.0 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:02:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=eq3dKPtbBF7rWe4bKN5T3ooRRbPr5QbZM1ouJogm7vI=; b=kSEDE8RT1o3ahxduoQUX9Z5VGP93852BtFDN1lQZrvot5KwbjISUkpQaSY/NFhn1qt cZNgPQ6yFXkeNRYpsncfLMoADSGOsxZ5PY16DpUG36Drn4HuUbX15HoCOFx4P2wlyEpe AncwheSOp5R2mGk9ZUcGjvh8X8w78m3GqqoU1OTKiXvuXFkIwlaKXHSueyt79Bt/hyak Jvm01QnJ78pn22XOdcHJBArcgxMqaKeRZkBMr4tMcrrbmehBay9ql6t7qJmRfvq3CJjI ywNKzoLgjIt3aGVFzFU7tMkkYWProT2lNR5iqGCkj62j+lx3nLLRL53kdhtdhAWBQOSE dJGA== X-Received: by 10.14.225.199 with SMTP id z47mr4550560eep.24.1381928544654; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.61.168.9] (173-38-208-169.cisco.com. [173.38.208.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm179385161eem.1.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn From: Giles Heron In-Reply-To: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:02:22 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <973E3634-5C44-423F-B524-BD79610B8CB4@gmail.com> References: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com> To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:02:26 -0000 We appear to have good consensus to adopt this as a L2VPN WG draft. authors, would you please republish as draft-ietf-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-00? Thanks Nabil & Giles On 30 Sep 2013, at 18:51, Giles Heron wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October = with comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption. >=20 > Nabil & Giles From zhuangshunwan@huawei.com Sun Oct 20 23:37:55 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA50411E84A1 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 23:37:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tsafBUoqEoVu for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 23:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F6811E814C for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 23:37:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AZG96600; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 06:37:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 07:36:29 +0100 Received: from SZXEML415-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.154) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 07:37:24 +0100 Received: from peky1z001750051 (10.111.80.111) by smtpscn.huawei.com (10.82.67.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:37:10 +0800 From: Zhuangshunwan To: Subject: [l2vpn] Soliciting WG feedback and comments on draft-li-l2vpn-ccvpn-arch-00.txt Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:37:08 +0800 Message-ID: <000501cece27$f7b60270$e7220750$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac7Nqr9spkmfNlkERoO5yYGbP7K3MwAfEzOw Content-Language: zh-cn X-Originating-IP: [10.111.80.111] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 06:37:56 -0000 Hi: We had submitted a new draft: = http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-l2vpn-ccvpn-arch-00, Your feedback = and comments on the L2VPN mailing list are appreciated. With the emergence of Software Defined Networks (SDN), various services (e.g. L2VPN, L3VPN, MVPN) have been considered to deploy in a central controlled mode. The architecture of central controlled BGP is defined in [I-D.li-idr-cc-bgp-arch]. In the central controlled framework, control functionality of L2VPN can be done only by the Controllers. Consequently it can reduce control functionality in network nodes. This document defines an architecture of Central Controlled L2VPN and corresponding protocol extension requirement. Thanks, Shunwan Zhuang -----=E9=82=AE=E4=BB=B6=E5=8E=9F=E4=BB=B6----- =E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: internet-drafts@ietf.org = [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]=20 =E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4: = 2013=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8820=E6=97=A5 23:41 =E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: Shunwan Zhuang; Zhenbin Li =E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98: New Version Notification for = draft-li-l2vpn-ccvpn-arch-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-li-l2vpn-ccvpn-arch-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Zhenbin Li and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-li-l2vpn-ccvpn-arch Revision: 00 Title: An Architecture of Central Controlled Layer 2 Virtual Private = Network (L2VPN) Creation date: 2013-10-20 Group: Individual Submission Number of pages: 8 URL: = http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-l2vpn-ccvpn-arch-00.txt Status: = http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-l2vpn-ccvpn-arch Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-l2vpn-ccvpn-arch-00 Abstract: With the emergence of Software Defined Networks (SDN), the architecture of forwarding and control element separation will develop faster. In the central controlled framework, control functionality of L2VPN can be done only by the Controllers. Consequently it can reduce control functionality in network nodes. This document defines the architecture of central controlled L2VPN and corresponding protocol extension requirement. = =20 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of = submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Oct 21 09:53:34 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10F711E8687; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:53:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.572 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8FUyDyKfRUlO; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E5711E822F; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:53:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-06.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20131021165326.32469.46177.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:53:26 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:53:34 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : VPLS Interoperability with Provider Backbone Bridges Author(s) : Ali Sajassi Samer Salam Nabil Bitar Florin Balus Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-06.txt Pages : 26 Date : 2013-10-21 Abstract: The scalability of Hierarchical Virtual Private LAN Service (H-VPLS) with Ethernet access networks [RFC4762] can be improved by incorporating Provider Backbone Bridge functionality in the VPLS access. Provider Backbone Bridging has been standardized as IEEE 802.1ah-2008, and aims to improve the scalability of MAC addresses and service instances in Provider Ethernet networks. This document describes different interoperability scenarios where Provider Backbone Bridge functionality is used in H-VPLS with Ethernet or MPLS access network to attain better scalability in terms of number of customer MAC addresses and number of service instances. The document also describes the scenarios and the mechanisms for incorporating Provider Backbone Bridge functionality within H-VPLS with existing Ethernet access and interoperability among them. Furthermore, the document discusses the migration mechanisms and scenarios by which Provider Backbone Bridge functionality can be incorporated into H- VPLS with existing MPLS access. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-06 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Oct 21 12:01:03 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC3511E86AD; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:01:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.573 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJnE-Q0hvVbo; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:00:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4556C11E86B0; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:58:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20131021185823.32455.49662.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:58:23 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:01:03 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : PBB-EVPN Author(s) : Ali Sajassi Samer Salam Sami Boutros Nabil Bitar Aldrin Isaac Lizhong Jin Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06.txt Pages : 22 Date : 2013-10-21 Abstract: This document discusses how Ethernet Provider Backbone Bridging [802.1ah] can be combined with EVPN in order to reduce the number of BGP MAC advertisement routes by aggregating Customer/Client MAC (C- MAC) addresses via Provider Backbone MAC address (B-MAC), provide client MAC address mobility using C-MAC aggregation and B-MAC sub- netting, confine the scope of C-MAC learning to only active flows, offer per site policies and avoid C-MAC address flushing on topology changes. The combined solution is referred to as PBB-EVPN. Conventions The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com Mon Oct 21 12:51:03 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FC811E86BE for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:50:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.448 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jZPOY6aIvqKI for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:50:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fldsmtpe03.verizon.com (fldsmtpe03.verizon.com [140.108.26.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B5611E81F8 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:46:25 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi03.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.145]) by fldsmtpe03.verizon.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2013 19:45:51 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,541,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217";a="575710976" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb05.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB05.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.87]) by fldsmtpi03.verizon.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2013 19:45:51 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.45]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB05.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.87]) with mapi; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:45:51 -0400 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:45:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [l2vpn] L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 88 - Vancouver Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 88 - Vancouver Thread-Index: Ac7OliUyuzhAYFQsSX6CAlvWiFTE+A== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CE8AFAB2CC7CDnabilnbitarverizoncom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:51:17 -0000 --_000_CE8AFAB2CC7CDnabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, If you haven't sent a request for a slot yet and you still want to request = one, please do that by Tuesday 10/22/2013 5:00PM EST (an extension from the= initial date). Thanks, Nabil and Giles From: , Nabil N > Date: Sunday, October 6, 2013 7:45 PM To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" > Cc: Giles Heron > Subject: [l2vpn] L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 88 - Vancouver Hi L2VPN WG, If you would like to request a time-slot for the L2VPN WG session at IETF 8= 8-Vancouver, please reply to us by Sunday October 20, 2013 along with the f= ollowing information: 1) Draft title 2) Presenter name 3) Requested duration Please, make sure that the subject of you reply is: Re:[l2vpn] L2VPN Age= nda Slot Call for IETF 88 =96 Vancouver. Please note that priority will be given to drafts that are clearly within t= he scope of the current L2VPN charter. Please also note the following cutoff date for draft submission. This date = applies to new 00 drafts and updated drafts. 2013-10-21 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, inc= luding -00) by UTC 24:00, upload using IETF ID Submission Tool. The l2vpn WG session is currently scheduled for Friday November 8, 2013 11:= 20-13:30 PST. You may see the agenda at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meetin= g/88/agenda.html Thanks, Nabil and Giles --_000_CE8AFAB2CC7CDnabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
If you haven't se= nt a request for a slot yet and you still want to request one, please do th= at by Tuesday 10/22/2013 5:00PM EST (an extension from the initial date).&n= bsp;

Thanks,
Nabil and Giles
<= br>

From: = <Bitar>, Nabil N <nabil.n.bitar@one.verizon.com>
Date: Sunday, October 6, 2013 7:45 PM
To: "l2vpn@ietf.org<= /a>" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
<= span style=3D"font-weight:bold">Cc: Giles Heron <giheron@cisco.com>
Subject: [l2vpn] L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 88 - Vanc= ouver

Hi L2VPN = WG,

If you would like to request a time-slot for t= he L2VPN WG session at IETF 88-Vancouver, please reply to us by Sunday October 20, 2013 along with the following information:

=
1) Draft title 2) Presenter name
3) Requested duration

Please, make sure that the subject of you reply is: =    Re:[l2vpn] L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 88 =96 Vancouver.
<= div>

Please note that priority will be given to drafts that are clearly within t= he scope of the current L2VPN charter.
Please also note the following cutoff date for draft submission. This dat= e applies to new 00 drafts and updated drafts. 

2013-10= -21 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all draf= ts, including -00) by UTC 24:00, upload using IETF ID Submission Tool.


The l2vpn WG session is currently = scheduled for Friday November 8, 2013 11:20-13:30 PST. You may see the agen= da at = https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/88/agenda.html

Thanks,
Nabil and Giles
 --_000_CE8AFAB2CC7CDnabilnbitarverizoncom_-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Oct 21 14:50:00 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3A011E8734; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:50:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.569 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZAPU77H5ztuh; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9156211E86B1; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:49:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-00.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20131021214948.32455.41086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:49:48 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:50:00 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : Shortest Path Bridging, MAC mode Support over EVPN Author(s) : Dave Allan Jeff Tantsura Don Fedyk Ali Sajassi Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-00.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2013-10-21 Abstract: This document describes how Ethernet Shortest Path Bridging MAC mode (802.1aq) can be combined with EVPN in a way that interworks with PBB-PEs as described in the PBB-EVPN solution. This is achieved via operational isolation of each Ethernet network subtending an EVPN core while supporting full interworking between the different variations of Ethernet networks. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-spbm-evpn There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com Wed Oct 23 09:32:09 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C4D11E80E7; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:32:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -109.195 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.195 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.896, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_LIST=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S88z+sgz-gK2; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586A411E83CB; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r9NGVwdo018743 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:31:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r9NGVvPw020345 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:31:57 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.189]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:31:57 +0200 From: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" To: "draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcops-vxlan@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Document shepherd review and implementation check: draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcops-vxlan-05.txt Thread-Topic: Document shepherd review and implementation check: draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcops-vxlan-05.txt Thread-Index: AQHO0A1j6vns+ROMnESn7FjegNCBLw== Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:31:55 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <1915A9D376E054439837AD9496E22EC5@exchange.lucent.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "nvo3@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:32:09 -0000 Hi, I am the document shepherd for draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcops-vxlan-05.txt. As discussed at IETF 87, the authors of this draft have requested that it be handled as an individual submission to the IESG. This is not the product of an IETF working group. The draft has an intended status of =8CExperimental', which I believe is appropriate. I have reviewed that draft and found it to be clear and well written. Since the draft is intended to document the current design of an existing, implemented protocol, I do not have specific technical comments. I only have minor or editorial comments, which I hope the authors will take into consideration. Once these have been addressed, I will post a document shepherd write up. As a part of the =8Cdocument quality=B9 section of the shepherd=B9s write-u= p, I also need to ask for any declarations that the protocol has been implemented. Please let me know if you are aware of implementations. Please direct any comments/discussion to the NVO3 list. Best regards, Matthew -- Major Comments =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D None Minor comments =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D I-D Nits: ---------- I-D nits throws up a number of issues. Please can you fix these. Here is the output: idnits 2.12.18=20 tmp/draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcops-vxlan-05.txt: Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info): =20 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - No issues found here. Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt: =20 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - =3D=3D The page length should not exceed 58 lines per page, but there was= 15 longer pages, the longest (page 1) being 61 lines Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist : =20 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ** There are 423 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest one being 11 characters in excess of 72. Miscellaneous warnings: =20 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - =3D=3D Line 26 has weird spacing: '...t-Draft is s...' =3D=3D Line 36 has weird spacing: '... at any ...' =3D=3D Line 39 has weird spacing: '... The list ...' =3D=3D Line 113 has weird spacing: '.... This is n...' =3D=3D Line 126 has weird spacing: '... the indiv...' =3D=3D (38 more instances...) -- The document date (October 16, 2013) is 7 days in the past. Is this intentional? Checking references for intended status: Experimental =20 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - =3D=3D Missing Reference: 'ECMP' is mentioned on line 121, but not define= d =3D=3D Unused Reference: 'RFC4601' is defined on line 836, but no explici= t reference was found in the text =3D=3D Unused Reference: 'RFC5015' is defined on line 840, but no explici= t reference was found in the text =3D=3D Unused Reference: 'RFC4541' is defined on line 844, but no explici= t reference was found in the text Author Count: =8B=8B=8B=8B=8B=8B=8B=8B There are 8 authors listed at the top of the draft. Please reduce this to fit within the RFC editor guideline of 5. One way to do this might be to follow the example of other RFCs, with editors listed at the top, but other authors include in the authors section of the document lower down (see RFC6310 for an example). Introduction, 3rd Para: =8B=8B=8B=8B=8B S/concomitant/common Section 3.1, 1st Para: =8B=8B=8B=8B=8B Add references to TRILL and SPB. Section 3.2: =8B=8B=8B=8B=8B=8B s/multitenant/multi-tenant Section 4.2, 3rd Para: =8B=8B=8B=8B=8B- Missing reference to PIM-SM Figure 1: =8B=8B=8B=8B=8B The bit-alignment of some the fields is hard to read, and there is text that appears to leak out of the fields on the left hand side. Please look at reformatting this figure. Figure 2: =8B=8B=8B=8B=8B Same comment as for Figure 1. Section 7: =8B=8B=8B=8B=8B=8B This section claims that VXLAN meets the requirements outlined in the NVO3 working group charter. You may want to qualify this by stating that this draft is not a product of the NVO3 working group, and add an informational reference to the NVO3 Gap Analysis draft (draft-ietf-nvo3-gap-analysis-00). Section 9: =8B=8B=8B=8B Please be explicit as to the name of the registry that IANA has allocated the value from. This is the =B3Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry=B2. =20 From amclachl@cisco.com Thu Oct 24 03:40:20 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D5B11E815E for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:40:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mzTP760uObGm for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF32B11E8110 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:40:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=291; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1382611215; x=1383820815; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=atysuW6f87uXK4/m3U5Bd8plYkjHcZeH16TPlG1Gumc=; b=lJNzOewg7YIsayWkdP3rTIM985gORWZAJeIZ3VIjcaYOmanQLQ9tK76G j0bSARGZ8pR2+jInf198YEgOdvimnJ7v5jxkKb9k5Dxmx+j+ToFye9Lq6 nKHcfxuiTOCipDQ5NZeX0PFAkNuwmd+FKe7ix8pGOGnw+HvX4STe6YoGO M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUFAEv4aFKtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4VL5SgRsWbQeCJwEEOlEBKhRCJwQbAYd9DZkNoVuPHYNXgQsDmTiQWIMkgio X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,561,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="276042279" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2013 10:40:12 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9OAeB7P009046 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:40:11 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.239]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 05:40:11 -0500 From: "Andrew McLachlan (amclachl)" To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: draft agenda for L2VPN @ IETF88 Thread-Topic: draft agenda for L2VPN @ IETF88 Thread-Index: AQHO0KVqlk9QLUNRaEKMujgX+V1rcQ== Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:40:11 +0000 Message-ID: <71856D87EAE6874FB4E434D2882D12A404DC82A2@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.147.60.150] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:40:20 -0000 The draft agenda for the L2VPN meeting at IETF88 can be found at: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/agenda/agenda-88-l2vpn Speakers please check your details are correct - and that you got the slot = you requested. Nabil, Giles, Andrew http://tools.ietf.org/wg/l2vpn/agenda From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Thu Oct 24 08:28:07 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6C411E82F0; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:28:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.405 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.405 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.195, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cYuRLAXQ+RQA; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB28A21F9A6C; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Subject: Last Call: (Requirements for Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) Ethernet-Tree (E-Tree) Support in L2VPN) to Informational RFC X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.81 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Sender: Message-ID: <20131024152806.2372.77949.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:28:06 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:28:07 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks WG (l2vpn) to consider the following document: - 'Requirements for Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) Ethernet-Tree (E-Tree) Support in L2VPN' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-11-18. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document provides functional requirements for Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) support in multipoint L2VPN solutions (referred to as simply L2VPN). It is intended that potential solutions will use these requirements as guidelines. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From giles.heron@gmail.com Tue Oct 29 12:51:55 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C535211E827E for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:51:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.449 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZA21pePDyrw1 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ea0-x235.google.com (mail-ea0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F5021E8083 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:50:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ea0-f181.google.com with SMTP id d10so160919eaj.26 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:50:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version; bh=hjMrs7j/16JOBvh0WHiCA985pYnJOHiX0vuMxqlNJ5g=; b=vM6TimbHmbB96A9AbjXcWegwkoqVgxeDvkXXMAi1RnupuYob9jQaKVCKgrZSSEW2Gl ahCAAsMIlGSEQ8SpO6zPjBtS1DFDtdz/clwHKtqjoMXmL/SfsJiyFkVE+sm3QTcXh5cz QHroyxUtykrfG2LBwMS6gIqrZa19a9C969RLKWrlYd5FO3YoTMIUAoEsfjq0MZWihDIf 2ca1WOQB7qN+2+yKYjv+aDnE+cBv6f/MOTZH49jB1Tdn+r2n3lIoCNkt6SUsLDTw2WlY 5AZA5yOEzIlFcOZq/6IO/I/KC5xWjMROIlPPZuzVN1VzM33OczkUbR6PUXHpwdFkifPI onxA== X-Received: by 10.14.241.74 with SMTP id f50mr1214308eer.29.1383076215810; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:50:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-bdlk10-vlan254-10-147-57-32.cisco.com (173-38-208-169.cisco.com. [173.38.208.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm74100623eev.6.2013.10.29.12.50.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:50:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Giles Heron Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:50:18 +0000 Message-Id: To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:51:55 -0000 All We are polling for any knowledge of IPR that applies to = draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12, in order to ensure that IPR has been = disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 = and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author please respond to this email as = to whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be progressed until a response has been received from = each author. If you are on the l2vpn WG email list, but not listed as an author for = this draft, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any = IPR that has not yet been disclosed in the conformance with the IETF = rules.. The draft can be found here: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12 This poll closes on Tuesday November 12th 2013. Cheers Andrew, Giles, Nabil From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Wed Oct 30 08:10:57 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0781221E811D; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:10:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.388 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.212, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gh96keKZzWnr; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80DF11E8245; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Subject: Last Call: (Requirements for Ethernet VPN (EVPN)) to Informational RFC X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.81 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Sender: Message-ID: <20131030150953.6969.95127.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:09:53 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:10:57 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks WG (l2vpn) to consider the following document: - 'Requirements for Ethernet VPN (EVPN)' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-11-27. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The widespread adoption of Ethernet L2VPN services and the advent of new applications for the technology (e.g., data center interconnect) have culminated in a new set of requirements that are not readily addressable by the current Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) solution. In particular, multi-homing with all-active forwarding is not supported and there's no existing solution to leverage Multipoint-to-Multipoint (MP2MP) LSPs for optimizing the delivery of multi-destination frames. Furthermore, the provisioning of VPLS, even in the context of BGP-based auto-discovery, requires network operators to specify various network parameters on top of the access configuration. This document specifies the requirements for an Ethernet VPN (EVPN) solution which addresses the above issues. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From kkoushik@cisco.com Thu Oct 31 14:31:57 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D33921F9F34 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:31:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1VgMMR9h9f3z for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5011221E8056 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:31:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3867; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383255112; x=1384464712; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Gl/ZPUI+z3VOdN4Z6GvqmREtMVz5j0JpdNtp3UZbEz8=; b=Z8bB9El/j28V9oM2j6cADpmmfuXjJIQ4yPVsNfStrH1r3zccuGptWx/y UdZEuRb+3SR69I7NDSWvxFf/pT3iXhNa/46QS5bv/kkyjEk1uKOZkzaas uu686qR530eyYsNA4nI8p729dflSwBAnC+vTQiX1Ai9aVot9x0Ly8z799 k=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAGrLclKrRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4wDeBKRZ0giUBAQEDAQEBATc0CwULHAMBAi8hBh8JCAYTG4daAwkFDrMBDYlrjF+BJ4FJBwaDGoEOA4lAimuBdIFrgS+LI4U3g0QegTU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,612,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="96184865" Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Oct 2013 21:31:52 +0000 Received: from rcdn-kkoushik-8812.cisco.com (rcdn-kkoushik-8812.cisco.com [10.99.130.227]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9VLVnhJ025372 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:31:50 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12 From: Agrahara Kiran Koushik In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:31:49 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8A695C33-D123-4D29-BF86-FB1622DCF265@cisco.com> References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:31:57 -0000 I'm not aware of any IPR for this MIB. Thanks Kiran > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:50:18 +0000 > From: Giles Heron > To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" > Subject: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12 > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii >=20 > All >=20 > We are polling for any knowledge of IPR that applies to = draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12, in order to ensure that IPR has been = disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 = and 5378 for more details). >=20 > If you are listed as a document author please respond to this email as = to whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. >=20 > The draft will not be progressed until a response has been received = from each author. >=20 > If you are on the l2vpn WG email list, but not listed as an author for = this draft, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any = IPR that has not yet been disclosed in the conformance with the IETF = rules.. >=20 > The draft can be found here: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12 >=20 > This poll closes on Tuesday November 12th 2013. >=20 > Cheers >=20 > Andrew, Giles, Nabil >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------ >=20 > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:09:53 -0700 > From: The IESG > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: Last Call: (Requirements > for Ethernet VPN (EVPN)) to Informational RFC > Message-ID: <20131030150953.6969.95127.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" >=20 >=20 > The IESG has received a request from the Layer 2 Virtual Private = Networks > WG (l2vpn) to consider the following document: > - 'Requirements for Ethernet VPN (EVPN)' > as Informational RFC >=20 > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-11-27. Exceptionally, comments may = be > sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >=20 > Abstract >=20 >=20 > The widespread adoption of Ethernet L2VPN services and the advent of > new applications for the technology (e.g., data center interconnect) > have culminated in a new set of requirements that are not readily > addressable by the current Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) > solution. In particular, multi-homing with all-active forwarding is > not supported and there's no existing solution to leverage > Multipoint-to-Multipoint (MP2MP) LSPs for optimizing the delivery of > multi-destination frames. Furthermore, the provisioning of VPLS, = even > in the context of BGP-based auto-discovery, requires network > operators to specify various network parameters on top of the access > configuration. This document specifies the requirements for an > Ethernet VPN (EVPN) solution which addresses the above issues. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req/ >=20 > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req/ballot/ >=20 >=20 > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------ >=20 > _______________________________________________ > L2vpn mailing list > L2vpn@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn >=20 >=20 > End of L2vpn Digest, Vol 113, Issue 18 > ************************************** From tnadeau@lucidvision.com Thu Oct 31 14:43:31 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADBB11E825F for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:43:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N0n7uy+UToYS for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE3621E8108 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.113] (static-72-71-250-38.cncdnh.fast04.myfairpoint.net [72.71.250.38]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA28525CBB1F; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:43:16 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E283E549-C7F5-43CF-80E4-B8CF09E8EFE9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\)) Subject: Re: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12 From: Thomas Nadeau In-Reply-To: <8A695C33-D123-4D29-BF86-FB1622DCF265@cisco.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:43:16 -0400 Message-Id: <2F794863-7E37-4E72-8031-6B1198FE0BFD@lucidvision.com> References: <8A695C33-D123-4D29-BF86-FB1622DCF265@cisco.com> To: Agrahara Kiran Koushik X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816) Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:43:31 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_E283E549-C7F5-43CF-80E4-B8CF09E8EFE9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Same here.=20 On Oct 31, 2013:5:31 PM, at 5:31 PM, Agrahara Kiran Koushik = wrote: > I'm not aware of any IPR for this MIB. >=20 > Thanks > Kiran >=20 >=20 >=20 >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:50:18 +0000 >> From: Giles Heron >> To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" >> Subject: IPR poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12 >> Message-ID: >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii >>=20 >> All >>=20 >> We are polling for any knowledge of IPR that applies to = draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12, in order to ensure that IPR has been = disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 = and 5378 for more details). >>=20 >> If you are listed as a document author please respond to this email = as to whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. >>=20 >> The draft will not be progressed until a response has been received = from each author. >>=20 >> If you are on the l2vpn WG email list, but not listed as an author = for this draft, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of = any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in the conformance with the IETF = rules.. >>=20 >> The draft can be found here: >>=20 >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-12 >>=20 >> This poll closes on Tuesday November 12th 2013. >>=20 >> Cheers >>=20 >> Andrew, Giles, Nabil >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> ------------------------------ >>=20 >> Message: 2 >> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:09:53 -0700 >> From: The IESG >> To: IETF-Announce >> Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org >> Subject: Last Call: (Requirements >> for Ethernet VPN (EVPN)) to Informational RFC >> Message-ID: <20131030150953.6969.95127.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" >>=20 >>=20 >> The IESG has received a request from the Layer 2 Virtual Private = Networks >> WG (l2vpn) to consider the following document: >> - 'Requirements for Ethernet VPN (EVPN)' >> as Informational RFC >>=20 >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to = the >> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-11-27. Exceptionally, comments = may be >> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >>=20 >> Abstract >>=20 >>=20 >> The widespread adoption of Ethernet L2VPN services and the advent of >> new applications for the technology (e.g., data center interconnect) >> have culminated in a new set of requirements that are not readily >> addressable by the current Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) >> solution. In particular, multi-homing with all-active forwarding is >> not supported and there's no existing solution to leverage >> Multipoint-to-Multipoint (MP2MP) LSPs for optimizing the delivery of >> multi-destination frames. Furthermore, the provisioning of VPLS, = even >> in the context of BGP-based auto-discovery, requires network >> operators to specify various network parameters on top of the access >> configuration. This document specifies the requirements for an >> Ethernet VPN (EVPN) solution which addresses the above issues. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> The file can be obtained via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req/ >>=20 >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req/ballot/ >>=20 >>=20 >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> ------------------------------ >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> L2vpn mailing list >> L2vpn@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn >>=20 >>=20 >> End of L2vpn Digest, Vol 113, Issue 18 >> ************************************** >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_E283E549-C7F5-43CF-80E4-B8CF09E8EFE9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJScs70AAoJEPcO+I7eiUJZNoQP/2kawcIQdyzr05C05K4jeLnR gSuP/n8vEzrkCIKDTIdbUCQzTZbLrSzznLsjhF4gei8Mo9yRu14vCG49sERMWhgv RApWB64TrZGzGgaCbCLi6O6QhalCADS8ZWeHSXQbMVeuEU7kLPC1Qx2fYaAW/LUS OD7Vva8tmw0SrMOz5Qeb5Cou8rHzlCKVt393QJbvaLLUGEvsTNZID9f27TAcwvsj VtnbiIyAwfZuT0kqlFre2shtoKljh+D5BjtK+5wNsVKhK/n70DIr6VbHFF1A11JR J7zlbAQa24krlgV7ygaMg46ZR8ofi81E1rAHLdaQU6o7mmOxBRbxtvg4ey3fCwVq O/za+R4fRtQRvEbEZ3XOou8hMbbWVwsw/RhCYo/3u8povGS2Rd5TWOQLCFTtuSRw PH32zIxUDqPlMj4iSqbELcNKzDop9Q4xygjdgjlvgpWo+ztCKVSf2l+6aJhwPB2s 4Hz+/D1gQgzliitWyXU5fvcQxSaP5YW1WS9UKuVXdyccBeM34GKOOnOUVyUxsm4q TBLQucbEuoMbsRmz+J4VsOJ5WCHxHyxA+GRafqGiAZ0rDssB7eEKYpHRF3y8gdAt KJL7TxhJL7BPi+Y4ye3T414XjJULbnfCMsy22bSv/hcK5ndCVhOt7b7i+8TxnF1L sntO1ioWQ8+XGOz7RoVC =CV8r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_E283E549-C7F5-43CF-80E4-B8CF09E8EFE9--