From nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com Mon Jan 6 04:10:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070811AD942 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 04:10:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jSQlDnrrwMtc for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 04:10:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43391AD8EF for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 04:10:13 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi01.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.143]) by omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2014 12:10:04 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,612,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217";a="641425818" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb04.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.83]) by fldsmtpi01.verizon.com with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2014 12:10:04 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.45]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.83]) with mapi; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 07:10:04 -0500 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 07:10:03 -0500 Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Thread-Index: Ac8K2Dq4jjGsmmSwRku5OSWI92tlVA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CEEFB20924290nabilnbitaroneverizoncom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "ostokes@extremenetworks.com" , "Balus, Florin Stelian \(Florin\)" , Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:10:16 -0000 --_000_CEEFB20924290nabilnbitaroneverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-vp= ls-ldp-mac-opt-09.txt, LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal = in H-VPLS, in order to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance wit= h IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email wheth= er or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disc= losed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received fro= m each author and contributor. If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft c= an be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 This poll closes on Monday January 13, 2014. Thanks, Nabil & Giles --_000_CEEFB20924290nabilnbitaroneverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

=
We are= polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to <= span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"line-height: 0px; white-space: pre= ; ">draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09.txt, LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Wi= thdrawal in H-VPLS, in order to ensure that IPR has been discl= osed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and = 5378 for more details). 

If you are listed as a document author,  please respond to this email whether o= r not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disclose= d. The draft= will not be adopted until a response has been received from each auth= or and contributor.

If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not l= isted as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware=  of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft can b= e found at 

This poll closes= on Monday January 13, 2014.

Nabil & Giles
--_000_CEEFB20924290nabilnbitaroneverizoncom_-- From ostokes@extremenetworks.com Mon Jan 6 12:24:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAE71AE205 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:24:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.438 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ivaag5mrSvn for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from usnc-casht-p1.extremenetworks.com (usnc-casht-p1.extremenetworks.com [12.38.15.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42ECA1AE204 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from USNC-MBX-P4.corp.extremenetworks.com ([fe80::daa:161d:dbf0:11e8]) by USNC-CASHT-P2.corp.extremenetworks.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:24:42 -0800 From: Olen Stokes To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Thread-Index: Ac8K2Dq4jjGsmmSwRku5OSWI92tlVAARJidQ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 20:24:42 +0000 Message-ID: <4611B179CEF5284C83064741D659C61F120D5148@usnc-mbx-p4.corp.extremenetworks.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.6.106.33] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4611B179CEF5284C83064741D659C61F120D5148usncmbxp4corpex_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Balus, Florin Stelian \(Florin\)" , Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:24:55 -0000 --_000_4611B179CEF5284C83064741D659C61F120D5148usncmbxp4corpex_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not aware of any applicable IPR. Olen From: Bitar, Nabil N [mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 7:10 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: Giles Heron; pranjal.dutta@alcatel-lucent.com; Olen Stokes; geraldine.c= alvignac@orange-ftgroup.com; Balus, Florin Stelian (Florin) Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Hi, We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-vp= ls-ldp-mac-opt-09.txt, LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal = in H-VPLS, in order to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance wit= h IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email wheth= er or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disc= losed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received fro= m each author and contributor. If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft c= an be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 This poll closes on Monday January 13, 2014. Thanks, Nabil & Giles --_000_4611B179CEF5284C83064741D659C61F120D5148usncmbxp4corpex_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am not aware of any app= licable IPR.

 <= /p>

Olen

 <= /p>

From: Bitar, N= abil N [mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 7:10 AM
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Cc: Giles Heron; pranjal.dutta@alcatel-lucent.com; Olen Stokes; gera= ldine.calvignac@orange-ftgroup.com; Balus, Florin Stelian (Florin)
Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-op= t-09

 

Hi,

 

We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-= ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09.txt, LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in H-VPLS, in order to ensure= that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). <= /span>

 

If you are listed as a document author,  please respond to = this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disclosed. The draft will not be adopted until a re= sponse has been received from each author and contributor.

 

If you are on the l2vpn WG = email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please= explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft can be fo= und at 

 

This poll closes on Monday = January 13, 2014.

 

Thanks,

Nabil & Giles

--_000_4611B179CEF5284C83064741D659C61F120D5148usncmbxp4corpex_-- From don.fedyk@hp.com Tue Jan 7 07:30:46 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183841ADF6D for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:30:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.737 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.737 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F6XQNIqJJdXl for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:30:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from g6t0185.atlanta.hp.com (g6t0185.atlanta.hp.com [15.193.32.62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3841C1ADF32 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:30:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from G6W4001.americas.hpqcorp.net (g6w4001.atlanta.hp.com [16.205.80.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g6t0185.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1075F24012; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from G6W3999.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.205.80.214) by G6W4001.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.205.80.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:29:53 +0000 Received: from G6W2492.americas.hpqcorp.net ([169.254.8.52]) by G6W3999.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.205.80.214]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:29:53 +0000 From: "Fedyk, Don" To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Thread-Index: Ac8K2Dq4jjGsmmSwRku5OSWI92tlVAA5O6IA Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:29:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [16.201.12.30] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A46D9C092EA46F489F135060986AD9FFCAC4B4G6W2492americashp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Balus, Florin Stelian \(Florin\)" , Giles Heron , "ostokes@extremenetworks.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:30:46 -0000 --_000_A46D9C092EA46F489F135060986AD9FFCAC4B4G6W2492americashp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi I'm not aware of any applicable IPR. Regards, Don From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bitar, Nabil N Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 7:10 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: ostokes@extremenetworks.com; Balus, Florin Stelian (Florin); Giles Hero= n Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Hi, We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-vp= ls-ldp-mac-opt-09.txt, LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal = in H-VPLS, in order to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance wit= h IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email wheth= er or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disc= losed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received fro= m each author and contributor. If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft c= an be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 This poll closes on Monday January 13, 2014. Thanks, Nabil & Giles --_000_A46D9C092EA46F489F135060986AD9FFCAC4B4G6W2492americashp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi

I’m not aware of an= y applicable IPR.

 <= /p>

Regards,

Don

 <= /p>

From: L2vpn [m= ailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bitar, Nabil N
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 7:10 AM
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Cc: ostokes@extremenetworks.com; Balus, Florin Stelian (Florin); Gil= es Heron
Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-op= t-09

 

Hi,

 

We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-= ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09.txt, LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in H-VPLS, in order to ensure= that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). <= /span>

 

If you are listed as a document author,  please respond to = this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disclosed. The draft will not be adopted until a re= sponse has been received from each author and contributor.

 

If you are on the l2vpn WG = email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please= explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft can be fo= und at 

 

This poll closes on Monday = January 13, 2014.

 

Thanks,

Nabil & Giles

--_000_A46D9C092EA46F489F135060986AD9FFCAC4B4G6W2492americashp_-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Fri Jan 17 06:26:58 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C641AE0D1; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 06:26:58 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AQWan0t5ToSY; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 06:26:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45A51AE0E9; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 06:26:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-13.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140117142656.3072.93660.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 06:26:56 -0800 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:26:59 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : Virtual Private Lan Services (VPLS) Management In= formation Base Authors : Thomas D. Nadeau A S Kiran Koushik Rohit Mediratta Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-13.txt Pages : 47 Date : 2014-01-13 Abstract: This memo defines an experimental portion of the Management Information Base for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects for modeling of Virtual Private LAN services. It needs to be used in conjunction with The Pseudowire (PW) Management Information Base. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-13 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-13 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From pranjal.dutta@alcatel-lucent.com Sat Jan 18 20:04:45 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45D51AD8DB for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 20:04:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CYxuhh82Xg-g for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 20:04:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB05F1AD6C1 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 20:04:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-5-2-63.lucent.com [135.5.2.63]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s0J44Giv021183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 18 Jan 2014 22:04:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70twxchhub03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.35]) by us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s0J44E42029373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 18 Jan 2014 23:04:15 -0500 Received: from SG70YWXCHHUB04.zap.alcatel-lucent.com (135.253.2.38) by US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 23:04:14 -0500 Received: from SG70YWXCHMBA08.zap.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.8.172]) by SG70YWXCHHUB04.zap.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.253.2.38]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 12:04:10 +0800 From: "Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)" To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Thread-Index: Ac8K2Dq4jjGsmmSwRku5OSWI92tlVAJ8y97Q Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 04:04:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.253.19.17] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ABD110CD5D879A4BB51C269846E4CA310A6138SG70YWXCHMBA08zap_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33 Cc: "ostokes@extremenetworks.com" , "Balus, Florin Stelian \(Florin\)" , Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 04:04:45 -0000 --_000_ABD110CD5D879A4BB51C269846E4CA310A6138SG70YWXCHMBA08zap_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I am not aware of any applicable IPR. Thanks, Pranjal From: Bitar, Nabil N [mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 4:10 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: Giles Heron; Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal); ostokes@extremenetworks.com; g= eraldine.calvignac@orange-ftgroup.com; Balus, Florin Stelian (Florin) Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Hi, We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-vp= ls-ldp-mac-opt-09.txt, LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal = in H-VPLS, in order to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance wit= h IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email wheth= er or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disc= losed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received fro= m each author and contributor. If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft c= an be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 This poll closes on Monday January 13, 2014. Thanks, Nabil & Giles --_000_ABD110CD5D879A4BB51C269846E4CA310A6138SG70YWXCHMBA08zap_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

    &= nbsp;       I am not aware of any applicable = IPR.

Thanks,=

Pranjal=

 <= /p>

From: Bitar, N= abil N [mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 4:10 AM
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Cc: Giles Heron; Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal); ostokes@extremenetworks= .com; geraldine.calvignac@orange-ftgroup.com; Balus, Florin Stelian (Florin= )
Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-op= t-09

 

Hi,

 

We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-= ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09.txt, LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in H-VPLS, in order to ensure= that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). <= /span>

 

If you are listed as a document author,  please respond to = this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disclosed. The draft will not be adopted until a re= sponse has been received from each author and contributor.

 

If you are on the l2vpn WG = email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please= explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft can be fo= und at 

 

This poll closes on Monday = January 13, 2014.

 

Thanks,

Nabil & Giles

--_000_ABD110CD5D879A4BB51C269846E4CA310A6138SG70YWXCHMBA08zap_-- From geraldine.calvignac@orange.com Mon Jan 20 00:52:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE181A00A3 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:52:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.802 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zd4u4SAgDQpl for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:52:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias244.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.244]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1A01A004C for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:51:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from omfeda06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.199]) by omfeda10.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id B1E73374235; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:51:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.183]) by omfeda06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 86EFEC8067; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:51:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from PEXCVZYM12.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::81f:1640:4749:5d13]) by PEXCVZYH02.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:51:58 +0100 From: To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Thread-Index: Ac8K2Dq4jjGsmmSwRku5OSWI92tlVAA5O6IAAn/GjjA= Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:51:57 +0000 Message-ID: <7540_1390207918_52DCE3AE_7540_9262_1_3CDAE1F19ECB70499C6242576D6D0BA314157AA0@PEXCVZYM12.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <1008_1389108643_52CC1DA3_1008_110_1_A46D9C092EA46F489F135060986AD9FFCAC4B4@G6W2492.americas.hpqcorp.net> In-Reply-To: <1008_1389108643_52CC1DA3_1008_110_1_A46D9C092EA46F489F135060986AD9FFCAC4B4@G6W2492.americas.hpqcorp.net> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.1] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3CDAE1F19ECB70499C6242576D6D0BA314157AA0PEXCVZYM12corpo_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.1.20.50915 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:24:15 -0800 Cc: Giles Heron , "ostokes@extremenetworks.com" , "Fedyk, Don" , "Balus, Florin Stelian \(Florin\)" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:52:02 -0000 --_000_3CDAE1F19ECB70499C6242576D6D0BA314157AA0PEXCVZYM12corpo_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I am not aware of any relevant IPR. Best regards, Geraldine From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bitar, Nabil N Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 7:10 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: ostokes@extremenetworks.com; Balus, Florin Stelian (Florin); Giles Heron Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Hi, We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-vp= ls-ldp-mac-opt-09.txt, LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal = in H-VPLS, in order to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance wit= h IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email wheth= er or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disc= losed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received fro= m each author and contributor. If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft c= an be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 This poll closes on Monday January 13, 2014. Thanks, Nabil & Giles ___________________________________________________________________________= ______________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden= tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu= ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages el= ectroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou = falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf= ormation that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele= te this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been = modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. --_000_3CDAE1F19ECB70499C6242576D6D0BA314157AA0PEXCVZYM12corpo_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

I am not a= ware of any relevant IPR.

 = ;

Best regar= ds,

 &nbs= p;            &= nbsp; Geraldine

 = ;

From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bitar, Nabil N
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 7:10 AM
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Cc: ostokes@extremenetworks.com; Balus, Florin Stelian (Florin); Gil= es Heron
Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-op= t-09

 

Hi,

 <= /o:p>

We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that appl= ies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09.txt, LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in H-VPLS, in = order to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).=  

 <= /o:p>

If you are listed as a document author,  please r= espond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disclosed. The draft will not be adopt= ed until a response has been received from each author and contributor= .

 <= /o:p>

If you are o= n the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or contribut= or, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.&n= bsp;The draft can be found at 

 <= /o:p>

This poll cl= oses on Monday January 13, 2014.

 <= /o:p>

Thanks,

Nabil & Giles

______________________________________________________________________=
___________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden=
tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu=
 ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages el=
ectroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou =
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf=
ormation that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele=
te this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been =
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
--_000_3CDAE1F19ECB70499C6242576D6D0BA314157AA0PEXCVZYM12corpo_-- From florin.balus@alcatel-lucent.com Mon Jan 20 08:43:43 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDEF1A01C1 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:43:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q25Tz2gannic for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:43:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7968D1A01BE for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:43:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-5-2-63.lucent.com [135.5.2.63]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s0KGhViB005071 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:43:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70twxchhub03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.35]) by us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s0KGhU4f014148 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:43:30 -0500 Received: from US70UWXCHMBA03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.9.176]) by US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.35]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:43:30 -0500 From: "Balus, Florin Stelian (Florin)" To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Thread-Index: Ac8K2Dq4jjGsmmSwRku5OSWI92tlVAJ8y97QAEaLeAA= Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:43:30 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.0.121105 x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.18] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CF0292083FC32florinbalusalcatellucentcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:49:03 -0800 Cc: "ostokes@extremenetworks.com" , Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:43:43 -0000 --_000_CF0292083FC32florinbalusalcatellucentcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I am not aware of any applicable IPR. Thanks, Florin From: Bitar, Nabil N [mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 4:10 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: Giles Heron; Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal); ostokes@extremenetworks.com; geraldine.calvignac@orange-ftgroup.com; Balus, Florin Stelian (Flori= n) Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 Hi, We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-vp= ls-ldp-mac-opt-09.txt, LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal = in H-VPLS, in order to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance wit= h IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email wheth= er or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disc= losed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received fro= m each author and contributor. If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft c= an be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09 This poll closes on Monday January 13, 2014. Thanks, Nabil & Giles --_000_CF0292083FC32florinbalusalcatellucentcom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

I am not aware of any applicable IP= R.

Thanks,

Florin

 

From: Bitar, Nabil N [mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 4:10 AM
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Cc: Giles Heron; Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal); ostokes@extremenetworks.com; geraldine.calvignac@orange-ftgroup.com; Balus, Florin Stelian (Florin)<= br> Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-op= t-09

 

Hi,<= /span>

 

We are poll= ing for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-09.txt= , LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in H-VPLS, in order to ensure that IPR has bee= n disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). 

 

If you are = listed as a document author,  please respond to this email whethe= r or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disclosed. The draft will not be adopted until = a response has been received from each author and contributor.<= /span>

 

If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but ar= e not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respo= nd only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft can be found at <= /span>

 

This poll closes on Monday January 13, 2014.=

 

Thanks,

Nabil &= Giles

 --_000_CF0292083FC32florinbalusalcatellucentcom_-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Jan 20 10:01:44 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814E41A0226; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:01:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ckjvzTQKR4co; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:01:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2871A0222; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:01:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-07.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140120180142.27338.75065.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:01:42 -0800 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:01:44 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : Extension to LDP-VPLS for Ethernet Broadcast and = Multicast Authors : Raymond Key Frederic Jounay Yuji Kamite Zhihua Liu Manuel Paul Ruediger Kunze Mach(Guoyi) Chen Lizhong Jin Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-07.txt Pages : 19 Date : 2014-01-16 Abstract: This document proposes a simple extension to LDP-VPLS to improve bandwidth efficiency for Ethernet broadcast/multicast traffic within a carrier's network. It makes use of unidirectional point-to-multipoint PseudoWires to minimise payload frame duplication on physical links. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-07 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exte= n-07 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Tue Jan 21 05:47:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765041A00AC; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:47:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KTTxAD40o5Y0; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:47:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C631A00E8; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:46:59 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Subject: Document Action: 'Requirements for Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) Ethernet-Tree (E-Tree) Support in L2VPN' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-05.txt) X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140121134659.13829.42833.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:46:59 -0800 Cc: l2vpn mailing list , l2vpn chair , RFC Editor X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 13:47:02 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Requirements for Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) Ethernet-Tree (E-Tree) Support in L2VPN' (draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-05.txt) as Informational RFC This document is the product of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Stewart Bryant and Adrian Farrel. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt/ Technical Summary The draft describes L2VPN requirements for a Metro Ethernet Forum services, known as the E-Tree services. An E-Tree services is defined by a one or more roots and one or more leaves. Roots can send traffic to other roots and leaves and received traffic from other roots and leaves. Leaves can only receive traffic from roots and send traffic to roots. E-Tree requirements are not satisfied by existing L2VPN solution. Working Group Summary This document is an L2VPN Working Group document. It has gone through a few iterations that addressed few comments received from the Working group and comments received the WG chairs. The draft was generalized from VPLS to L2VPN to allow for a potentially wider solution set, namely including E-VPN. The draft also has a substantial number of authors and contributors from the Working Group. The draft had good support when it was adopted as a WG draft. However when the draft was last called, no feedback was received, maybe due to the nature of the draft and the fact that there are several authors and contributors to the draft already from the WG. Upon last review by the WG chairs of the draft and feedback to the authors, the authors updated the draft addressing the chairs' comments, mainly modifying the author list and moving some to contributors, performing few edits, and removing the appendix on use cases as it did not include requirements. The use cases are part of another framework draft. Document Quality The document has good quality. It is clear on the technical content and written with good English and layout. There may be an edit or so needed that may be taken up during the RFC edits. Personnel Nabil Bitar (nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com) is the Document Shepherd. Stewart Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com is the Responsible Area Director. RFC Editor Note OLD Appendix A. Frequently Asked Questions NEW Appendix A. A Frequently Asked Question END Please remove section 8 The following seem not to have been expanded on first use: L2VPN - Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) E-VPN - Ethernet VPN PW - pseudowire CE - Customer Edge (CE) VPMS - Virtual Private Multicast Service P2MP - Point-to-Multipoint From internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue Jan 21 10:18:25 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9E91A0182; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:18:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QBcT0eHJMY1r; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:18:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA58F1A00DE; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:18:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-10.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140121181822.16533.28648.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:18:22 -0800 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 18:18:25 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdraw= al in H-VPLS Authors : Pranjal Kumar Dutta Florin Balus Olen Stokes Geraldine Calvinac Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-10.txt Pages : 23 Date : 2014-01-21 Abstract: RFC4762 describes a mechanism to remove or unlearn MAC addresses that have been dynamically learned in a Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Instance for faster convergence on topology change. The procedure also removes MAC addresses in the VPLS that do not require relearning due to such topology change. This document defines an enhancement to the MAC Address Withdrawal procedure with empty MAC List from RFC4762, which enables a Provider Edge(PE) device to remove only the MAC addresses that need to be relearned. Additional extensions to RFC4762 MAC Withdrawal procedures are specified to provide optimized MAC flushing for the PBB-VPLS specified in RFC7041. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue Jan 21 15:20:59 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A881A01B5; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:20:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H1lLvrpg_c1S; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:20:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE9C1A0125; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:20:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140121232057.2174.55669.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:20:57 -0800 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:20:59 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service ov= er a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network Authors : Raymond Key Lucy Yong Simon Delord Frederic Jounay Lizhong Jin Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2014-01-21 Abstract: This document describes an Ethernet-Tree (E-Tree) solution framework for supporting the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) E-Tree service over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) network. The objective is to provide a simple and effective approach to emulate E-Tree services in addition to Ethernet LAN (E-LAN) services on an existing MPLS network. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com Tue Jan 21 19:06:54 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3691A1A038F for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:06:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GQdYxSniP6HZ for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:06:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.208]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E251A0373 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:06:52 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi02.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.144]) by omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 22 Jan 2014 03:06:51 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,697,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="635461854" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb03.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB03.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.86]) by fldsmtpi02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 22 Jan 2014 03:06:51 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.45]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB03.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.86]) with mapi; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:06:51 -0500 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:06:51 -0500 Subject: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 (etree framework) Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 (etree framework) Thread-Index: AQHPFx7+XN0DgvQEy0aIFOaAVGlC9g== Message-ID: References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:06:54 -0000 Hi, This is the start of a two-week working group last call on the draft "A Fra= mework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a Multiprotocol Label Switch= ing (MPLS) Network". The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/= draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04. Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group e= mail list by responding to this email. This WG last call will close on Wednesday February 05, 2014. Regards, Nabil & Giles From nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com Tue Jan 21 19:13:58 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39B41A03B0 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:13:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aqGkdM8cYiyc for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:13:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5CD1A0373 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:13:55 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi02.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.144]) by omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 22 Jan 2014 03:13:55 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,697,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="635463413" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb02.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB02.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.85]) by fldsmtpi02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 22 Jan 2014 03:13:51 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.45]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB02.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.85]) with mapi; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:13:50 -0500 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:12:34 -0500 Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Thread-Index: AQHPFx/LhTnJOFSvm02q4CLaHUvh3A== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Giles Heron \(giheron@cisco.com\)" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:13:58 -0000 Hi, We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-et= ree-frwk-04, A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a Multipro= tocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network, in order to ensure that IPR has been = disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and = 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email wheth= er or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disc= losed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received fro= m each author and contributor. If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft c= an be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04. This poll closes on Wednesday 02/05/2014. Thanks, Nabil & Giles= From wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com Tue Jan 21 19:16:11 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0D01A00EA for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:16:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6AEeJJeSpQR3 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:16:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from hoemail1.alcatel.com (hoemail1.alcatel.com [192.160.6.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE341A01A8 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:16:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by hoemail1.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s0M3G7Mf024206 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:16:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s0M3G6Zo028884 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 04:16:06 +0100 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.122]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 04:16:06 +0100 From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Thread-Index: AQHPFx/LhTnJOFSvm02q4CLaHUvh3JqPe3EA Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:16:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.38] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Giles Heron \(giheron@cisco.com\)" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:16:12 -0000 I am not aware of IPR related to this draft On 21/01/14 19:12, "Bitar, Nabil N" wrote: >Hi, > >We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to >draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04, A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) >Service over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network, in order to >ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see >RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > >If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email >whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been >properly disclosed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has >been received from each author and contributor. > >If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or >contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any >IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The >draft can be found at >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04. > >This poll closes on Wednesday 02/05/2014. > > >Thanks, >Nabil & Giles From raymond.key@hotmail.com Tue Jan 21 19:57:03 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A634C1A0279 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:57:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.434 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.434 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yiPTo_fPpyB5 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:57:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from blu0-omc2-s31.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s31.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.106]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C481A0216 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:57:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from BLU175-W14 ([65.55.111.73]) by blu0-omc2-s31.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:57:02 -0800 X-TMN: [ImfbCw2uB63wvg0P+v18Qct6Cgp56OtSyT70gy3uO0I=] X-Originating-Email: [raymond.key@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_ee170bce-4f7f-4ea1-8da8-77690106108d_" From: Raymond Key Sender: To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "Giles Heron (giheron@cisco.com)" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:57:01 +1100 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: , MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2014 03:57:02.0027 (UTC) FILETIME=[019C99B0:01CF1726] X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:57:03 -0000 --_ee170bce-4f7f-4ea1-8da8-77690106108d_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not aware of IPR related to this draft. Raymond Key =20 > From: wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com > To: nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com=3B l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 > Date: Wed=2C 22 Jan 2014 03:16:05 +0000 > CC: giheron@cisco.com >=20 > I am not aware of IPR related to this draft >=20 > On 21/01/14 19:12=2C "Bitar=2C Nabil N" wrote= : >=20 > >Hi=2C > > > >We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to > >draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04=2C A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) > >Service over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network=2C in order = to > >ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (se= e > >RFCs 3979=2C 4879=2C 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > > >If you are listed as a document author=2C please respond to this email > >whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been > >properly disclosed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has > >been received from each author and contributor. > > > >If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or > >contributor=2C then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of a= ny > >IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The > >draft can be found at > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04. > > > >This poll closes on Wednesday 02/05/2014. > > > > > >Thanks=2C > >Nabil & Giles >=20 = --_ee170bce-4f7f-4ea1-8da8-77690106108d_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am not aware of IPR related to= this draft.
Raymond Key

 =3B
>=3B From: wim.hender= ickx@alcatel-lucent.com
>=3B To: nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com=3B l2vpn@ie= tf.org
>=3B Subject: Re: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-= etree-frwk-04
>=3B Date: Wed=2C 22 Jan 2014 03:16:05 +0000
>=3B C= C: giheron@cisco.com
>=3B
>=3B I am not aware of IPR related to = this draft
>=3B
>=3B On 21/01/14 19:12=2C "Bitar=2C Nabil N" <= =3Bnabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>=3B wrote:
>=3B
>=3B >=3BHi=2C<= br>>=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3BWe are polling for knowledge of any IPR th= at applies to
>=3B >=3Bdraft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04=2C A Framework= for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree)
>=3B >=3BService over a Multiprotocol La= bel Switching (MPLS) Network=2C in order to
>=3B >=3Bensure that IPR= has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see
>=3B >=3B= RFCs 3979=2C 4879=2C 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>=3B >=3B
&= gt=3B >=3BIf you are listed as a document author=2C please respond to th= is email
>=3B >=3Bwhether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR t= hat has not been
>=3B >=3Bproperly disclosed. The draft will not be = adopted until a response has
>=3B >=3Bbeen received from each author= and contributor.
>=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3BIf you are on the l2vpn = WG email list but are not listed as an author or
>=3B >=3Bcontributo= r=2C then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
>=3B = >=3BIPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. T= he
>=3B >=3Bdraft can be found at
>=3B >=3Bhttp://tools.ietf.= org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04.
>=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3BT= his poll closes on Wednesday 02/05/2014.
>=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3B<= br>>=3B >=3BThanks=2C
>=3B >=3BNabil &=3B Giles
>=3B
= --_ee170bce-4f7f-4ea1-8da8-77690106108d_-- From simon.delord@gmail.com Wed Jan 22 01:15:57 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAC71A03DE for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:15:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fAfyJ_oR1vOu for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:15:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F277D1A03D6 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:15:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id x13so91344wgg.33 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:15:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hsn5e5v6LJHj/V+B4cLSoUl7hzSH1spSdmXZSU1fCDQ=; b=Y2YnxZXP3NzwejDnM+Npff/eE2cwBGXKbsVym57TdKcJzHuZ6xqWoDyBRPQYd6Tq5z YAItHXpP7r9HSGGxs6+pG8vWtyhrZ7eYmMJG8cL42MkrNhlYr8P6SgmD1w6bXK25YN4C rWzzlKtt/9C4bJags/YrFSnx0PegKK+4+pUmxNhyZfboszcFNCs3SyimiSpb3B5eVQT6 +S4iY9G5MTuCdrbhH77DvYeXUscO3ZWr+sasAjVRlUrmKxCvUW6icaswoxOnHR45ytr1 hrrcZ4fvSCyS/Ldj9XbUddrFMmvcFGe3SepNVGFiSPmgVlB80V6V9vbFCen1WjZGKv5D gFAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.74.200 with SMTP id w8mr18471021wiv.58.1390382155065; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:15:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.135.74 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:15:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.135.74 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:15:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:15:55 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 From: Simon Delord To: "Bitar, Nabil N" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04374a0b746dd704f08b9233 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org, Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:15:57 -0000 --f46d04374a0b746dd704f08b9233 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm not aware of any IPR for this draft. Simon On 22/01/2014 2:14 PM, "Bitar, Nabil N" wrote: > Hi, > > We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04, A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) > Service over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network, in order to > ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see > RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email > whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly > disclosed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received > from each author and contributor. > > If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any > IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The > draft can be found at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04. > > This poll closes on Wednesday 02/05/2014. > > > Thanks, > Nabil & Giles --f46d04374a0b746dd704f08b9233 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm not aware of any IPR for this draft.
Simon

On 22/01/2014 2:14 PM, "Bitar, Nabil N"= ; <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.co= m> wrote:
Hi,

We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-et= ree-frwk-04, A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a Multipro= tocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network, in order to ensure that IPR has been = disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and = 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as a document author, =A0please respond to this email whe= ther or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly di= sclosed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received f= rom each author and contributor.

If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft c= an be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etr= ee-frwk-04.

This poll closes on Wednesday 02/05/2014.


Thanks,
Nabil & Giles
--f46d04374a0b746dd704f08b9233-- From Frederic.Jounay@orange.ch Wed Jan 22 01:17:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE391A03DE for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:17:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.518 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CN5anXxk_lDH for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:17:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com [195.245.230.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEE41A03CD for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:17:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [195.245.230.51:12027] by server-13.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id F7/D7-28603-EBC8FD25; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:17:50 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Frederic.Jounay@orange.ch X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-33.messagelabs.com!1390382266!25555!14 X-Originating-IP: [213.55.206.7] X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 11269 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2014 09:17:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chcrochs054.orange.ch) (213.55.206.7) by server-14.tower-33.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Jan 2014 09:17:50 -0000 Received: from CHCROCHC051.orange.ch ([fe80:0000:0000:0000:704b:3a68:12.14.247.83]) by chcrochs054.orange.ch ([172.19.166.54]) with mapi; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:17:44 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jounay_Fr=E9d=E9ric?= To: "Bitar, Nabil N" Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:17:43 +0100 Subject: RE: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Thread-Index: Ac8XUpPvVH/2kknnSpSe0O3g1W3sIQAABSAw Message-ID: <78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E201840BADE48E@CHCROCHC051.orange.ch> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E201840BADE48ECHCROCHC051_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:17:55 -0000 --_000_78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E201840BADE48ECHCROCHC051_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I'm not aware of any patent related to this draft BR, Fred On 22/01/2014 2:14 PM, "Bitar, Nabil N" > wrote: Hi, We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-et= ree-frwk-04, A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a Multipro= tocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network, in order to ensure that IPR has been = disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and = 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email wheth= er or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disc= losed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received fro= m each author and contributor. If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft c= an be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04. This poll closes on Wednesday 02/05/2014. Thanks, Nabil & Giles --_000_78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E201840BADE48ECHCROCHC051_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

<= o:p> 

I’= m not aware of any patent related to this draft

 

BR,

Fred

 

 

On 22/01/20= 14 2:14 PM, "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com> wrote:

Hi,

We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that appli= es to draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04, A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree= ) Service over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network, in order to = ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see R= FCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed a= s a document author,  please respond to this email whether or not you = are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disclosed. The dra= ft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author = and contributor.

If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not l= isted as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if y= ou are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with= IETF rules. The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/h= tml/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04.

This poll closes on Wednesda= y 02/05/2014.


Thanks,
Nabil & Giles

<= /div>= --_000_78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E201840BADE48ECHCROCHC051_-- From lucy.yong@huawei.com Wed Jan 22 06:15:45 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67D21A00D9 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:15:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.735 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nvgw80_lXLp1 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:15:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7591A00B6 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:15:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BCU32499; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:15:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:15:27 +0000 Received: from DFWEML704-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.141) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:15:40 +0000 Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.21]) by dfweml704-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.202]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:15:30 -0800 From: Lucy yong To: "Bitar, Nabil N" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Thread-Index: AQHPF3xnJnuC2qPBOk+DLv0Nv6zeHQ== Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:15:30 +0000 Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D453231FA@dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com> References: <78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E201840BADE48E@CHCROCHC051.orange.ch> In-Reply-To: <78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E201840BADE48E@CHCROCHC051.orange.ch> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.212.246.117] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D453231FAdfweml701chmchi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:15:46 -0000 --_000_2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D453231FAdfweml701chmchi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Lucy On 22/01/2014 2:14 PM, "Bitar, Nabil N" > wrote: Hi, We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-et= ree-frwk-04, A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a Multipro= tocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network, in order to ensure that IPR has been = disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and = 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email wheth= er or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disc= losed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received fro= m each author and contributor. If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft c= an be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04. This poll closes on Wednesday 02/05/2014. Thanks, Nabil & Giles --_000_2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D453231FAdfweml701chmchi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am not aware of any IPR = related to this draft.

 

Lucy

 

On 22/01/2014 2:14 PM, "Bi= tar, Nabil N" <nabil.n= .bitar@verizon.com> wrote:

Hi,

We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-et= ree-frwk-04, A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a Multipro= tocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network, in order to ensure that IPR has been = disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as a document author,  please respond to this email = whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly= disclosed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been receive= d from each author and contributor.

If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR = that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft c= an be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04.

This poll closes on Wednesday 02/05/2014.


Thanks,
Nabil & Giles

--_000_2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D453231FAdfweml701chmchi_-- From lizho.jin@gmail.com Wed Jan 22 22:16:52 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703D41A0238 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:16:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5aNDWlHOSLB2 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:16:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pb0-x229.google.com (mail-pb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EBF1A016D for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:16:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id up15so1428391pbc.28 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:16:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=19zExp08RmY7gQlzPKj44SpnYxiWc+36ErTwY7kNB44=; b=gS2cieSn3F7xrjCw9cKbVmLZbJL9jUogWmonjsqUcefzoLW16qVN0Ak6gw5jOczOM2 pEhm5ML5W4b7n02JlXD2yw6TtconfFREAp2pzbGZFAhYbT5tqMPo/JNlBF4rSEJVWWmX fm7TbtMWQC9bAj3Wp7eK+aGMbDZnLBMkD0x/J4bAK8eQ5TP2AXRtXNLL1S7QB6Vaq0Ec Wz3NmaFZiuIkBeIr1igap6n2eotX0y8Q+5gmCOx5d/dFfPQOLKaclcGOmD/GMCyK3CAM W2fygWlZtMhNhMPbV4BoT2gByY91bW1jNZmJW41tXMog3jXafZ7SnnbqdnPhOcX/CIH/ PnsQ== X-Received: by 10.68.236.9 with SMTP id uq9mr6345769pbc.10.1390457809458; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:16:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from LIZHONGJ ([180.166.53.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jn12sm31938725pbd.37.2014.01.22.22.16.47 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:16:49 -0800 (PST) From: "Lizhong Jin" To: Subject: RE: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:16:44 +0800 Message-ID: <00e701cf1802$b35ea800$1a1bf800$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac8YAp3gNQgb2UDNR868xh3wZZqDvw== Content-Language: zh-cn Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org, giheron@cisco.com X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:16:53 -0000 Hi, I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Regards Lizhong > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:12:34 -0500 > From: "Bitar, Nabil N" > To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" > Cc: "Giles Heron \(giheron@cisco.com\)" > Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 > Message-ID: > V63.us.one.verizon.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi, > > We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn- > etree-frwk-04, A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) Service over a > Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network, in order to ensure that IPR > has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, > 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email whether > or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disclosed. > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each > author and contributor. > > If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR > that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft can > be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04. > > This poll closes on Wednesday 02/05/2014. > > > Thanks, > Nabil & Giles > > ------------------------------ > From ssalam@cisco.com Thu Jan 23 13:40:35 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78591A0297 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:40:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.035 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G55cMlR4d0wo for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:40:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BDC1A0345 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:40:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=33146; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1390513228; x=1391722828; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=tERqxnYEOskJDkONUt8N1poqJDKpN3Cin0COTf5dKd8=; b=VTpRMVvoBILZ6bGhFN/p+wdM4r2+DV7ccgRUD9vChx5Cd76ZsqPCUvdF 2m0LWJynoF2+1RfGxcVPnGNmssdIB1OPJmxrTpP7tXQIrmT/DqAm5bmlw AZ973IimiLLuyKqklgLAxFIIPzsYB6Wi/rs5CyuUX0Nc+tkFpGFFelzsW c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiEFAMiL4VKtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABagkgjIThWvDeBFRZ0giUBAgQtXgEIEQMBAiEBBigRFAkIAQEEARIbh1YDEQHBIQ2FVheMbIIDGIQ4BJY3gWyMXYU7gW+BPoIq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,708,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217";a="15102751" Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2014 21:40:28 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0NLeQAv009762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:40:28 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:40:26 -0600 From: "Samer Salam (ssalam)" To: Gregory Mirsky , "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" , "Sam Aldrin (aldrin.ietf@gmail.com)" , "John E Drake (jdrake@juniper.net)" , "Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Comments on draft-salam-l2vpn-evpn-oam-req-frmwk and draft-vgovindan-l2vpn-evpn-bfd Thread-Topic: Comments on draft-salam-l2vpn-evpn-oam-req-frmwk and draft-vgovindan-l2vpn-evpn-bfd Thread-Index: Ac7lDSTCOfeFij7fTiOpIkx3ocp0YQQ5iE0AAAD0+QAAM9uyMAhrGsCA Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:40:25 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B732E56@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [161.44.210.122] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CF06CAFC1D113ssalamciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:40:36 -0000 --_000_CF06CAFC1D113ssalamciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Greg, Thank you for the response. I have incorporated your comments, more details= on the resolution inline, please see @SS: From: Gregory Mirsky > Date: Wednesday, 11 December, 2013 7:09 PM To: Samer Salam >, "Ali Sajassi (= sajassi)" >, "Sam Aldrin (aldri= n.ietf@gmail.com)" >, "John E Drake (jdrake@juniper.net)" >, "Vengada = Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" >= , "l2vpn@ietf.org" > Subject: RE: Comments on draft-salam-l2vpn-evpn-oam-req-frmwk and draft-vgo= vindan-l2vpn-evpn-bfd Hi Samer, thank you for kind consideration of my notes. Am glad that we can snip so m= any of them. Please find my answers in-line and tagged by GIM>>. Regards, Greg [=85] * I think that monitoring of =93representative path=94 may not be re= liable test of MEP hosting node liveliness. As I understand, it still verif= ication of the MEP liveliness but out-band. Or it is implied that the targe= t of this monitoring is not the MEP but an ID associated with the node wher= e the MEP defined? Then wouldn=92t that be verification of a control plane = rather than data plane operation? The intent was that this is a mechanism to verify that the node is alive, p= rovided that the MEP's operation fate-shares the liveness of the PE. The id= ea is that the messages will use flow entropy parameters corresponding to s= ome test flow (I.E. some MAC, VLAN etc=85 parameters to represent an exampl= e flow =96 not necessarily a customer flow). GIM>> Consider Up MEP case. It may be unreachable, i.e. LoC detected, becau= se of problem in bridging element while the hosting node is operational. I = think that =93fate-sharing=94 is in area of uncertainty and assumptions. I= =92d consider explicitly stating all assumptions, i.e. =93LoC detection int= erpreted as failure of the hosting node=94. @SS: Updated accordingly. [=85] * =93Monitoring of all ECMP paths between MEPs is not a requirement = for E-VPN OAM.=94 Is in regard to concurrent monitoring all paths between t= wo (?) MEPs or to problem of exercising particular paths at-will? Both. A particular path may not be exercisable because the ECMP hashing is = a local function. GIM>> This is interesting and hard to crack problem. ECMP may be monitored = on link level and AIS-like used to inform client level. @SS: Added text to clarify the context: the MEPs in question here are not o= n back-to-back devices, hence proactive monitoring of all ECMP using Contin= uity Check messages is not possible. [=85] * Section 3.1.2.2 * Connectivity Verification vs. Continuity Check. There=92s referenc= e to =93connectivity faults=94 in the first paragraph. Should it be changed= to =93continuity=94 or on-demand OAM, at least in E-VPN Service OAM, requi= red to detect mis-connectivity? If =93yes=94, why the same is not applicabl= e to proactive OAM for E-VPN Service? I am not sure I follow the question here. This section is about on-demand f= ault localization (I.E. the equivalent of the Linktrace function in CFM). GIM>> The complete sentence is =93That is, given two PEs A and B, localizat= ion of connectivity faults between them requires running fault isolation pr= ocedures from PE A to PE B as well as from PE B to PE A.=94 ETH-LT/linktrace or IP traceroute helpful in localizing continuity failure.= I don=92t think that either is helpful in localizing mis-connectivity defe= cts. My question is about terminology. =93Connectivity defect=94 and =93con= tinuity defect=94 are not the same defects and, I believe, should not be us= ed interchangeably. @SS: Ah, now I get your point. Updated. [=85] * Section 3.2.1 * Use of Synthetic LM is usually in out-of-service state as test fra= mes expected to be statistically representative of real data flow. LM in mp= 2mp network can be constructed of set of p2p LM metrics. If this were to rely on data-packet counters, and the solution allows MP2MP= connectivity, then this requires maintaining packet statistics per source-= destination pair, which is typically not available in implementations. At l= east for Y.1731, my experience has been that this function was rarely imple= mented, due to the associated complexity and HW cost implications. GIM>> Alternatively, passive methods of performance measurement may be cons= idered. @SS: This could be a could discussion point for the upcoming IETF. Regards, Samer Regards, Samer --_000_CF06CAFC1D113ssalamciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Greg,

Thank you for the response. I have incorporated your comments, more de= tails on the resolution inline, please see @SS:

From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> Date: Wednesday, 11 December, 2013 = 7:09 PM
To: Samer Salam <ssalam@cisco.com>, "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)&= quot; <sajassi@cisco.com>, &= quot;Sam Aldrin (aldrin.ietf@gmail= .com)" <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>= , "John E Drake (jdrake@juniper.= net)" <jdrake@juniper.net= >, "Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" <venggovi@cisco.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Comments on draft-sala= m-l2vpn-evpn-oam-req-frmwk and draft-vgovindan-l2vpn-evpn-bfd

Hi Samer,

thank you for kind con= sideration of my notes. Am glad that we can snip so many of them. Please fi= nd my answers in-line and tagged by GIM>>.

 

   &nbs= p;            Regard= s,

   &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;   Greg

 

[=85]

&n= bsp;

    • I think that monitoring of =93representative path=94 may not be reliable te= st of MEP hosting node liveliness. As I understand, it still verification o= f the MEP liveliness but out-band. Or it is implied that the target of this= monitoring is not the MEP but an ID associated with the node where the MEP defined? Then wouldn=92t that be ve= rification of a control plane rather than data plane operation?<= /li>

The i= ntent was that this is a mechanism to verify that the node is alive, provid= ed that the MEP's operation fate-shares the liveness of the PE. The idea is= that the messages will use flow entropy parameters corresponding to some test flow (I.E. some MAC, VLAN etc=85 par= ameters to represent an example flow =96 not necessarily a custom= er flow).

 

GIM>> Conside= r Up MEP case. It may be unreachable, i.e. LoC detected, because of problem= in bridging element while the hosting node is operational. I think that = =93fate-sharing=94 is in area of uncertainty and assumptions. I=92d consider explicitly stating all assumptions, i.e. =93Lo= C detection interpreted as failure of the hosting node=94.

@SS: Updated accordingly.

<= /p>

[=85]

    • =93Monitoring of all ECMP paths between MEPs is not a requirement for E-VPN= OAM.=94 Is in regard to concurrent monitoring all paths between two (?) ME= Ps or to problem of exercising particular paths at-will?

Both. A particular path may n= ot be exercisable because the ECMP hashing is a local function.<= /span>

 

GIM>> This is= interesting and hard to crack problem. ECMP may be monitored on link level= and AIS-like used to inform client level.

@SS: Added text to clarify the context: the MEPs in question here are = not on back-to-back devices, hence proactive monitoring of all ECMP using C= ontinuity Check messages is not possible.

[=85]

  • Section 3.1.2.2
    • Connectivity Verification vs. Continuity Check. There=92s reference to =93c= onnectivity faults=94 in the first paragraph. Should it be changed to =93co= ntinuity=94 or on-demand OAM, at least in E-VPN Service OAM, required to de= tect mis-connectivity? If =93yes=94, why the same is not applicable to proactive OAM for E-VPN Service?

I am not sure I&nbs= p;follow the question here. This section is about on-demand fault loca= lization (I.E. the equivalent of the Linktrace function in CFM).

 

GIM>> The com= plete sentence is =93That is, given two PEs A and B, localization of connec= tivity faults between them requires running fault isolation procedures from= PE A to PE B as well as from PE B to PE A.=94

ETH-LT/linktrace or= IP traceroute helpful in localizing continuity failure. I don=92t think th= at either is helpful in localizing mis-connectivity defects. My question is= about terminology. =93Connectivity defect=94 and =93continuity defect=94 are not the same defects and, I believe, shoul= d not be used interchangeably.


@SS: Ah, now I get your point. Updated.

[=85]

  • Section 3.2.1
    • Use of Synthetic LM is usually in out-of-service state as test frames expec= ted to be statistically representative of real data flow. LM in mp2mp netwo= rk can be constructed of set of p2p LM metrics.

If this were to rely on data-= packet counters, and the solution allows MP2MP connectivity, then this requ= ires maintaining packet statistics per source-destination pair, which is typically not available in implementatio= ns. At least for Y.1731, my experience has been that this function was rare= ly implemented, due to the associated complexity and HW cost implications.<= /span>

 

GIM>> Alterna= tively, passive methods of performance measurement may be considered.<= /o:p>

 
@SS: This could be a could discussion point for the upcoming IETF.

Regards,
Samer

Regards,

Samer<= /p>

--_000_CF06CAFC1D113ssalamciscocom_-- From y.kamite@ntt.com Tue Jan 28 01:13:31 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619851A01DA for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:13:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.436 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.436 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pg7b0lEPOKIi for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:13:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mgw010.noc.ntt.com (mgw010.noc.ntt.com [210.160.55.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CBE1A0018 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:13:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from c0043i0.coe.ntt.com (unknown [10.18.161.12]) by mgw010.noc.ntt.com (NTT Com MailSV) with ESMTP id 9504057A019D; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:13:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from C0037I0.coe.ntt.com (10.18.160.41) by c0043i0.coe.ntt.com (10.18.161.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.438.0; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:13:23 +0900 Received: from C0007I0.coe.ntt.com ([169.254.1.138]) by C0037I0.coe.ntt.com ([10.18.160.41]) with mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:13:24 +0900 From: Yuji Kamite To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 Thread-Index: AQHPFx/LhTnJOFSvm02q4CLaHUvh3JqZ4++g Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:13:23 +0000 Message-ID: <1A095D7ECD89A64C9D3C77AE2DDE660B57F6A7CE@C0007I0.coe.ntt.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US Content-Language: ja-JP X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ccmail-original-to: nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com, l2vpn@ietf.org x-ccmail-original-cc: giheron@cisco.com x-originating-ip: [10.14.150.185] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Giles Heron \(giheron@cisco.com\)" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:13:31 -0000 Hi, I'm not aware of any IPR for this document. Best regards, -Yuji > -----Original Message----- > From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bitar, Nabil N > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:13 PM > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Cc: Giles Heron (giheron@cisco.com) > Subject: [l2vpn] Polling for IPR on draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04 > > Hi, > > We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04, A Framework for Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) > Service over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Network, in order to > ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see > RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email whether > or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disclosed. > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each > author and contributor. > > If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any > IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The > draft can be found at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-04. > > This poll closes on Wednesday 02/05/2014. > > > Thanks, > Nabil & Giles From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu Jan 30 14:50:19 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA9E1A0513; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:50:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cbXfki_4ekdE; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:50:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B11A1A04DE; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:50:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-14.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140130225017.28855.31017.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:50:17 -0800 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 22:50:19 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : Virtual Private Lan Services (VPLS) Management In= formation Base Authors : Thomas D. Nadeau A S Kiran Koushik Rohit Mediratta Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-14.txt Pages : 47 Date : 2014-01-30 Abstract: This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects for to configure and/or monitor Virtual Private LAN services. It needs to be used in conjunction with The Pseudowire (PW) Management Information Base. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-14 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-14 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Fri Jan 31 07:03:08 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40DF1A1F4C; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 07:03:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zBY4UVEQuIvw; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 07:03:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28DF1A03F5; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 07:03:06 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Subject: Last Call: (Virtual Private Lan Services (VPLS) Management Information Base) to Proposed Standard X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Sender: Message-ID: <20140131150306.30573.84964.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 07:03:06 -0800 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:03:08 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks WG (l2vpn) to consider the following document: - 'Virtual Private Lan Services (VPLS) Management Information Base' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-02-14. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects for to configure and/or monitor Virtual Private LAN services. It needs to be used in conjunction with The Pseudowire (PW) Management Information Base. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.