From nobody Mon Jun 2 04:54:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608FC1A06DC for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 19:10:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.602 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CjZ-a84cEV1y for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 19:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0235.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7321A02BE for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 19:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BY2PR05MB677.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.221.145) by BY2PR05MB109.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.38.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.949.11; Sat, 31 May 2014 02:10:43 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.38.16) by BY2PR05MB677.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.221.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.949.11; Sat, 31 May 2014 02:10:40 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.99]) by BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.99]) with mapi id 15.00.0949.001; Sat, 31 May 2014 02:10:40 +0000 From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Index: AQHPeC+y0ElTxAw21UCVXEsDnxkbqJtZ94/w Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 02:10:40 +0000 Message-ID: <8aaa14e5c8344feba289e388bb7d04e1@BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11] x-microsoft-antispam: BL:0; ACTION:Default; RISK:Low; SCL:0; SPMLVL:NotSpam; PCL:0; RULEID: x-forefront-prvs: 0228DDDDD7 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(428001)(377454003)(5423002)(51704005)(13464003)(189002)(199002)(164054003)(4396001)(83322001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(86362001)(76482001)(21056001)(76176999)(50986999)(54356999)(85852003)(33646001)(101416001)(99396002)(2656002)(15202345003)(81542001)(81342001)(15975445006)(87936001)(64706001)(74662001)(20776003)(77982001)(74502001)(66066001)(46102001)(83072002)(74316001)(76576001)(80022001)(79102001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB677; H:BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=zzhang@juniper.net; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BL:0; ACTION:Default; RISK:Low; SCL:0; SPMLVL:NotSpam; PCL:0; RULEID: X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/CpQj016qrOUW5db9jNzmfNpTgVg X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 04:54:07 -0700 Cc: Heidi Woods , Ray Qiu , "Karl \(Xiangrong\) Cai" , Princy Elizabeth X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 02:10:51 -0000 As a co-author, I want to report that Juniper filed US Patent Application N= o. 13/943,292 for the Relay Mode specified in the draft. An IETF IPR Disclosure has been filed, though there is a trouble ticket wit= h the submission: From: IETF-IPR via RT [mailto:ietf-ipr@ietf.org]=20 Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 5:42 PM To: Heidi Woods Subject: [www.ietf.org/rt #65781] AutoReply: Juniper's Statement of IPR Thanks. Jeffrey > -----Original Message----- > From: Bitar, Nabil N [mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com] > Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 11:41 AM > To: Bitar, Nabil N; l2vpn@ietf.org > Cc: Giles Heron (giheron@cisco.com); jayant.kotalwar@alcatel-lucent.com; > vhemige@gmail.com; Ray Qiu; Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang; > olivier.dornon@alcatel-lucent.com > Subject: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. > Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond >=20 > Hi, >=20 > We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf- > l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06, PIM Snooping over VPLS, in order to ensure > that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs > 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >=20 > If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email > whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been > properly disclosed. The draft will not be progressed until a response > has been received from each author and contributor. >=20 > If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any > IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The > draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls- > pim-snooping-06 >=20 > This poll closes on Sunday 06/01/2014. >=20 >=20 > Thanks, > Nabil & Giles From xcai@juniper.net Fri May 30 19:18:20 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E7C1A06DC for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 19:18:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6-gv1NYdt2Tv for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 19:18:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1lp0140.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B3961A02BE for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 19:18:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SN2PR0501MB864.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.14.15) by BN1PR05MB074.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.199.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.944.11; Sat, 31 May 2014 02:18:10 +0000 Received: from SN2PR0501MB864.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.14.15]) by SN2PR0501MB864.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.14.15]) with mapi id 15.00.0944.000; Sat, 31 May 2014 02:18:09 +0000 From: "Karl (Xiangrong) Cai" To: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" , "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Index: AQHPeC+y0ElTxAw21UCVXEsDnxkbqJtZ94/wgAAE+fA= Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 02:18:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: , <8aaa14e5c8344feba289e388bb7d04e1@BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <8aaa14e5c8344feba289e388bb7d04e1@BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11] x-microsoft-antispam: BL:0; ACTION:Default; RISK:Low; SCL:0; SPMLVL:NotSpam; PCL:0; RULEID: x-forefront-prvs: 0228DDDDD7 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(428001)(5423002)(189002)(199002)(51704005)(164054003)(13464003)(377454003)(79102001)(74316001)(77982001)(86362001)(64706001)(81342001)(83322001)(66066001)(4396001)(15202345003)(80022001)(19580405001)(1941001)(76576001)(74662001)(20776003)(54356999)(99396002)(2656002)(76176999)(101416001)(85852003)(83072002)(81542001)(76482001)(46102001)(15975445006)(33646001)(74502001)(19580395003)(87936001)(50986999)(21056001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR05MB074; H:SN2PR0501MB864.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=xcai@juniper.net; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/KUl2D539S0sQ4-nysG3hj-LG7Bw X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 04:54:07 -0700 Cc: Heidi Woods , Ray Qiu , Princy Elizabeth X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 02:20:38 -0000 As a contributor, same here.=20 Thanks. --Karl -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang=20 Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 10:11 PM To: Bitar, Nabil N; l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: Ray Qiu; Karl (Xiangrong) Cai; Princy Elizabeth; Heidi Woods Subject: RE: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Po= ll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond As a co-author, I want to report that Juniper filed US Patent Application N= o. 13/943,292 for the Relay Mode specified in the draft. An IETF IPR Disclosure has been filed, though there is a trouble ticket wit= h the submission: From: IETF-IPR via RT [mailto:ietf-ipr@ietf.org] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 5:42 PM To: Heidi Woods Subject: [www.ietf.org/rt #65781] AutoReply: Juniper's Statement of IPR Thanks. Jeffrey > -----Original Message----- > From: Bitar, Nabil N [mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com] > Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 11:41 AM > To: Bitar, Nabil N; l2vpn@ietf.org > Cc: Giles Heron (giheron@cisco.com);=20 > jayant.kotalwar@alcatel-lucent.com; > vhemige@gmail.com; Ray Qiu; Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang;=20 > olivier.dornon@alcatel-lucent.com > Subject: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. > Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond >=20 > Hi, >=20 > We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-=20 > l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06, PIM Snooping over VPLS, in order to ensure=20 > that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see=20 > RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >=20 > If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email=20 > whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been=20 > properly disclosed. The draft will not be progressed until a response=20 > has been received from each author and contributor. >=20 > If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author=20 > or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware=20 > of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF=20 > rules. The draft can be found at=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls- > pim-snooping-06 >=20 > This poll closes on Sunday 06/01/2014. >=20 >=20 > Thanks, > Nabil & Giles From nobody Mon Jun 2 12:02:42 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB021A025F for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:57:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UKrScwXdRISa for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:57:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0208.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B1551A03E7 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BL2PR05MB178.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.198.16) by BL2PR05MB067.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.232.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.949.11; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 18:57:10 +0000 Received: from BL2PR05MB178.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.126]) by BL2PR05MB178.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.126]) with mapi id 15.00.0949.001; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 18:57:09 +0000 From: Princy Elizabeth To: "Karl (Xiangrong) Cai" , "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" , "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Index: AQHPeC+y0ElTxAw21UCVXEsDnxkbqJtZ94/wgAAE+fCABDvrgA== Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 18:57:09 +0000 Message-ID: <442fbd2a8f1646ce9d524035890aa5f5@BL2PR05MB178.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: , <8aaa14e5c8344feba289e388bb7d04e1@BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.19] x-microsoft-antispam: BL:0; ACTION:Default; RISK:Low; SCL:0; SPMLVL:NotSpam; PCL:0; RULEID: x-forefront-prvs: 0230B09AC4 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(428001)(51704005)(189002)(199002)(164054003)(377454003)(5423002)(13464003)(1941001)(85852003)(76482001)(74316001)(77982001)(99396002)(15975445006)(99286001)(101416001)(20776003)(79102001)(92566001)(15202345003)(80022001)(66066001)(64706001)(86362001)(76576001)(74662001)(19580395003)(74502001)(31966008)(83322001)(19580405001)(81542001)(46102001)(50986999)(54356999)(76176999)(33646001)(21056001)(87936001)(81342001)(2656002)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2PR05MB067; H:BL2PR05MB178.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=princy@juniper.net; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/DPXwXm9zYJdUnaat_dEPyDfM4Zc X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:02:40 -0700 Cc: Heidi Woods , Ray Qiu X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:57:33 -0000 As a contributor, same here. Thanks, Princy -----Original Message----- From: Karl (Xiangrong) Cai=20 Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 7:48 AM To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang; Bitar, Nabil N; l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: Ray Qiu; Princy Elizabeth; Heidi Woods Subject: RE: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Po= ll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond As a contributor, same here.=20 Thanks. --Karl -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 10:11 PM To: Bitar, Nabil N; l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: Ray Qiu; Karl (Xiangrong) Cai; Princy Elizabeth; Heidi Woods Subject: RE: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Po= ll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond As a co-author, I want to report that Juniper filed US Patent Application N= o. 13/943,292 for the Relay Mode specified in the draft. An IETF IPR Disclosure has been filed, though there is a trouble ticket wit= h the submission: From: IETF-IPR via RT [mailto:ietf-ipr@ietf.org] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 5:42 PM To: Heidi Woods Subject: [www.ietf.org/rt #65781] AutoReply: Juniper's Statement of IPR Thanks. Jeffrey > -----Original Message----- > From: Bitar, Nabil N [mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com] > Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 11:41 AM > To: Bitar, Nabil N; l2vpn@ietf.org > Cc: Giles Heron (giheron@cisco.com); > jayant.kotalwar@alcatel-lucent.com; > vhemige@gmail.com; Ray Qiu; Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang;=20 > olivier.dornon@alcatel-lucent.com > Subject: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. > Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond >=20 > Hi, >=20 > We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-=20 > l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06, PIM Snooping over VPLS, in order to ensure=20 > that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see=20 > RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >=20 > If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email=20 > whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been=20 > properly disclosed. The draft will not be progressed until a response=20 > has been received from each author and contributor. >=20 > If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author=20 > or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware=20 > of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF=20 > rules. The draft can be found at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls- > pim-snooping-06 >=20 > This poll closes on Sunday 06/01/2014. >=20 >=20 > Thanks, > Nabil & Giles From nobody Tue Jun 3 03:57:14 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28A31A043D; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 14:59:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LcGRrftd4-CQ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 14:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA48F1A0346; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 14:59:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: vhemige@gmail.com, olivier.dornon@alcatel-lucent.com, jayant.kotalwar@alcatel-lucent.com, rqiu@juniper.net Subject: IPR Disclosure: Juniper's Statement of IPR related to draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06 X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.4.2.p3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140602215904.17287.15142.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 14:59:04 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/T9eQLm--qqAbU86JJJ_tNSQnMYk X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 03:57:13 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org, giheron@cisco.com, akatlas@gmail.com, ipr-announce@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 21:59:06 -0000 Dear Venu Hemige, Olivier Dornon, Jayant Kotalwar, Ray (Lei) Qiu: An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "PIM Snooping over VPLS" (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping) was submitted to the IETF Secretariat on 2014-05-31 and has been posted on the "IETF Page of Intellectual Property Rights Disclosures" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2366/). The title of the IPR disclosure is "Juniper's Statement of IPR related to draft-ietf- l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06.""); The IETF Secretariat From nobody Tue Jun 3 09:24:03 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C7A1A0326; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 09:24:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ukjKwSDgN7K6; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 09:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0BD1A02E6; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 09:24:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-12.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.4.2.p3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140603162401.27034.36982.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 09:24:01 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/3lW46F7cbXmttJqgih6bhdqqFBE Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:24:02 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group of the IETF. Title : LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in H-VPLS Authors : Pranjal Kumar Dutta Florin Balus Olen Stokes Don Fedyk Geraldine Calvginac Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-12.txt Pages : 26 Date : 2014-06-03 Abstract: RFC4762 describes a mechanism to remove or unlearn MAC addresses that have been dynamically learned in a Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Instance for faster convergence on topology change. The procedure also removes MAC addresses in the VPLS that do not require relearning due to such topology change. This document defines an enhancement to the MAC Address Withdrawal procedure with empty MAC List from RFC4762, which enables a Provider Edge(PE) device to remove only the MAC addresses that need to be relearned. Additional extensions to RFC4762 MAC Withdrawal procedures are specified to provide optimized MAC flushing for the Provider Backbone Bridging (PBB)VPLS specified in RFC7041. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-12 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-12 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Jun 4 14:34:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CD81A032D; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:34:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nnCH7bC8frjo; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F011A0356; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:34:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-14.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.4.3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140604213404.16655.57886.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 14:34:04 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/iyngO2UAe-YWzl_L802W2CJuEfg Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 21:34:07 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group of the IETF. Title : IP-Only LAN Service (IPLS) Authors : Himanshu Shah Eric Rosen Francois Le Faucheur Giles Heron Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-14.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2014-06-04 Abstract: A Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) is used to interconnect systems across a wide-area or metropolitan-area network, making it appear that they are on a private LAN. The systems which are interconnected may themselves be LAN switches. If, however, they are IP hosts or IP routers, certain simplifications to the operation of the VPLS are possible. We call this simplified type of VPLS an "IP-only LAN Service" (IPLS). In an IPLS, as in a VPLS, LAN interfaces are run in promiscuous mode, and frames are forwarded based on their destination MAC addresses. However, the maintenance of the MAC forwarding tables is done via signaling, rather than via the MAC address learning procedures specified in [IEEE 802.1D]. This draft specifies the protocol extensions and procedures for support of the IPLS service. The original intent was to provide an alternate solution to VPLS for those PE routers that were not capable of learning MAC address through data plane. This became non-issue with newer hardware. The concepts put forth by this draft are still valuable and are adopted in one form or other by newer work such as Ethernet VPN in L2VPN Working Group and possible data center applications. At this point, no further action is planned to update this document and is published simply as a historic record of the ideas. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-14 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-14 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Jun 6 08:42:50 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F561A00F6 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:42:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.752 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_51=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJKmB5bmfIEZ for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fldsmtpe03.verizon.com (fldsmtpe03.verizon.com [140.108.26.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA6861A01B6 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:42:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verizon.com; i=nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1402069360; x=1433605360; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=bGQl+kzZaNb+lRKwsvbHJlENDKd9SuD9KODz0sFJGbg=; b=HT9clXHISKUe2l4HE7DEgeDQhGykWs+E3xRG1qQxHqpGojfBa+4hntRY KgHgSxmWlphDSo1ITIZTLR10wT5zslA0KyUOuSvi5rJwP61Jp7EA4i9BR 0LhfrwPPgcMk5THg2HSWI6XEbrvHyXbFRNOfp0il4u7WePSZMUzoQwVfe Q=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi02.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.144]) by fldsmtpe03.verizon.com with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2014 15:42:36 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,989,1392163200"; d="scan'208";a="738145782" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb05.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB05.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.87]) by fldsmtpi02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2014 15:42:14 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.45]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB05.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.87]) with mapi; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 11:42:13 -0400 To: Olivier Dornon , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 11:42:13 -0400 Subject: Re: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Index: Ac+BneMqwjkW/pYnRtS6eT1INhZo7w== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5382C26D.8060004@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/ITpQcoRBky9vfy8h7JTwCYsJs5o Cc: "zzhang@juniper.net" , "Giles Heron \(giheron@cisco.com\)" , "rqiu@juniper.net" , "vhemige@gmail.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:42:48 -0000 Hi, I looked through the contributor list and reads like an aknowledgment. Please, advise how you want to handle that. To progress based oon the contributor's list I still need to hear from the following folks mentioned as contributors but there is no contact information: Yetik Serbest Suresh Boddapati=20 If contributor list is stil the same, include their contact and please forward the initial IPR call to them asking to respond to it. In addition, We haven;t hear yet from Venu and Jayant, unless I missed some email. Thanks, Nabil On 5/26/14 12:26 AM, "Olivier Dornon" wrote: >I'm not aware of any IPR related to this draft. > >Olivier. > >On 05/25/2014 05:40 PM, Bitar, Nabil N wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to >>draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06, PIM Snooping over VPLS, in order >>to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >> >> If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email >>whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been >>properly disclosed. The draft will not be progressed until a response >>has been received from each author and contributor. >> >> If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author >>or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of >>any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >>The draft can be found at >>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06 >> >> This poll closes on Sunday 06/01/2014. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Nabil & Giles > From nobody Fri Jun 6 08:46:49 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3ADD1A055D for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:46:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.951 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_51=0.6, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id en1wxc2FQM5f for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay1.labs.att.com (postman.labs.att.com [205.173.58.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E862D1A0547 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:46:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailpolish.labs.att.com (mailpolish [144.60.65.114]) by relay1.labs.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071001F6B1; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 10:50:28 -0500 (CDT) X-CheckPoint: {5391E25C-66-6B093C90-C0000001} Received: from mailpolish.labs.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Email Security Appliance) with SMTP id BACF1126F0B_391E25CB; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 15:46:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from irelay1.labs.att.com (irelay1.labs.att.com [144.60.17.146]) by mailpolish.labs.att.com (Sophos Email Appliance) with ESMTP id DE203126C06_391E254F; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 15:46:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SAUSMAILHUB.ad.tri.sbc.com (sausmailhub.ad.tri.sbc.com [144.60.55.228]) by irelay1.labs.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D782924001F; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 10:46:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from SAUSMAILMBX2.ad.tri.sbc.com ([144.60.55.230]) by SAUSMAILHUB.ad.tri.sbc.com ([144.60.55.228]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 10:46:28 -0500 From: "Serbest, Yetik" To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , Olivier Dornon , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Index: Ac+BneMqwjkW/pYnRtS6eT1INhZo7wAAI1bg Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 15:46:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5382C26D.8060004@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [144.60.6.49] x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.500.1017-20740.007 x-tm-as-result: No--36.321900-0.000000-31 x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/mDSeto0XzQlk_ZKg7tp6o4kEsSs Cc: "zzhang@juniper.net" , "Giles Heron \(giheron@cisco.com\)" , "vhemige@gmail.com" , "rqiu@juniper.net" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:46:46 -0000 I'm not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Thanks yetik -----Original Message----- From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bitar, Nabil N Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 10:42 AM To: Olivier Dornon; l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: zzhang@juniper.net; Giles Heron (giheron@cisco.com); rqiu@juniper.net; = vhemige@gmail.com Subject: Re: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Po= ll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Hi, I looked through the contributor list and reads like an aknowledgment. Please, advise how you want to handle that. To progress based oon the contributor's list I still need to hear from the following folks mentioned as contributors but there is no contact information: Yetik Serbest Suresh Boddapati=20 If contributor list is stil the same, include their contact and please forward the initial IPR call to them asking to respond to it. In addition, We haven;t hear yet from Venu and Jayant, unless I missed some email. Thanks, Nabil On 5/26/14 12:26 AM, "Olivier Dornon" wrote: >I'm not aware of any IPR related to this draft. > >Olivier. > >On 05/25/2014 05:40 PM, Bitar, Nabil N wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to >>draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06, PIM Snooping over VPLS, in order >>to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >> >> If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email >>whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been >>properly disclosed. The draft will not be progressed until a response >>has been received from each author and contributor. >> >> If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author >>or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of >>any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >>The draft can be found at >>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06 >> >> This poll closes on Sunday 06/01/2014. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Nabil & Giles > From nobody Fri Jun 6 14:53:42 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48FE1A0273 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 14:53:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_51=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aFpH4eUYLEdS for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 14:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B82CF1A02A9 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 14:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-5-2-65.lucent.com [135.5.2.65]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s56LrOJ9022726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:53:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70twxchhub03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.35]) by us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s56LrN74025268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Jun 2014 17:53:24 -0400 Received: from US70UWXCHMBA04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.12.31]) by US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.35]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 17:53:23 -0400 From: "Kotalwar, Jayant (Jayant)" To: Venu Hemige , "Bitar, Nabil N" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Index: AQHPgc6guWk4wU0hz0222TRGP5jE+ptknzrg Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 21:53:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: <0338C802-F961-4115-86A8-D78C4291F982@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0338C802-F961-4115-86A8-D78C4291F982@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.16] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/kfVC9ex9-MEMvMSoQKdJVIsPTN4 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "zzhang@juniper.net" , "Giles Heron \(giheron@cisco.com\)" , "rqiu@juniper.net" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 21:53:41 -0000 Hi Nabil, I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Thanks, --Jayant -----Original Message----- From: Venu Hemige [mailto:vhemige@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 2:26 PM To: Bitar, Nabil N Cc: Dornon, Olivier (Olivier); l2vpn@ietf.org; Giles Heron (giheron@cisco.c= om); Kotalwar, Jayant (Jayant); rqiu@juniper.net; zzhang@juniper.net Subject: Re: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Po= ll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Hi Nabil, Apologies for the delay in response. I am not aware of any IPR related to t= his draft.=20 Regards, Venu On Jun 6, 2014, at 8:42 AM, "Bitar, Nabil N" wr= ote: > Hi, > I looked through the contributor list and reads like an aknowledgment. > Please, advise how you want to handle that. To progress based oon the=20 > contributor's list I still need to hear from the following folks=20 > mentioned as contributors but there is no contact information: >=20 > Yetik Serbest > Suresh Boddapati >=20 > If contributor list is stil the same, include their contact and please=20 > forward the initial IPR call to them asking to respond to it. >=20 >=20 > In addition, > We haven;t hear yet from Venu and Jayant, unless I missed some email. >=20 > Thanks, > Nabil >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 5/26/14 12:26 AM, "Olivier Dornon"=20 > > wrote: >=20 >> I'm not aware of any IPR related to this draft. >>=20 >> Olivier. >>=20 >> On 05/25/2014 05:40 PM, Bitar, Nabil N wrote: >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to=20 >>> draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06, PIM Snooping over VPLS, in=20 >>> order to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF=20 >>> IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >>>=20 >>> If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this=20 >>> email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not=20 >>> been properly disclosed. The draft will not be progressed until a=20 >>> response has been received from each author and contributor. >>>=20 >>> If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an=20 >>> author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you=20 >>> are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance wit= h IETF rules. >>> The draft can be found at >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06 >>>=20 >>> This poll closes on Sunday 06/01/2014. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Thanks, >>> Nabil & Giles >=20 From nobody Sat Jun 7 02:16:41 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A8B1A00E9 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 02:16:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_51=0.6, MIME_BAD_LINEBREAK=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m333H1LKTDz7 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 02:16:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 824DC1A0327 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 02:16:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verizon.com; i=nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1402132592; x=1433668592; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=pZ11YqLmHeeu1zwBzGle1tN8BEF99S8PFAWX7d6HFw8=; b=bLGxunN8bdSjiIHF5fEp4ny75TGBlNaa8aQ15+PGd+/2EFWbWmB/u6bg GbUa48pnB10+ZYc2ghW7jjQEYL/OXIsbj3CWGYCYCieapXD1tGBkzmAgK /QrgNx1n8oboyj35NlcyYkDiaC9pXzgn1SmoCexZnEYv5PSMLmYqpY6X0 k=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi03.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.145]) by omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 07 Jun 2014 09:16:30 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,994,1392163200"; d="scan'208";a="739744438" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb03.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB03.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.86]) by fldsmtpi03.verizon.com with ESMTP; 07 Jun 2014 09:16:30 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.45]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB03.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.86]) with mapi; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 05:16:29 -0400 To: "'Kotalwar, Jayant (Jayant)'" , 'Venu Hemige' Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 05:16:29 -0400 Subject: RE: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Index: AQHPgc6guWk4wU0hz0222TRGP5jE+ptknzrggAC/fds= Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/mxEMcsGAOVTXupgPspcSCFh8wRE Cc: "'l2vpn@ietf.org'" , "'zzhang@juniper.net'" , "'Giles Heron \(giheron@cisco.com\)'" , "'rqiu@juniper.net'" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 09:16:40 -0000 SGksClRoYW5rcy4gQ2FuIHlvdSBwbGVhc2UgcmVzcG9uZCB0byB0aGUgb3JpZ2luYWwgZW1haWwg IGluY2x1ZGluZyB0aGUgbDJ2cG4gbGlzdC4KClRoYW5rcwpOYWJpbAoKDQ1TZW50IHdpdGggR29v ZCAod3d3Lmdvb2QuY29tKQoNCg0KIC0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiAJ S290YWx3YXIsIEpheWFudCAoSmF5YW50KSBbbWFpbHRvOmpheWFudC5rb3RhbHdhckBhbGNhdGVs LWx1Y2VudC5jb21dDQpTZW50OglGcmlkYXksIEp1bmUgMDYsIDIwMTQgMDU6NTMgUE0gRWFzdGVy biBTdGFuZGFyZCBUaW1lDQpUbzoJVmVudSBIZW1pZ2U7IEJpdGFyLCBOYWJpbCBODQpDYzoJRG9y bm9uLCBPbGl2aWVyIChPbGl2aWVyKTsgbDJ2cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmc7IEdpbGVzIEhlcm9uIChnaWhl cm9uQGNpc2NvLmNvbSk7IHJxaXVAanVuaXBlci5uZXQ7IHp6aGFuZ0BqdW5pcGVyLm5ldA0KU3Vi amVjdDoJUkU6IFtsMnZwbl0gSVBSIFBvbGwgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtbDJ2cG4tdnBscy1waW0t c25vb3BpbmctMDYuIFBvbGwgY2xvc2VzIG9uIDYvMS8yMDE0LiBQbGVhc2UsIHJlc3BvbmQNCg0K SGkgTmFiaWwsDQoNCkkgYW0gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgcmVsYXRlZCB0byB0aGlzIGRy YWZ0Lg0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQotLUpheWFudA0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0K RnJvbTogVmVudSBIZW1pZ2UgW21haWx0bzp2aGVtaWdlQGdtYWlsLmNvbV0gDQpTZW50OiBGcmlk YXksIEp1bmUgMDYsIDIwMTQgMjoyNiBQTQ0KVG86IEJpdGFyLCBOYWJpbCBODQpDYzogRG9ybm9u LCBPbGl2aWVyIChPbGl2aWVyKTsgbDJ2cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmc7IEdpbGVzIEhlcm9uIChnaWhlcm9u QGNpc2NvLmNvbSk7IEtvdGFsd2FyLCBKYXlhbnQgKEpheWFudCk7IHJxaXVAanVuaXBlci5uZXQ7 IHp6aGFuZ0BqdW5pcGVyLm5ldA0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFtsMnZwbl0gSVBSIFBvbGwgZm9yIGRy YWZ0LWlldGYtbDJ2cG4tdnBscy1waW0tc25vb3BpbmctMDYuIFBvbGwgY2xvc2VzIG9uIDYvMS8y MDE0LiBQbGVhc2UsIHJlc3BvbmQNCg0KSGkgTmFiaWwsDQoNCkFwb2xvZ2llcyBmb3IgdGhlIGRl bGF5IGluIHJlc3BvbnNlLiBJIGFtIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8gdGhp cyBkcmFmdC4gDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQpWZW51DQoNCg0KT24gSnVuIDYsIDIwMTQsIGF0IDg6NDIg QU0sICJCaXRhciwgTmFiaWwgTiIgPG5hYmlsLm4uYml0YXJAdmVyaXpvbi5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0K DQo+IEhpLA0KPiBJIGxvb2tlZCB0aHJvdWdoIHRoZSBjb250cmlidXRvciBsaXN0IGFuZCByZWFk cyBsaWtlIGFuIGFrbm93bGVkZ21lbnQuDQo+IFBsZWFzZSwgYWR2aXNlIGhvdyB5b3Ugd2FudCB0 byBoYW5kbGUgdGhhdC4gVG8gcHJvZ3Jlc3MgYmFzZWQgb29uIHRoZSANCj4gY29udHJpYnV0b3In cyBsaXN0IEkgc3RpbGwgbmVlZCB0byBoZWFyIGZyb20gdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBmb2xrcyANCj4g bWVudGlvbmVkIGFzIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycyBidXQgdGhlcmUgaXMgbm8gY29udGFjdCBpbmZvcm1h dGlvbjoNCj4gDQo+IFlldGlrIFNlcmJlc3QNCj4gU3VyZXNoIEJvZGRhcGF0aQ0KPiANCj4gSWYg Y29udHJpYnV0b3IgbGlzdCBpcyBzdGlsIHRoZSBzYW1lLCBpbmNsdWRlIHRoZWlyIGNvbnRhY3Qg YW5kIHBsZWFzZSANCj4gZm9yd2FyZCB0aGUgaW5pdGlhbCBJUFIgY2FsbCB0byB0aGVtIGFza2lu ZyB0byByZXNwb25kIHRvIGl0Lg0KPiANCj4gDQo+IEluIGFkZGl0aW9uLA0KPiBXZSBoYXZlbjt0 IGhlYXIgeWV0IGZyb20gVmVudSBhbmQgSmF5YW50LCB1bmxlc3MgSSBtaXNzZWQgc29tZSBlbWFp bC4NCj4gDQo+IFRoYW5rcywNCj4gTmFiaWwNCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPiBPbiA1LzI2 LzE0IDEyOjI2IEFNLCAiT2xpdmllciBEb3Jub24iIA0KPiA8b2xpdmllci5kb3Jub25AYWxjYXRl bC1sdWNlbnQuY29tPg0KPiB3cm90ZToNCj4gDQo+PiBJJ20gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIg cmVsYXRlZCB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lg0KPj4gDQo+PiBPbGl2aWVyLg0KPj4gDQo+PiBPbiAwNS8y NS8yMDE0IDA1OjQwIFBNLCBCaXRhciwgTmFiaWwgTiB3cm90ZToNCj4+PiBIaSwNCj4+PiANCj4+ PiBXZSBhcmUgcG9sbGluZyBmb3Iga25vd2xlZGdlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzIHRv IA0KPj4+IGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtbDJ2cG4tdnBscy1waW0tc25vb3BpbmctMDYsIFBJTSBTbm9vcGlu ZyBvdmVyIFZQTFMsIGluIA0KPj4+IG9yZGVyIHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBk aXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29tcGxpYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgDQo+Pj4gSVBSIHJ1bGVzIChzZWUgUkZD cyAzOTc5LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1Mzc4IGZvciBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMpLg0KPj4+IA0KPj4+ IElmIHlvdSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXV0aG9yLCAgcGxlYXNlIHJlc3BvbmQg dG8gdGhpcyANCj4+PiBlbWFpbCB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBy ZWxldmFudCBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IA0KPj4+IGJlZW4gcHJvcGVybHkgZGlzY2xvc2VkLiBU aGUgZHJhZnQgd2lsbCBub3QgYmUgcHJvZ3Jlc3NlZCB1bnRpbCBhIA0KPj4+IHJlc3BvbnNlIGhh cyBiZWVuIHJlY2VpdmVkIGZyb20gZWFjaCBhdXRob3IgYW5kIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLg0KPj4+IA0K Pj4+IElmIHlvdSBhcmUgb24gdGhlIGwydnBuIFdHIGVtYWlsIGxpc3QgYnV0IGFyZSBub3QgbGlz dGVkIGFzIGFuIA0KPj4+IGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgZXhwbGlj aXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91IA0KPj4+IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQg aGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29uZm9ybWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIHJ1bGVz Lg0KPj4+IFRoZSBkcmFmdCBjYW4gYmUgZm91bmQgYXQNCj4+PiBodHRwOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5v cmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLWwydnBuLXZwbHMtcGltLXNub29waW5nLTA2DQo+Pj4gDQo+Pj4g VGhpcyBwb2xsIGNsb3NlcyBvbiBTdW5kYXkgMDYvMDEvMjAxNC4NCj4+PiANCj4+PiANCj4+PiBU aGFua3MsDQo+Pj4gTmFiaWwgJiBHaWxlcw0KPiANCg== From nobody Sun Jun 8 18:32:06 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC541B279D for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RKv3Gf-qHqUu for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 18:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A6A51B279C for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 18:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-5-2-65.lucent.com [135.5.2.65]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s591Vw1l017704 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 8 Jun 2014 20:31:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70twxchhub03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.35]) by us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s591VsIt026662 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 8 Jun 2014 21:31:58 -0400 Received: from US70UWXCHMBA04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.12.31]) by US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.35]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 21:31:56 -0400 From: "Kotalwar, Jayant (Jayant)" To: Venu Hemige Subject: Re: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Index: AQHPg3tGuWk4wU0hz0222TRGP5jE+ptn/jyV Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 01:31:56 +0000 Message-ID: References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D94FF69D52664510A52393451B95C822alcatellucentcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/He1dfeQGTIJqzfwVVyUZBzoiPOE Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "Giles Heron \(giheron@cisco.com\)" , "Jeffrey \(Zhaohui\) Zhang" , Ray Qiu X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 01:32:05 -0000 --_000_D94FF69D52664510A52393451B95C822alcatellucentcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As a co-author of this draft, I am not aware of any IPR related to this dra= ft. --Jayant On Jun 8, 2014, at 5:39 PM, "Venu Hemige" > wrote: I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Regards, -Venu On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Ray Qiu > wrote: As a co-author of the draft, I state that I am not aware of any relevant IPR. Thanks, Ray On 5/25/14, 8:40 AM, "Bitar, Nabil N" > wrote: >Hi, > >We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to >draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06, PIM Snooping over VPLS, in order >to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > >If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email >whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been >properly disclosed. The draft will not be progressed until a response has >been received from each author and contributor. > >If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or >contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any >IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The >draft can be found at >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06 > >This poll closes on Sunday 06/01/2014. > > >Thanks, >Nabil & Giles --_000_D94FF69D52664510A52393451B95C822alcatellucentcom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As a co-author of this draft, I am not aware of any IPR related to thi= s draft.

--Jayant

On Jun 8, 2014, at 5:39 PM, "Venu Hemige" <vhemige@gmail.com> wrote:

I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.

Regards,
-Venu


On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Ray Qiu <rqiu@juniper.net<= /a>> wrote:
As a co-author of the draft, I state that I am not aware of any relevant IPR.

Thanks,
Ray

On 5/25/14, 8:40 AM, "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to
>draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06, PIM Snooping over VPLS, in order=
>to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules=
>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>If you are listed as a document author,  please respond to this em= ail
>whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been
>properly disclosed. The draft will not be progressed until a response h= as
>been received from each author and contributor.
>
>If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author o= r
>contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of an= y
>IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The=
>draft can be found at
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pi= m-snooping-06
>
>This poll closes on Sunday 06/01/2014.
>
>
>Thanks,
>Nabil & Giles


--_000_D94FF69D52664510A52393451B95C822alcatellucentcom_-- From nobody Sun Jun 8 18:36:43 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA611A018C for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 18:36:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q_IxSDsZiNLW for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 18:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42BEE1B278D for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 18:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-5-2-65.lucent.com [135.5.2.65]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s591aaCo020146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 8 Jun 2014 20:36:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70twxchhub03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.35]) by us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s591aa2Z029865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 8 Jun 2014 21:36:36 -0400 Received: from US70TWXCHMBA09.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.121]) by US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.35]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 21:36:36 -0400 From: "Boddapati, Suresh V (Suresh)" To: "Kotalwar, Jayant (Jayant)" , "Venu Hemige" Subject: Re: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Index: AQHPg3tGuWk4wU0hz0222TRGP5jE+ptn/jyV///PAoA= Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 01:36:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030 x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.16] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CFBA5D21B129sureshboddapatialcatellucentcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/bRPNw0jlO6pveLXL10G7klaNGG8 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "Jeffrey \(Zhaohui\) Zhang" , "Giles Heron \(giheron@cisco.com\)" , Ray Qiu X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 01:36:41 -0000 --_000_CFBA5D21B129sureshboddapatialcatellucentcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Suresh From: , "Jayant (Jayant)" > Date: Sunday, June 8, 2014 6:31 PM To: Venu Hemige > Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" >, "Giles Heron (giheron@cisco.com)" >, "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" >, Ray Qiu > Subject: Re: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Po= ll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond As a co-author of this draft, I am not aware of any IPR related to this dra= ft. --Jayant On Jun 8, 2014, at 5:39 PM, "Venu Hemige" > wrote: I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Regards, -Venu On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Ray Qiu > wrote: As a co-author of the draft, I state that I am not aware of any relevant IPR. Thanks, Ray On 5/25/14, 8:40 AM, "Bitar, Nabil N" > wrote: >Hi, > >We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to >draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06, PIM Snooping over VPLS, in order >to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > >If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email >whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been >properly disclosed. The draft will not be progressed until a response has >been received from each author and contributor. > >If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or >contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any >IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The >draft can be found at >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06 > >This poll closes on Sunday 06/01/2014. > > >Thanks, >Nabil & Giles --_000_CFBA5D21B129sureshboddapatialcatellucentcom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7EC361B320E48843B6214569D3DB01D0@exchange.lucent.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.

Suresh

From: <Kotalwar>, "Jayan= t (Jayant)" <= jayant.kotalwar@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Sunday, June 8, 2014 6:31 PM<= br> To: Venu Hemige <vhemige@gmail.com>
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2v= pn@ietf.org>, "Giles Heron (giheron@cisco.com)" <gih= eron@cisco.com>, "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>, Ray Qiu <rqiu@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for d= raft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, resp= ond

As a co-author of this draft, I am not aware of any IPR related to thi= s draft.

--Jayant

On Jun 8, 2014, at 5:39 PM, "Venu Hemige" <vhemige@gmail.com> wrote:

I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.

Regards,
-Venu


On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Ray Qiu <rqiu@juniper.net<= /a>> wrote:
As a co-author of the draft, I state that I am not aware of any relevant IPR.

Thanks,
Ray

On 5/25/14, 8:40 AM, "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to
>draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06, PIM Snooping over VPLS, in order=
>to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules=
>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>If you are listed as a document author,  please respond to this em= ail
>whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been
>properly disclosed. The draft will not be progressed until a response h= as
>been received from each author and contributor.
>
>If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author o= r
>contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of an= y
>IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The=
>draft can be found at
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pi= m-snooping-06
>
>This poll closes on Sunday 06/01/2014.
>
>
>Thanks,
>Nabil & Giles


 --_000_CFBA5D21B129sureshboddapatialcatellucentcom_-- From nobody Sun Jun 8 18:47:58 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D401A026C for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 18:47:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cuxzxKpsYr7F for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 18:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay1.labs.att.com (postman.labs.att.com [205.173.58.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F057D1A01E2 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 18:47:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailpolish.labs.att.com (mailpolish.labs.att.com [144.60.65.114]) by relay1.labs.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138621F58A; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 20:51:19 -0500 (CDT) X-CheckPoint: {53951244-38-6B093C90-C0000001} Received: from mailpolish.labs.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Email Security Appliance) with SMTP id 8CBA1126A21_3951244B; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 01:47:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from irelay1.labs.att.com (irelay1.labs.att.com [144.60.17.146]) by mailpolish.labs.att.com (Sophos Email Appliance) with ESMTP id 27A0D1269F1_395123CF; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 01:47:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SAUSMAILHUB.ad.tri.sbc.com (sausmailhub.ad.tri.sbc.com [144.60.55.228]) by irelay1.labs.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E031824001F; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 20:47:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from SAUSMAILMBX2.ad.tri.sbc.com ([144.60.55.230]) by SAUSMAILHUB.ad.tri.sbc.com ([144.60.55.228]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 20:47:39 -0500 From: "Serbest, Yetik" To: "Boddapati, Suresh V (Suresh)" , "Kotalwar, Jayant (Jayant)" , Venu Hemige Subject: RE: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond Thread-Index: AQHPg3tGwjkW/pYnRtS6eT1INhZo75tn/jyV///PAoCAADVVoA== Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 01:47:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20140609013648.57F7F126B10_3950FB0B@mailpolish.labs.att.com> In-Reply-To: <20140609013648.57F7F126B10_3950FB0B@mailpolish.labs.att.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [144.60.6.66] x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.500.1017-20746.003 x-tm-as-result: No--46.678800-0.000000-31 x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A4FD9D4DBD70B042BCAE0093201AA99D1B4586EASAUSMAILMBX2adt_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/9X-IlBh2krM9MyCgoFkVxYzdRF4 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "Jeffrey \(Zhaohui\) Zhang" , "Giles Heron \(giheron@cisco.com\)" , Ray Qiu X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 01:47:52 -0000 --_000_A4FD9D4DBD70B042BCAE0093201AA99D1B4586EASAUSMAILMBX2adt_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. yetik From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Boddapati, Suresh = V (Suresh) Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 8:37 PM To: Kotalwar, Jayant (Jayant); Venu Hemige Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org; Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang; Giles Heron (giheron@cisco.com= ); Ray Qiu Subject: Re: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Po= ll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Suresh From: , "Jayant (Jayant)" > Date: Sunday, June 8, 2014 6:31 PM To: Venu Hemige > Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" >, "Giles Heron (giheron@cisco.com)" >, "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" >, Ray Qiu > Subject: Re: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Po= ll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond As a co-author of this draft, I am not aware of any IPR related to this dra= ft. --Jayant On Jun 8, 2014, at 5:39 PM, "Venu Hemige" > wrote: I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Regards, -Venu On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Ray Qiu > wrote: As a co-author of the draft, I state that I am not aware of any relevant IPR. Thanks, Ray On 5/25/14, 8:40 AM, "Bitar, Nabil N" > wrote: >Hi, > >We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to >draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06, PIM Snooping over VPLS, in order >to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > >If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email >whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been >properly disclosed. The draft will not be progressed until a response has >been received from each author and contributor. > >If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or >contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any >IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The >draft can be found at >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06 > >This poll closes on Sunday 06/01/2014. > > >Thanks, >Nabil & Giles --_000_A4FD9D4DBD70B042BCAE0093201AA99D1B4586EASAUSMAILMBX2adt_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am not aware of any IPR r= elated to this draft.

 

yetik

 <= /p>

From: L2vpn [m= ailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Boddapati, Suresh V (Suresh)
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 8:37 PM
To: Kotalwar, Jayant (Jayant); Venu Hemige
Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org; Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang; Giles Heron (giheron@ci= sco.com); Ray Qiu
Subject: Re: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping= -06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond

 

I am not aware of any IPR r= elated to this draft.

 

Suresh

 

From: <Kotalwar>, "Jayant (Jayant)= " <jayant.kot= alwar@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Sunday, June 8, 2014 6:31 PM
To: Venu Hemige <vhemige@gma= il.com>
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org"= <l2vpn@ietf.org>, "Giles = Heron (giheron@cisco.com)" &l= t;giheron@cisco.com>, "Jef= frey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@jun= iper.net>, Ray Qiu <rqiu@juni= per.net>
Subject: Re: [l2vpn] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping= -06. Poll closes on 6/1/2014. Please, respond

 

As a co-author of this draf= t, I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.

 

--Jayant<= /p>


On Jun 8, 2014, at 5:39 PM, "Venu Hemige" <vhemige@gmail.com> wrote:

I am not aware of any IPR r= elated to this draft.

 

Regards,<= /p>

-Venu

 

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 8:3= 5 PM, Ray Qiu <rqi= u@juniper.net> wrote:

As a co-author of the draft= , I state that I am not aware of any relevant
IPR.

Thanks,
Ray


On 5/25/14, 8:40 AM, "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to
>draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06, PIM Snooping over VPLS, in order=
>to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules=
>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>If you are listed as a document author,  please respond to this em= ail
>whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been
>properly disclosed. The draft will not be progressed until a response h= as
>been received from each author and contributor.
>
>If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author o= r
>contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of an= y
>IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The=
>draft can be found at
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pi= m-snooping-06
>
>This poll closes on Sunday 06/01/2014.
>
>
>Thanks,
>Nabil & Giles

 

--_000_A4FD9D4DBD70B042BCAE0093201AA99D1B4586EASAUSMAILMBX2adt_-- From nobody Tue Jun 10 06:02:08 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A541F1A0043 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:02:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m_U4hgVhb1H9 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FF381A0503 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q59so2197833wes.13 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:01:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=iTc0M87CrFMqxYNhT/YWd6OOscTsz8cesdCNsQiUvYU=; b=XBVWB3ryTBJHbuiq1VGU2HqhywGbIqXDMIH4jBj/blC3HzLNYpvDrXynikHf55fNcT FE4iKkzbNkCzeh1q3Oi1lZRTrhV5gYfQmYDOte4K4hLogL7k4qAIHZXYq4AUGSR0i33Z GHrBHaaiiknw+vuSb0bLAswSv3dLhSNs/oPuPAq1OvQ8JvE/yshucRbPBMJWfwnQW00C L7eR3/nXTl4f1+gpYqRVIFY2UQ1pUz32KysJ0y50bP/061fyVwKtEgGxAyDdIWZRwKC9 sCX+TpTb3aByZYZFDnSw/HuBIbh3bBkXfsIjCI2/j59Kz1vHqKkp5JfLu+i3/k/UK4VS 1ZRg== X-Received: by 10.14.216.71 with SMTP id f47mr103517eep.23.1402405314910; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:01:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp8046.cisco.com (173-38-208-169.cisco.com. [173.38.208.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m44sm52134894eeh.14.2014.06.10.06.01.53 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 From: Giles Heron In-Reply-To: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:01:52 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> References: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> To: Himanshu Shah , l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/EUe0frGVt4aCBRb_aN5gPYl5BC8 Cc: "msiva@cisco.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:02:05 -0000 Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and believe that we should poll the = WG for adoption. WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. The = call will close on Tuesday June 24th. Please comment as to the = suitability of the draft for adoption, giving reasoning if possible. Giles On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu wrote: > WG =96 > We posted the following draft while back. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 > =20 > Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the = same in PWE3 WG. > There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that = MAC withdraw work > should reside in L2VPN WG. > =20 > Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service = provider as a co-author. > There is a good interest in this work especially from those service = providers who have > deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs. > =20 > Since there has been sufficient history to this document, the authors = request that this be > adopted as WG draft. > =20 > Thanks, > himanshu From nobody Tue Jun 10 07:28:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1D11A0193 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:28:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kr6eb0F1emDP for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qc0-x22f.google.com (mail-qc0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55EC51A0162 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id i8so2128260qcq.6 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:28:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=jFE3j/rNVeWGXuW++EgQ9XNJi66hkBVciZh/jwRpSoo=; b=dSt4TJz5Xin4LYovb9Iy3iJqtxkEG4uEGxij8IIk5+9F/WB7Ex6XpOM1PhgPGPAdSy pK81j8H4EcS1FHUPiH4Zb09BBzqI9izKIuVFHTWyYZbBqV2u9YACtTFwSrMFwz1xzBie MjCNBUd5LTS2yfEtE2rWo1dGc893ESdyXUzu6cC6v7jargLicVtCCaONZgtVBlABhLZJ keWYkRX60q/knD3cZtNjPOwHxfEWUy0ieF/nDMsCH/Q9ukJLYdwaandJDHOa2/xCeMhW YuCN0Hz12PSHXYwMhCgL88xRng2fuwJymeZOISzcM4tL1/wQ2+LH3PiFpqUIe8PaLWr6 4nQA== X-Received: by 10.140.49.76 with SMTP id p70mr39331293qga.86.1402410490442; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:28:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.86.148 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:27:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> References: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:27:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 To: Giles Heron Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11370a341cbebd04fb7c23fd Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/g1wa8P5P0PNntb0CVsJD_yNx7h0 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "msiva@cisco.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:28:13 -0000 --001a11370a341cbebd04fb7c23fd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I support this draft being adopted, this is good work and it's found the appropriate home in l2vpn. We already have MAC withdraw when using dynamic PWs for L2VPNs and it's required when using static PWs as well. Cheers, Andy On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Giles Heron wrote: > Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and believe that we should poll the W= G > for adoption. > > WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. The call > will close on Tuesday June 24th. Please comment as to the suitability of > the draft for adoption, giving reasoning if possible. > > Giles > > On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu wrote: > > > WG =E2=80=93 > > We posted the following draft while back. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 > > > > Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the > same in PWE3 WG. > > There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that > MAC withdraw work > > should reside in L2VPN WG. > > > > Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service provider > as a co-author. > > There is a good interest in this work especially from those service > providers who have > > deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs. > > > > Since there has been sufficient history to this document, the authors > request that this be > > adopted as WG draft. > > > > Thanks, > > himanshu > > --001a11370a341cbebd04fb7c23fd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I support this draft being adopted, this is good work and = it's found the appropriate home in l2vpn. We already have MAC withdraw = when using dynamic PWs for L2VPNs and it's required when using static P= Ws as well.

Cheers,
Andy



On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at= 9:01 AM, Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:
Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and beli= eve that we should poll the WG for adoption.

WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. =C2=A0The c= all will close on Tuesday June 24th. =C2=A0Please comment as to the suitabi= lity of the draft for adoption, giving reasoning if possible.

Giles

On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu <hshah@ciena.com> wrote:

> WG =E2=80=93
> We posted the following draft while back.
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpl= s-tp-mac-wd-03
>
> Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the = same in PWE3 WG.
> There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that = MAC withdraw work
> should reside in L2VPN WG.
>
> Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service provide= r as a co-author.
> There is a good interest in this work especially from those service pr= oviders who have
> deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs.
>
> Since there has been sufficient history to this document, =C2=A0the au= thors request that this be
> adopted as WG draft.
>
> Thanks,
> himanshu


--001a11370a341cbebd04fb7c23fd-- From nobody Tue Jun 10 08:01:30 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4371B27CD for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:01:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.267 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CaEt-l8IltbO for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.144.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BD6F1B27BC for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0000419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s5AExnMP015647; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:01:22 -0400 Received: from vawvcgsie2k1302.ciena.com (LIN1-118-36-36.ciena.com [63.118.36.36]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1mden4k0mp-2 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:01:21 -0400 Received: from ONWVEXCHHT04.ciena.com (10.128.6.44) by VAWVCGSIE2K1302.ciena.com (2.6.6.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:01:18 -0400 Received: from ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com ([::1]) by ONWVEXCHHT04.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:01:18 -0400 From: "Shah, Himanshu" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:01:16 -0400 Subject: RE: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Topic: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Index: Ac+ErDe8Xk4FNHjgTZS220ay3HBNpwAEJVug Message-ID: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B72EC6806@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> References: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US, en-CA Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, en-CA x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-20748.007 x-tm-as-result: No--35.411700-8.000000-31 x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52, 1.0.14, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-06-10_05:2014-06-10,2014-06-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1406100179 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/eHXU4KjERuRh8ro3mwfT15e7QOw Cc: "msiva@cisco.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:01:28 -0000 Support as co-author.. -----Original Message----- From: Giles Heron [mailto:giles.heron@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:02 AM To: Shah, Himanshu; l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: msiva@cisco.com; Nabil Bitar Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and believe that we should poll the WG = for adoption. WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. The call w= ill close on Tuesday June 24th. Please comment as to the suitability of th= e draft for adoption, giving reasoning if possible. Giles On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu wrote: > WG - > We posted the following draft while back. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 > =20 > Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the sam= e in PWE3 WG. > There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that=20 > MAC withdraw work should reside in L2VPN WG. > =20 > Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service provider a= s a co-author. > There is a good interest in this work especially from those service=20 > providers who have deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs. > =20 > Since there has been sufficient history to this document, the authors=20 > request that this be adopted as WG draft. > =20 > Thanks, > himanshu From nobody Tue Jun 10 08:16:37 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4476B1B27CD for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:16:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.152 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qU_JnNpOYJ9c for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D5081A01A5 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:16:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1420; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1402413391; x=1403622991; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=NCdo/1iFNggjd6rx8/nthg+2y+mXH93bHJWmJK2TelU=; b=UnCX1nwbZeTag0lIqdmg10UpTQgP2o2h3j5Ywa4maGRo67xZLy7x6m9b gMEFo2m6p/H4W0SNgZpDCaEKmFwCdipmrZpe+PeAIx1eqHW2RBoUdgcBp 2uWPqmLltGpAbJlg+wpACPxvK8ZP75Cpgry+A+7K8yW48PJ1IDrZNcIyO 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgoFAAchl1OtJA2M/2dsb2JhbABZgw1SWcQCAYEIFnWEAwEBAQMBOj8FBwQCAQgRBAEBCxQJByERFAkIAQEEAQ0FCIgmAwkIDcY3DYVHF4wngXExBwaDJYEWBJgqgzyMCoV5gzyCLw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,1009,1392163200"; d="scan'208";a="332043676" Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2014 15:16:30 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5AFGUqe011758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:16:30 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([169.254.3.84]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:16:30 -0500 From: "Siva Sivabalan (msiva)" To: Giles Heron , Himanshu Shah , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Topic: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Index: Ac92n0AAmd85MLEDQeuOSZTGWgDMvgONs6YAAAXXmaA= Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:16:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [161.44.193.144] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/DaX4uPiIi1SAVuf6d01JYiAVBmc X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:16:36 -0000 Support as a co-author. -----Original Message----- From: Giles Heron [mailto:giles.heron@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:02 AM To: Himanshu Shah; l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: Siva Sivabalan (msiva); Nabil Bitar Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and believe that we should poll the WG = for adoption. WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. The call w= ill close on Tuesday June 24th. Please comment as to the suitability of th= e draft for adoption, giving reasoning if possible. Giles On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu wrote: > WG - > We posted the following draft while back. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 > =20 > Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the sam= e in PWE3 WG. > There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that=20 > MAC withdraw work should reside in L2VPN WG. > =20 > Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service provider a= s a co-author. > There is a good interest in this work especially from those service=20 > providers who have deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs. > =20 > Since there has been sufficient history to this document, the authors=20 > request that this be adopted as WG draft. > =20 > Thanks, > himanshu From nobody Tue Jun 10 08:45:17 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F761B27D6 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:45:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xirny941xG6O for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0059D1B2824 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:45:00 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c618062d-f79be6d000006b89-82-5396d72f17e3 Received: from EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.75]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id C9.EC.27529.F27D6935; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:00:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:44:47 -0400 From: Jeff Tantsura To: "Siva Sivabalan (msiva)" , Giles Heron , Himanshu Shah , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Topic: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Index: AQHPhKwzu72UMFikt0+cbs+XCVh1Eptqt52A//+SkQA= Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:44:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.1.140326 x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.9] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <51C0B75AB7061144A1608523F5997E60@ericsson.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupnkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZXLrHW1f/+rRgg+Y3phZPj85gtNi1cTWj xeNvh9gtLjw6zuzA4nH25j8Wjym/N7J67Jx1l91jyZKfTAEsUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZ98/e ZC1YxV2xc0ILUwNjF2cXIyeHhICJxJbL1xghbDGJC/fWs3UxcnEICRxllLjzah8zhLOcUWLy ss1gVWwCBhL/vx1nAUmICMxmlPj15QwrSEJYwFli/uFpLCC2iICLxLLnu5ggbCuJ5892s4PY LAKqEm37loDFeQXMJSY2PYTacJhRYu3/rWCDOAV8JaZM6GEDsRmBbvp+ag1YA7OAuMStJ/OZ IG4VkFiy5zwzhC0q8fLxP7BeUQE9iXfHYWoUJfb1T2eH6NWRWLD7ExuEbS1x4UsjI4StLbFs 4WtmiIMEJU7OfMIygVF8FpJ1s5C0z0LSPgtJ+ywk7QsYWVcxcpQWp5blphsZbGIExuAxCTbd HYx7XloeYhTgYFTi4V3QOjVYiDWxrLgy9xCjNAeLkjiv9s2qYCGB9MSS1OzU1ILUovii0pzU 4kOMTBycUg2McskVTv0rjGwbwh1y3LPOLuVQbWrSW3nYeNOuO/sMuD+dSvLMrtuQP+vpyzk9 s1mKXP/m9Tt+ctP91K4SlRr+XympwHNFxMubwkscp034MS8tya0y2UvG85X+YlkplT7russP HvvvXb5B4Yn5Ras/DQvdr1yYycP36e+UwNeRjAxFbpsPKuYqsRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAklX376IC AAA= Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/LliKRQrNPx4WmS6UsR7pD3w7aGo X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:45:12 -0000 Yes/support Cheers, Jeff > >-----Original Message----- >From: Giles Heron [mailto:giles.heron@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:02 AM >To: Himanshu Shah; l2vpn@ietf.org >Cc: Siva Sivabalan (msiva); Nabil Bitar >Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 > >Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and believe that we should poll the >WG for adoption. > >WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. The call >will close on Tuesday June 24th. Please comment as to the suitability of >the draft for adoption, giving reasoning if possible. > >Giles > >On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu wrote: > >> WG - >> We posted the following draft while back. >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 >> =20 >> Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the >>same in PWE3 WG. >> There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that >> MAC withdraw work should reside in L2VPN WG. >> =20 >> Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service provider >>as a co-author. >> There is a good interest in this work especially from those service >> providers who have deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs. >> =20 >> Since there has been sufficient history to this document, the authors >> request that this be adopted as WG draft. >> =20 >> Thanks, >> himanshu > From prvs=5238a6803a=ckung@ciena.com Tue Jun 10 09:05:07 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4041A01FF for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:05:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.267 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jYhxMI8hbYdz for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.144.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAD4D1A01ED for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0000419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s5AG0YBa019181; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:05:00 -0400 Received: from mdwvexchht01.ciena.com (LIN1-118-36-28.ciena.com [63.118.36.28]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1me4cs07dx-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:05:00 -0400 Received: from MDWVEXCHHT02.ciena.com (10.4.156.176) by MDWVEXCHHT01.ciena.com (10.4.156.175) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.298.1; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:04:59 -0400 Received: from ONWVEXCHHT02.ciena.com (10.128.6.17) by MDWVEXCHHT02.ciena.com (10.4.156.176) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.298.1; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:04:59 -0400 Received: from ONWVEXCHMB05.ciena.com ([::1]) by ONWVEXCHHT02.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:04:58 -0400 From: "Kung, David" To: "Shah, Himanshu" , Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:04:57 -0400 Subject: RE: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Topic: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Index: Ac+ErDe8Xk4FNHjgTZS220ay3HBNpwAEJVugAAIoxzA= Message-ID: <23903483D1A9B04AB5D759C6C845237F6384A597@ONWVEXCHMB05.ciena.com> References: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B72EC6806@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> In-Reply-To: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B72EC6806@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-20750.000 X-TM-AS-Result: No--12.363700-8.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52, 1.0.14, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-06-10_05:2014-06-10,2014-06-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1406100192 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/-PG1xe9-KDAv486JOD-tMAImYU0 Cc: "msiva@cisco.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:08:24 -0000 Support. David -----Original Message----- From: Giles Heron [mailto:giles.heron@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:02 AM To: Shah, Himanshu; l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: msiva@cisco.com; Nabil Bitar Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and believe that we should poll the WG = for adoption. WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. The call w= ill close on Tuesday June 24th. Please comment as to the suitability of th= e draft for adoption, giving reasoning if possible. Giles On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu wrote: > WG - > We posted the following draft while back. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 > =20 > Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the sam= e in PWE3 WG. > There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that=20 > MAC withdraw work should reside in L2VPN WG. > =20 > Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service provider a= s a co-author. > There is a good interest in this work especially from those service=20 > providers who have deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs. > =20 > Since there has been sufficient history to this document, the authors=20 > request that this be adopted as WG draft. > =20 > Thanks, > himanshu From nobody Tue Jun 10 12:04:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548AA1A026B; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:03:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.151 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1cuYv2yqKdr; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:03:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D77E1A0265; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:03:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5934; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1402427010; x=1403636610; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=Dc3hr127a1X+3mZdBPQzA/LAdjc5BmgXpMtO1fFmr4Q=; b=JFeAsyaCIQAkI7pcxI9f6r15+b4k9RG1LTo5E+mdf6vVQKM2YC5zkBXD YTc4E+yQZf5nU2fQVwyIFqMT4dzQA7lqinYZPYZXcCjeDyD3yDEixI04Z JRbUbVGxArc+mKv0k/2Z+aaQnc3Xrd3HN8lMSWuEeFN5tjNbAS6X4FHOg c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArgPAPdVl1OtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABZgkZHUlmqaQEBBoMIjH2JDQGBChZ1hAUBBC1eASpWJgEEARqIOg3NEBeFVohCg2OBFgSbZpIDgzyCLw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,1010,1392163200"; d="scan'208,217";a="51931176" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2014 19:03:29 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com [173.36.12.86]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5AJ3TO1011224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:03:29 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.8.200]) by xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com ([173.36.12.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:03:29 -0500 From: "Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" To: "netmod@ietf.org" , "nvo3@ietf.org" , "trill@ietf.org" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "opsawg@ietf.org" Subject: YANG models for OAM Thread-Topic: YANG models for OAM Thread-Index: Ac+E3qlMyPi638vnRGmjYh75Wx+edA== Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:03:28 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.155.1.132] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FBEA3E19AA24F847BA3AE74E2FE193562EE91CDAxmbrcdx08ciscoc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/RyH74okNQv48WZxrPLAxtnTCgiw X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:03:32 -0000 --_000_FBEA3E19AA24F847BA3AE74E2FE193562EE91CDAxmbrcdx08ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All We have published YANG model for OAM. #1 draft below place the generic fram= ework for OAM, that can be augmented for different technologies. #2 and #3 = are application of the concept to NVO3 and TRILL, 1. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-netmod-oam/ 2. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-nvo3-yang-oam/ 3. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-trill-yang-oam/ Please review and share your comments Thanks Tissa --_000_FBEA3E19AA24F847BA3AE74E2FE193562EE91CDAxmbrcdx08ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All

 

We have published YANG model for OAM. #1 draft below= place the generic framework for OAM, that can be augmented for different t= echnologies. #2 and #3 are application of the concept to NVO3 and TRILL,

 

1.      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-netmod-= oam/

2.      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-nvo3-ya= ng-oam/

3.      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-trill-yang= -oam/

 

Please review and share your comments

 

Thanks

Tissa

 

 

--_000_FBEA3E19AA24F847BA3AE74E2FE193562EE91CDAxmbrcdx08ciscoc_-- From nobody Tue Jun 10 13:44:21 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50671A042D for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:43:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mp8o6boXb0Wp for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB2811A02FB for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id y10so2116067wgg.20 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:43:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references :cc:to; bh=tptC6rFknR4Uh/6jnsjuCIP2QSdJpXXq/lx1aXlAlQg=; b=q7Z2o+p0Lz5wiSmi9Sjc+YaNfBHilIOhM/obcsFv+4yoOifLcwy0tzd9Q1LHpeDk/O v/K4K11QCVvGZTsUE1CmyUQH0uwqXqKNE+uCQV3nklskhse/NFzpNu+fCttS5WDU43Jj MtiWfRgEDqZkBvuKNZskUbHNnyWKMK2jAfa6OQDEiKAaYRAxIg4yRFQ1S6BvM3VZi40c 7TvMWVt1UGAkZvLAleeBq1gOcsNDA6xN8B9rVzygVJ8foCw7aisr0aQcCyNo/2entndO 58+nfRNmHbQkjRRsugSr+PBRUJmesqT0GXyM5j1ro6jUcWKNYiPm+Aj4+bERq7aLOBsL 4N7w== X-Received: by 10.14.194.136 with SMTP id m8mr3109403een.4.1402433028861; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.61.205.17] (173-38-208-169.cisco.com. [173.38.208.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x42sm54455823eel.41.2014.06.10.13.43.47 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:43:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Giles Heron Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F502E2ED-8170-419F-98FB-046B5D945D20" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) Subject: Fwd: Improving and Restructuring the Routing Area Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:43:46 +0100 References: To: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/uGxOdV6Dp8y_FeXkEYhtBNosbQ4 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:43:56 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_F502E2ED-8170-419F-98FB-046B5D945D20 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii please do read this.=09 Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: > From: Alia Atlas > Subject: Fwd: Improving and Restructuring the Routing Area > Date: 10 June 2014 21:14:10 BST > Resent-To: , , , = , , = , , = , , , = , , = , , = , , = , , , = , , , = , , = , , , = , , = , , = , , = , , , = , , , = , , , = > To: "rtg-chairs@ietf.org" >=20 > Could you please forward to your working groups for those not on = routing-discussion? >=20 > Thanks, > Alia >=20 > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Alia Atlas > Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:57 PM > Subject: Improving and Restructuring the Routing Area > To: routing-discussion@ietf.org >=20 >=20 > To all participants in the Routing Area, >=20 > Adrian and I are working on improving the quality, speed, and > experience of getting work done in the IETF Routing Area. There are > three initiatives that we are working: WG Draft QA, Routing Area > specific WG chair training, and reorganizing the working groups in the > area. >=20 > First, we intend to use our Routing Directorate more proactively by > introducing a Working Group Draft Quality Assurance (WG Draft QA) > process where the same selected routing directorate member will review > a draft during WG draft adoption and during WG last call. The process > will be documented on the Routing Area wiki > (http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki). This should allow > directorate reviews to report technical issues that can actually get > fixed early in the process (equivalent of bug reports) as opposed to > just noting the concerns in the drafts (equivalent of release notes). >=20 > Second, as was discussed during the recent IESG retreat, in addition > to the IETF-wide WG chair training, we intend to have a series of > training sessions for WG Chairs in the Routing Area addressing topics > such as judging consensus, project management, motivating volunteers, > using the datatracker (via a sandbox version that can be played > with safely), and sharing experiences between WG chairs. >=20 > Third, we intend to reorganize the working groups in the Routing area. > We feel that it is important to focus on areas where there is active > interest in standardization and to be open and able to accept new work > into the area. As you know, we have had several new working groups > (nvo3, i2rs, sfc, spring) created in the last few years and we need to > be open and able to handle more new work as it comes in. We would > also like to improve the signal-to-noise ratio experienced by > participants in the different working groups and improve the quantity > and quality of discussion and reviews. It is likely that not all WGs > in the Routing Area will be directly affected. >=20 > Here is the time-line for reorganizing the WGs. >=20 > NOW: public discussion on routing-discussion@ietf.org about how to > reorganize the working groups to best meet our motivations. > Additional focused discussions are expected on the > rtg-chairs@ietf.org and rtg-dir@ietf.org mailing lists. >=20 > In Toronto: There will be meetings with the WG chairs and the > Routing Directorate to get the ideas described and agreed upon. >=20 > At the Routing Area Meeting in Toronto: Discuss the set of > reorganized WGs and general charter content in the Routing Area > meeting. >=20 > September 2014: Based upon the feedback, suggestions, and > discussion, Adrian and I finalize the reorganized WG charters. We > start the internal IESG discussion and public reviews. >=20 > October 2014: Formal rechartering process completes. >=20 > In Honolulu: The new set of WGs meet. >=20 > After Honolulu: Adrian and I deal with any issues and charter > updates based upon a few months of experience. >=20 > Here are the motivations that Adrian and I would like to be considered > when coming up with ideas for how the WGs should be reorganized. >=20 > 1) Move towards organizing working groups on functional > responsibilities rather than scoping them to specific protocols. >=20 > 2) Split giant working groups so relevant work is done in one place > and there is an improved signal-to-noise ratio for participants who > are only interested in a slice of the current working group's work. >=20 > 3) Create synergies for scattered functionality (example ideas: > OAM, FRR, traffic-engineering) >=20 > 4) Create a DISPATCH working group for clear new idea discussion; > rtgwg serves some of this purpose but doesn't have a clear process > and isn't drawing in the new ideas. >=20 > 5) Focus Routing Area time on design centers rather than on far > corner cases. >=20 > 6) Each working group should have clear, well defined, and = achievable goals. >=20 > Noting that the Routing Area has inherited some of its WG structure > from the sub-IP area, it is not a goal to force IP routing and MPLS > routing to remain separated. >=20 > The goal of this reorganization is not closing working groups. Adrian > and Alia are perfectly capable of closing working groups without going > through restructuring. >=20 > For those of you that have read this far, thank you. Getting this 80% > right is going to take some serious discussion and thought. We all > work in the Routing Area together with different perspectives. Please > think carefully and help us have a highly focused discussion. >=20 > Thanks, > Alia and Adrian >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_F502E2ED-8170-419F-98FB-046B5D945D20 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii please = do read this. =

Begin forwarded message:

From: = Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Improving and Restructuring = the Routing Area
Date: = 10 June 2014 = 21:14:10 BST
Resent-To: <jhaas@pfrc.org>, <nobo@cisco.com>, <dbrungard@att.com>, <lberger@labn.net>, <hadi@mojatatu.com>, <damascene.joachimpilla= i@verizon.com>, <jhaas@pfrc.org>, <edc@google.com>, <shares@ndzh.com>, <jgs@juniper.net>, <chopps@rawdofmt.org>, <hannes@juniper.net>, <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>= ;, <giheron@cisco.com>, = <thomas.morin@orange.com>, = <martin.vigoureux@alcat= el-lucent.com>, <macker@itd.nrl.navy.mil>, = <sratliff@cisco.com>, = <swallow@cisco.com>, = <loa@pi.nu>, <rcallon@juniper.net>, <bensons@queuefull.net>, = <matthew.bocci@alcatel-luc= ent.com>, <akr@cisco.com>, <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>,= <jpv@cisco.com>, <julien.meuric@orange.com>,= <mmcbride7@gmail.com>, = <stig@venaas.com>, <matthew.bocci@alcatel-luc= ent.com>, <agmalis@gmail.com>, <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, = <mariainesrobles@gmail.com>= ;, <aretana@cisco.com>, = <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com&= gt;, <narten@us.ibm.com>, = <jguichar@cisco.com>, = <sandy@tislabs.com>, = <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, = <aretana@cisco.com>, = <jgs@juniper.net>, <akatlas@gmail.com>, <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
=

Could you please forward to your = working groups for those not on = routing-discussion?

Thanks,
Alia

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: = Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:57 PM
Subject: Improving and = Restructuring the Routing Area
To: routing-discussion@ietf.org


To all participants in the Routing = Area,

Adrian and I are working on improving the quality, = speed, and
experience of getting work done in the IETF Routing = Area.  There are
three initiatives that we are working: WG Draft QA, Routing = Area
specific WG chair training, and reorganizing the working = groups in the
area.

First, we intend = to use our Routing Directorate more proactively by
introducing a Working Group Draft Quality Assurance (WG Draft = QA)
process where the same selected routing directorate member = will review
a draft during WG draft adoption and during WG = last call.  The process
will be documented on the Routing Area wiki
directorate reviews to report = technical issues that can actually get
fixed early in the process (equivalent of bug reports) as opposed = to
just noting the concerns in the drafts (equivalent of = release notes).

Second, as was discussed during = the recent IESG retreat, in addition
to the IETF-wide WG chair training, we intend to have a series = of
training sessions for WG Chairs in the Routing Area = addressing topics
such as judging consensus, project = management, motivating volunteers,
using the datatracker (via a sandbox version that can be = played
with safely), and sharing experiences between WG = chairs.

Third, we intend to reorganize the = working groups in the Routing area.
We feel that it is important to focus on areas where there is = active
interest in standardization and to be open and able to = accept new work
into the area.  As you know, we have had = several new working groups
(nvo3, i2rs, sfc, spring) created in the last few years and we need = to
be open and able to handle more new work as it comes in. =  We would
also like to improve the signal-to-noise ratio = experienced by
participants in the different working groups and improve the = quantity
and quality of discussion and reviews.  It is = likely that not all WGs
in the Routing Area will be directly = affected.

Here is the time-line for reorganizing the = WGs.

   NOW: public discussion on routing-discussion@ietf.org about how to
   reorganize the working groups to best meet our = motivations.
   Additional focused discussions are expected on = the
   rtg-chairs@ietf.org and rtg-dir@ietf.org = mailing lists.

   In Toronto: There will be meetings with the WG = chairs and the
   Routing Directorate to get the = ideas described and agreed upon.

  =  At the Routing Area Meeting in Toronto: Discuss the set of
   reorganized WGs and general charter content in the = Routing Area
  =  meeting.

   September 2014: = Based upon the feedback, suggestions, and
  =  discussion, Adrian and I finalize the reorganized WG charters. =  We
   start the internal IESG discussion and public = reviews.

   October 2014: Formal = rechartering process completes.

   In = Honolulu: The new set of WGs meet.

   After Honolulu: Adrian and I deal with any = issues and charter
   updates based upon a few = months of experience.

Here are the motivations = that Adrian and I would like to be considered
when coming up with ideas for how the WGs should be = reorganized.

   1) Move towards = organizing working groups on functional
  =  responsibilities rather than scoping them to specific = protocols.

   2) Split giant working groups so = relevant work is done in one place
   and there is = an improved signal-to-noise ratio for participants who
  =  are only interested in a slice of the current working group's = work.

   3) Create synergies for scattered = functionality (example ideas:
   OAM, FRR, = traffic-engineering)

   4) Create a = DISPATCH working group for clear new idea discussion;
   rtgwg serves some of this purpose but doesn't have a = clear process
   and isn't drawing in the new = ideas.

   5) Focus Routing Area time = on design centers rather than on far
   corner cases.

   6) = Each working group should have clear, well defined, and achievable = goals.

Noting that the Routing Area has = inherited some of its WG structure
from the sub-IP area, it is not a goal to force IP routing and = MPLS
routing to remain separated.

The = goal of this reorganization is not closing working groups. =  Adrian
and Alia are perfectly capable of closing working = groups without going
through restructuring.

For those of you = that have read this far, thank you.  Getting this = 80%
right is going to take some serious discussion and = thought.  We all
work in the Routing Area together with = different perspectives.  Please
think carefully and help us have a highly focused = discussion.

Thanks,
Alia and = Adrian



= --Apple-Mail=_F502E2ED-8170-419F-98FB-046B5D945D20-- From nobody Tue Jun 10 13:53:12 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0721A02D3 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:52:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ttm2NFmQX8-w for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B7EA1A02D8 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id bs8so466215wib.13 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:52:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=W3V+R6O/3ivpQ5h2RRFOCTHWw9BvbbijukZZSD1ssOo=; b=AFe20jGuaHrr5Z273v65q1Mc/9XIEwLxdOkgO//f1QrxBImaeqbPmVN/a6KS4cxhc7 wwQaOikSvkzgic9X/7/s515k60zlZ9wHPNqp8BpNB27Ql/3BcJcRWDs89gMomCH4+5uJ tqpi4hJmvFSvZdNywlB4+OnhhZwciDRPKzQylcnqL8/TqSPxIIjC64XUY+83kapcNTnH eTooD/PcqNND5aQhe1+2Vrj4XISl5c/0OZlJOGjVZhv8aeLw0ynGXimtemFxkQCRJSRt QyFAXVVTCpbecqnF3WQ3EGnS9QMVsqWP93Sg3ONIlitz1cmVUikOcuj2fwUVJNVF7fbJ oB2Q== X-Received: by 10.14.4.199 with SMTP id 47mr4686032eej.9.1402433565668; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.61.205.17] (173-38-208-169.cisco.com. [173.38.208.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i2sm54496016eem.11.2014.06.10.13.52.44 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) Subject: Re: Improving and Restructuring the Routing Area From: Giles Heron In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:52:43 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <613B8EB4-1902-4786-B994-05CE0FE89D17@gmail.com> References: To: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/5vE_uwP8KYuLsTF4vk1jQPWREVk X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:52:49 -0000 please also note that discussion will happen on = routing-discussion@ietf.org. So if you want to participate then please = join that list. Giles On 10 Jun 2014, at 21:43, Giles Heron wrote: > please do read this.=09 >=20 > Begin forwarded message: >=20 >> Resent-From: >> From: Alia Atlas >> Subject: Fwd: Improving and Restructuring the Routing Area >> Date: 10 June 2014 21:14:10 BST >> Resent-To: , , , = , , = , , = , , , = , , = , , = , , = , , , = , , , = , , = , , , = , , = , , = , , = , , , = , , , = , , , = >> To: "rtg-chairs@ietf.org" >>=20 >> Could you please forward to your working groups for those not on = routing-discussion? >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Alia >>=20 >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Alia Atlas >> Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:57 PM >> Subject: Improving and Restructuring the Routing Area >> To: routing-discussion@ietf.org >>=20 >>=20 >> To all participants in the Routing Area, >>=20 >> Adrian and I are working on improving the quality, speed, and >> experience of getting work done in the IETF Routing Area. There are >> three initiatives that we are working: WG Draft QA, Routing Area >> specific WG chair training, and reorganizing the working groups in = the >> area. >>=20 >> First, we intend to use our Routing Directorate more proactively by >> introducing a Working Group Draft Quality Assurance (WG Draft QA) >> process where the same selected routing directorate member will = review >> a draft during WG draft adoption and during WG last call. The = process >> will be documented on the Routing Area wiki >> (http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki). This should allow >> directorate reviews to report technical issues that can actually get >> fixed early in the process (equivalent of bug reports) as opposed to >> just noting the concerns in the drafts (equivalent of release notes). >>=20 >> Second, as was discussed during the recent IESG retreat, in addition >> to the IETF-wide WG chair training, we intend to have a series of >> training sessions for WG Chairs in the Routing Area addressing topics >> such as judging consensus, project management, motivating volunteers, >> using the datatracker (via a sandbox version that can be played >> with safely), and sharing experiences between WG chairs. >>=20 >> Third, we intend to reorganize the working groups in the Routing = area. >> We feel that it is important to focus on areas where there is active >> interest in standardization and to be open and able to accept new = work >> into the area. As you know, we have had several new working groups >> (nvo3, i2rs, sfc, spring) created in the last few years and we need = to >> be open and able to handle more new work as it comes in. We would >> also like to improve the signal-to-noise ratio experienced by >> participants in the different working groups and improve the quantity >> and quality of discussion and reviews. It is likely that not all WGs >> in the Routing Area will be directly affected. >>=20 >> Here is the time-line for reorganizing the WGs. >>=20 >> NOW: public discussion on routing-discussion@ietf.org about how to >> reorganize the working groups to best meet our motivations. >> Additional focused discussions are expected on the >> rtg-chairs@ietf.org and rtg-dir@ietf.org mailing lists. >>=20 >> In Toronto: There will be meetings with the WG chairs and the >> Routing Directorate to get the ideas described and agreed upon. >>=20 >> At the Routing Area Meeting in Toronto: Discuss the set of >> reorganized WGs and general charter content in the Routing Area >> meeting. >>=20 >> September 2014: Based upon the feedback, suggestions, and >> discussion, Adrian and I finalize the reorganized WG charters. We >> start the internal IESG discussion and public reviews. >>=20 >> October 2014: Formal rechartering process completes. >>=20 >> In Honolulu: The new set of WGs meet. >>=20 >> After Honolulu: Adrian and I deal with any issues and charter >> updates based upon a few months of experience. >>=20 >> Here are the motivations that Adrian and I would like to be = considered >> when coming up with ideas for how the WGs should be reorganized. >>=20 >> 1) Move towards organizing working groups on functional >> responsibilities rather than scoping them to specific protocols. >>=20 >> 2) Split giant working groups so relevant work is done in one = place >> and there is an improved signal-to-noise ratio for participants = who >> are only interested in a slice of the current working group's = work. >>=20 >> 3) Create synergies for scattered functionality (example ideas: >> OAM, FRR, traffic-engineering) >>=20 >> 4) Create a DISPATCH working group for clear new idea discussion; >> rtgwg serves some of this purpose but doesn't have a clear process >> and isn't drawing in the new ideas. >>=20 >> 5) Focus Routing Area time on design centers rather than on far >> corner cases. >>=20 >> 6) Each working group should have clear, well defined, and = achievable goals. >>=20 >> Noting that the Routing Area has inherited some of its WG structure >> from the sub-IP area, it is not a goal to force IP routing and MPLS >> routing to remain separated. >>=20 >> The goal of this reorganization is not closing working groups. = Adrian >> and Alia are perfectly capable of closing working groups without = going >> through restructuring. >>=20 >> For those of you that have read this far, thank you. Getting this = 80% >> right is going to take some serious discussion and thought. We all >> work in the Routing Area together with different perspectives. = Please >> think carefully and help us have a highly focused discussion. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Alia and Adrian >>=20 >>=20 >=20 From nobody Tue Jun 10 19:23:59 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477C21A0442 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:23:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.852 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tbMGAELnE6CI for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7C381A032D for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BIH18799; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 02:23:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.36) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 03:23:52 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.41]) by SZXEMA404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:23:48 +0800 From: Jiangyuanlong To: Giles Heron , Himanshu Shah Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Topic: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Index: AQHPhRwsLJMteVLtZEadCTcjaic7mQ== Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 02:23:47 +0000 Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A74FE89@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.76.118] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/pWTjzDi2yf0zUMoYX4vKI0jG7mg Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 02:23:57 -0000 Support. This is a piece of good work which should be progressed in the WG. Regards, Yuanlong -----Original Message----- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:01:52 +0100 From: Giles Heron To: Himanshu Shah , l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: "msiva@cisco.com" Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Message-ID: <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dwindows-1252 Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and believe that we should poll the WG = for adoption. WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. The call w= ill close on Tuesday June 24th. Please comment as to the suitability of th= e draft for adoption, giving reasoning if possible. Giles On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu wrote: > WG ? > We posted the following draft while back. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 > =20 > Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the sam= e in PWE3 WG. > There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that MAC= withdraw work > should reside in L2VPN WG. > =20 > Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service provider a= s a co-author. > There is a good interest in this work especially from those service provi= ders who have > deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs. > =20 > Since there has been sufficient history to this document, the authors re= quest that this be > adopted as WG draft. > =20 > Thanks, > himanshu From nobody Tue Jun 10 20:49:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9461A034F for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:49:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.852 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JIMx7XgfdYSb for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF541A0338 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BFH16901; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 03:49:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.39) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:49:08 +0100 Received: from NKGEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.94]) by nkgeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:49:03 +0800 From: Mingui Zhang To: Giles Heron , Himanshu Shah , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Topic: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Index: Ac92n0AAmd85MLEDQeuOSZTGWgDMvgNydegAAC+6OxA= Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 03:49:02 +0000 Message-ID: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76A0B5181@nkgeml508-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.102.175] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/v2kxX8qqzsxnU9-zC2-BJcsovso Cc: "msiva@cisco.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 03:49:51 -0000 Support. Mingui >-----Original Message----- >From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles Heron >Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:02 PM >To: Himanshu Shah; l2vpn@ietf.org >Cc: msiva@cisco.com >Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 > >Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and believe that we should poll the WG= for >adoption. > >WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. The call = will >close on Tuesday June 24th. Please comment as to the suitability of the d= raft >for adoption, giving reasoning if possible. > >Giles > >On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu wrote: > >> WG - >> We posted the following draft while back. >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 >> >> Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the sa= me >in PWE3 WG. >> There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that MA= C >withdraw work >> should reside in L2VPN WG. >> >> Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service provider >as a co-author. >> There is a good interest in this work especially from those service prov= iders >who have >> deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs. >> >> Since there has been sufficient history to this document, the authors r= equest >that this be >> adopted as WG draft. >> >> Thanks, >> himanshu From nobody Wed Jun 11 02:29:50 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090D31A0338; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:22:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.401 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZZwoV6dM038; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 529CE1A02F4; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:22:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BIH26045; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:22:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.40) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 05:22:03 +0100 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.193]) by nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 12:22:00 +0800 From: Qin Wu To: "Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" , "time@ietf.org" Subject: RE: YANG models for OAM Thread-Topic: YANG models for OAM Thread-Index: Ac+E3qlMyPi638vnRGmjYh75Wx+edAATLCxA Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:21:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.180] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84549D17nkgeml501mbschi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/YPX6zPKsHpQQiwrVQDg1ngYqpFY X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 02:29:44 -0700 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "opsawg@ietf.org" , "nvo3@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" , "trill@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:22:11 -0000 --_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84549D17nkgeml501mbschi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGksIFRpc3NhOg0KVGhhbmtzIGZvciBpbml0aWF0aW5nIGRpc2N1c3Npb24gb24gdGhpcyB0b3Bp Yy4NClVuaWZpZWQgT0FNIGZvciBtdWx0aS1MYXllciBuZXR3b3JrIGlzIGEgZ29vZCBpZGVhIHRv IG1lLg0KZHJhZnQtd3ctb3BzYXdnLW11bHRpLWxheWVyLW9hbS0wMCB3ZSBwcm9wb3NlZCBpbiBv cHNhd2cgbGFpZCBvdXQgdGhlIGFuIGluaXRpYWwgZGVzY3JpcHRpb24gb2YgdGhlIHByb2JsZW0u DQpUaGUgcXVlc3Rpb24gdG8gZHJhZnQtdGlzc2EtbmV0bW9kLW9hbSBpcw0KSSBhbSB3b25kZXJp bmcgaG93IHRoaXMgZ2VuZXJpYyBZYW5nIE1vZGVsIGNhbiBiZSBhcHBsaWVkIHRvIFNGQyBlbnZp cm9ubWVudD8NCkhvdyBkbyB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCB0aGUgY2FzZSB3aGVyZSB0d28gZW5kcG9pbnRz IHN1cHBvcnQgZGlmZmVyZW50IGxheWVyIE9BTSBvciBkb2VzbqGvdCBzdXBwb3J0IGFueSBPQU0g YXQgdGhhdCBsYXllci4NCg0KQlRXOiBJIGhhdmUgY2Ohr2VkIHRpbWUgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0IHNp bmNlIEkgYmVsaWV2ZSB0aGlzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdCBpcyBwdXJwb3NlZCB0byBsb29rIGZvciBn ZW5lcmljIGFuZCBpbnRlZ3JhdGVkIE9BTSBjb3ZlcmluZyB2YXJpb3VzIGhldGVyb2dlbmVvdXMg bmV0d29ya2luZyB0ZWNobm9sb2dpZXMuDQpSZWdhcmRzIQ0KLVFpbg0Kt6K8/sjLOiBuZXRtb2Qg W21haWx0bzpuZXRtb2QtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gtPqx7SBUaXNzYSBTZW5ldmlyYXRobmUg KHRzZW5ldmlyKQ0Kt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTTE6jbUwjExyNUgMzowMw0KytW8/sjLOiBuZXRtb2RA aWV0Zi5vcmc7IG52bzNAaWV0Zi5vcmc7IHRyaWxsQGlldGYub3JnOyBsMnZwbkBpZXRmLm9yZzsg b3BzYXdnQGlldGYub3JnDQrW98ziOiBbbmV0bW9kXSBZQU5HIG1vZGVscyBmb3IgT0FNDQoNCkFs bA0KDQpXZSBoYXZlIHB1Ymxpc2hlZCBZQU5HIG1vZGVsIGZvciBPQU0uICMxIGRyYWZ0IGJlbG93 IHBsYWNlIHRoZSBnZW5lcmljIGZyYW1ld29yayBmb3IgT0FNLCB0aGF0IGNhbiBiZSBhdWdtZW50 ZWQgZm9yIGRpZmZlcmVudCB0ZWNobm9sb2dpZXMuICMyIGFuZCAjMyBhcmUgYXBwbGljYXRpb24g b2YgdGhlIGNvbmNlcHQgdG8gTlZPMyBhbmQgVFJJTEwsDQoNCg0KMS4gICAgICAgaHR0cDovL2Rh dGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC10aXNzYS1uZXRtb2Qtb2FtLw0KDQoyLiAgICAg ICBodHRwOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LXRpc3NhLW52bzMteWFuZy1v YW0vDQoNCjMuICAgICAgIGh0dHA6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtdGlz c2EtdHJpbGwteWFuZy1vYW0vDQoNClBsZWFzZSByZXZpZXcgYW5kIHNoYXJlIHlvdXIgY29tbWVu dHMNCg0KVGhhbmtzDQpUaXNzYQ0KDQoNCg== --_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84549D17nkgeml501mbschi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, Tissa:

Thanks for initiating discussion on this topic.=

Unified OAM for multi-Layer network is a good idea to me.

draft-ww-opsawg-multi-layer-oam-00 we proposed in opsawg laid out= the an initial description of the problem.

The question to draft-= tissa-netmod-oam is

I am wondering how this generic Yang Model can be applied to SFC = environment?

How do you support the case where two endpoints support different= layer OAM or doesn=A1=AFt support any OAM at that layer.=

 

BTW: I have cc=A1=AFed time mailing list since I believe this mai= ling list is purposed to look for generic and integrated OAM covering vario= us heterogeneous networking technologies.

Regards!

-Qin

=B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: netmod = [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] =B4=FA= =B1=ED Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)
=B7=A2= =CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2014=C4=EA6=D4=C211=C8=D5 3:03
=CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: netmod@ietf.org; nvo3@ietf.org; trill@ietf.org; l2vpn@ietf.org; ops= awg@ietf.org
=D6=F7=CC=E2: [netmod] YANG models for OAM

 

All

 

We have published YANG model fo= r OAM. #1 draft below place the generic framework for OAM, that can be augm= ented for different technologies. #2 and #3 are application of the concept = to NVO3 and TRILL,

 

1. &nbs= p;     http://datatracker.ietf.org/do= c/draft-tissa-netmod-oam/

2. &nbs= p;     http://datatracker.ietf.org= /doc/draft-tissa-nvo3-yang-oam/

3. &nbs= p;     http://datatracker.ietf.or= g/doc/draft-tissa-trill-yang-oam/

 

Please review and share your co= mments

 

Thanks

Tissa

 

 

--_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84549D17nkgeml501mbschi_-- From nobody Wed Jun 11 06:51:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117E11A00E5; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:51:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.552 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sH8aCc80jtJa; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE6E1A00DA; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.181.109.54] (mobile-166-137-176-061.mycingular.net [166.137.176.61]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F2727DD383; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:51:11 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-04F7ECFE-B2CD-4026-AE82-EEE68295C12A Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [netmod] YANG models for OAM From: Thomas Nadeau X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D201) In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:51:09 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: "Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/lR6FUjbUmjU0xeF8KMyTiuqB_pU Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "opsawg@ietf.org" , "nvo3@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" , "trill@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:51:14 -0000 --Apple-Mail-04F7ECFE-B2CD-4026-AE82-EEE68295C12A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Are these models based on any implementation/s or proof-of-concept code that= anyone can look at? Tom=20 > On Jun 10, 2014, at 12:03 PM, "Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" wrote: >=20 > All > =20 > We have published YANG model for OAM. #1 draft below place the generic fra= mework for OAM, that can be augmented for different technologies. #2 and #3 a= re application of the concept to NVO3 and TRILL, > =20 > 1. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-netmod-oam/ > 2. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-nvo3-yang-oam/ > 3. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-trill-yang-oam/ > =20 > Please review and share your comments > =20 > Thanks > Tissa > =20 > =20 > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod --Apple-Mail-04F7ECFE-B2CD-4026-AE82-EEE68295C12A Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Are these models based on any implementation/s or proof-of-concept code that anyone can look at?

Tom 


On Jun 10, 2014, at 12:03 PM, "Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" <tsenevir@cisco.com> wrote:

All

 

We have published YANG model for OAM. #1 draft below place the generic framework for OAM, that can be augmented for different technologies. #2 and #3 are application of the concept to NVO3 and TRILL,

 

1.      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-netmod-oam/

2.      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-nvo3-yang-oam/

3.      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-trill-yang-oam/

 

Please review and share your comments

 

Thanks

Tissa

 

 

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
--Apple-Mail-04F7ECFE-B2CD-4026-AE82-EEE68295C12A-- From nobody Wed Jun 11 09:06:05 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8821B27B7; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:05:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.151 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8K3NOpXgz7qW; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC6801A063B; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:05:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12000; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1402502755; x=1403712355; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=FH4eyIvWt92FvLwHbHVoyxp5+N77vMFBZKMyjMQOr60=; b=FvcB9/v3lfiu8yQdigH2ck3Cvb8dlXdAt/hSpFHJt3s3JJMpTC5ERzoj pzY6/aLQsddmDwI6PFps1ECZ6q7BZs21ZVMtJo4oLIoSGO6upAMjNo8yk 9iNG1FU/v9EsqtYlP8ntENvbHTap8wJF9CakVFBp/9UQsXXX4gxZv8h71 E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnYJAId9mFOtJA2I/2dsb2JhbABagkZHUlmCbKd1AQEBAQEBBQGDCI0FgVIBhmpRARltFnWEAwEBAQQBAQEgCkELEAIBCA4DBAEBCx0DAgICJQsUCQgBAQQOBQiIOg2wMJ88F4VciEwtBAYBgnU2gRYEm3CSCYM8gi8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.01,458,1400025600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="52212609" Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2014 16:05:54 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5BG5sg7002159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:05:54 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.8.200]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:05:54 -0500 From: "Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" To: Thomas Nadeau Subject: RE: [netmod] YANG models for OAM Thread-Topic: [netmod] YANG models for OAM Thread-Index: Ac+E3qlMyPi638vnRGmjYh75Wx+edAAx3I+AAAXWFYA= Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:05:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.155.1.132] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FBEA3E19AA24F847BA3AE74E2FE193562EE925ABxmbrcdx08ciscoc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/ycndFi2OLYhu0Sn_IZiG1ATQdLI Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "opsawg@ietf.org" , "nvo3@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" , "trill@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:05:57 -0000 --_000_FBEA3E19AA24F847BA3AE74E2FE193562EE925ABxmbrcdx08ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 QWxsIG9mIFRoZSBZQU5HIGNvZGUgaXMgaW5jbHVkZWQgaW4gZHJhZnRzLiBPciBhcmUgeW91IHJl ZmVycmluZyB0byBiYWNrZW5kIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9ucyBvciBYTUwgZW5jb2RpbmcgPw0KDQpG cm9tOiBUaG9tYXMgTmFkZWF1IFttYWlsdG86dG5hZGVhdUBsdWNpZHZpc2lvbi5jb21dDQpTZW50 OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIEp1bmUgMTEsIDIwMTQgNjo1MSBBTQ0KVG86IFRpc3NhIFNlbmV2aXJhdGhu ZSAodHNlbmV2aXIpDQpDYzogbmV0bW9kQGlldGYub3JnOyBudm8zQGlldGYub3JnOyB0cmlsbEBp ZXRmLm9yZzsgbDJ2cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmc7IG9wc2F3Z0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFtu ZXRtb2RdIFlBTkcgbW9kZWxzIGZvciBPQU0NCg0KQXJlIHRoZXNlIG1vZGVscyBiYXNlZCBvbiBh bnkgaW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb24vcyBvciBwcm9vZi1vZi1jb25jZXB0IGNvZGUgdGhhdCBhbnlvbmUg Y2FuIGxvb2sgYXQ/DQoNClRvbQ0KDQoNCk9uIEp1biAxMCwgMjAxNCwgYXQgMTI6MDMgUE0sICJU aXNzYSBTZW5ldmlyYXRobmUgKHRzZW5ldmlyKSIgPHRzZW5ldmlyQGNpc2NvLmNvbTxtYWlsdG86 dHNlbmV2aXJAY2lzY28uY29tPj4gd3JvdGU6DQpBbGwNCg0KV2UgaGF2ZSBwdWJsaXNoZWQgWUFO RyBtb2RlbCBmb3IgT0FNLiAjMSBkcmFmdCBiZWxvdyBwbGFjZSB0aGUgZ2VuZXJpYyBmcmFtZXdv cmsgZm9yIE9BTSwgdGhhdCBjYW4gYmUgYXVnbWVudGVkIGZvciBkaWZmZXJlbnQgdGVjaG5vbG9n aWVzLiAjMiBhbmQgIzMgYXJlIGFwcGxpY2F0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBjb25jZXB0IHRvIE5WTzMgYW5k IFRSSUxMLA0KDQoNCjEuICAgICAgaHR0cDovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFm dC10aXNzYS1uZXRtb2Qtb2FtLw0KDQoyLiAgICAgIGh0dHA6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9y Zy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtdGlzc2EtbnZvMy15YW5nLW9hbS8NCg0KMy4gICAgICBodHRwOi8vZGF0YXRy YWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LXRpc3NhLXRyaWxsLXlhbmctb2FtLw0KDQpQbGVhc2Ug cmV2aWV3IGFuZCBzaGFyZSB5b3VyIGNvbW1lbnRzDQoNClRoYW5rcw0KVGlzc2ENCg0KDQpfX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KbmV0bW9kIG1haWxp bmcgbGlzdA0KbmV0bW9kQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzpuZXRtb2RAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQpodHRwczov L3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL25ldG1vZA0K --_000_FBEA3E19AA24F847BA3AE74E2FE193562EE925ABxmbrcdx08ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTQgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 Q2FsaWJyaTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDE1IDUgMiAyIDIgNCAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJ e2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlRhaG9tYTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgNCAzIDUgNCA0IDIgNDt9DQov KiBTdHlsZSBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLw0KcC5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGxpLk1zb05vcm1hbCwgZGl2Lk1z b05vcm1hbA0KCXttYXJnaW46MGluOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNp emU6MTEuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIiwic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI7fQ0KYTpsaW5r LCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGluaw0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6Ymx1 ZTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJsaW5lO30NCmE6dmlzaXRlZCwgc3Bhbi5Nc29IeXBl cmxpbmtGb2xsb3dlZA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6cHVycGxlOw0K CXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0KcC5Nc29MaXN0UGFyYWdyYXBoLCBsaS5Nc29M aXN0UGFyYWdyYXBoLCBkaXYuTXNvTGlzdFBhcmFncmFwaA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6 MzQ7DQoJbWFyZ2luLXRvcDowaW47DQoJbWFyZ2luLXJpZ2h0OjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9t OjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW4tbGVmdDouNWluOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250 LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIiwic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI7fQ0Kc3Bh bi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMTgNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVyc29uYWw7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 IkNhbGlicmkiLCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjp3aW5kb3d0ZXh0O30NCnNwYW4uRW1haWxT dHlsZTE5DQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS10eXBlOnBlcnNvbmFsLXJlcGx5Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJD YWxpYnJpIiwic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI7DQoJY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RDt9DQouTXNvQ2hwRGVmYXVsdA0K CXttc28tc3R5bGUtdHlwZTpleHBvcnQtb25seTsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O30NCkBwYWdl IFdvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtzaXplOjguNWluIDExLjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW46MS4waW4gMS4waW4g MS4waW4gMS4waW47fQ0KZGl2LldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtwYWdlOldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMTt9DQov KiBMaXN0IERlZmluaXRpb25zICovDQpAbGlzdCBsMA0KCXttc28tbGlzdC1pZDo3MDA5MzMwMDM7 DQoJbXNvLWxpc3QtdHlwZTpoeWJyaWQ7DQoJbXNvLWxpc3QtdGVtcGxhdGUtaWRzOi04ODQ1MTMx NCA2NzY5ODcwMyA2NzY5ODcxMyA2NzY5ODcxNSA2NzY5ODcwMyA2NzY5ODcxMyA2NzY5ODcxNSA2 NzY5ODcwMyA2NzY5ODcxMyA2NzY5ODcxNTt9DQpAbGlzdCBsMDpsZXZlbDENCgl7bXNvLWxldmVs LXRhYi1zdG9wOm5vbmU7DQoJbXNvLWxldmVsLW51bWJlci1wb3NpdGlvbjpsZWZ0Ow0KCXRleHQt aW5kZW50Oi0uMjVpbjt9DQpAbGlzdCBsMDpsZXZlbDINCgl7bXNvLWxldmVsLW51bWJlci1mb3Jt YXQ6YWxwaGEtbG93ZXI7DQoJbXNvLWxldmVsLXRhYi1zdG9wOm5vbmU7DQoJbXNvLWxldmVsLW51 bWJlci1wb3NpdGlvbjpsZWZ0Ow0KCXRleHQtaW5kZW50Oi0uMjVpbjt9DQpAbGlzdCBsMDpsZXZl bDMNCgl7bXNvLWxldmVsLW51bWJlci1mb3JtYXQ6cm9tYW4tbG93ZXI7DQoJbXNvLWxldmVsLXRh Yi1zdG9wOm5vbmU7DQoJbXNvLWxldmVsLW51bWJlci1wb3NpdGlvbjpyaWdodDsNCgl0ZXh0LWlu ZGVudDotOS4wcHQ7fQ0KQGxpc3QgbDA6bGV2ZWw0DQoJe21zby1sZXZlbC10YWItc3RvcDpub25l Ow0KCW1zby1sZXZlbC1udW1iZXItcG9zaXRpb246bGVmdDsNCgl0ZXh0LWluZGVudDotLjI1aW47 fQ0KQGxpc3QgbDA6bGV2ZWw1DQoJe21zby1sZXZlbC1udW1iZXItZm9ybWF0OmFscGhhLWxvd2Vy Ow0KCW1zby1sZXZlbC10YWItc3RvcDpub25lOw0KCW1zby1sZXZlbC1udW1iZXItcG9zaXRpb246 bGVmdDsNCgl0ZXh0LWluZGVudDotLjI1aW47fQ0KQGxpc3QgbDA6bGV2ZWw2DQoJe21zby1sZXZl bC1udW1iZXItZm9ybWF0OnJvbWFuLWxvd2VyOw0KCW1zby1sZXZlbC10YWItc3RvcDpub25lOw0K CW1zby1sZXZlbC1udW1iZXItcG9zaXRpb246cmlnaHQ7DQoJdGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6LTkuMHB0O30N CkBsaXN0IGwwOmxldmVsNw0KCXttc28tbGV2ZWwtdGFiLXN0b3A6bm9uZTsNCgltc28tbGV2ZWwt bnVtYmVyLXBvc2l0aW9uOmxlZnQ7DQoJdGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6LS4yNWluO30NCkBsaXN0IGwwOmxl dmVsOA0KCXttc28tbGV2ZWwtbnVtYmVyLWZvcm1hdDphbHBoYS1sb3dlcjsNCgltc28tbGV2ZWwt dGFiLXN0b3A6bm9uZTsNCgltc28tbGV2ZWwtbnVtYmVyLXBvc2l0aW9uOmxlZnQ7DQoJdGV4dC1p bmRlbnQ6LS4yNWluO30NCkBsaXN0IGwwOmxldmVsOQ0KCXttc28tbGV2ZWwtbnVtYmVyLWZvcm1h dDpyb21hbi1sb3dlcjsNCgltc28tbGV2ZWwtdGFiLXN0b3A6bm9uZTsNCgltc28tbGV2ZWwtbnVt YmVyLXBvc2l0aW9uOnJpZ2h0Ow0KCXRleHQtaW5kZW50Oi05LjBwdDt9DQpvbA0KCXttYXJnaW4t Ym90dG9tOjBpbjt9DQp1bA0KCXttYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBpbjt9DQotLT48L3N0eWxlPjwhLS1b aWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVkZWZhdWx0cyB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCIgc3BpZG1h eD0iMTAyNiIgLz4NCjwveG1sPjwhW2VuZGlmXS0tPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0K PG86c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiPg0KPG86aWRtYXAgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiIGRhdGE9 IjEiIC8+DQo8L286c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQ+PC94bWw+PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+DQo8L2hlYWQ+DQo8Ym9k eSBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyIgbGluaz0iYmx1ZSIgdmxpbms9InB1cnBsZSI+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJX b3JkU2VjdGlvbjEiPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMx RjQ5N0QiPkFsbCBvZiBUaGUgWUFORyBjb2RlIGlzIGluY2x1ZGVkIGluIGRyYWZ0cy4gT3IgYXJl IHlvdSByZWZlcnJpbmcgdG8gYmFja2VuZCBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbnMgb3IgWE1MIGVuY29kaW5n ID88bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHls ZT0iY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxk aXYgc3R5bGU9ImJvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRlci10b3A6c29saWQgI0I1QzRERiAxLjBwdDtwYWRk aW5nOjMuMHB0IDBpbiAwaW4gMGluIj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxiPjxzcGFuIHN0 eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1RhaG9tYSZxdW90OywmcXVv dDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7Ij5Gcm9tOjwvc3Bhbj48L2I+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6 ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7VGFob21hJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYm cXVvdDsiPiBUaG9tYXMgTmFkZWF1IFttYWlsdG86dG5hZGVhdUBsdWNpZHZpc2lvbi5jb21dDQo8 YnI+DQo8Yj5TZW50OjwvYj4gV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBKdW5lIDExLCAyMDE0IDY6NTEgQU08YnI+DQo8 Yj5Ubzo8L2I+IFRpc3NhIFNlbmV2aXJhdGhuZSAodHNlbmV2aXIpPGJyPg0KPGI+Q2M6PC9iPiBu ZXRtb2RAaWV0Zi5vcmc7IG52bzNAaWV0Zi5vcmc7IHRyaWxsQGlldGYub3JnOyBsMnZwbkBpZXRm Lm9yZzsgb3BzYXdnQGlldGYub3JnPGJyPg0KPGI+U3ViamVjdDo8L2I+IFJlOiBbbmV0bW9kXSBZ QU5HIG1vZGVscyBmb3IgT0FNPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4N CjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNs YXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPkFyZSB0aGVzZSBtb2RlbHMgYmFzZWQgb24gYW55IGltcGxlbWVudGF0 aW9uL3Mgb3IgcHJvb2Ytb2YtY29uY2VwdCBjb2RlIHRoYXQgYW55b25lIGNhbiBsb29rIGF0Pzxv OnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4m bmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5Ub20m bmJzcDs8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwi PjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCIgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTIuMHB0Ij48YnI+DQpPbiBKdW4gMTAsIDIwMTQsIGF0 IDEyOjAzIFBNLCAmcXVvdDtUaXNzYSBTZW5ldmlyYXRobmUgKHRzZW5ldmlyKSZxdW90OyAmbHQ7 PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOnRzZW5ldmlyQGNpc2NvLmNvbSI+dHNlbmV2aXJAY2lzY28uY29tPC9h PiZndDsgd3JvdGU6PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxibG9ja3F1b3RlIHN0eWxlPSJt YXJnaW4tdG9wOjUuMHB0O21hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206NS4wcHQiPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJN c29Ob3JtYWwiPkFsbDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+Jm5ic3A7 PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5XZSBoYXZlIHB1Ymxpc2hlZCBZ QU5HIG1vZGVsIGZvciBPQU0uICMxIGRyYWZ0IGJlbG93IHBsYWNlIHRoZSBnZW5lcmljIGZyYW1l d29yayBmb3IgT0FNLCB0aGF0IGNhbiBiZSBhdWdtZW50ZWQgZm9yIGRpZmZlcmVudCB0ZWNobm9s b2dpZXMuICMyIGFuZCAjMyBhcmUgYXBwbGljYXRpb24gb2YgdGhlIGNvbmNlcHQgdG8gTlZPMyBh bmQgVFJJTEwsPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj4mbmJzcDs8bzpw PjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29MaXN0UGFyYWdyYXBoIiBzdHlsZT0idGV4dC1pbmRl bnQ6LS4yNWluO21zby1saXN0OmwwIGxldmVsMSBsZm8yIj48IVtpZiAhc3VwcG9ydExpc3RzXT48 c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0ibXNvLWxpc3Q6SWdub3JlIj4xLjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250OjcuMHB0ICZx dW90O1RpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiZxdW90OyI+Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7 DQo8L3NwYW4+PC9zcGFuPjwhW2VuZGlmXT48YSBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0 Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LXRpc3NhLW5ldG1vZC1vYW0vIj5odHRwOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0 Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LXRpc3NhLW5ldG1vZC1vYW0vPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAg Y2xhc3M9Ik1zb0xpc3RQYXJhZ3JhcGgiIHN0eWxlPSJ0ZXh0LWluZGVudDotLjI1aW47bXNvLWxp c3Q6bDAgbGV2ZWwxIGxmbzIiPjwhW2lmICFzdXBwb3J0TGlzdHNdPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJtc28t bGlzdDpJZ25vcmUiPjIuPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQ6Ny4wcHQgJnF1b3Q7VGltZXMgTmV3IFJv bWFuJnF1b3Q7Ij4mbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsNCjwvc3Bhbj48L3NwYW4+ PCFbZW5kaWZdPjxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQt dGlzc2EtbnZvMy15YW5nLW9hbS8iPmh0dHA6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJh ZnQtdGlzc2EtbnZvMy15YW5nLW9hbS88L2E+PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNv TGlzdFBhcmFncmFwaCIgc3R5bGU9InRleHQtaW5kZW50Oi0uMjVpbjttc28tbGlzdDpsMCBsZXZl bDEgbGZvMiI+PCFbaWYgIXN1cHBvcnRMaXN0c10+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9Im1zby1saXN0Oklnbm9y ZSI+My48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udDo3LjBwdCAmcXVvdDtUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4mcXVvdDsi PiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOw0KPC9zcGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48IVtlbmRpZl0+ PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC10aXNzYS10cmls bC15YW5nLW9hbS8iPmh0dHA6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtdGlzc2Et dHJpbGwteWFuZy1vYW0vPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+ Jm5ic3A7PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5QbGVhc2UgcmV2aWV3 IGFuZCBzaGFyZSB5b3VyIGNvbW1lbnRzPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9y bWFsIj4mbmJzcDs8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPlRoYW5rczxv OnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+VGlzc2E8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4N CjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPiZuYnNwOzxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1z b05vcm1hbCI+Jm5ic3A7PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYmxvY2txdW90ZT4NCjxi bG9ja3F1b3RlIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tdG9wOjUuMHB0O21hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206NS4wcHQiPg0K PGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0 O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1RpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzZXJpZiZxdW90 OyI+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX188YnI+DQpu ZXRtb2QgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0PGJyPg0KPGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOm5ldG1vZEBpZXRmLm9yZyI+ bmV0bW9kQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPjxicj4NCjxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21h aWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vbmV0bW9kIj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3Rp bmZvL25ldG1vZDwvYT48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYmxvY2txdW90 ZT4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9ib2R5Pg0KPC9odG1sPg0K --_000_FBEA3E19AA24F847BA3AE74E2FE193562EE925ABxmbrcdx08ciscoc_-- From nobody Wed Jun 11 10:27:49 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373801A0213 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:27:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rrvn_JWeyzjP for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qc0-x231.google.com (mail-qc0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8716B1A0207 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id i17so97099qcy.22 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:27:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yUcnSjuFA4ml0X78sAq803CHUV1SwyWrIxc3Q0vndEE=; b=s6lQtlL6qUPArnBF/1S1mhfQpQERWu9H1mBFTDhomUYhuxSCpV575uqDA6/RYo7SG+ fhvEcbH3P+ptytggM1i87ylEave3ZbbfERW91Gv6QarEvgYqKXgaKmZKp5xLgF1ElW0j WxEKzC0oFkdOhnQQQtxjJMseEW+b/4vaJJJCWSKoCXq40Dusj0D3PkkSNaJFHBJNkL5M xNKMQi+0AEGuk63cdoWYDdMZcY0DwDLjr6OHSd/Ka7SvWmbzSLfwcxezcBaYM0XEP46U X8yMtj2vQJz61c7bBmi2JdSlrPvp+a7QySaheyJ6POBB7HDL1IPILJWVPShS/1nr6pmo Yn+A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.97.71 with SMTP id k7mr6883027qcn.4.1402507665728; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.70.106 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:27:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76A0B5181@nkgeml508-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76A0B5181@nkgeml508-mbx.china.huawei.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:27:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 From: Sam Aldrin To: Mingui Zhang Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133738635ea2f04fb92c38d Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/_99QXxRDFIxjYIrrYXHVvI8xX7o Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "msiva@cisco.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:27:48 -0000 --001a1133738635ea2f04fb92c38d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Support this. We need this MAC withdrawal notification in statically provisioned PW's. -sam On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Mingui Zhang wrote: > Support. > > Mingui > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles Heron > >Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:02 PM > >To: Himanshu Shah; l2vpn@ietf.org > >Cc: msiva@cisco.com > >Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 > > > >Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and believe that we should poll the > WG for > >adoption. > > > >WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. The call > will > >close on Tuesday June 24th. Please comment as to the suitability of the > draft > >for adoption, giving reasoning if possible. > > > >Giles > > > >On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu wrote: > > > >> WG - > >> We posted the following draft while back. > >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 > >> > >> Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the > same > >in PWE3 WG. > >> There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that > MAC > >withdraw work > >> should reside in L2VPN WG. > >> > >> Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service provider > >as a co-author. > >> There is a good interest in this work especially from those service > providers > >who have > >> deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs. > >> > >> Since there has been sufficient history to this document, the authors > request > >that this be > >> adopted as WG draft. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> himanshu > > --001a1133738635ea2f04fb92c38d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Support this. We need this MAC withdrawal notification in = statically provisioned PW's.=C2=A0

-sam
<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">

On Tue, Jun 10= , 2014 at 8:49 PM, Mingui Zhang <zhangmingui@huawei.com> wrote:
Support.

Mingui

>-----Original Message-----
>From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bou= nces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles Heron
>Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:02 PM
>To: Himanshu Shah; l2vpn@ietf.org=
>Cc: m= siva@cisco.com
>Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03
>
>Agreed - Nabil and I have= discussed and believe that we should poll the WG for
>adoption.
>
>WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. =C2=A0T= he call will
>close on Tuesday June 24th. =C2=A0Please comment as to the suitability = of the draft
>for adoption, giving reasoning if possible.
>
>Giles
>
>On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu <hshah@ciena.com> wrote:
>
>> WG -
>> We posted the following draft while back.
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn= -mpls-tp-mac-wd-03
>>
>> Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued = the same
>in PWE3 WG.
>> There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt t= hat MAC
>withdraw work
>> should reside in L2VPN WG.
>>
>> Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service pro= vider
>as a co-author.
>> There is a good interest in this work especially from those servic= e providers
>who have
>> deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs.
>>
>> Since there has been sufficient history to this document, =C2=A0th= e authors request
>that this be
>> adopted as WG draft.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> himanshu


--001a1133738635ea2f04fb92c38d-- From nobody Thu Jun 12 10:43:41 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E58D1A01C0 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:43:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FxZJCjQp90g2 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA331A01AB for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id u56so1686093wes.35 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:43:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rRFILmv9yRR+EnhHbvsoSW/4C1QZMgqp45KI/XuICAg=; b=ax+70rqA6dRpKhtbVvGVXEJmIEYsfXdOwusWdYyoZwH7hjRCfuOKXqLRzd5Kb0D1iR NCI/wyIa/SPyIbt3u/RgmcNBh/ie8vFHJScPM3JzUscJoCOnTwhJjtJdNeZ/lo7hT81l roCqOhQlZqXRuSXwQHFJKmSxBxYYydhf8vllkKl5U77p0lK2hTQebfqSysAppE7nHxeW TeMvcx+ErtT/5MNTJ9xMy/s8nFUpOC6MVO+KAlCXE3IBOuExxm8Sd8w/2wtjko5MBQQK atO/npv4rAcqFUMTLgbmeKtnvPNZp2ms/m6GCsFvwx2CohBxpGxa+JKCOCBNBzLcbRHo 8NuQ== X-Received: by 10.194.90.77 with SMTP id bu13mr6727217wjb.92.1402595016956; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.61.204.5] (173-38-208-169.cisco.com. [173.38.208.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm6030388eew.38.2014.06.12.10.43.34 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) Subject: Re: IPR call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 From: Giles Heron In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:43:34 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/ZCQxjNCpKeLEYU44Fy2YmM0t77w X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:43:40 -0000 The IPR call has now completed, and the draft will now move to the IESG. thanks. Giles On 29 May 2014, at 13:51, Giles Heron wrote: > Hi, >=20 > this email initiates an IPR call for: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-07 >=20 > would all authors please respond to this email indicating whether = there is any IPR they are aware of which has not already been disclosed = to the IETF. >=20 > Likewise if anyone else is aware of any IPR that has not already been = disclosed to the IETF would you please respond to this email. >=20 > And would everyone please take a look at the IPR that has already been = disclosed - especially in view of the fact that one of those disclosures = only happened this month: >=20 > = https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=3Ddocument_search&id=3Ddra= ft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn >=20 > Please respond to the list if you have any concerns about the impact = of any of this IPR on the suitability of this draft for adoption as a = standards-track RFC. >=20 > this IPR call closes on Thursday 10th June 2014. >=20 > Giles From nobody Thu Jun 12 11:37:07 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971581B2AF4 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:37:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.852 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U4EZd6DMNrP3 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26FA01B2AEC for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BFI90801; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:37:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from DFWEML706-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.225) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:36:35 +0100 Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.64]) by dfweml706-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.4]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:36:27 -0700 From: Lucy yong To: Giles Heron , Himanshu Shah , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Topic: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Index: AQHPhKw36ZO0DtaFI0mEWVM1uD5Oe5tt0NdQ Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:36:27 +0000 Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D4538C6DE@dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com> References: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.128.179] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/Ndvg_HVYlv_QcQMSyaiuU4CtgTU Cc: "msiva@cisco.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:37:04 -0000 Support! Lucy -----Original Message----- From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles Heron Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 8:02 AM To: Himanshu Shah; l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: msiva@cisco.com Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and believe that we should poll the WG = for adoption. WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. The call w= ill close on Tuesday June 24th. Please comment as to the suitability of th= e draft for adoption, giving reasoning if possible. Giles On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu wrote: > WG - > We posted the following draft while back. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 > =20 > Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the sam= e in PWE3 WG. > There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that=20 > MAC withdraw work should reside in L2VPN WG. > =20 > Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service provider a= s a co-author. > There is a good interest in this work especially from those service=20 > providers who have deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs. > =20 > Since there has been sufficient history to this document, the authors=20 > request that this be adopted as WG draft. > =20 > Thanks, > himanshu From nobody Sat Jun 14 11:07:35 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946131B27C6 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:07:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.152 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qrblCJwqpdDH for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8FBE1A05CB for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:07:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1256; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1402769251; x=1403978851; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=AjuL4Jy/q1Xc+159YKJTfHQ3AADLjnv8MD+iZUhvw4g=; b=SElasz/LmHuErEFYoWxuf55CMhHvZwpxngIt+E+U0LJkL1UaZHTfLQvC fTKqqyDWZeZ2pItVPnbjiB8PbEUTtYZs+r3qmQQP5KDeHyS7YNZx3yWOZ Mayen7NVHGKrrrTgZNeTvlwNYZugUh5OFJIECAUmKFSYAnavElAX/lnsF E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsGAFeOnFOtJA2I/2dsb2JhbABagw1SWqlaDAEBAQEBAQUBmSQBgQMWdYQDAQEBAwF5BQsCAQgYLjIlAQEEDgWIOggNz0oXhWOIYDMHgy2BFgSaQ4FDkhWDQIIw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,478,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="53105266" Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2014 18:07:30 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5EI7UOE003450 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:07:30 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.9]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 13:07:29 -0500 From: "Sami Boutros (sboutros)" To: Giles Heron Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Topic: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 Thread-Index: Ac92n0AAmd85MLEDQeuOSZTGWgDMvgONs6YAANPWsQA= Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:07:29 +0000 Message-ID: <78BEFCBB-0B66-4993-AEE6-238CE71C021D@cisco.com> References: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.82.223.190] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <371B43C8E245BE47BBCD60AC005B5582@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/5WdD9RR7wjk75MVxZeybJgFnc3k Cc: "" , "Siva Sivabalan \(msiva\)" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:07:32 -0000 Support as a co-author, Sami On Jun 10, 2014, at 6:01 AM, Giles Heron wrote: > Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and believe that we should poll the W= G for adoption. >=20 > WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. The call= will close on Tuesday June 24th. Please comment as to the suitability of = the draft for adoption, giving reasoning if possible. >=20 > Giles >=20 > On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu wrote: >=20 >> WG =96 >> We posted the following draft while back. >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 >>=20 >> Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the sa= me in PWE3 WG. >> There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that MA= C withdraw work >> should reside in L2VPN WG. >>=20 >> Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service provider = as a co-author. >> There is a good interest in this work especially from those service prov= iders who have >> deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs. >>=20 >> Since there has been sufficient history to this document, the authors r= equest that this be >> adopted as WG draft. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> himanshu >=20 From nobody Tue Jun 17 05:18:21 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C0D1A036B for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RB97P-9vuBMP for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E17481A0369 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:18:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verizon.com; i=nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1403007495; x=1434543495; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=dkN7vHAG9houeny2OiAp91JSCyCZ1RM9xnmwEZzgsdg=; b=PJwjcho1iet6/4YPgK0WyNzPgFfXbQk5gptlTxUvLYTLa9ytQL84woIB eZom4XP4/K1a0WvmEB0RqOeKmsxOjN0U7vXUKz3MwqQ0tbTGAs6D3AOTZ CXpOogHoWtTVQ75L4DNHV5GL/l8sJaUaac/YiWexl7aUyZyxyH7NJjD48 s=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi02.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.144]) by omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2014 12:18:13 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,493,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="745613522" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb04.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.83]) by fldsmtpi02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2014 12:18:13 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.45]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.83]) with mapi; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:18:13 -0400 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:14:33 -0400 Subject: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06 (PIM Snooping over VPLS) Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06 (PIM Snooping over VPLS) Thread-Index: AQHPiiY1cCMzdNG36UehRmaQfqPoYA== Message-ID: References: , , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/v6FnLzrcJOf1P5c-HpLPsBW_clA Cc: Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:18:19 -0000 Hi, This is the start of a three-week working group last call on the draft "PIM= Snooping over VPLS". The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html= /draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-06. Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group e= mail list by responding to this email. This WG last call will close on Tuesday July 08, 2014. Regards, Nabil & Giles From nobody Tue Jun 17 05:26:04 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033A91A0373 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:26:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QkyiX47hiR14 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95B6E1A0358 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:25:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verizon.com; i=nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1403007958; x=1434543958; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=lJaGsB36Og+iVytb51EAwYqTFGAg+mMz659bGKySIqA=; b=YeYaqi14FEKRmM6kFjnIgM09JLvxuTseFkKm08F7pjqin/myo+qbeSPH CSVFYhA7gRX7JrgFVSKFwt6GbeDWgxZEst1TbU6KtrbLZn0XHWdCSHuCL +Ml8GLdEg+QEYNElPdy3qqAttx6LefKat+MZFAKVwpCrdDudL1CGK0dFE U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi01.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.143]) by omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2014 12:23:11 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,493,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="772014058" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb03.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB03.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.86]) by fldsmtpi01.verizon.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2014 12:23:07 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.45]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB03.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.86]) with mapi; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:23:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:20:11 -0400 Subject: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.txt (e-tree support in VPLS) Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.txt (e-tree support in VPLS) Thread-Index: AQHPiibkTJrBIWb6fU+6jx7BPZkItA== Message-ID: References: , , , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/vlMuiDEE8x6gl05v5AJvfHbblmI Cc: Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:26:03 -0000 Hi, This is the start of a two-week working group last call on the draft " Ethe= rnet-Tree (E-Tree) Support in Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)". The dra= ft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etre= e-03. Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group e= mail list by responding to this email. This WG last call will close on Tuesday July 01, 2014. Regards, Nabil & Giles From nobody Tue Jun 17 05:56:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0AF1A0375 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:56:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aWX8wmcqXm7n for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 269521A0378 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:56:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verizon.com; i=nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1403009765; x=1434545765; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=EQwWSFJMRicj4AJg7kDgfLAtLrbYrl8/C1H8x/G/q9w=; b=uim5SE4xJhR6uc21iIRrAB9o/tpyMDzYH0eIVxsptWVjTXMLtgP/+Zic 5wILwj2QR4CMolh1i6UgKJltt6U2cVRiFezCjA49bGlufZIjov2GzN5XR KbMHPMVqmR0ba9IKddcUIoIhnZxgD5kTLZJqmWeh6+VImz4dX3Lvj80p1 I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi03.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.145]) by omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2014 12:56:04 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,493,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="746902713" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb04.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.83]) by fldsmtpi03.verizon.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2014 12:56:03 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.45]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.83]) with mapi; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:56:03 -0400 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:56:02 -0400 Subject: [l2vpn] L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 90 - Toronto Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] L2VPN Agenda Slot Call for IETF 90 - Toronto Thread-Index: AQHPiit++kpztVXkTUyzy6NLDHL/bQ== Message-ID: References: , , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/AhHIaJ7iQpMLDlSYpEoclg0rd4o Cc: Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:56:09 -0000 Hi L2VPN WG, If you would like to request a time-slot for the L2VPN WG session at IETF 9= 0-Toronto, please reply to us by Friday 07/04/2014 along with the following= information: 1) Draft title 2) Presenter name 3) Requested duration Please, make sure that the subject of you reply is: Re:[l2vpn] L2VPN Age= nda Slot Call for IETF 90 =96 Toronto (i.e., reply to this email and the WG= chairs and secretary (Andrew)) Please note that priority will be given to drafts that are clearly within t= he scope of the current L2VPN charter. Please also note the following cutoff date for draft submission. This date = applies to new 00 drafts and updated drafts. 2014-07-04 (Friday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, inc= luding -00) by UTC 23:5, upload using IETF ID Submission Tool. Thanks, Nabil & Giles From nobody Tue Jun 17 11:09:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F94F1A03B4 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:09:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u3bnzZ7dbpaz for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B79321A0111 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:09:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id n3so6311554wiv.8 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:09:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version; bh=QihHa10ZMS7pLjGYx1BFXoULGrZvCG0Z8m40eNP9kgk=; b=kp/SMrCfsyDMxQyhRvJcDjd/6ISATkR6JfBQsFEKq0N1gRGQeeDzXuIKXG3RUIjwdr 5A70bT4zw+Dwf72R4QfCgkH+kp13zuW7hgAiKA5Iy263K4OzjnfA3DdS+NsCKUNLhLiJ 4WLpP1LhlCbKYT7G9KrIXSQr/XZQyA3ShwiYW24lBagezwRjJUvrl3xQ8rzWGKdbCVLh JXdryra4y+RaGZrnD0YL8rqbbP7b1857VC5sNZ42YRp7FRM6WzKxYBVOVYjZY1L75ep7 1SSoCdJdHyTQtyMZw6yGel8FqrdHdHUwgvmwk6fADmL1BP6VB3QEUfqEUdsaE3T9HQey A9SQ== X-Received: by 10.180.212.77 with SMTP id ni13mr38526108wic.5.1403028568432; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:09:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.61.175.56] (173-38-208-169.cisco.com. [173.38.208.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v45sm42563745eeg.29.2014.06.17.11.09.27 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:09:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Giles Heron Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: IPR call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:09:26 +0100 Message-Id: <0D7E73DB-2A45-49D7-89D0-F8C5AD4EAD74@gmail.com> To: l2vpn@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/3uNWvpsNmU52sCqr_wbONIYlsvc X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:09:33 -0000 Hi, this email initiates an IPR call for: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 would all authors please respond to this email indicating whether there = is any IPR that they are aware of which has not been disclosed to the = IETF. Likewise if anyone else is aware of any IPR that has not already been = disclosed to the IETF would you please respond to this email. this IPR call closes on Tuesday 1st July 2014. Giles= From nobody Tue Jun 17 11:34:18 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15CB1A0127 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:34:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mj6-ESJSmGr1 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoemail2.alcatel.com (hoemail2.alcatel.com [192.160.6.149]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5216B1A0111 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by hoemail2.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s5HIYCW5006140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:34:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s5HIYBl8023345 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:34:11 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.52]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:34:12 +0200 From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: Re: IPR call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 Thread-Topic: IPR call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 Thread-Index: AQHPildgCwIUBWI4Ek+LvaHuL8UqVZt1oLuA Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:34:10 +0000 Message-ID: References: <0D7E73DB-2A45-49D7-89D0-F8C5AD4EAD74@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0D7E73DB-2A45-49D7-89D0-F8C5AD4EAD74@gmail.com> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.2.140509 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4A0484748E8BDE4E9354F272F4A22B27@exchange.lucent.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/052lyjuL1JqdBxApZCch6Z7Yd0w X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:34:17 -0000 Not aware of IPR other than the one disclosed on the base EVPN draft On 17/06/14 20:09, "Giles Heron" wrote: >Hi, > >this email initiates an IPR call for: > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 > >would all authors please respond to this email indicating whether there >is any IPR that they are aware of which has not been disclosed to the >IETF. > >Likewise if anyone else is aware of any IPR that has not already been >disclosed to the IETF would you please respond to this email. > >this IPR call closes on Tuesday 1st July 2014. > >Giles From nobody Tue Jun 17 13:42:29 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436001A0154 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:42:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.152 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjlepLfbuI5B for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F20A51A010F for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:42:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=644; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1403037748; x=1404247348; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=kkMdvzpsH0K/8x2676mzd05JxyDQ4Dbx9BkxOA0AQwI=; b=WCi//lMqoMKxS3WFkEaeb2x96dQ5eKSbywC4YS6yM+Z1c2hrXWWwm6cE dCJlCbIZ8gtKib4TJ1oxreFhK7RMW07C0Kg3iv8xcdbU5Qu4etCs1kB7v WaQnLK8vL5i/ihkjrrhxenAw6OBjEzpAZvF+jSUvwJOI83wbpua9yl4rm E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuUGAMSmoFOtJA2J/2dsb2JhbABagmkkUlqqAwEBAQEBAQUBmSYBgQ8WdYQKHR1RAQg2MRElAgQBEoguAxEBDMQNDYY2F4VjhnCBQREBV4RDBJhKgXmBQ4wVhgCDQIF3OQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,496,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="53806885" Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2014 20:42:27 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5HKgQOR010339 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:42:26 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:42:26 -0500 From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: Re: IPR call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 Thread-Topic: IPR call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 Thread-Index: AQHPildfW0WeQPqSgE6h2eFDFBp5q5t1oxKA Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:42:25 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <0D7E73DB-2A45-49D7-89D0-F8C5AD4EAD74@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416 x-originating-ip: [10.128.2.16] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <92DACE0509620C4EA7B538AEE8B5CBB2@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/CZvscVq_cLP0Grds7BlBX4svZZI X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:42:28 -0000 I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft that hasn't already been disclosed. Cheers, Ali On 6/17/14 11:09 AM, "Giles Heron" wrote: >Hi, > >this email initiates an IPR call for: > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 > >would all authors please respond to this email indicating whether there >is any IPR that they are aware of which has not been disclosed to the >IETF. > >Likewise if anyone else is aware of any IPR that has not already been >disclosed to the IETF would you please respond to this email. > >this IPR call closes on Tuesday 1st July 2014. > >Giles From nobody Tue Jun 17 18:37:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0AC1A009A for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:37:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.852 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_BAD_LINEBREAK=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X5fqYOPwZ8Fp for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fldsmtpe01.verizon.com (fldsmtpe01.verizon.com [140.108.26.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0BF31A017F for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:37:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verizon.com; i=nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1403055420; x=1434591420; h=from:to:date:subject:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=HK0QnJhcXHC5cH7sL3ANN++GaRSV9tfPNkk5MHxF6lg=; b=roJVs9Zm+vQx2LZrsjOUWTzBWx7OS+MVYXl2+QMYCFfexaH0ktERXuup Ec4hUFmASm4Skrh3qboxxRphbdooOMokOeDXGTOL6MJtc/rL81sfIMwSF 0p7fM1/bXitl2oWlJtJ+xvwtWwvrf1SCY1gwFuv7aXht820USM6PYXgpz M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi02.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.144]) by fldsmtpe01.verizon.com with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2014 01:36:59 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,498,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="746220631" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb01.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB01.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.45.78]) by fldsmtpi02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2014 01:36:59 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.45]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB01.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.78]) with mapi; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:36:59 -0400 To: 'Giles Heron' , "'l2vpn@ietf.org'" Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:36:58 -0400 Subject: RE: IPR call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 Thread-Topic: IPR call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 Thread-Index: Ac+KV0jYYrpeQ8byQBeYl1kTzmuSwAAPoKXr Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/l_ZwFRD9wsiQxnRVLvCV9uhF9ik X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 01:37:07 -0000 SGksCkkgYW0gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgcmVsYXRlZCB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IHRoYXQg aGFzIG5vdCBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZC4uCgpUaGFua3MsCk5hYmlsCgoNDVNlbnQgd2l0aCBHb29k ICh3d3cuZ29vZC5jb20pCg0KDQogLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IAlH aWxlcyBIZXJvbiBbbWFpbHRvOmdpbGVzLmhlcm9uQGdtYWlsLmNvbV0NClNlbnQ6CVR1ZXNkYXks IEp1bmUgMTcsIDIwMTQgMDI6MDkgUE0gRWFzdGVybiBTdGFuZGFyZCBUaW1lDQpUbzoJbDJ2cG5A aWV0Zi5vcmcNCkNjOglCaXRhciwgTmFiaWwgTg0KU3ViamVjdDoJSVBSIGNhbGwgZm9yIGRyYWZ0 LWlldGYtbDJ2cG4tcGJiLWV2cG4tMDYNCg0KSGksDQoNCnRoaXMgZW1haWwgaW5pdGlhdGVzIGFu IElQUiBjYWxsIGZvcjoNCg0KaHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1s MnZwbi1wYmItZXZwbi0wNg0KDQp3b3VsZCBhbGwgYXV0aG9ycyBwbGVhc2UgcmVzcG9uZCB0byB0 aGlzIGVtYWlsIGluZGljYXRpbmcgd2hldGhlciB0aGVyZSBpcyBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgdGhleSBh cmUgYXdhcmUgb2Ygd2hpY2ggaGFzIG5vdCBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCB0byB0aGUgSUVURi4NCg0K TGlrZXdpc2UgaWYgYW55b25lIGVsc2UgaXMgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGhhcyBub3Qg YWxyZWFkeSBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCB0byB0aGUgSUVURiB3b3VsZCB5b3UgcGxlYXNlIHJlc3Bv bmQgdG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbC4NCg0KdGhpcyBJUFIgY2FsbCBjbG9zZXMgb24gVHVlc2RheSAxc3Qg SnVseSAyMDE0Lg0KDQpHaWxlcw== From nobody Tue Jun 17 19:46:38 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AB71A00AF for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:46:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.152 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fYoBiIoNFC9R for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:46:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E2F1A00A8 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:46:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=626; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1403059595; x=1404269195; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=5/S0DjLs4xdZBpK1yOgb60nVXVLMrJ0qIMgGPgRVFS0=; b=il/nz8ZZzzJUagKmb9TiTc87nS4aOB6n8mNyhQx+Bk7MrSLXH2LqdGY7 GJTnPvBvFq4AiY1Ug0o2wqO12uwEtFxbyLLgb/+qvBWx7Zo6hS1vjVqb2 QJkktdXAFZb3wxJU/zsOfdWvk3WVZ+CtawIdWfZnE7EUZAqZ8mgsGOmo/ c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak8IAH38oFOtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABagmkkUlqpfgwBAQEBAQEFAZkoAYENFnWECh0dUQEINjERJQIEARKILgMRAQzEGg2GNheFYoZwgUERAVeEQwSYSoF5gUOMFYYAg0KBdzk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,498,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="53879059" Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2014 02:46:34 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com [173.36.12.86]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5I2kYJn026223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:46:34 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com ([173.36.12.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:46:34 -0500 From: "Samer Salam (ssalam)" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: Re: IPR call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 Thread-Topic: IPR call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 Thread-Index: AQHPildfAML7PcnQekCmGiWKnBVRk5t2CNGA Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:46:34 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <0D7E73DB-2A45-49D7-89D0-F8C5AD4EAD74@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [10.21.148.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <48AF1DD331B9E2418D40416236DB5302@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/7FgkPmVVvrNImlLMtLazheoHvW4 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:46:36 -0000 I am not aware of any IPR that has not been already disclosed. Regards, Samer On 2014-06-17 11:09 AM, "Giles Heron" wrote: >Hi, > >this email initiates an IPR call for: > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 > >would all authors please respond to this email indicating whether there >is any IPR that they are aware of which has not been disclosed to the >IETF. > >Likewise if anyone else is aware of any IPR that has not already been >disclosed to the IETF would you please respond to this email. > >this IPR call closes on Tuesday 1st July 2014. > >Giles From nobody Tue Jun 17 19:47:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02E61A00C9 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:47:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.852 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N1AYJe2mHY2G for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:47:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3D781A00A8 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BFN75998; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:47:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.35) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 03:47:10 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.41]) by SZXEMA403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:46:59 +0800 From: Jiangyuanlong To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "Bitar, Nabil N" Subject: Re: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.txt (e-tree support in VPLS) Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.txt (e-tree support in VPLS) Thread-Index: AQHPip+TNpypk0zJTEqoUDZN5gLGoA== Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:46:59 +0000 Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A751D4D@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.76.118] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/mScUqStLAUGYUVyeOViAw7hfJnc X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:47:15 -0000 Support as a co-author. Regards, Yuanlong ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:20:11 -0400 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Cc: Giles Heron Subject: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.txt (e-tree support in VPLS) Message-ID: =09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Hi, This is the start of a two-week working group last call on the draft " Ethe= rnet-Tree (E-Tree) Support in Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)". The dra= ft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etre= e-03. Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group e= mail list by responding to this email. This WG last call will close on Tuesday July 01, 2014. Regards, Nabil & Giles From nobody Thu Jun 19 23:44:48 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5891A0653; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:44:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yeQoN6sUEIXY; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10021A0418; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:44:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.5.0.p3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140620064436.16967.41825.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:44:36 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/deTYCO0CH_YjqkTfbltu-JjNfBk Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 06:44:43 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group of the IETF. Title : PBB-EVPN Authors : Ali Sajassi Samer Salam Nabil Bitar Aldrin Isaac Wim Henderickx Lizhong Jin Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07.txt Pages : 21 Date : 2014-06-19 Abstract: This document discusses how Ethernet Provider Backbone Bridging [802.1ah] can be combined with EVPN in order to reduce the number of BGP MAC advertisement routes by aggregating Customer/Client MAC (C- MAC) addresses via Provider Backbone MAC address (B-MAC), provide client MAC address mobility using C-MAC aggregation and B-MAC sub- netting, confine the scope of C-MAC learning to only active flows, offer per site policies and avoid C-MAC address flushing on topology changes. The combined solution is referred to as PBB-EVPN. Conventions The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-07 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Jun 20 00:09:41 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41F61A854C for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:09:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z_qU3mXfhBfY for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com (mail-pd0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 549891ACAD6 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:08:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id v10so2676343pde.40 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:08:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=Jho/TaLgC0MyT/e/ntdhrSk5hWYcjU5XuHmgsBbBuKU=; b=ZgRaIB/0v9uWQqMrHuByGZ+/WgMqmM9r+kNY/cNuw6lZkkejlOwlVihpXhGqUpNpEO nG6PbTT281ZLeu26rX8gGLM37UX8LyBfSrL8xCRVwpJfBYoFrjdugFVM3DG0roXrlV9E sDxs6SnhGwPmyQSy6sXShcDGq03l8d+kgE8/MzuqbX8GNcRdLz1hukysC1OUTn6gj0AZ 9I5svs7mlyXSsqqdn6N894XQsaexQJqYmaGX42QdOw+8EZdzGcyv6WymAOpXt7EKSRDk /9xrMHpdvksemAQnzIIizO+8XtgsD2rQ+fdL+kvzQOmwMV5fso3fBpAwRjZ7LaHhnDcf xy8A== X-Received: by 10.66.227.199 with SMTP id sc7mr39237pac.45.1403248108937; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from LIZHONGJ ([180.166.53.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm11901743pbw.26.2014.06.20.00.08.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:08:28 -0700 (PDT) From: "Lizhong Jin" To: Subject: RE: IPR call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:08:23 +0800 Message-ID: <03de01cf8c56$6f556fe0$4e004fa0$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac+MVjPrPVckxd8IQLC1saRb/2Pmyg== Content-Language: zh-cn Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/3MClnkLEnjqqLCMVlCWHBlBXJ4c Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 07:09:34 -0000 I am not aware of any IPR that has not been already disclosed. Regards Lizhong > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:09:26 +0100 > From: Giles Heron > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: IPR call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 > Message-ID: <0D7E73DB-2A45-49D7-89D0-F8C5AD4EAD74@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi, > > this email initiates an IPR call for: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-06 > > would all authors please respond to this email indicating whether there is any > IPR that they are aware of which has not been disclosed to the IETF. > > Likewise if anyone else is aware of any IPR that has not already been > disclosed to the IETF would you please respond to this email. > > this IPR call closes on Tuesday 1st July 2014. > > Giles > > ********* From nobody Wed Jun 25 15:25:40 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEE01A039C for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:25:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.151 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p7bJMC5hoKRh for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E9FA1B27DC for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:25:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2034; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1403735135; x=1404944735; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=YItdxU48kuwNL0mI06iG72QU4a6JNWshIawv2yRUWOw=; b=gdxFEaJ4WDxSiHIarOKw26zUPEZ25RxYUQBttdlAcfdPCKuzUKrIs4Vp YBWwx5kHdnw0bQ/Gk7JWo+ACHdUwST/2TSy5x4s33rllUuOlBKvL8z/wN iAYYUkXhp5SjstPDRBc7dXyk6ZZZCTtuJDF5UtTgO0jJySHFXWfPC+GVq 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuMFAB5Lq1OtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABZgkYjJFJaqhgFAQWZNYEPFnWECnkSAQwBcycEAQ2IRwEMw2wTBIVjiCxpBIRKBZpRk2uDQoIw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.01,548,1400025600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="55974121" Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2014 22:25:34 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5PMPYDP010090 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:25:34 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:25:34 -0500 From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , Giles Heron Subject: Request to adopt draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03 Thread-Topic: Request to adopt draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03 Thread-Index: AQHPkMRhcjyqg7Uxb02vpeFURz4LGg== Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:25:33 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416 x-originating-ip: [10.89.1.237] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CFD099D0DC004sajassiciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/aeBEjtjuWvTfWApz3IINELWArHs Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:25:37 -0000 --_000_CFD099D0DC004sajassiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Giles, Nabil: This draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay/?in= clude_text=3D1 (initially called draft-sajassi-drake-l2vpn-evpn-overlay) w= as first published in December 2012 after the merged between two other draf= ts: draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane-00 and draft-sajassi-nvo3-evpn-over= lay-01. After the merged, the resultant draft has gone through several iter= ations to incorporate WG comments. The authors believe there is good consen= sus for this draft and would like to request for the WG call. Regards, Ali --_000_CFD099D0DC004sajassiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <855A35859406F44087099D021DFD7916@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Giles, Nabil:

This draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay/?include_text= =3D1  (initially called draft-sajassi-drake-l2vpn-evpn-overlay) wa= s first published in December 2012 after the merged between two other draft= s: draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane-00 and draft-sajassi-nvo3-evpn-overlay-01. After the merged, the resultant dr= aft has gone through several iterations to incorporate WG comments. The aut= hors believe there is good consensus for this draft and would like to reque= st for the WG call.

Regards,
Ali

--_000_CFD099D0DC004sajassiciscocom_-- From nobody Fri Jun 27 07:47:19 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275B31B31EC; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 07:47:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kehbqHZhMkNv; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 07:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5C61B31E3; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 07:47:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-13.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.5.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140627144714.4154.52453.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 07:47:14 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/J8SapEPtgY1pJvZbxtxdvuYXyQI Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:47:17 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group of the IETF. Title : LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in H-VPLS Authors : Pranjal Kumar Dutta Florin Balus Olen Stokes Don Fedyk Geraldine Calvginac Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-13.txt Pages : 26 Date : 2014-06-27 Abstract: RFC4762 describes a mechanism to remove or unlearn MAC addresses that have been dynamically learned in a Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Instance for faster convergence on topology change. The procedure also removes MAC addresses in the VPLS that do not require relearning due to such topology change. This document defines an enhancement to the MAC Address Withdrawal procedure with empty MAC List from RFC4762, which enables a Provider Edge(PE) device to remove only the MAC addresses that need to be relearned. Additional extensions to RFC4762 MAC Withdrawal procedures are specified to provide optimized MAC flushing for the Provider Backbone Bridging (PBB)VPLS specified in RFC7041. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-13 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-13 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sat Jun 28 04:37:49 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DD41A011B for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:37:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RvQoebdNILvm for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BLU004-OMC2S29.hotmail.com (blu004-omc2s29.hotmail.com [65.55.111.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B1F1A007D for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BLU175-W28 ([65.55.111.71]) by BLU004-OMC2S29.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22712); Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:37:44 -0700 X-TMN: [I8ONlsjerP97U8CKoC52bIxikG2Q7iFtb71m9rX0ZgM=] X-Originating-Email: [raymond.key@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_e7c4c732-bb2c-4f0f-ac50-291fb33e9d05_" From: Raymond Key Sender: To: Jiangyuanlong , "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "Bitar, Nabil N" , "giheron@cisco.com" Subject: RE: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.txt (e-tree support in VPLS) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:07:44 +1030 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A751D4D@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: , <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A751D4D@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2014 11:37:44.0552 (UTC) FILETIME=[60B1EE80:01CF92C5] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/--dM5DFFFp---qGjPOAJXlfzeRc X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:37:47 -0000 --_e7c4c732-bb2c-4f0f-ac50-291fb33e9d05_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I support moving this draft forward. =20 =20 > From: jiangyuanlong@huawei.com > To: l2vpn@ietf.org=3B nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com > Subject: Re: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.= txt (e-tree support in VPLS) > Date: Wed=2C 18 Jun 2014 02:46:59 +0000 >=20 > Support as a co-author. >=20 > Regards=2C > Yuanlong > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue=2C 17 Jun 2014 08:20:11 -0400 > From: "Bitar=2C Nabil N" > To: "Bitar=2C Nabil N" =2C "l2vpn@ietf.org" > > Cc: Giles Heron > Subject: [l2vpn] WG last call for > draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.txt (e-tree support in VPLS) > Message-ID: > > =09 > Content-Type: text/plain=3B charset=3D"us-ascii" >=20 > Hi=2C >=20 > This is the start of a two-week working group last call on the draft " Et= hernet-Tree (E-Tree) Support in Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)". The d= raft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-et= ree-03. >=20 > Please=2C review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working gro= up email list by responding to this email. >=20 > This WG last call will close on Tuesday July 01=2C 2014. >=20 > Regards=2C > Nabil & Giles >=20 >=20 >=20 = --_e7c4c732-bb2c-4f0f-ac50-291fb33e9d05_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I support moving this draft forw= ard.
 =3B
 =3B
>=3B From: jiangyuanlong@huawei.com<= br>>=3B To: l2vpn@ietf.org=3B nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com
>=3B Subject= : Re: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.txt (e-tr= ee support in VPLS)
>=3B Date: Wed=2C 18 Jun 2014 02:46:59 +0000
&g= t=3B
>=3B Support as a co-author.
>=3B
>=3B Regards=2C
= >=3B Yuanlong
>=3B ------------------------------
>=3B Date: Tu= e=2C 17 Jun 2014 08:20:11 -0400
>=3B From: "Bitar=2C Nabil N" <=3Bna= bil.n.bitar@verizon.com>=3B
>=3B To: "Bitar=2C Nabil N" <=3Bnabil.= n.bitar@verizon.com>=3B=2C "l2vpn@ietf.org"
>=3B <=3Bl2vpn@ietf.o= rg>=3B
>=3B Cc: Giles Heron <=3Bgiheron@cisco.com>=3B
>=3B = Subject: [l2vpn] WG last call for
>=3B draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etre= e-03.txt (e-tree support in VPLS)
>=3B Message-ID:
>=3B <=3BEE= 3DB9B68D417942A9B1863918E159FA11E3181CEA@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com&= gt=3B
>=3B
>=3B Content-Type: text/plain=3B charset=3D"us-ascii= "
>=3B
>=3B Hi=2C
>=3B
>=3B This is the start of a tw= o-week working group last call on the draft " Ethernet-Tree (E-Tree) Suppor= t in Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)". The draft can be found at http:/= /tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.
>=3B
>= =3B Please=2C review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working g= roup email list by responding to this email.
>=3B
>=3B This WG l= ast call will close on Tuesday July 01=2C 2014.
>=3B
>=3B Regard= s=2C
>=3B Nabil &=3B Giles
>=3B
>=3B
>=3B
= --_e7c4c732-bb2c-4f0f-ac50-291fb33e9d05_-- From nobody Sat Jun 28 05:26:14 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D21D1A0125; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 05:26:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dT1Q9Hc2fJbX; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 05:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AA71A011C; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 05:26:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-08.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.5.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140628122611.8470.66268.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 05:26:11 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/_eFSM59nD61C-NOUPaVnyKZ9ytQ Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:26:13 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group of the IETF. Title : Extension to LDP-VPLS for Ethernet Broadcast and Multicast Authors : Raymond Key Frederic Jounay Yuji Kamite Zhihua Liu Manuel Paul Ruediger Kunze Mach(Guoyi) Chen Lizhong Jin Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-08.txt Pages : 19 Date : 2014-06-28 Abstract: This document proposes a simple extension to LDP-VPLS to improve bandwidth efficiency for Ethernet broadcast/multicast traffic within a carrier's network. It makes use of unidirectional point-to-multipoint PseudoWires to minimise payload frame duplication on physical links. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-08 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-vpls-broadcast-exten-08 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sun Jun 29 09:20:50 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6A11A0095; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:20:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -12.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FO3nCZlTPvJw; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC901A00D3; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:20:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=18015; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1404058832; x=1405268432; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=rprHflacPwG+j+k/FMzM2WJk1rZ+HaBa7VzyFKlnAws=; b=fwNPlQdVki1DaWJatpAltUFQYdiu+DbjY4eLySgD2x31pndTUBFpublc 3R4Ib/PgjMhojPK3n+yqx47u8c96R6uOxJNnfVh/wasWiFnxS+S1wT91Q Djx3x48ptGo5pub0bYBVYCzywOmzgH2c1lHw03cjFiYepRNtdwBqzbr+m E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah0LAMk7sFOtJV2Q/2dsb2JhbABZgkZHUlqCbqgaAQEBAQEBBQFugiqOCIkVARlvFnWEAwEBAQQtQQsQAgEGAg4DBAEBCx0FAgIwFAkIAQEEAQ0FCIg6DY0OnCEInEkXhWSIchYbBgGCczqBFgWcJJI3g0KCMA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,571,1400025600"; d="scan'208,217";a="336300708" Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2014 16:20:30 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5TGKTFd026251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:20:29 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.8.36]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:20:29 -0500 From: "Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" To: Qin Wu , "time@ietf.org" Subject: RE: YANG models for OAM Thread-Topic: YANG models for OAM Thread-Index: Ac+E3qlMyPi638vnRGmjYh75Wx+edAATLCxAA6JRP1A= Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:20:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.21.120.135] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FBEA3E19AA24F847BA3AE74E2FE193562EEC1E8Bxmbrcdx08ciscoc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/_bj06XNxRTXx1IjZPyS4n2qIT4k Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "opsawg@ietf.org" , "nvo3@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" , "trill@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:20:35 -0000 --_000_FBEA3E19AA24F847BA3AE74E2FE193562EEC1E8Bxmbrcdx08ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgUWluDQoNClRoZXJlIGFyZSBzZXZlcmFsIHdheSB0aGlzIGlzIGFwcGxpY2FibGUgdG8gU0ZD DQoNCg0KMS4gICAgICBTRkMgaXMgdW5kZXJsYXllciBpbmRlcGVuZGVudCAsIHdoaWNoIG1lYW5z IGl0IGNhbiBoYXZlIGFsbCBzb3J0cyBvZiBlbmNhcCB0eXBlcyB1bmRlcm5lYXRoLCB0aGUgbW9k ZWwgcHJlc2VudGVkIGluIHRpc3NhLW5ldG1vZC1vYW0sIGFkZHJlc3MgZXhhY3RseSB0aGF0IGlz c3VlLiBJbnN0ZWFkIG9mIHJlLWludmVudGluZyBhbmQgcmUtaW1wbGVtZW50aW5nIHZhcmlvdXMg ZGlmZmVyZW50IE9BTSB0aGUgZHJhZnQgcHJvcG9zZSB0byBpbnRlZ3JhdGUgdGhlbSBhdCB0aGUg bWFuYWdlbWVudCBsYXllci4NCg0KMi4gICAgICBJbiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IHdlIGRlZmluZSBhIGZs b3ctZW50cm9weSBhcyBhbiBvcGFxdWUgZWxlbWVudCB0aGF0IGVhY2ggb2YgdGhlIHRlY2hub2xv Z3kgdHlwZSBjYW4gc3BlY2lmeSBhbmQgaW5jbHVkZS4gSWYgd2UgbG9vayBhdCBkcmFmdC1xdWlu bi1zZmMtbnNoLTAyLnR4dCwgaXQgZGVmaW5lIGEgYmxvY2sgdGhhdCBzcGVjaWZpZXMgU0ZDLiBT RkMgdmVyc2lvbiBvZiBZQU5HICBjYW4gc3BlY2lmeSB0aGlzIGFzIHBhcnQgb2YgaXRzIGZsb3cg ZW50cm9weS4gVGhlIGJlYXV0eSBpcyB0aGF0IGl0IGlzIGFsbCB1cCB0byB0aGUgdGVjaG5vbG9n eSB0byBzcGVjaWZ5IHRoYXQgKHNpemUgYW5kIHNoYXBlIGlzIHRlY2hub2xvZ3kgZGVwZW5kZW50 KSBhbmQgYmFzZSBtb2RlbCBpcyBzdGlsbCBpbnRhY3QuDQoNCldpdGggdGhlIGFib3ZlIGluIG1p bmQgLCBjYW4geW91IHBsZWFzZSByZXZpZXcgZHJhZnQtdGlzc2EtbmV0bW9kLW9hbSBhbmQgc2Vl IGl0IGlzIGZsZXhpYmxlIGFuZCBleHRlbnNpYmxlIGVub3VnaCB0byBmb3IgdGhlIHB1cnBvc2Uu IElmIHRoaW5ncyBhcmUgbWlzc2luZyB3ZSBjYW4gYWRkIGFuZCBleHRlbmQuDQoNCkkgaGF2ZSBy ZXF1ZXN0ZWQgbmV0bW9kIFdHIGNoYWlycyBmb3IgYSBwcmVzZW50YXRpb24gc2xvdCBmb3IgZnVy dGhlciBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIG9mIHRoZSBkcmFmdC4NCg0KRnJvbTogUWluIFd1IFttYWlsdG86Ymls bC53dUBodWF3ZWkuY29tXQ0KU2VudDogVHVlc2RheSwgSnVuZSAxMCwgMjAxNCA5OjIyIFBNDQpU bzogVGlzc2EgU2VuZXZpcmF0aG5lICh0c2VuZXZpcik7IHRpbWVAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCkNjOiBuZXRt b2RAaWV0Zi5vcmc7IG52bzNAaWV0Zi5vcmc7IHRyaWxsQGlldGYub3JnOyBsMnZwbkBpZXRmLm9y Zzsgb3BzYXdnQGlldGYub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSRTogWUFORyBtb2RlbHMgZm9yIE9BTQ0KDQpI aSwgVGlzc2E6DQpUaGFua3MgZm9yIGluaXRpYXRpbmcgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiBvbiB0aGlzIHRvcGlj Lg0KVW5pZmllZCBPQU0gZm9yIG11bHRpLUxheWVyIG5ldHdvcmsgaXMgYSBnb29kIGlkZWEgdG8g bWUuDQpkcmFmdC13dy1vcHNhd2ctbXVsdGktbGF5ZXItb2FtLTAwIHdlIHByb3Bvc2VkIGluIG9w c2F3ZyBsYWlkIG91dCB0aGUgYW4gaW5pdGlhbCBkZXNjcmlwdGlvbiBvZiB0aGUgcHJvYmxlbS4N ClRoZSBxdWVzdGlvbiB0byBkcmFmdC10aXNzYS1uZXRtb2Qtb2FtIGlzDQpJIGFtIHdvbmRlcmlu ZyBob3cgdGhpcyBnZW5lcmljIFlhbmcgTW9kZWwgY2FuIGJlIGFwcGxpZWQgdG8gU0ZDIGVudmly b25tZW50Pw0KSG93IGRvIHlvdSBzdXBwb3J0IHRoZSBjYXNlIHdoZXJlIHR3byBlbmRwb2ludHMg c3VwcG9ydCBkaWZmZXJlbnQgbGF5ZXIgT0FNIG9yIGRvZXNuoa90IHN1cHBvcnQgYW55IE9BTSBh dCB0aGF0IGxheWVyLg0KDQpCVFc6IEkgaGF2ZSBjY6GvZWQgdGltZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3Qgc2lu Y2UgSSBiZWxpZXZlIHRoaXMgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0IGlzIHB1cnBvc2VkIHRvIGxvb2sgZm9yIGdl bmVyaWMgYW5kIGludGVncmF0ZWQgT0FNIGNvdmVyaW5nIHZhcmlvdXMgaGV0ZXJvZ2VuZW91cyBu ZXR3b3JraW5nIHRlY2hub2xvZ2llcy4NClJlZ2FyZHMhDQotUWluDQq3orz+yMs6IG5ldG1vZCBb bWFpbHRvOm5ldG1vZC1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSC0+rHtIFRpc3NhIFNlbmV2aXJhdGhuZSAo dHNlbmV2aXIpDQq3osvNyrG85DogMjAxNMTqNtTCMTHI1SAzOjAzDQrK1bz+yMs6IG5ldG1vZEBp ZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86bmV0bW9kQGlldGYub3JnPjsgbnZvM0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86bnZv M0BpZXRmLm9yZz47IHRyaWxsQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzp0cmlsbEBpZXRmLm9yZz47IGwydnBu QGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzpsMnZwbkBpZXRmLm9yZz47IG9wc2F3Z0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86 b3BzYXdnQGlldGYub3JnPg0K1vfM4jogW25ldG1vZF0gWUFORyBtb2RlbHMgZm9yIE9BTQ0KDQpB bGwNCg0KV2UgaGF2ZSBwdWJsaXNoZWQgWUFORyBtb2RlbCBmb3IgT0FNLiAjMSBkcmFmdCBiZWxv dyBwbGFjZSB0aGUgZ2VuZXJpYyBmcmFtZXdvcmsgZm9yIE9BTSwgdGhhdCBjYW4gYmUgYXVnbWVu dGVkIGZvciBkaWZmZXJlbnQgdGVjaG5vbG9naWVzLiAjMiBhbmQgIzMgYXJlIGFwcGxpY2F0aW9u IG9mIHRoZSBjb25jZXB0IHRvIE5WTzMgYW5kIFRSSUxMLA0KDQoNCjEuICAgICAgaHR0cDovL2Rh dGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC10aXNzYS1uZXRtb2Qtb2FtLw0KDQoyLiAgICAg IGh0dHA6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtdGlzc2EtbnZvMy15YW5nLW9h bS8NCg0KMy4gICAgICBodHRwOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LXRpc3Nh LXRyaWxsLXlhbmctb2FtLw0KDQpQbGVhc2UgcmV2aWV3IGFuZCBzaGFyZSB5b3VyIGNvbW1lbnRz DQoNClRoYW5rcw0KVGlzc2ENCg0KDQo= --_000_FBEA3E19AA24F847BA3AE74E2FE193562EEC1E8Bxmbrcdx08ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Qin

 

There are several way = this is applicable to SFC

 

1.&n= bsp;     SFC is underla= yer independent , which means it can have all sorts of encap types undernea= th, the model presented in tissa-netmod-oam, address exactly that issue. In= stead of re-inventing and re-implementing various different OAM the draft propose to integrate them at the managemen= t layer.

2.&n= bsp;     In this draft = we define a flow-entropy as an opaque element that each of the technology t= ype can specify and include. If we look at draft-quinn-sfc-nsh-02.txt, it d= efine a block that specifies SFC. SFC version of YANG  can specify this as part of its flow entropy. Th= e beauty is that it is all up to the technology to specify that (size and s= hape is technology dependent) and base model is still intact.

 

With the above in mind= , can you please review draft-tissa-netmod-oam and see it is flexible and = extensible enough to for the purpose. If things are missing we can add and = extend.

 

I have requested netmo= d WG chairs for a presentation slot for further discussion of the draft. &n= bsp;

 

From: Qin Wu [= mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:22 PM
To: Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir); time@ietf.org
Cc: netmod@ietf.org; nvo3@ietf.org; trill@ietf.org; l2vpn@ietf.org; = opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: YANG models for OAM

 

Hi, T= issa:

Thank= s for initiating discussion on this topic.

Unifi= ed OAM for multi-Layer network is a good idea to me.

draft= -ww-opsawg-multi-layer-oam-00 we proposed in opsawg laid out the an initial= description of the problem.

The q= uestion to draft-tissa-netmod-oam is

I am = wondering how this generic Yang Model can be applied to SFC environment?

How d= o you support the case where two endpoints support different layer OAM or d= oesn=A1=AFt support any OAM at that layer.

=  

BTW: = I have cc=A1=AFed time mailing list since I believe this mailing list is pu= rposed to look for generic and integrated OAM covering various heterogeneou= s networking technologies.

Regar= ds!

-Qin<= o:p>

=B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: netmod [mailto:= netmod-bounces@ietf.org] =B4=FA=B1=ED Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevi= r)
=B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2014=C4=EA6=D4=C211=C8=D5 3:03
=CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: netmod@ietf.org; nvo3@ietf.org; trill@ietf.org; l2vpn@ietf.org; <= a href=3D"mailto:opsawg@ietf.org"> opsawg@ietf.org
=D6=F7=CC=E2: [netmod] YANG models for O= AM

 

All

 

We have published YANG model for OAM. #1 draft below= place the generic framework for OAM, that can be augmented for different t= echnologies. #2 and #3 are application of the concept to NVO3 and TRILL,

 

1.      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-netmod-oam/

2.      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-nvo3-yang-o= am/

3.      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-trill-yang= -oam/

 

Please review and share your comments

 

Thanks

Tissa

 

 

--_000_FBEA3E19AA24F847BA3AE74E2FE193562EEC1E8Bxmbrcdx08ciscoc_-- From nobody Mon Jun 30 02:18:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D754E1A01C6 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:18:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.818 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.818 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fxHzRzARWN9e for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:18:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E8B1A01BD for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [85.158.136.83:7348] by server-16.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id B3/21-18862-25B21B35; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:18:10 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Frederic.Jounay@orange.ch X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-36.messagelabs.com!1404119882!8828327!24 X-Originating-IP: [213.55.206.7] X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.11.3; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 12744 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2014 09:18:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chcrochs054.orange.ch) (213.55.206.7) by server-15.tower-36.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 Jun 2014 09:18:09 -0000 Received: from CHCROCHC051.orange.ch ([fe80:0000:0000:0000:704b:3a68:12.14.247.83]) by chcrochs054.orange.ch ([172.19.166.54]) with mapi; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:17:57 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jounay_Fr=E9d=E9ric?= To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" , "Bitar, Nabil N" , "giheron@cisco.com" Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:17:56 +0200 Subject: RE: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.txt (e-tree support in VPLS) Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.txt (e-tree support in VPLS) Thread-Index: Ac+SxWkj9M4ZKQgaQuCwIie+u50wuwBfq8VQ Message-ID: <78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E201865C204D87@CHCROCHC051.orange.ch> References: , <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B5A751D4D@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E201865C204D87CHCROCHC051_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/uEmqLb0_otrezyivhlVWjjLWc7Y X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:18:14 -0000 --_000_78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E201865C204D87CHCROCHC051_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Support as co-author BR Fred > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:20:11 -0400 > From: "Bitar, Nabil N" > > To: "Bitar, Nabil N" >, "l2vpn@ietf.org" > > > Cc: Giles Heron > > Subject: [l2vpn] WG last call for > draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.txt (e-tree support in VPLS) > Message-ID: > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" > > Hi, > > This is the start of a two-week working group last call on the draft " Et= hernet-Tree (E-Tree) Support in Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)". The dr= aft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etr= ee-03. > > Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group= email list by responding to this email. > > This WG last call will close on Tuesday July 01, 2014. > > Regards, > Nabil & Giles > > > --_000_78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E201865C204D87CHCROCHC051_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi

Support = as co-author

B= R

Fred


> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 17 Ju= n 2014 08:20:11 -0400
> From: "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>
= > To: "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org"
> <l2vpn@ietf.org>
> Cc: Giles Heron <giheron@cisco.com>
> Subject: [l2vpn] WG la= st call for
> draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.txt (e-tree support i= n VPLS)
> Message-ID:
> <EE3DB9B68D4179= 42A9B1863918E159FA11E3181CEA@FLDP1LUMXC7V63.us.one.verizon.com>
&= gt;
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii"
&g= t;
> Hi,
>
> This is the start of a two-week working gr= oup last call on the draft " Ethernet-Tree (E-Tree) Support in Virtual= Private LAN Service (VPLS)". The draft can be found at http://tools.iet= f.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-03.
>
> Please, = review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group email lis= t by responding to this email.
>
> This WG last call will clos= e on Tuesday July 01, 2014.
>
> Regards,
> Nabil & G= iles
>
>
>

= --_000_78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E201865C204D87CHCROCHC051_-- From nobody Mon Jun 30 04:34:22 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A462F1A020A for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 04:34:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_W09yI4wffo for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 04:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5512E1A0208 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 04:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id x13so7671892wgg.3 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 04:34:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=MpH7AP4x3IT84IU3+b+DrsfdoxmvYjpUX8E9fs/ntEk=; b=QQjC34sfZl0QCrE3nYwQHIAbS2oVNRZOqxtzccL2L7aDhrVcHpLbRFHKRipek/C30F O3QX1Ms2nFP/mrkn+iuwi3ShzifVEzycRBqe01mcaMtqhC1bEDcQuKq5TFXzynsjQJx0 Jy2F8P61qeFwWnw6m+PXJEv6b6/6kBGFZe8A8FtziyL27A4Tg83y7nI3HcfWJVc2xS4f Ks93nHbQ99HH16fShc3IQBcmO+kqcE2QsUUyn0gC4dlqhXx4IvvBnaGCwKM7nznfkYv4 Bd0gdyBZciktNnTMueiMwz2S7o8Yfs4uVmYbDm59GjiFUBkg+oPmNY0fysakjVWI606X 4UXA== X-Received: by 10.181.11.232 with SMTP id el8mr7357582wid.57.1404128053618; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 04:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.61.175.233] (173-38-208-169.cisco.com. [173.38.208.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h3sm40753292wjz.48.2014.06.30.04.34.12 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 04:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 From: Giles Heron In-Reply-To: <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:34:20 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B70AA2948@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> <77D000D0-D458-46CE-AE20-59EBA52429A9@gmail.com> To: Himanshu Shah , l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/zHDg43ZtYpW9rOiKIJKW1HM8yQ8 Cc: "msiva@cisco.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:34:19 -0000 Hi all this email closes the WG adoption call for = draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03. Consensus is judged to be that = the draft be adopted as an L2VPN WG doc. Authors please re-publish as draft-ietf-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-00. Nabil & Giles On 10 Jun 2014, at 14:01, Giles Heron wrote: > Agreed - Nabil and I have discussed and believe that we should poll = the WG for adoption. >=20 > WG - this starts a 2 week call to adopt this draft as a WG doc. The = call will close on Tuesday June 24th. Please comment as to the = suitability of the draft for adoption, giving reasoning if possible. >=20 > Giles >=20 > On 23 May 2014, at 17:00, Shah, Himanshu wrote: >=20 >> WG =96 >> We posted the following draft while back. >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-l2vpn-mpls-tp-mac-wd-03 >>=20 >> Sami presented this draft a few times in L2VPN WG while I pursued the = same in PWE3 WG. >> There was a good consensus in PWE3 WG for the draft but was felt that = MAC withdraw work >> should reside in L2VPN WG. >>=20 >> Hence the update was sent to L2VPN WG. We have added a service = provider as a co-author. >> There is a good interest in this work especially from those service = providers who have >> deployed MPLS-TP network with static PWs. >>=20 >> Since there has been sufficient history to this document, the = authors request that this be >> adopted as WG draft. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> himanshu >=20 From nobody Mon Jun 30 14:50:52 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD421A0AF4; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:50:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v9bF3g7LKQsk; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ECF1A0AF8; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:50:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Subject: Protocol Action: 'LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in H-VPLS' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-13.txt) X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.5.2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140630215046.9569.25656.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:50:46 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/6PLwaicJomsY1IcV79PBOXiTamE Cc: l2vpn mailing list , l2vpn chair , RFC Editor X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 21:50:50 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in H-VPLS' (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-13.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel and Alia Atlas. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt/ Technical Summary: RFC4762 describes a mechanism to remove or unlearn MAC addresses that have been dynamically learned in a Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Instance for faster convergence on topology change. The procedure also removes MAC addresses in the VPLS that do not require relearning due to such topology change. This document defines new procedures for MAC flushing in VPLS, H-VPLS and PBB- VPLS services upon access topology changes. These procedures cover additional additional scenarios to that covered RFC 4762 for H-VPLS. MAC flushing is a mechanism used to minimize traffic black-holing time when reachability to MAC addresses changes due to topology access changes. In particular, this document describes procedures for MTU-s initiated MAC flush when MTU-s is dual-homed to provider edges (PEs) over an active and standby Pseudowires, and the propagation of the MAC flush message over the VPLS core and processing at PEs. It also describes a new optimized MAC flush mechanism termed "negative flush" that enables PEs with instances of a VPLS instance to flush the MAC entries reachable via the PE where the topology change was experienced. This is opposed to the current procedure defined in RFC 4762 which cause all MAC addresses previously learned to be flushed except those that are learned from the PE that initiates the flush. Lastly, this document defines the MAC flush and optimized MAC flush for PBB-VPLS services. Working Group Summary: This document is an L2VPN Working Group document. It has gone through a few iterations that addressed comments received from the Working group and comments from the WG chairs. The draft got good support when it was adopted as a WG draft. The Working Group last call got no feedback from the Working Group and the only comments that needed to be addressed were those of the WG chairs. Document Quality: The document has OK quality. It is clear on the technical content and written with reasonable English and layout. The draft has authors from a couple companies that claim to have implemented the solution albeit no interoperability testing was done. Personnel: Document Shepherd: Nabil Bitar (nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com) Area Director: Adrian Farrel (Adrian@olddog.co.uk)