From nobody Sat Nov 1 00:49:06 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535C11A884E for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 00:49:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x_krAVRmOmEZ for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 00:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9044E1A884D for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 00:49:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2363; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414828145; x=1416037745; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VNPhMdy9Q3y7nJ2J8F9Bsd5AodvLGEJf9ZaMHpfIVkI=; b=FsMcV2Kp/AHM77mTmFxpzECJmOoPcd+vi9JogBdArBMQowUb9vYLqVBT xGGWtVyVIZgixHNkc6dv0TqczB9d6hlbEQ5RGNhlXGqxR8GRpj60OHpSw 2+WnaCOMxKcDv0AcDlouKPpu4xKdif0gKjoF9mHHD5wJFvj0t6NX6T1qs M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiQFAJWPVFStJV2c/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWIMGyjOHTQKBFRYBAQEBAX2EAgEBAQQdBhVADQQLEQQBAQECAgUWBAQDAgIJAwIBAgE0CQgTBgIBAYg9DbUDlFABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEagS2PagYQgmGBVAEEi3SKc4cWgTE9gxCCdopQhAmCNIFkHS8BAYJJAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,295,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="368406078" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2014 07:49:03 +0000 Received: from [10.21.71.234] ([10.21.71.234]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA17n1aO026728 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 07:49:01 GMT Message-ID: <5454906D.3010603@cisco.com> Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 00:49:01 -0700 From: Bhavani Parise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: l3vpn@ietf.org Subject: Re: Extended to Nov 4th: New Poll for adoption on draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes related to late IPR disclosure References: <5433F079.6090605@orange.com> <544E0602.1060109@orange.com> <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D445CB547B@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D445CB547B@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/2Dm7O_b8L_H7uef4u-ZpbrIVKL4 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 07:49:05 -0000 support -Bhavani On 10/29/14 2:43 PM, Huaimo Chen wrote: > Support. > > Best Regards, > Huaimo >> -----Original Message----- >> From: L3VPN [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin >> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 1:45 AM >> To: L3VPN >> Cc: draft-ietf-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes@tools.ietf.org; L3VPN ADs; >> draft- bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes@tools.ietf.org >> Subject: Extended to Nov 4th: New Poll for adoption on >> draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf- covering-prefixes related to late IPR >> disclosure >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> We are concerned by the reduced support for this document, now that an >> IPR disclosure has been made against it ; in particular compared to >> the support expressed during the initial call for adoption. >> >> This call is thus extended to Nov 4th. >> >> Thank you for your understanding, >> >> -Thomas and Martin >> >> >> Tue Oct 07 2014 15:54:01 GMT+0200 (CEST), Thomas Morin: >>> Hello working group, >>> >>> At the end of July, IPR has been disclosed on both >>> draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes and >>> draft-ietf-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes, related to a patent by one >>> of the co-authors, Lucy Yong ; we consider this disclosure far from >>> satisfying considering the rules of BCP79 ("as soon as reasonably >>> possible after the Contribution is published" [1]), and in >>> particular because the information was not provided when an IPR >>> disclosure reminder question was asked by chairs to authors, during >>> the call for adoption in June. >>> >>> The WG Chairs have thus decided to take a step back and initiate a >>> new poll for adoption on draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes-03 [2]. >>> >>> Knowing about this IPR [3], please express your opinion on whether >>> this document should be adopted or not by the Working Group. Please >>> motivate your opinion. >>> >>> Progressing this document as an L3VPN WG item is thus subject to >>> renewed WG consensus. >>> >>> Please send your comments, to the list or to the chairs, before >>> **October the 21th**. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Thomas & Martin, >>> l3vpn chairs >>> >>> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp79#section-6.2.1 >>> [2] >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes- >>> 03 [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2397/ >>> From nobody Sun Nov 2 14:57:26 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60031A1A4B; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 14:57:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.594 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7AnU21-dwIwO; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 14:57:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from fldsmtpe03.verizon.com (fldsmtpe03.verizon.com [140.108.26.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16AF91A1A3F; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 14:57:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verizon.com; i=nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1414969042; x=1446505042; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=Fr4WypZrHm531bY4qGdG/Hu7LICYpUEVAzRhpaaAqL4=; b=pFw0JvIC+vHhEoKOqh7H4uIW/vssJ+z6RG7kqGH+oJLT60SwA/SMs9/i M50QJl2Ni/rp5h748ms0J6kpr+H8aAQio3h+LHSuxGj6icBbhpReuMAsk gcLRQz9A419vHgVpv9n+a2vZQN1CKK3VRWy7xZopSmHbMsy/ecJ+1fskP M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi03.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.145]) by fldsmtpe03.verizon.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2014 22:57:20 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,303,1413244800"; d="scan'208,217";a="860722990" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb04.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.83]) by fldsmtpi03.verizon.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2014 22:57:20 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.45]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.83]) with mapi; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 17:57:20 -0500 To: "Martin Vigoureux (martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com)" Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 17:57:19 -0500 Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption poll - draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 Thread-Topic: [bess] WG adoption poll - draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 Thread-Index: Ac/28FrpWIJjUDAxQ4eaun1Eu/fURA== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D453FDD4B@dfweml701-chm> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D07C20863720Fnabilnbitaroneverizoncom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/yFR02gZ2yugNkGLA-JXND2Zuups Cc: "l3vpn@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 22:57:23 -0000 --_000_D07C20863720Fnabilnbitaroneverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Support as co-author. I am not aware of any relevant IPR. Thanks, Nabil --_000_D07C20863720Fnabilnbitaroneverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Support as co-author. I = am not aware of any relevant IPR.

Thanks,
Nabil

--_000_D07C20863720Fnabilnbitaroneverizoncom_-- From nobody Wed Nov 5 00:21:47 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6081A1A87EA for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 00:21:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jKGR7Alb2Xn3 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 00:21:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B458C1A87E8 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 00:21:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n3so11634819wiv.12 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:21:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MSdmWGjEkGxJjZHdo63V0zk0tWp8RtBG11yrlnoGQzw=; b=EWO7D+waUQ1AVzs2Ij4firO4CxPoyq7qzby6oqcLXT6qGUYdOnDVqIMz1PSFcGHggF Xar0NM4zw2gOvthG5BoRMl1a/N261lA4P3Cu8k0pxqRVuwT08g+1YlLxCOyleC2F+CHe bwFzlpdNUjeo5wCMXioqpy/77ZCZBg8WJXiovqhEUTd1OlZI3A+1jvRIZptm7zMqmEq5 UckeA2cFaRX0CiWPfTONrJCbjhh/gMAVm5kcw0j9av9KZTQlaEle6a3xc5Tny+14JKpt 6q8SbSruA1jh+gOAImFq6xmGFqo/fvbXYEloQPmBymNM/Xv42uCStWU98kZzEzu2xvt3 NYCA== X-Received: by 10.181.13.208 with SMTP id fa16mr29912369wid.61.1415175703421; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:21:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ARennes-652-1-187-250.w2-11.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2.11.250.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fq1sm14907663wib.12.2014.11.05.00.21.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:21:42 -0800 (PST) Sender: Thomas Morin Message-ID: <5459DE12.7090000@orange.com> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 09:21:38 +0100 From: Thomas Morin Organization: Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: L3VPN Subject: draft-...-orf-covering-prefixes re-adopted (was Re: New Poll for adoption on draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes related to late IPR disclosure) References: <5433F079.6090605@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <5433F079.6090605@orange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/x_uQTyIG4Bc8BlXTwPaNbAzggF8 Cc: draft-ietf-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes@tools.ietf.org, L3VPN ADs , draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes@tools.ietf.org X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 08:21:46 -0000 Hi everyone, This call for re-adoption is closed and we have a (not) new working group document. Can authors please resubmit as draft-bess-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes-00 ? Thank you, -Thomas 2014-10-07, Thomas Morin: > Hello working group, > > At the end of July, IPR has been disclosed on both > draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes and > draft-ietf-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes, related to a patent by one of > the co-authors, Lucy Yong ; we consider this disclosure far from > satisfying considering the rules of BCP79 ("as soon as reasonably > possible after the Contribution is published" [1]), and in particular > because the information was not provided when an IPR disclosure reminder > question was asked by chairs to authors, during the call for adoption in > June. > > The WG Chairs have thus decided to take a step back and initiate a new > poll for adoption on draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes-03 [2]. > > Knowing about this IPR [3], please express your opinion on whether this > document should be adopted or not by the Working Group. Please motivate > your opinion. > > Progressing this document as an L3VPN WG item is thus subject to renewed > WG consensus. > > Please send your comments, to the list or to the chairs, before > **October the 21th**. > > Thank you, > > Thomas & Martin, > l3vpn chairs > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp79#section-6.2.1 > [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes-03 > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2397/ > From nobody Wed Nov 5 15:36:14 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D06B1A0217; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:36:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.494 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ksosLg761e2a; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:36:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 063AF1A01F9; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:36:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id B007A3453855F; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:36:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id sA5Na6eq025679 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 6 Nov 2014 00:36:06 +0100 Received: from [135.244.192.4] (135.239.27.40) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 00:36:06 +0100 Message-ID: <545AB464.90304@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 00:36:04 +0100 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BESS Subject: Re: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting References: <544FB481.1020009@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <544FB481.1020009@orange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.40] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/_M-eYwZMVPkvG8dBHRpCs36brdY Cc: L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:36:12 -0000 All, we have updated the agenda. We have a 2nd session on Friday and we'll be discussing 5 more documents at that time. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-bess Speakers, please start sending your slides, and please do so, whether you're on Wed or Fri, before Tuesday 11pm local time. Thank you M&T Le 28/10/2014 16:21, Thomas Morin a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > You can find our *draft* agenda at: > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-bess > > Note well that this agenda is subject to change. > Do no hesitate to send us your feedback and comments. > > Best, > > -Thomas & Martin > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > From nobody Wed Nov 5 15:41:25 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EBF1A020A; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:41:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.494 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0o8mR7-BQwOj; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B66BD1A0204; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 03C4CB68B62A0; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:41:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id sA5NfIuw031161 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 6 Nov 2014 00:41:18 +0100 Received: from [135.244.192.4] (135.239.27.38) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 00:41:18 +0100 Message-ID: <545AB59D.40809@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 00:41:17 +0100 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Poll Closed [Re: WG adoption poll - draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05] References: <54440A63.4090404@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <54440A63.4090404@alcatel-lucent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.38] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/uAFhsvDFzLNN6hurD7kzXKLdVe4 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:41:22 -0000 WG, this document is adopted as a new WG item. Authors, please resubmit as draft-ietf-bess-virtual-pe-00, when the tool re-opens. Thank you -m Le 19/10/2014 21:00, Martin Vigoureux a écrit : > Hello Working Group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 [1]. > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in both cases please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until November the 3rd. > > > Coincidentally, we remind you to check and then state on this list if > you are aware, or not, of any undisclosed IPR (according to IETF IPR > rules, see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details) relating to > draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email and state whether or not you are aware of any relevant > IPR. The response needs to be sent to the L3VPN WG mailing list. The > document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been > received from each author and contributor. > > If you are on the L3VPN WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any > IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you > > M&T > > --- > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 > > > > From nobody Wed Nov 5 21:43:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E5B1A1A52; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 21:43:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3FEu1nZ4578m; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 21:43:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yh0-x22b.google.com (mail-yh0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C88D31A1A4F; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 21:43:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yh0-f43.google.com with SMTP id f73so1062947yha.16 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 21:43:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7IrxsCFR3h39hHa1iu4BgXE83CaMrSrmxZFTRa+ID94=; b=mDqmYqjn57/mMY6qgb81qT/LLdrVZ0RpSr5OhGasB8BuJ8a617pTfftqigv62CKtup Ag/MzetmTn9z1d/jEMM699NQyFwOofwAAJ0e2s9Swv2UzuDhlCjD/tiU6cNyELImk2yV LRsvjbc7e1gyIuYXXdO3veIcdN65cAF9/25BfeDgHOiZX1MplFcmOR/mhz6UXuMvcWyV amVl0qCX9C4/WskAe50o+9cFgxp5daOZxn0hOxCkAVx7NOhH0En1+xHIWLMtwMo8d0Kh l8wO2/LSrkesOyebDAjTSKIlEi65Sj9vvIT1b68Z46N0DlN6la/Z5HmECfU9BdrIV2d/ nRNA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.170.88.5 with SMTP id f5mr2171129yka.2.1415252612922; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 21:43:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.86.133 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 21:43:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <545AB59D.40809@alcatel-lucent.com> References: <54440A63.4090404@alcatel-lucent.com> <545AB59D.40809@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 00:43:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll Closed [Re: WG adoption poll - draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05] From: Luyuan Fang To: Martin Vigoureux Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a7ed642c4d405072a2d34 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/tBzYqIoLsqlbG_MqlIltji-T1Kw Cc: l3vpn@ietf.org, "bess@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 05:43:43 -0000 --001a113a7ed642c4d405072a2d34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, Martin! Will do. Luyuan On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Martin Vigoureux < martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > WG, > > this document is adopted as a new WG item. > > Authors, please resubmit as draft-ietf-bess-virtual-pe-00, when the tool > re-opens. > > Thank you > -m > > Le 19/10/2014 21:00, Martin Vigoureux a =C3=A9crit : > >> Hello Working Group, >> >> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >> draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 [1]. >> >> Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >> not (in both cases please also state the reasons). >> >> This poll runs until November the 3rd. >> >> >> Coincidentally, we remind you to check and then state on this list if >> you are aware, or not, of any undisclosed IPR (according to IETF IPR >> rules, see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details) relating to >> draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to >> this email and state whether or not you are aware of any relevant >> IPR. The response needs to be sent to the L3VPN WG mailing list. The >> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been >> received from each author and contributor. >> >> If you are on the L3VPN WG email list but are not listed as an author or >> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any >> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >> >> Thank you >> >> M&T >> >> --- >> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > --001a113a7ed642c4d405072a2d34 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks, Martin!
Will do.

Luyu= an

On = Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vi= goureux@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
WG,

this document is adopted as a new WG item.

Authors, please resubmit as draft-ietf-bess-virtual-pe-00, when the tool re= -opens.

Thank you
-m

Le 19/10/2014 21:00, Martin Vigoureux a =C3=A9crit :
Hello Working Group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 [1].

Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
not (in both cases please also state the reasons).

This poll runs until November the 3rd.


Coincidentally, we remind you to check and then state on this list if
you are aware, or not, of any undisclosed IPR (according to IETF IPR
rules, see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details) relating to
draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email and state whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. The response needs to be sent to the L3VPN WG mailing list. The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the L3VPN WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you

M&T

---
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual= -pe-05





_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

--001a113a7ed642c4d405072a2d34-- From nobody Thu Nov 6 14:17:26 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D9E1A924A; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:17:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vHzZn1K7RW8S; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:17:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 770441A90E7; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:17:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1850; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415312236; x=1416521836; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=S8zrSLDVrNaXxs2NDfQEDnaIYMUlMKOqTYE0G8ddUDM=; b=c75aMqRwlRo/R7+reU8gJzCdTeh8tZNA8m8VmsMwPadiGDTxKydKQQsD q9++aDEvXmzprMIcBNFwyIz2sVYBef5+0wp1MfwH6Db6WoucaitayctxT OHcZLpsTCqnZkU4B7Vlb1YWU43sfSxgKebmsE1au5ouiGQXFn+e5o6Mzz 0=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhsFADnyW1StJA2L/2dsb2JhbABbgmsjVFkEyyUKh00CgSEWAQEBAQF9hAMBAQQBAQFrCxIBCG0LJQIEAQ0FCYg4AQzPLAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEZkREHhEsFiz+GZYtygTKDTo1ShAmDeGyBBgc7gQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,328,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="94232724" Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2014 22:17:15 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA6MHFax026250 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 6 Nov 2014 22:17:15 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:17:15 -0600 From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" To: Martin Vigoureux , BESS , Thomas Morin Subject: Re: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting Thread-Topic: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting Thread-Index: AQHP+VFDYDLv2+oHOUiPw0Co5slYqpxUCqiA Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 22:17:14 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <545AB464.90304@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913 x-originating-ip: [10.154.201.175] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <38749D4CA168204E81D4805F1DC57A45@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/fblexc9czu15oDOo8LYVqSo4wv4 Cc: L2vpn , "Giles Heron \(giheron\)" , L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 22:17:18 -0000 Hi Martin, Thomas: Thanks for arraigning the 2nd session as this is our first IETF BESS meeting and there are quite a few topics to discuss. BTW, I have a question regarding the pending WG calls for L2VPN drafts. There have been a number of WG calls for EVPN related drafts with a large number of positive responses in support for adoption of these drafts. These calls were initiated over 4 weeks ago and I am hoping that the L2VPN WG chairs (Nabil and Giles) publish the results soon. I was not planning to present any of the EVPN drafts that are in L2VPN WG calls. Would you please advise me if there is any need to present/discuss these drafts yet again at our BESS session(s)? Do you want to discuss this with the L2VPN WG chairs before answering my question? Regards, Ali On 11/5/14, 3:36 PM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >All, > >we have updated the agenda. We have a 2nd session on Friday and we'll be >discussing 5 more documents at that time. > >http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-bess > >Speakers, please start sending your slides, and please do so, whether >you're on Wed or Fri, before Tuesday 11pm local time. > >Thank you > >M&T > >Le 28/10/2014 16:21, Thomas Morin a =E9crit : >> Hi everyone, >> >> You can find our *draft* agenda at: >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-bess >> >> Note well that this agenda is subject to change. >> Do no hesitate to send us your feedback and comments. >> >> Best, >> >> -Thomas & Martin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> BESS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Fri Nov 7 08:04:28 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC261A0055 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 15:12:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SKtIojDmYd9B; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 15:11:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8F01A001E; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 15:11:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: l3vpn-chairs@tools.ietf.org, thomas.morin@rd.francetelecom.com, draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system.all@tools.ietf.org, l3vpn@ietf.org Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.7.2.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141106231159.32432.36600.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 15:11:59 -0800 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/AZY7LkKZgpN-G1RvPCgDHQ0Ju4U X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 08:04:17 -0800 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 23:12:02 -0000 IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system/ From nobody Fri Nov 7 16:23:47 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E2C1A0066; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:23:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.979 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.514] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3kSnHGAz-Irc; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:23:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66A8C1A0055; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:23:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 57290564DD449; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 00:23:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id sA80Ne56016693 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 8 Nov 2014 01:23:40 +0100 Received: from FR712WXCHMBA09.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.5.168]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 01:23:40 +0100 From: "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" To: BESS , Thomas Morin , "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" Subject: RE: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting Thread-Topic: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting Thread-Index: AQHP+VFDOajVGCWrR1y8pr7Q1lKzCpxUCqiAgAHXMiI= Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 00:23:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <545AB464.90304@alcatel-lucent.com>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FEA27CFACBAF3A429E381E6FD69CDC7325F1D50FFR712WXCHMBA09z_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/VeqF5U5vE7yvAVu8awaqkY8YZ04 Cc: L2vpn , "Giles Heron \(giheron\)" , L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 00:23:45 -0000 --_000_FEA27CFACBAF3A429E381E6FD69CDC7325F1D50FFR712WXCHMBA09z_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ali, We will cover the drafts that went through L2VPN LC/adoption as part of the= WG status. No a priori need to have dedicated discussion slot for these -m ________________________________ De : Ali Sajassi (sajassi) Envoy=E9 : 06/11/2014 14:17 =C0 : VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN); BESS; Thomas Morin Cc : L3VPN; L2vpn; Bitar, Nabil N; Giles Heron (giheron) Objet : Re: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting Hi Martin, Thomas: Thanks for arraigning the 2nd session as this is our first IETF BESS meeting and there are quite a few topics to discuss. BTW, I have a question regarding the pending WG calls for L2VPN drafts. There have been a number of WG calls for EVPN related drafts with a large number of positive responses in support for adoption of these drafts. These calls were initiated over 4 weeks ago and I am hoping that the L2VPN WG chairs (Nabil and Giles) publish the results soon. I was not planning to present any of the EVPN drafts that are in L2VPN WG calls. Would you please advise me if there is any need to present/discuss these drafts yet again at our BESS session(s)? Do you want to discuss this with the L2VPN WG chairs before answering my question? Regards, Ali On 11/5/14, 3:36 PM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >All, > >we have updated the agenda. We have a 2nd session on Friday and we'll be >discussing 5 more documents at that time. > >http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-bess > >Speakers, please start sending your slides, and please do so, whether >you're on Wed or Fri, before Tuesday 11pm local time. > >Thank you > >M&T > >Le 28/10/2014 16:21, Thomas Morin a =E9crit : >> Hi everyone, >> >> You can find our *draft* agenda at: >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-bess >> >> Note well that this agenda is subject to change. >> Do no hesitate to send us your feedback and comments. >> >> Best, >> >> -Thomas & Martin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> BESS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess --_000_FEA27CFACBAF3A429E381E6FD69CDC7325F1D50FFR712WXCHMBA09z_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ali,

We will cover the drafts that went through L2VPN LC/adoption as part of the= WG status. No a priori need to have dedicated discussion slot for these
-m
De : Ali Sa= jassi (sajassi)
Envoy=E9 : 06/11/= 2014 14:17
=C0 : VIGOUR= EUX, MARTIN (MARTIN); BESS; Thomas Morin
Cc : L3VPN;= L2vpn; Bitar, Nabil N; Giles Heron (giheron)
Objet : Re: [b= ess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting


Hi Martin, Thomas:

Thanks for arraigning the 2nd session as this is our first IETF BESS
meeting and there are quite a few topics to discuss. BTW, I have a
question regarding the pending WG calls for L2VPN drafts. There have been a number of WG calls for EVPN related drafts with a large number of
positive responses in support for adoption of these drafts. These calls
were initiated over 4 weeks ago and I am hoping that the L2VPN WG chairs (Nabil and Giles) publish the results soon. I was not planning to present any of the EVPN drafts that are in L2VPN WG calls. Would you please advise<= br> me if there is any need to present/discuss these drafts yet again at our BESS session(s)? Do you want to discuss this with the L2VPN WG chairs
before answering my question?

Regards,
Ali

On 11/5/14, 3:36 PM, "Martin Vigoureux"
<martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

>All,
>
>we have updated the agenda. We have a 2nd session on Friday and we'll b= e
>discussing 5 more documents at that time.
>
>ht= tp://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-bess
>
>Speakers, please start sending your slides, and please do so, whether >you're on Wed or Fri, before Tuesday 11pm local time.
>
>Thank you
>
>M&T
>
>Le 28/10/2014 16:21, Thomas Morin a =E9crit :
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> You can find our *draft* agenda at:
>>     http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda= -91-bess
>>
>> Note well that this agenda is subject to change.
>> Do no hesitate to send us your feedback and comments.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -Thomas & Martin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> BESS mailing list
>> BESS@ietf.org
>> https://www= .ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>BESS mailing list
>BESS@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf= .org/mailman/listinfo/bess

 --_000_FEA27CFACBAF3A429E381E6FD69CDC7325F1D50FFR712WXCHMBA09z_-- From nobody Thu Nov 13 10:42:36 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DD91A9218; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:42:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cGNE0GnhA6Bs; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:42:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C801A9164; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:42:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h11so387790wiw.7 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:42:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fsty99DCH3VcaB2BJqrN7kzgMQtm6EkTGXo9xYvfDis=; b=qWH2C/ZXQofdWSJcq7bFBsPQ8Gtk3rFeHD+nngpn4sftLgIBeloxYY6fxkj0yVSGWM mXzwY2/rtb2s/V7ypkGZpoco1ZVFNAPSo0ULaiOAvVn7EX49zUmNTiFPgjGo3JmABcBg v1s8sFbCxCDu00wBl9dnzYqqFZoCyMYlZXSVIcEv983N264MHMaOovjjlWNn8Z8OwHMF vA7Q1Gx4AOxub7M81qzw4JKIfAhgSeLqxhicRm0UCNCbdmu5ZzAC0+reO/+oKBxgbaj9 xBvrNxLbTfWAFCwekfG1asoD9/GCpfLzdOE1r/w6gtef/FaXafq6wDlJmSqCnad61J/N K3eA== X-Received: by 10.180.8.193 with SMTP id t1mr769811wia.15.1415904143340; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:42:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ARennes-652-1-57-75.w2-11.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2.11.56.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rx8sm36548946wjb.30.2014.11.13.10.42.18 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:42:22 -0800 (PST) Sender: Thomas Morin Message-ID: <5464FB88.7080703@orange.com> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 08:42:16 -1000 From: Thomas Morin Organization: Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: iesg-secretary@ietf.org Subject: Request for publication of draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/W-o7-d80NUzDNu7bcBNTn20KwuI Cc: Adrian Farrel , draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community@tools.ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, L3VPN X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:42:35 -0000 IESG, The L3VPN WG requests that draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community-08 be published as an RFC on the Standard track. The shepherd write-up is in the datatacker [1]. Thank you, -Thomas for the BESS WG [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community/shepherdwriteup/ From nobody Thu Nov 20 06:26:42 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AF31A1A0F; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:26:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -107.496 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mYPlzpFkgRJl; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:26:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EFA1A1A0E; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:26:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C5425180015; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:25:30 -0800 (PST) To: wesley.george@twcable.com, jeremy.de_clercq@alcatel.be, dirk@onesparrow.com, marco.carugi@nortel.com, flefauch@cisco.com Subject: [Errata Rejected] RFC4659 (4087) X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20141120142530.C5425180015@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:25:30 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/lY_kKuqaSSQF_Ze_flA4mRMg1Nk Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, l3vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:26:40 -0000 The following errata report has been rejected for RFC4659, "BGP-MPLS IP Virtual Private Network (VPN) Extension for IPv6 VPN". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4659&eid=4087 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Wesley George Date Reported: 2014-08-18 Rejected by: Adrian Farrel (IESG) Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- No "updates" metadata reference to update RFC4364 Corrected Text -------------- This document updates RFC4364 (and associated metadata links) Notes ----- RFC4659 provides an extension to the standard defined in RFC4364 to add IPv6 support to a standard that was originally IPv4-only. This metadata link will make it clearer for implementers that both standards are necessary for a full implementation. --VERIFIER NOTES-- Considering the definition of "updates", the normal terms of an errata report, and the discussion on the Bess mailing list I am rejecting this. This should not be construed as meaning that IPv6 support is not critically important: BGP/MPLS VPNs should, of course, be fully functional in IPv6 networks. -------------------------------------- RFC4659 (draft-ietf-l3vpn-bgp-ipv6-07) -------------------------------------- Title : BGP-MPLS IP Virtual Private Network (VPN) Extension for IPv6 VPN Publication Date : September 2006 Author(s) : J. De Clercq, D. Ooms, M. Carugi, F. Le Faucheur Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks INT Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Sun Nov 23 01:21:36 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3091A1B25; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:21:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ITBp7xmPGxOV; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:21:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632AC1A1B22; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:21:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: l3vpn-chairs@tools.ietf.org, thomas.morin@rd.francetelecom.com, draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system.all@tools.ietf.org, l3vpn@ietf.org, bess-chair@tools.ietf.org, bess@ietf.org Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.7.4 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141123092131.6548.55410.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:21:31 -0800 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/Jl0UVRsw_7KdyKeGSvXu0pllQrY X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 09:21:33 -0000 IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system/ From nobody Mon Nov 24 07:57:08 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8681A6FF6; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:57:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4F7GhBKYdMqb; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:57:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6821A6F57; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:57:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: l3vpn-chairs@tools.ietf.org, thomas.morin@rd.francetelecom.com, draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system.all@tools.ietf.org, l3vpn@ietf.org, bess-chair@tools.ietf.org, bess@ietf.org Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.7.4 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141124155701.10176.39548.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:57:01 -0800 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/c_wkzLJ_Y-dL42nKSS2bKudhRi8 X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:57:04 -0000 Last call has been made for draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system and state has been changed to In Last Call ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system/