From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Tue Apr 2 12:20:00 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA24283 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 12:20:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA26563; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 12:07:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA26531 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 12:07:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from kathmandu.sun.com (kathmandu.sun.com [192.18.98.36]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA23501 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 12:06:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from rowlf.Central.Sun.COM ([129.153.131.70]) by kathmandu.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22215 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 10:07:00 -0700 (MST) Received: from sun.com (dhcp-aus09-222 [129.153.130.222]) by rowlf.Central.Sun.COM (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id g32H6we07020 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 11:06:58 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <3CA9E575.CD1313BC@sun.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 11:08:05 -0600 From: Mark Wahl Reply-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ldapext] LDAPEXT mailing list move Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In order to reduce the SPAM traffic, the LDAP Extensions Working Group mailing list has been changed from ietf-ldapext@netscape.com to ldapext@ietf.org All current members of ietf-ldapext@netscape.com have already been moved over to the new list. No action need be taken. If you wish to unsubscribe or have other questions, contact ldapext-admin@ietf.org To subscribe, please see the instructions at https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext Mail to ietf-ldapext@netscape.com will not be forwarded and that alias name will be shut down shortly. Note Well All statements related to the activities of the IETF and addressed to the IETF are subject to all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026, which grants to the IETF and its participants certain licenses and rights in such statements. Such statements include verbal statements in IETF meetings, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to the IETF plenary session, any IETF working group or portion thereof, the IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG, the IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB, any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices, the RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function Statements made outside of an IETF meeting, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF activity, group or function, are not subject to these provisions. Mark Wahl Sun Microsystems Inc. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Wed Apr 3 07:41:31 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA01057 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 07:41:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA18426; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 07:30:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA18393 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 07:30:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from QSERVER.COM ([210.23.213.24]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA00688 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 07:30:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost ([210.23.213.24]) by QSERVER.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2172.1); Wed, 3 Apr 2002 20:56:13 -0800 X-Sender: jans103@yahoo.com From: Jans Lindo To: ldapext@ietf.org Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 20:56:13 -0800 Reply-To: jans102@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2002 04:56:13.0452 (UTC) FILETIME=[0B9CCCC0:01C1DB95] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ldapext] Join for FREE! Work a little and Succeed! Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Fellow Internet Marketer, My name is Janus Lindo. I am now focusing on one online opportunity. I have tried several of these online opportunities full of hype promising us thousands of dollars every month. It is a sad fact that many people who are in need to earn additional income is being victimized by this fly by night scam artists. Every time I tried one opportunity after the other, I ended more broke than ever. As a result of trying all these opportunities, I have decided to select on my portfolio the company which is true to their words. Not the one full of hype. The only one that has consistently sent me the monthly check. Even without the hype they have given me the best compensation plan with their high % commission. They are providing real service not the one that simply transfer wealth from the new signups to the people at the top of the pyramid. They are not a form of a pyramid scam. Also when you join, you will have a team of upline sponsors who will help you succeed every step of the way. Instead of being left alone, you will be guided step by step by real people, not those autoresponders. Do not believe in do nothing, no recruiting, no selling schemes. They are scams. You might want to try it to prove my words. Only you can make your own success together with the help of your sponsors. If you have 2 to 3 hours a day, you will be able to earn a full income in a few months. And there is absolutely no limit as how much you can earn. It is designed to gain momentum after some time. But I prefer to avoid such statements as "You will get rich". I read it everywhere and I do not want to sound like them. Click here <> or send email to jans2k2@yahoo.com and put "SIGN ME UP FOR FREE" in the subject and your fullname in the body of your email. Regards, Janus Lindo jans2k2@yahoo.com Note: You don't need to request for removal. This is a one time email. Your email address will be automatically de-activated in our list if you don't reply in this mail. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Wed Apr 3 07:47:51 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA01288 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 07:47:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA18353; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 07:30:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from QSERVER.COM ([210.23.213.24]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA18294 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 07:30:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost ([210.23.213.24]) by QSERVER.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2172.1); Wed, 3 Apr 2002 20:56:13 -0800 X-Sender: jans103@yahoo.com From: Jans Lindo To: ldapext@ns.ietf.org Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 20:56:13 -0800 Reply-To: jans102@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2002 04:56:13.0342 (UTC) FILETIME=[0B8C03E0:01C1DB95] Subject: [ldapext] Join for FREE! Work a little and Succeed! Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Fellow Internet Marketer, My name is Janus Lindo. I am now focusing on one online opportunity. I have tried several of these online opportunities full of hype promising us thousands of dollars every month. It is a sad fact that many people who are in need to earn additional income is being victimized by this fly by night scam artists. Every time I tried one opportunity after the other, I ended more broke than ever. As a result of trying all these opportunities, I have decided to select on my portfolio the company which is true to their words. Not the one full of hype. The only one that has consistently sent me the monthly check. Even without the hype they have given me the best compensation plan with their high % commission. They are providing real service not the one that simply transfer wealth from the new signups to the people at the top of the pyramid. They are not a form of a pyramid scam. Also when you join, you will have a team of upline sponsors who will help you succeed every step of the way. Instead of being left alone, you will be guided step by step by real people, not those autoresponders. Do not believe in do nothing, no recruiting, no selling schemes. They are scams. You might want to try it to prove my words. Only you can make your own success together with the help of your sponsors. If you have 2 to 3 hours a day, you will be able to earn a full income in a few months. And there is absolutely no limit as how much you can earn. It is designed to gain momentum after some time. But I prefer to avoid such statements as "You will get rich". I read it everywhere and I do not want to sound like them. Click here <> or send email to jans2k2@yahoo.com and put "SIGN ME UP FOR FREE" in the subject and your fullname in the body of your email. Regards, Janus Lindo jans2k2@yahoo.com Note: You don't need to request for removal. This is a one time email. Your email address will be automatically de-activated in our list if you don't reply in this mail. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Sat Apr 6 21:32:01 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA18412 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 21:32:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA13782; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 21:09:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from QSERVER.COM (ppp213.dyn212.pacific.net.ph [210.23.212.213] (may be forged)) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA13750 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 21:09:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost ([210.23.212.213]) by QSERVER.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2172.1); Sun, 7 Apr 2002 11:36:15 -0700 X-Sender: sarahj@bonbon.net From: Sarah Jane To: ldapext@ns.ietf.org Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 11:36:15 -0700 Reply-To: sarjane@bonbon.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2002 18:36:15.0391 (UTC) FILETIME=[197E22F0:01C1DE63] Subject: [ldapext] Join for FREE! Work a little and Succeed! Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Fellow Internet Marketer, My name is Sarah Jane Arias. I am now focusing on one online opportunity. I have tried several of these online opportunities full of hype promising us thousands of dollars every month. It is a sad fact that many people who are in need to earn additional income is being victimized by this fly by night scam artists. Every time I tried one opportunity after the other, I ended more broke than ever. As a result of trying all these opportunities, I have decided to select on my portfolio the company which is true to their words. Not the one full of hype. The only one that has consistently sent me the monthly check. Even without the hype they have given me the best compensation plan with their high % commission. They are providing real service not the one that simply transfer wealth from the new signups to the people at the top of the pyramid. They are not a form of a pyramid scam. Also when you join, you will have a team of upline sponsors who will help you succeed every step of the way. Instead of being left alone, you will be guided step by step by real people, not those autoresponders. Do not believe in do nothing, no recruiting, no selling schemes. They are scams. You might want to try it to prove my words. Only you can make your own success together with the help of your sponsors. If you have 2 to 3 hours a day, you will be able to earn a full income in a few months. And there is absolutely no limit as how much you can earn. It is designed to gain momentum after some time. But I prefer to avoid such statements as "You will get rich". I read it everywhere and I do not want to sound like them. Click here or send email to sarahjanebiz@SoftHome.net and put "REGISTER ME FOR FREE" in the subject and your fullname in the body of your email. Regards, Sarah Jane Arias sarahjanebiz@SoftHome.net Note: You don't need to request for removal. This is a one time email. Your email address will be automatically de-activated in our list if you don't reply in this mail. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Mon Apr 15 03:15:59 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA08664 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 03:15:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA18478; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 03:01:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA18428 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 03:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DESKTOP (h00207818a19b.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.60.238.3]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id DAA08425 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 03:01:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200204150701.DAA08425@ietf.org> From: "Adam Erickson" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 03:01:48 -0400 Subject: [ldapext] Resume Writing and Distribution Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Dear Job Seeker,


How can we help you find your DREAM JOB?

Resume Author.com is an established resume writing and distribution firm that specializes in custom-tailored career development. We have a dedicated staff of resume writers and an Opt-In E-mail Distribution Network of over 19,000 recruiters and employers (We can have your professional resume in their hands in a matter of minutes).

We're so confident in the effectiveness of our services that we guarantee job interviews!!!

Learn more about the most effective career marketing services available.

Resume Writing & Editing Services Click Here
Starting at only 79.95

E-mail Resume Distribution Services Click Here
Starting at only 29.95


Best Regards,

Adam Erickson
Client Development,
Resume Author


Would you like to test our quality? We provide a FREE Resume Critique for all interested parties.




CONCERNED ABOUT JUNK MAIL? SO ARE WE.

As a ResumeAuthor.com Sales Representative, I believe you meet the criteria we look for in a resume writing and distribution customer. If, however, you feel that you have received this email in error, I apologize. We will comply with all removal requests. To be removed type "remove" in the subject line and MAIL TO:aerickson@resumeauthor.com this is the only way to be removed. Hitting reply will NOT remove you.

This message is sent in compliance of the new email bill section 301.Per Section 301, Paragraph (a)(2)(C) of S. 1618. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Mon Apr 15 18:26:23 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08206 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:26:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA18182; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:21:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA18139 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:21:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from prv-mail20.provo.novell.com (prv-mail20.provo.novell.com [137.65.81.122]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08080 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:21:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from INET-PRV-MTA by prv-mail20.provo.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 16:20:44 -0600 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.1 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 16:20:35 -0600 From: "Steve Sonntag" To: , Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ldapext] Java LDAP API, sorting Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rob, I have been reviewing the changes associated with the addition of the Java Collections Framework. I believe the specification is incomplete relative to the use of this framework. Specifically I am looking at how one performs sorts using the collections framework and have reviewed the statements in Appendix 9.2 that relate to sorting. > LDAPAttributeSet > > Implements Cloneable and java.util.Set. Removed the methods > made redundant by implementing Set: add(LDAPAttribute attr), > elementAt(), getAttributes(), remove(String name), > removeElementAt(), and size(). > > LDAPCompareAttrNames > > Implements java.util.Comparator instead of LDAPEntryComparator. > > LDAPSearchResults > > Does not implement Enumeration. > > Removed nextElement(). > > Renamed hasMoreElements() to hasMore(). > > Removed sort() (sorting can now be done with classes/interfaces > of the Collections framework now that LDAPAttributeSet > implements Set). The collections framework has two interfaces and two classes that facilitate sorting. These are: - The Comparable interface - an implementing object can be compared with another implementing object, determining the natural ordering of the objects. - The Comparator interface - implementers can compare and order two objects, called specific ordering. - The Arrays class - allows sorting of objects contained in an array using either natural or specific ordering. - The Collections class - allows sorting of objects contained in a class that implements the List interface using natural or specific ordering. There seem to be three obvious kinds of data that one might consider sorting: 1) Values of a multi-valued attribute. 2) Attribute Names 3) Search Entries Let's see how the Collections Framework can be used to sort these items: Sort values from a multivalued binary attribute: byte[][] values = attr.getByteValueArray( ) Arrays.sort( values[]); // Order by byte values Arrays.sort( values[], myComparator) // Specific ordering Sort values from a multivalued String attribute: String[] values = attr.getStringValueArray(); Arrays.sort(values); // Natural ordering Arrays.sort(values, myComparator); // Specific Ordering Sort Attribute objects LDAPEntry entry = results.next(); LDAPAttributeSet aset = entry.getAttributeSet() LDAPAttribute[] attrs = new LDAPAttribute[20]; attrs = aset.toArray(attrs); // from Set Arrays.sort(attrs); // Natural ordering by attribute name Arrays.sort(attrs, myComparator); // Specific ordering Note: Currently natural ordering between LDAPAttribute objects is undefined since LDAPAttribute does not implement the Comparable interface. I suggest that LDAPAttribute implement the Comparable interface with natural ordering based on attribute name. Sort LDAPEntry objects It is not possible to sort Entries, since there is no way to get either a List or an Array from LDAPSearchResults. I suggest that LDAPEntry implement the Comparable interface with natural ordering based on the dn, and that LDAPSearchResults implement a nextArray() method (see below). If this were done, sorting of LDAPEntry objects could be done as follows: LDAPEntry[] entries = results.nextArray(); Arrays.sort(entries); // Sort by dn Arrays.sort(entries, myComparator); // Specific ordering. Note: myComparator is probably of type LDAPCompareAttrNames, but an application could implement their own Comparator class. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suggested changes to the draft: 2.1 public class LDAPAttribute implements Cloneable, Serializable, Comparable ------------------------ 2.2.2 compareTo public int compareTo(Object obj) Compares this object with the specified object for order. Ordering is determined by comparing attribute names (see getName()) using the compareTo() method of the String class. Returns a negative integer, zero, or a positive integer as this object is less than, equal to, or greater than the specified object. obj The object to be compared to this object. ------------------------ 2.14 public classs LDAPEntry implements Serializable, Comparable ------------------------ 2.14.2 compareTo public int compareTo(Object obj) Compares this object with the specified object for order. Ordering is determined by comparing dn values (see getDN) using the compareTo() method of the String class. Returns a negative integer, zero, or a positive integer as this object is less than, equal to, or greater than the specified object. obj The object to be compared to this object. ------------------------ (in class LDAPSearchResults) 2.35.5 nextArray public LDAPEntry[] nextArray() throws LDAPException Returns an array containing all LDAPEntries in the order they were received. If automatic referral following is disabled or a referral was not followed, nextArray() will throw an LDAPReferralException when the referral is received. It should be noted that only those Entries which have been received and not retrieved via next() or nextArray() are placed in the array. This will generally be the number of entries specified by batchsize. The size of the array returned will equal the number of entries returned. If all entries have already been returned, nextArray() throws NoSuchElementException. If a sort of all entries returned by a search is desired, batchsize should be set to zero so that all entries are received by the API before control is returned to the application. (see LDAPSearchConstraints.setBatchSize()). Sorting can be performed using the sort method of the Arrays class. ------------------------ -Steve ------------------------ Steven Sonntag Novell, Inc., The leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Wed Apr 17 16:58:54 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA07601 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 16:58:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA11285; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:35:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA11236 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:35:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from prv-mail20.provo.novell.com (prv-mail20.provo.novell.com [137.65.81.122]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA03454 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:35:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from INET-PRV-MTA by prv-mail20.provo.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:34:35 -0600 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.1 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:34:24 -0600 From: "Steve Sonntag" To: , "Steve Sonntag" , Subject: Re: [ldapext] Java LDAP API, sorting Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rob, I realize I overlooked something in the discussion on sorting, specifically the two classes TreeSet and TreeMap that order objects as they are added into the to the Tree object. Objects are sorted either by their natural order or as specified by a Comparator object. With that information, the following changes are in order. >>> "Steve Sonntag" 15-Apr-02 4:20:35 PM >>> > Rob, > > I have been reviewing the changes associated > with the addition of the Java Collections > Framework. I believe the specification is > incomplete relative to the use of this framework. > > Specifically I am looking at how one performs sorts > using the collections framework and have reviewed > the statements in Appendix 9.2 that relate to sorting. > > > LDAPAttributeSet > > > > Implements Cloneable and java.util.Set. Removed the methods > > > made redundant by implementing Set: add(LDAPAttribute attr), > > > elementAt(), getAttributes(), remove(String name), > > removeElementAt(), and size(). > > > > LDAPCompareAttrNames > > > > Implements java.util.Comparator instead of > LDAPEntryComparator. > > > > LDAPSearchResults > > > > Does not implement Enumeration. > > > > Removed nextElement(). > > > > Renamed hasMoreElements() to hasMore(). > > > > Removed sort() (sorting can now be done with > classes/interfaces > > of the Collections framework now that LDAPAttributeSet > > implements Set). > > The collections framework has two interfaces and two classes Four Classes > that facilitate sorting. These are: > > - The Comparable interface - an implementing > object can be compared with another implementing > object, determining the natural ordering of > the objects. > - The Comparator interface - implementers can > compare and order two objects, called specific ordering. > - The Arrays class - allows sorting of objects > contained in an array using either natural > or specific ordering. > - The Collections class - allows sorting of > objects contained in a class that implements the > List interface using natural or specific ordering. - The TreeSet class, an implementation of the SortedSet interface sorts objects as they are added to the object, and uses natural or specific ordering. - The TreeMap class, an implementation of the SortedMap interface sorts objects by keys as they are added to the object, and uses natural or specific ordering. > > There seem to be three obvious kinds of data > that one might consider sorting: > > 1) Values of a multi-valued attribute. > 2) Attribute Names > 3) Search Entries > > Let's see how the Collections Framework > can be used to sort these items: > > Sort values from a multivalued binary attribute: > > byte[][] values = attr.getByteValueArray( ) > Arrays.sort( values[]); // Order by byte values > Arrays.sort( values[], myComparator) // Specific ordering > TreeSet can be used to order values by looping through values and adding them to the set using natural ordering or a specific comparator. > Sort values from a multivalued String attribute: > > String[] values = attr.getStringValueArray(); > Arrays.sort(values); // Natural ordering > Arrays.sort(values, myComparator); // Specific Ordering > TreeSet can be used to order values by looping through values and adding them to the set using natural ordering or a specific comparator. > Sort Attribute objects > > LDAPEntry entry = results.next(); > LDAPAttributeSet aset = entry.getAttributeSet() > LDAPAttribute[] attrs = new LDAPAttribute[20]; > attrs = aset.toArray(attrs); // from Set > Arrays.sort(attrs); // Natural > ordering by attribute name > Arrays.sort(attrs, myComparator); // Specific ordering > > Note: Currently natural ordering between > LDAPAttribute objects is undefined since > LDAPAttribute does not implement the Comparable > interface. I suggest that LDAPAttribute implement > the Comparable interface with natural ordering > based on attribute name. > TreeSet can be used to order attributes by looping through the name and adding each to the set using natural ordering or a specific comparator. If LDAPAttribute objects implement Comparable as I suggest, one can simply say "new TreeSet(attributeSet)" to create a naturally sorted collection of attributes. > Sort LDAPEntry objects > > It is not possible to sort Entries, since > there is no way to get either a List or an > Array from LDAPSearchResults. I suggest > that LDAPEntry implement the Comparable > interface with natural ordering based on the > dn, and that LDAPSearchResults implement > a nextArray() method (see below). If this > were done, sorting of LDAPEntry objects > could be done as follows: > > LDAPEntry[] entries = results.nextArray(); > Arrays.sort(entries); // Sort by dn > Arrays.sort(entries, myComparator); // Specific ordering. > > Note: myComparator is probably of type LDAPCompareAttrNames, > but an application could implement their own Comparator class. Using TreeSet, Entries can be sorted by adding the Entries to the TreeSet object. This has the advantage over nextArray() in that no fiddling need be done with batchsize. It is up to the application to determine which Entries are sorted and how to deal with ensuring adequate memory for large sorts. I see no need for the above described nextArray method. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Suggested changes to the draft: > > 2.1 public class LDAPAttribute > implements Cloneable, Serializable, Comparable > ------------------------ > 2.2.2 compareTo > > public int compareTo(Object obj) > > Compares this object with the specified object for > order. Ordering is determined by comparing attribute > names (see getName()) using the compareTo() method of > the String class. Returns a negative integer, zero, or > a positive integer as this object is less than, equal > to, or greater than the specified object. > > obj The object to be compared to this object. > ------------------------ > > 2.14 public classs LDAPEntry > implements Serializable, Comparable > ------------------------ > 2.14.2 compareTo > > public int compareTo(Object obj) > > Compares this object with the specified object for > order. Ordering is determined by comparing dn values > (see getDN) using the compareTo() method of the StringaringValueArray(); > Array > class. Returns a negative integer, zero, or a > positive integer as this object is less than, equal > to, or greater than the specified object. > > obj The object to be compared to this object. > > ------------------------ > (in class LDAPSearchResults) > > 2.35.5 nextArray > > public LDAPEntry[] nextArray() throws LDAPException > > Returns an array containing all LDAPEntries in the > order they were received. If automatic referral > following is disabled or a referral was not > followed, nextArray() will throw an > LDAPReferralException when the referral is received. > > It should be noted that only those Entries which > have been received and not retrieved via next() > or nextArray() are placed in the array. This will > generally be the number of entries specified by > batchsize. The size of the array returned will > equal the number of entries returned. If all > entries have already been returned, nextArray() > throws NoSuchElementException. If a sort of all > entries returned by a search is desired, batchsize > should be set to zero so that all entries are received > by the API before control is returned to the application. > (see LDAPSearchConstraints.setBatchSize()). Sorting > can be performed using the sort method of the Arrays class. > ------------------------ Eliminate nextArray, but do have LDAPEntry and LDAPAttribute implement Comparable. The description of LDAPCompareAttrNames should be clarified to something like the following: 2.7 public class LDAPCompareaAttrNames implements Comparator An object of this class defines the ordering when sorting search results. LDAPEntry objects are sorted by the value of the specified attribute name(s) in ascending or descending order. This object is typically supplied to an implementation of the collection interfaces like TreeSet which performs the sort. ----------------------------------------------- In summary what I suggest is, add "implement Comparable" for classes LDAPAttribute and LDAPEntry (with appropriate description of natural compare mechanism) Clarify description for LDAPCompareAttrNames -Steve > > > -Steve > > > > ------------------------ > Steven Sonntag > Novell, Inc., The leading provider of Net business solutions > http://www.novell.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Ldapext mailing list > Ldapext@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Sun Apr 21 05:56:57 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA23083 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:56:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA20235; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:50:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA20203 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:50:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from moutvdom00.kundenserver.de (moutvdom00.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.149]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA22973 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:50:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [195.20.224.219] (helo=mrvdom03.kundenserver.de) by moutvdom00.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 16zDyw-0005FJ-00; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:50:06 +0200 Received: from [217.230.199.162] (helo=TRAVELMATE) by mrvdom03.kundenserver.de with smtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 16zDyw-0007o8-00; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:50:06 +0200 From: "Jochen Keutel" To: , Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:49:33 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by optimus.ietf.org id FAA20204 Subject: [ldapext] LDAP and subtree specification and subentries Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello, RFC2252 lists in 4.3.2 a syntax Subtree Specification Y 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.45 However - there is no further definition of the syntax. Question: Where is defined how values of attributes of syntax subtree specification (esp. values of the attribute subtreeSpecification) have to be encoded? One product (Syntegra LDE) is doing it this way: subtreeSpecification: $ minimum:0 Is this correct??? Other general question: Is it allowed to search / to modify objects of DSE-Type subentry (e.g. collective-attribute-subentries) via LDAP? Best regards, Jochen Keutel. --- Dr. Jochen Keutel Management Consultancy Wusterhausener Str. 8 D-15732 Eichwalde Germany phone +49 30 678 19189 mobile +49 177 6572720 e-mail jochen@keutel.de _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Sun Apr 21 13:54:18 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA29265 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:54:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA07575; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:16:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA07547 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:16:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from thegate.worldspot.com (adsl-209-233-223-106.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [209.233.223.106]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA28752 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:16:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from worldspot.com (h-64-236-139-71.aoltw.net [64.236.139.71]) by thegate.worldspot.com (8.11.0/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g3LI5xV22066; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:05:59 -0700 Message-ID: <3CC2F3EA.313B92FA@worldspot.com> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 10:16:26 -0700 From: Rob Weltman X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Sonntag CC: ldapext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [ldapext] Java LDAP API, sorting References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Steve, Your second message on this topic (below) is very difficult to parse. Could you rewrite it to just include what you are proposing? Thanks, Rob Steve Sonntag wrote: > > Rob, > > I realize I overlooked something in the discussion on sorting, > specifically > the two classes TreeSet and TreeMap that order objects as they are > added into the to the Tree object. Objects are sorted either by > their natural order or as specified by a Comparator object. > > With that information, the following changes are in order. > > >>> "Steve Sonntag" 15-Apr-02 4:20:35 PM >>> > > > Rob, > > > > I have been reviewing the changes associated > > with the addition of the Java Collections > > Framework. I believe the specification is > > incomplete relative to the use of this framework. > > > > Specifically I am looking at how one performs sorts > > using the collections framework and have reviewed > > the statements in Appendix 9.2 that relate to sorting. > > > > > LDAPAttributeSet > > > > > > Implements Cloneable and java.util.Set. Removed the > methods > > > > > made redundant by implementing Set: add(LDAPAttribute > attr), > > > > > elementAt(), getAttributes(), remove(String name), > > > removeElementAt(), and size(). > > > > > > LDAPCompareAttrNames > > > > > > Implements java.util.Comparator instead of > > LDAPEntryComparator. > > > > > > LDAPSearchResults > > > > > > Does not implement Enumeration. > > > > > > Removed nextElement(). > > > > > > Renamed hasMoreElements() to hasMore(). > > > > > > Removed sort() (sorting can now be done with > > classes/interfaces > > > of the Collections framework now that LDAPAttributeSet > > > implements Set). > > > > The collections framework has two interfaces and two classes > Four Classes > > that facilitate sorting. These are: > > > > - The Comparable interface - an implementing > > object can be compared with another implementing > > object, determining the natural ordering of > > the objects. > > - The Comparator interface - implementers can > > compare and order two objects, called specific ordering. > > - The Arrays class - allows sorting of objects > > contained in an array using either natural > > or specific ordering. > > - The Collections class - allows sorting of > > objects contained in a class that implements the > > List interface using natural or specific ordering. > > - The TreeSet class, an implementation of the SortedSet interface > sorts objects as they are added to the object, and > uses natural or specific ordering. > - The TreeMap class, an implementation of the SortedMap interface > sorts objects by keys as they are added to the object, and > uses natural or specific ordering. > > > > There seem to be three obvious kinds of data > > that one might consider sorting: > > > > 1) Values of a multi-valued attribute. > > 2) Attribute Names > > 3) Search Entries > > > > Let's see how the Collections Framework > > can be used to sort these items: > > > > Sort values from a multivalued binary attribute: > > > > byte[][] values = attr.getByteValueArray( ) > > Arrays.sort( values[]); // Order by byte values > > Arrays.sort( values[], myComparator) // Specific ordering > > > TreeSet can be used to order values by looping through > values and adding them to the set using natural ordering > or a specific comparator. > > > Sort values from a multivalued String attribute: > > > > String[] values = attr.getStringValueArray(); > > Arrays.sort(values); // Natural ordering > > Arrays.sort(values, myComparator); // Specific Ordering > > > TreeSet can be used to order values by looping through > values and adding them to the set using natural ordering > or a specific comparator. > > > Sort Attribute objects > > > > LDAPEntry entry = results.next(); > > LDAPAttributeSet aset = entry.getAttributeSet() > > LDAPAttribute[] attrs = new LDAPAttribute[20]; > > attrs = aset.toArray(attrs); // from Set > > Arrays.sort(attrs); // Natural > > ordering by attribute name > > Arrays.sort(attrs, myComparator); // Specific ordering > > > > Note: Currently natural ordering between > > LDAPAttribute objects is undefined since > > LDAPAttribute does not implement the Comparable > > interface. I suggest that LDAPAttribute implement > > the Comparable interface with natural ordering > > based on attribute name. > > > > TreeSet can be used to order attributes by looping > through the name and adding each to the set using natural > ordering or a specific comparator. > > If LDAPAttribute objects implement Comparable as I > suggest, one can simply say "new TreeSet(attributeSet)" > to create a naturally sorted collection of attributes. > > > Sort LDAPEntry objects > > > > It is not possible to sort Entries, since > > there is no way to get either a List or an > > Array from LDAPSearchResults. I suggest > > that LDAPEntry implement the Comparable > > interface with natural ordering based on the > > dn, and that LDAPSearchResults implement > > a nextArray() method (see below). If this > > were done, sorting of LDAPEntry objects > > could be done as follows: > > > > LDAPEntry[] entries = results.nextArray(); > > Arrays.sort(entries); // Sort by dn > > Arrays.sort(entries, myComparator); // Specific ordering. > > > > Note: myComparator is probably of type LDAPCompareAttrNames, > > but an application could implement their own Comparator class. > > Using TreeSet, Entries can be sorted by adding the Entries > to the TreeSet object. This has the advantage over nextArray() > in that no fiddling need be done with batchsize. It is up > to the application to determine which Entries are sorted and > how to deal with ensuring adequate memory for large sorts. > > I see no need for the above described nextArray method. > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Suggested changes to the draft: > > > > 2.1 public class LDAPAttribute > > implements Cloneable, Serializable, Comparable > > ------------------------ > > 2.2.2 compareTo > > > > public int compareTo(Object obj) > > > > Compares this object with the specified object for > > order. Ordering is determined by comparing attribute > > names (see getName()) using the compareTo() method of > > the String class. Returns a negative integer, zero, or > > a positive integer as this object is less than, equal > > to, or greater than the specified object. > > > > obj The object to be compared to this object. > > ------------------------ > > > > 2.14 public classs LDAPEntry > > implements Serializable, Comparable > > ------------------------ > > 2.14.2 compareTo > > > > public int compareTo(Object obj) > > > > Compares this object with the specified object for > > order. Ordering is determined by comparing dn values > > (see getDN) using the compareTo() method of the > StringaringValueArray(); > > Array > > class. Returns a negative integer, zero, or a > > positive integer as this object is less than, equal > > to, or greater than the specified object. > > > > obj The object to be compared to this object. > > > > ------------------------ > > (in class LDAPSearchResults) > > > > 2.35.5 nextArray > > > > public LDAPEntry[] nextArray() throws LDAPException > > > > Returns an array containing all LDAPEntries in the > > order they were received. If automatic referral > > following is disabled or a referral was not > > followed, nextArray() will throw an > > LDAPReferralException when the referral is received. > > > > It should be noted that only those Entries which > > have been received and not retrieved via next() > > or nextArray() are placed in the array. This will > > generally be the number of entries specified by > > batchsize. The size of the array returned will > > equal the number of entries returned. If all > > entries have already been returned, nextArray() > > throws NoSuchElementException. If a sort of all > > entries returned by a search is desired, batchsize > > should be set to zero so that all entries are received > > by the API before control is returned to the application. > > (see LDAPSearchConstraints.setBatchSize()). Sorting > > can be performed using the sort method of the Arrays class. > > ------------------------ > > Eliminate nextArray, but do have LDAPEntry and LDAPAttribute > implement Comparable. > > The description of LDAPCompareAttrNames should be clarified to > something like the following: > > 2.7 public class LDAPCompareaAttrNames > implements Comparator > > An object of this class defines the ordering when sorting > search results. LDAPEntry objects are sorted by the value > of the specified attribute name(s) in ascending or descending > order. This object is typically supplied to an implementation > of the collection interfaces like TreeSet which performs the sort. > > ----------------------------------------------- > > In summary what I suggest is, > > add "implement Comparable" for classes LDAPAttribute and LDAPEntry > (with appropriate description of natural compare mechanism) > > Clarify description for LDAPCompareAttrNames > > -Steve > > > > > > -Steve > > > > > > > > ------------------------ > > Steven Sonntag > > Novell, Inc., The leading provider of Net business solutions > > http://www.novell.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ldapext mailing list > > Ldapext@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Sun Apr 21 14:11:27 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA29448 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:11:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA09290; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:48:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA09253 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:48:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from thegate.worldspot.com (adsl-209-233-223-106.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [209.233.223.106]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA29152 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:48:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from worldspot.com (h-64-236-139-71.aoltw.net [64.236.139.71]) by thegate.worldspot.com (8.11.0/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g3LIbMV22177; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:37:23 -0700 Message-ID: <3CC2FB46.785E69A4@worldspot.com> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 10:47:50 -0700 From: Rob Weltman X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Sonntag , ldapext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [ldapext] Java LDAP API, sorting References: <3CC2F3EA.313B92FA@worldspot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Also, please explain how LDAPAttribute and LDAPEntry will implement compareTo. Rob Rob Weltman wrote: > > Steve, > > Your second message on this topic (below) is very difficult to parse. Could you rewrite it to just include what you are proposing? > > Thanks, > Rob > > Steve Sonntag wrote: > > > > Rob, > > > > I realize I overlooked something in the discussion on sorting, > > specifically > > the two classes TreeSet and TreeMap that order objects as they are > > added into the to the Tree object. Objects are sorted either by > > their natural order or as specified by a Comparator object. > > > > With that information, the following changes are in order. > > > > >>> "Steve Sonntag" 15-Apr-02 4:20:35 PM >>> > > > > > Rob, > > > > > > I have been reviewing the changes associated > > > with the addition of the Java Collections > > > Framework. I believe the specification is > > > incomplete relative to the use of this framework. > > > > > > Specifically I am looking at how one performs sorts > > > using the collections framework and have reviewed > > > the statements in Appendix 9.2 that relate to sorting. > > > > > > > LDAPAttributeSet > > > > > > > > Implements Cloneable and java.util.Set. Removed the > > methods > > > > > > > made redundant by implementing Set: add(LDAPAttribute > > attr), > > > > > > > elementAt(), getAttributes(), remove(String name), > > > > removeElementAt(), and size(). > > > > > > > > LDAPCompareAttrNames > > > > > > > > Implements java.util.Comparator instead of > > > LDAPEntryComparator. > > > > > > > > LDAPSearchResults > > > > > > > > Does not implement Enumeration. > > > > > > > > Removed nextElement(). > > > > > > > > Renamed hasMoreElements() to hasMore(). > > > > > > > > Removed sort() (sorting can now be done with > > > classes/interfaces > > > > of the Collections framework now that LDAPAttributeSet > > > > implements Set). > > > > > > The collections framework has two interfaces and two classes > > Four Classes > > > that facilitate sorting. These are: > > > > > > - The Comparable interface - an implementing > > > object can be compared with another implementing > > > object, determining the natural ordering of > > > the objects. > > > - The Comparator interface - implementers can > > > compare and order two objects, called specific ordering. > > > - The Arrays class - allows sorting of objects > > > contained in an array using either natural > > > or specific ordering. > > > - The Collections class - allows sorting of > > > objects contained in a class that implements the > > > List interface using natural or specific ordering. > > > > - The TreeSet class, an implementation of the SortedSet interface > > sorts objects as they are added to the object, and > > uses natural or specific ordering. > > - The TreeMap class, an implementation of the SortedMap interface > > sorts objects by keys as they are added to the object, and > > uses natural or specific ordering. > > > > > > There seem to be three obvious kinds of data > > > that one might consider sorting: > > > > > > 1) Values of a multi-valued attribute. > > > 2) Attribute Names > > > 3) Search Entries > > > > > > Let's see how the Collections Framework > > > can be used to sort these items: > > > > > > Sort values from a multivalued binary attribute: > > > > > > byte[][] values = attr.getByteValueArray( ) > > > Arrays.sort( values[]); // Order by byte values > > > Arrays.sort( values[], myComparator) // Specific ordering > > > > > TreeSet can be used to order values by looping through > > values and adding them to the set using natural ordering > > or a specific comparator. > > > > > Sort values from a multivalued String attribute: > > > > > > String[] values = attr.getStringValueArray(); > > > Arrays.sort(values); // Natural ordering > > > Arrays.sort(values, myComparator); // Specific Ordering > > > > > TreeSet can be used to order values by looping through > > values and adding them to the set using natural ordering > > or a specific comparator. > > > > > Sort Attribute objects > > > > > > LDAPEntry entry = results.next(); > > > LDAPAttributeSet aset = entry.getAttributeSet() > > > LDAPAttribute[] attrs = new LDAPAttribute[20]; > > > attrs = aset.toArray(attrs); // from Set > > > Arrays.sort(attrs); // Natural > > > ordering by attribute name > > > Arrays.sort(attrs, myComparator); // Specific ordering > > > > > > Note: Currently natural ordering between > > > LDAPAttribute objects is undefined since > > > LDAPAttribute does not implement the Comparable > > > interface. I suggest that LDAPAttribute implement > > > the Comparable interface with natural ordering > > > based on attribute name. > > > > > > > TreeSet can be used to order attributes by looping > > through the name and adding each to the set using natural > > ordering or a specific comparator. > > > > If LDAPAttribute objects implement Comparable as I > > suggest, one can simply say "new TreeSet(attributeSet)" > > to create a naturally sorted collection of attributes. > > > > > Sort LDAPEntry objects > > > > > > It is not possible to sort Entries, since > > > there is no way to get either a List or an > > > Array from LDAPSearchResults. I suggest > > > that LDAPEntry implement the Comparable > > > interface with natural ordering based on the > > > dn, and that LDAPSearchResults implement > > > a nextArray() method (see below). If this > > > were done, sorting of LDAPEntry objects > > > could be done as follows: > > > > > > LDAPEntry[] entries = results.nextArray(); > > > Arrays.sort(entries); // Sort by dn > > > Arrays.sort(entries, myComparator); // Specific ordering. > > > > > > Note: myComparator is probably of type LDAPCompareAttrNames, > > > but an application could implement their own Comparator class. > > > > Using TreeSet, Entries can be sorted by adding the Entries > > to the TreeSet object. This has the advantage over nextArray() > > in that no fiddling need be done with batchsize. It is up > > to the application to determine which Entries are sorted and > > how to deal with ensuring adequate memory for large sorts. > > > > I see no need for the above described nextArray method. > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Suggested changes to the draft: > > > > > > 2.1 public class LDAPAttribute > > > implements Cloneable, Serializable, Comparable > > > ------------------------ > > > 2.2.2 compareTo > > > > > > public int compareTo(Object obj) > > > > > > Compares this object with the specified object for > > > order. Ordering is determined by comparing attribute > > > names (see getName()) using the compareTo() method of > > > the String class. Returns a negative integer, zero, or > > > a positive integer as this object is less than, equal > > > to, or greater than the specified object. > > > > > > obj The object to be compared to this object. > > > ------------------------ > > > > > > 2.14 public classs LDAPEntry > > > implements Serializable, Comparable > > > ------------------------ > > > 2.14.2 compareTo > > > > > > public int compareTo(Object obj) > > > > > > Compares this object with the specified object for > > > order. Ordering is determined by comparing dn values > > > (see getDN) using the compareTo() method of the > > StringaringValueArray(); > > > Array > > > class. Returns a negative integer, zero, or a > > > positive integer as this object is less than, equal > > > to, or greater than the specified object. > > > > > > obj The object to be compared to this object. > > > > > > ------------------------ > > > (in class LDAPSearchResults) > > > > > > 2.35.5 nextArray > > > > > > public LDAPEntry[] nextArray() throws LDAPException > > > > > > Returns an array containing all LDAPEntries in the > > > order they were received. If automatic referral > > > following is disabled or a referral was not > > > followed, nextArray() will throw an > > > LDAPReferralException when the referral is received. > > > > > > It should be noted that only those Entries which > > > have been received and not retrieved via next() > > > or nextArray() are placed in the array. This will > > > generally be the number of entries specified by > > > batchsize. The size of the array returned will > > > equal the number of entries returned. If all > > > entries have already been returned, nextArray() > > > throws NoSuchElementException. If a sort of all > > > entries returned by a search is desired, batchsize > > > should be set to zero so that all entries are received > > > by the API before control is returned to the application. > > > (see LDAPSearchConstraints.setBatchSize()). Sorting > > > can be performed using the sort method of the Arrays class. > > > ------------------------ > > > > Eliminate nextArray, but do have LDAPEntry and LDAPAttribute > > implement Comparable. > > > > The description of LDAPCompareAttrNames should be clarified to > > something like the following: > > > > 2.7 public class LDAPCompareaAttrNames > > implements Comparator > > > > An object of this class defines the ordering when sorting > > search results. LDAPEntry objects are sorted by the value > > of the specified attribute name(s) in ascending or descending > > order. This object is typically supplied to an implementation > > of the collection interfaces like TreeSet which performs the sort. > > > > ----------------------------------------------- > > > > In summary what I suggest is, > > > > add "implement Comparable" for classes LDAPAttribute and LDAPEntry > > (with appropriate description of natural compare mechanism) > > > > Clarify description for LDAPCompareAttrNames > > > > -Steve > > > > > > > > > -Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ > > > Steven Sonntag > > > Novell, Inc., The leading provider of Net business solutions > > > http://www.novell.com > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Ldapext mailing list > > > Ldapext@ietf.org > > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Sun Apr 21 22:20:41 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA05297 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:20:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA29728; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:15:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA29698 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:15:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nexus.adacel.com ([203.36.26.146]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id WAA05186 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:15:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 18473 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2002 02:09:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO osmium) (10.32.24.165) by nexus.adacel.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2002 02:09:47 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Steven Legg" To: "'Jochen Keutel'" Cc: Subject: RE: [ldapext] LDAP and subtree specification and subentries Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:14:36 +1000 Message-ID: <002801c1e9a3$73a07080$a518200a@osmium.mtwav.adacel.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jochen, Jochen Keutel wrote: > Hello, > > RFC2252 lists in 4.3.2 a syntax > > Subtree Specification Y 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.45 > > However - there is no further definition of the syntax. > > Question: Where is defined how values of attributes of syntax > subtree specification (esp. values of the attribute > subtreeSpecification) have to be encoded? There is no standard definition of the LDAP-specific encoding for the Subtree Specification syntax. An early draft of the I-D that led to RFC 2252 (draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-attributes-03.txt) defined an LDAP-specific encoding for SubtreeSpecification but this did not make it into the final RFC. There is an Internet draft, draft-zeilenga-ldap-subentry-03.txt, currently being reviewed by the IESG, that defines the LDAP-specific encoding for the Subtree Specification syntax. > > One product (Syntegra LDE) is doing it this way: > > subtreeSpecification: $ minimum:0 > > Is this correct??? It would appear to be a proprietary format. It doesn't fit either the format described in draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-attributes-03.txt or the format defined in draft-zeilenga-ldap-subentry-03.txt. > > Other general question: Is it allowed to search / to modify > objects of DSE-Type subentry (e.g. > collective-attribute-subentries) via LDAP? Yes. Regards, Steven > > Best regards, > > Jochen Keutel. > > --- > Dr. Jochen Keutel > Management Consultancy > Wusterhausener Str. 8 > D-15732 Eichwalde > Germany > phone +49 30 678 19189 > mobile +49 177 6572720 > e-mail jochen@keutel.de > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ldapext mailing list > Ldapext@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext > _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Mon Apr 22 03:22:20 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA18251 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 03:22:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA23079; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 03:15:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA23050 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 03:15:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.200]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA18122 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 03:14:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [195.20.224.220] (helo=mrvdomng1.kundenserver.de) by moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 16zY2J-0002Dm-00 for ldapext@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:14:55 +0200 Received: from [217.231.199.167] (helo=TRAVELMATE) by mrvdomng1.kundenserver.de with smtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 16zY2G-00009D-00 for ldapext@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:14:53 +0200 From: "Jochen Keutel" To: Subject: RE: [ldapext] LDAP and subtree specification and subentries Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:14:50 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <002801c1e9a3$73a07080$a518200a@osmium.mtwav.adacel.com.au> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by optimus.ietf.org id DAA23051 Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello, thanks for the clarification. One comment: > > Other general question: Is it allowed to search / to modify > > objects of DSE-Type subentry (e.g. > > collective-attribute-subentries) via LDAP? > > Yes. OK - it's allowed. But it's not really possible because I can't express some attributes, e.g. subtreeSpecification, in LDAP. You are right: draft-zeilenga-ldap-subentry-03.txt solves this problem - but only for subtreeSpecification. I still can't see how to express the other attributes I usually find in (X.500) subentries, e.g. - prescriptiveACI for access control subentries - DIT content rules and structure rules for subschema subentries - collective attributes for collective attributes subentries (e.g. collectiveTelephoneNumber (X.520)) The last one seems to be addressed by draft-zeilenga-ldap-collective-06.txt, but not the other two kinds of subentries. So it seems that today each X.500 vendor has a vendor-specific (or no) representation of these subentries when read / modified via LDAP. Best regards, Jochen Keutel. --- Dr. Jochen Keutel Management Consultancy Wusterhausener Str. 8 D-15732 Eichwalde Germany phone +49 30 678 19189 mobile +49 177 6572720 e-mail jochen@keutel.de _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Mon Apr 22 21:05:24 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA19649 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 21:05:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA04560; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:56:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA04507 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:56:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nexus.adacel.com ([203.36.26.146]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id UAA19505 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:56:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 19374 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 00:50:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO osmium) (10.32.24.165) by nexus.adacel.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2002 00:50:54 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Steven Legg" To: "'Jochen Keutel'" Cc: Subject: RE: [ldapext] LDAP and subtree specification and subentries Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:55:48 +1000 Message-ID: <001c01c1ea61$9c147c00$a518200a@osmium.mtwav.adacel.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jochen, Jochen Keutel wrote: > Hello, > thanks for the clarification. One comment: > > > > Other general question: Is it allowed to search / to modify > > > objects of DSE-Type subentry (e.g. > > > collective-attribute-subentries) via LDAP? > > > > Yes. > > OK - it's allowed. But it's not really possible because > I can't express some attributes, e.g. subtreeSpecification, in LDAP. In the worst case, LDAP allows all attribute and assertion syntaxes defined in X.500 to be transfered in the LDAP protocol in BER format by using ";binary". The extent to which any particular LDAP product supports this capability is a separate issue. > > You are right: draft-zeilenga-ldap-subentry-03.txt solves > this problem - but only for subtreeSpecification. > I still can't see how to express > the other attributes I usually find in (X.500) subentries, e.g. > > - prescriptiveACI for access control subentries I have proposed an LDAP-specific encoding for the ACI Item syntax in draft-legg-ldap-acm-bac-00.txt. > - DIT content rules and structure rules for subschema subentries LDAP-specific encodings for these are already defined in RFC 2252. > - collective attributes for collective attributes subentries > (e.g. collectiveTelephoneNumber (X.520)) The LDAP-specific encodings for collective attributes are simply the same as their non-collective counterparts since they share the same attribute syntaxes. > > The last one seems to be addressed by > draft-zeilenga-ldap-collective-06.txt, > but not the other two kinds of subentries. > > So it seems that today each X.500 vendor has a > vendor-specific (or no) representation > of these subentries when read / modified via LDAP. Currently, the only LDAP standard representation defined for things like subtree specifications, ACI items, etc, is the ";binary" representation. This will change. The I-Ds Kurt and I have submitted complete the definition of human-readable LDAP-specific encodings for all the subentry operational attributes. Regards, Steven > > Best regards, > > Jochen Keutel. > > --- > Dr. Jochen Keutel > Management Consultancy > Wusterhausener Str. 8 > D-15732 Eichwalde > Germany > phone +49 30 678 19189 > mobile +49 177 6572720 > e-mail jochen@keutel.de > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ldapext mailing list > Ldapext@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext > _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Tue Apr 23 07:25:12 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA12531 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:25:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA19408; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:17:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from remo ([202.164.189.101]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA19354 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:17:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([202.164.189.101]) by remo with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2172.1); Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:51:40 -0700 X-Sender: richremo3@yahoo.com From: Richel Remonde To: ldapext@ns.ietf.org Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:51:40 -0700 Reply-To: richremo4@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2002 02:51:40.0648 (UTC) FILETIME=[F5BC6680:01C1EB3A] Subject: [ldapext] Join for FREE! Work a little and Succeed Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Fellow Networker, My name is Richel Remonde. I am now focusing on one online opportunity. I have tried several of these online opportunities full of hype promising us thousands of dollars every month. It is a sad fact that many people who are in need to earn additional income is being victimized by this fly by night scam artists. Every time I tried one opportunity after the other, I ended more broke than ever. As a result of trying all these opportunities, I have decided to select on my portfolio the company which is true to their words. Not the one full of hype. The only one that has consistently sent me the monthly check. Even without the hype they have given me the best compensation plan with their high % commission. They are providing real service not the one that simply transfer wealth from the new signups to the people at the top of the pyramid. They are not a form of a pyramid scam. Also when you join, you will have a team of upline sponsors who will help you succeed every step of the way. Instead of being left alone, you will be guided step by step by real people, not those autoresponders. Do not believe in do nothing, no recruiting, no selling schemes. They are scams. You might want to try it to prove my words. Only you can make your own success together with the help of your sponsors. If you have 2 to 3 hours a day, you will be able to earn a full income in a few months. And there is absolutely no limit as how much you can earn. It is designed to gain momentum after some time. But I prefer to avoid such statements as "You will get rich". I read it everywhere and I do not want to sound like them. Send email to richremo1@yahoo.com and put "SIGN ME UP FOR FREE" in the subject and your fullname in the body of your email. Regards, Richel Remonde richremo1@yahoo.com Note: You don't need to request for removal. This is a one time email. Your email address will be automatically de-activated in our list if you don't reply in this mail. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Tue Apr 23 07:26:35 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA12613 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA19441; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:17:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA19407 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:17:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from remo ([202.164.189.101]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA12228 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:17:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([202.164.189.101]) by remo with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2172.1); Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:51:40 -0700 X-Sender: richremo3@yahoo.com From: Richel Remonde To: ldapext@ietf.org Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:51:40 -0700 Reply-To: richremo4@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2002 02:51:40.0899 (UTC) FILETIME=[F5E2B330:01C1EB3A] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ldapext] Join for FREE! Work a little and Succeed Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Fellow Networker, My name is Richel Remonde. I am now focusing on one online opportunity. I have tried several of these online opportunities full of hype promising us thousands of dollars every month. It is a sad fact that many people who are in need to earn additional income is being victimized by this fly by night scam artists. Every time I tried one opportunity after the other, I ended more broke than ever. As a result of trying all these opportunities, I have decided to select on my portfolio the company which is true to their words. Not the one full of hype. The only one that has consistently sent me the monthly check. Even without the hype they have given me the best compensation plan with their high % commission. They are providing real service not the one that simply transfer wealth from the new signups to the people at the top of the pyramid. They are not a form of a pyramid scam. Also when you join, you will have a team of upline sponsors who will help you succeed every step of the way. Instead of being left alone, you will be guided step by step by real people, not those autoresponders. Do not believe in do nothing, no recruiting, no selling schemes. They are scams. You might want to try it to prove my words. Only you can make your own success together with the help of your sponsors. If you have 2 to 3 hours a day, you will be able to earn a full income in a few months. And there is absolutely no limit as how much you can earn. It is designed to gain momentum after some time. But I prefer to avoid such statements as "You will get rich". I read it everywhere and I do not want to sound like them. Send email to richremo1@yahoo.com and put "SIGN ME UP FOR FREE" in the subject and your fullname in the body of your email. Regards, Richel Remonde richremo1@yahoo.com Note: You don't need to request for removal. This is a one time email. Your email address will be automatically de-activated in our list if you don't reply in this mail. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Wed Apr 24 07:23:31 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA29652 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:23:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA20778; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:17:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from US0.pxxserver.com ([202.58.246.74]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA20740 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:17:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([202.58.246.74]) by US0.pxxserver.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:20:35 +0800 X-Sender: richremo3@yahoo.com From: Richel To: ldapext@ns.ietf.org Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:20:35 +0800 Reply-To: richremo2@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2002 12:20:35.0518 (UTC) FILETIME=[6FB435E0:01C1EB8A] Subject: [ldapext] Join for FREE! Work a little and Succeed Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Fellow Networker, My name is Richel Remonde. I am now focusing on one online opportunity. I have tried several of these online opportunities full of hype promising us thousands of dollars every month. It is a sad fact that many people who are in need to earn additional income is being victimized by this fly by night scam artists. Every time I tried one opportunity after the other, I ended more broke than ever. As a result of trying all these opportunities, I have decided to select on my portfolio the company which is true to their words. Not the one full of hype. The only one that has consistently sent me the monthly check. Even without the hype they have given me the best compensation plan with their high % commission. They are providing real service not the one that simply transfer wealth from the new signups to the people at the top of the pyramid. They are not a form of a pyramid scam. Also when you join, you will have a team of upline sponsors who will help you succeed every step of the way. Instead of being left alone, you will be guided step by step by real people, not those autoresponders. Do not believe in do nothing, no recruiting, no selling schemes. They are scams. You might want to try it to prove my words. Only you can make your own success together with the help of your sponsors. If you have 2 to 3 hours a day, you will be able to earn a full income in a few months. And there is absolutely no limit as how much you can earn. It is designed to gain momentum after some time. But I prefer to avoid such statements as "You will get rich". I read it everywhere and I do not want to sound like them. Send email to richremo1@yahoo.com and put "SIGN ME UP FOR FREE" in the subject and your fullname in the body of your email. Regards, Richel Remonde richremo1@yahoo.com Note: You don't need to request for removal. This is a one time email. Your email address will be automatically de-activated in our list if you don't reply in this mail. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Wed Apr 24 07:23:39 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA29665 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:23:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA20742; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:17:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA20709 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:17:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from US0.pxxserver.com ([202.58.246.74]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA29454 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:17:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([202.58.246.74]) by US0.pxxserver.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:20:35 +0800 X-Sender: richremo3@yahoo.com From: Richel To: ldapext@ietf.org Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:20:35 +0800 Reply-To: richremo2@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2002 12:20:35.0778 (UTC) FILETIME=[6FDBE220:01C1EB8A] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ldapext] Join for FREE! Work a little and Succeed Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Fellow Networker, My name is Richel Remonde. I am now focusing on one online opportunity. I have tried several of these online opportunities full of hype promising us thousands of dollars every month. It is a sad fact that many people who are in need to earn additional income is being victimized by this fly by night scam artists. Every time I tried one opportunity after the other, I ended more broke than ever. As a result of trying all these opportunities, I have decided to select on my portfolio the company which is true to their words. Not the one full of hype. The only one that has consistently sent me the monthly check. Even without the hype they have given me the best compensation plan with their high % commission. They are providing real service not the one that simply transfer wealth from the new signups to the people at the top of the pyramid. They are not a form of a pyramid scam. Also when you join, you will have a team of upline sponsors who will help you succeed every step of the way. Instead of being left alone, you will be guided step by step by real people, not those autoresponders. Do not believe in do nothing, no recruiting, no selling schemes. They are scams. You might want to try it to prove my words. Only you can make your own success together with the help of your sponsors. If you have 2 to 3 hours a day, you will be able to earn a full income in a few months. And there is absolutely no limit as how much you can earn. It is designed to gain momentum after some time. But I prefer to avoid such statements as "You will get rich". I read it everywhere and I do not want to sound like them. Send email to richremo1@yahoo.com and put "SIGN ME UP FOR FREE" in the subject and your fullname in the body of your email. Regards, Richel Remonde richremo1@yahoo.com Note: You don't need to request for removal. This is a one time email. Your email address will be automatically de-activated in our list if you don't reply in this mail. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Thu Apr 25 07:31:00 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA01452 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:31:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA25820; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:19:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA25787 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:19:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from US0.pxxserver.com ([202.58.246.163]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA01137 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:19:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([202.58.246.163]) by US0.pxxserver.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:12:09 +0800 X-Sender: richremo3@yahoo.com From: Richel To: ldapext@ietf.org Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:12:09 +0800 Reply-To: richremo2@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2002 12:12:09.0326 (UTC) FILETIME=[6C6730E0:01C1EC52] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ldapext] Join for FREE! Work a little and Succeed Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Fellow Networker, My name is Richel Remonde. I am now focusing on one online opportunity. I have tried several of these online opportunities full of hype promising us thousands of dollars every month. It is a sad fact that many people who are in need to earn additional income is being victimized by this fly by night scam artists. Every time I tried one opportunity after the other, I ended more broke than ever. As a result of trying all these opportunities, I have decided to select on my portfolio the company which is true to their words. Not the one full of hype. The only one that has consistently sent me the monthly check. Even without the hype they have given me the best compensation plan with their high % commission. They are providing real service not the one that simply transfer wealth from the new signups to the people at the top of the pyramid. They are not a form of a pyramid scam. Also when you join, you will have a team of upline sponsors who will help you succeed every step of the way. Instead of being left alone, you will be guided step by step by real people, not those autoresponders. Do not believe in do nothing, no recruiting, no selling schemes. They are scams. You might want to try it to prove my words. Only you can make your own success together with the help of your sponsors. If you have 2 to 3 hours a day, you will be able to earn a full income in a few months. And there is absolutely no limit as how much you can earn. It is designed to gain momentum after some time. But I prefer to avoid such statements as "You will get rich". I read it everywhere and I do not want to sound like them. Send email to richremo1@yahoo.com and put "SIGN ME UP FOR FREE" in the subject and your fullname in the body of your email. Regards, Richel Remonde richremo1@yahoo.com Note: You don't need to request for removal. This is a one time email. Your email address will be automatically de-activated in our list if you don't reply in this mail. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Thu Apr 25 07:31:13 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA01477 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:31:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA26413; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:21:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from US0.pxxserver.com ([202.58.246.163]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA26367 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:21:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([202.58.246.163]) by US0.pxxserver.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:14:25 +0800 X-Sender: richremo3@yahoo.com From: Richel To: ldapext@ns.ietf.org Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:14:25 +0800 Reply-To: richremo2@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2002 12:14:25.0612 (UTC) FILETIME=[BDA2C8C0:01C1EC52] Subject: [ldapext] Join for FREE! Work a little and Succeed Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Fellow Networker, My name is Richel Remonde. I am now focusing on one online opportunity. I have tried several of these online opportunities full of hype promising us thousands of dollars every month. It is a sad fact that many people who are in need to earn additional income is being victimized by this fly by night scam artists. Every time I tried one opportunity after the other, I ended more broke than ever. As a result of trying all these opportunities, I have decided to select on my portfolio the company which is true to their words. Not the one full of hype. The only one that has consistently sent me the monthly check. Even without the hype they have given me the best compensation plan with their high % commission. They are providing real service not the one that simply transfer wealth from the new signups to the people at the top of the pyramid. They are not a form of a pyramid scam. Also when you join, you will have a team of upline sponsors who will help you succeed every step of the way. Instead of being left alone, you will be guided step by step by real people, not those autoresponders. Do not believe in do nothing, no recruiting, no selling schemes. They are scams. You might want to try it to prove my words. Only you can make your own success together with the help of your sponsors. If you have 2 to 3 hours a day, you will be able to earn a full income in a few months. And there is absolutely no limit as how much you can earn. It is designed to gain momentum after some time. But I prefer to avoid such statements as "You will get rich". I read it everywhere and I do not want to sound like them. Send email to richremo1@yahoo.com and put "SIGN ME UP FOR FREE" in the subject and your fullname in the body of your email. Regards, Richel Remonde richremo1@yahoo.com Note: You don't need to request for removal. This is a one time email. Your email address will be automatically de-activated in our list if you don't reply in this mail. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Thu Apr 25 07:31:25 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA01492 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:31:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA25876; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:19:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from US0.pxxserver.com ([202.58.246.163]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA25823 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:19:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([202.58.246.163]) by US0.pxxserver.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:12:09 +0800 X-Sender: richremo3@yahoo.com From: Richel To: ldapext@optimus.ietf.org Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:12:09 +0800 Reply-To: richremo2@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2002 12:12:09.0076 (UTC) FILETIME=[6C410B40:01C1EC52] Subject: [ldapext] Join for FREE! Work a little and Succeed Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Fellow Networker, My name is Richel Remonde. I am now focusing on one online opportunity. I have tried several of these online opportunities full of hype promising us thousands of dollars every month. It is a sad fact that many people who are in need to earn additional income is being victimized by this fly by night scam artists. Every time I tried one opportunity after the other, I ended more broke than ever. As a result of trying all these opportunities, I have decided to select on my portfolio the company which is true to their words. Not the one full of hype. The only one that has consistently sent me the monthly check. Even without the hype they have given me the best compensation plan with their high % commission. They are providing real service not the one that simply transfer wealth from the new signups to the people at the top of the pyramid. They are not a form of a pyramid scam. Also when you join, you will have a team of upline sponsors who will help you succeed every step of the way. Instead of being left alone, you will be guided step by step by real people, not those autoresponders. Do not believe in do nothing, no recruiting, no selling schemes. They are scams. You might want to try it to prove my words. Only you can make your own success together with the help of your sponsors. If you have 2 to 3 hours a day, you will be able to earn a full income in a few months. And there is absolutely no limit as how much you can earn. It is designed to gain momentum after some time. But I prefer to avoid such statements as "You will get rich". I read it everywhere and I do not want to sound like them. Send email to richremo1@yahoo.com and put "SIGN ME UP FOR FREE" in the subject and your fullname in the body of your email. Regards, Richel Remonde richremo1@yahoo.com Note: You don't need to request for removal. This is a one time email. Your email address will be automatically de-activated in our list if you don't reply in this mail. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext From ldapext-admin@ietf.org Sat Apr 27 05:02:37 2002 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA07798 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 05:02:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA00113; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 04:43:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from US0.pxxserver.com ([202.58.246.208]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA00083 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 04:43:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([202.58.246.208]) by US0.pxxserver.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Sat, 27 Apr 2002 17:52:09 +0800 X-Sender: richremo2@yahoo.com From: Richel To: ldapext@optimus.ietf.org Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 17:52:09 +0800 Reply-To: richremo1@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Apr 2002 09:52:09.0816 (UTC) FILETIME=[32BB2D80:01C1EDD1] Subject: [ldapext] Join for FREE! Work a little and Succeed Sender: ldapext-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: ldapext-admin@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, Greetings! My name is Richel Remonde. I am now focusing on one online opportunity. I have tried several of these online opportunities full of hype promising us thousands of dollars every month. It is a sad fact that many people who are in need to earn additional income is being victimized by this fly by night scam artists. Every time I tried one opportunity after the other, I ended more broke than ever. As a result of trying all these opportunities, I have decided to select on my portfolio the company which is true to their words. Not the one full of hype. The only one that has consistently sent me the monthly check. Even without the hype they have given me the best compensation plan with their high % commission. They are providing real service not the one that simply transfer wealth from the new signups to the people at the top of the pyramid. They are not a form of a pyramid scam. Also when you join, you will have a team of upline sponsors who will help you succeed every step of the way. Instead of being left alone, you will be guided step by step by real people, not those autoresponders. Do not believe in do nothing, no recruiting, no selling schemes. They are scams. You might want to try it to prove my words. Only you can make your own success together with the help of your sponsors. If you have 2 to 3 hours a day, you will be able to earn a full income in a few months. And there is absolutely no limit as how much you can earn. It is designed to gain momentum after some time. But I prefer to avoid such statements as "You will get rich". I read it everywhere and I do not want to sound like them. Send email to richremo1@yahoo.com and put "SIGN ME UP FOR FREE" in the subject and your fullname in the body of your email. Regards, Richel Remonde richremo1@yahoo.com Note: You don't need to request for removal. This is a one time email. Your email address will be automatically de-activated in our list if you don't reply in this mail. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext