From Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com Sun Nov 6 06:36:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D1521F8490 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 06:36:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.669 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.930, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j5oCidolLFIV for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 06:36:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD5B21F8464 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 06:36:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1320590204; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=KiCJje1XMjhe4dCAWUk9B79dntwVAQIrw80Yyl+jBxk=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=iujaPvGxi8kb8ouAeRSKIPKQP3cRNdj/7Vsg3AWvzzJJR2yMtPutyP0tqMUDbTZ2jDVksG hvihAweQLcKkAh6dcS2yIQcKxmMT3cMsAqx5FD2Ejux89meu80onEMEG9kcIU0rqy8BBzL u0E5A91k2ijltCktcu7UcJUIPeLRJMs=; Received: from [192.168.42.5] (75-141-240-242.dhcp.reno.nv.charter.com [75.141.240.242]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 14:36:43 +0000 From: Kurt Zeilenga Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 06:36:36 -0800 References: <5B9E6041-E2D2-43BA-9F53-44E2962CCCA7@Isode.COM> To: ldapext@ietf.org Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [ldapext] Fwd: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:36:45 -0000 FYI. If you have comments on this request, please send them to the = directory@apps.ietf.org list. Begin forwarded message: > From: Kurt Zeilenga > Subject: Re: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration > Date: November 6, 2011 6:35:11 AM PST > To: Matthew Key > Cc: directory@apps.ietf.org >=20 > As the assigned expert for the IANA LDAP parameter registries, I = acknowledge your request to register a family of object identifier = descriptors under section 3.4 of BCP 64 [RFC 4520]. Your request = requires Expert Review and I hereby initiate a 2 week review of this = request. >=20 > Members of the community are welcomed to comment and discuss this = request on the directory@apps.ietf.org on or before 20 November 2011. >=20 > Regards, Kurt >=20 >=20 >> Descriptor (short name): wja-* (preferred) or westjet-* (alternative) >>=20 >> Object Identifier: 2.16.124.113625.1.2.2.2.1.101.* >>=20 >> Person & email address to contact for further information:=20 >> Matthew Key >> WestJet >> +1 403 444 2167 >> mkey@westjet.com >>=20 >>=20 >> Usage: other - family of short names (for custom object class and = attribute descriptors) >> Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI) N/A for private use? >>=20 >> Author/Change Controller: same as contact >>=20 >> Comments: >>=20 >> The intent is to introduce standardized naming without appearing to = over complicate the existing process (x- will be the preferred = alternative over e-com-westjet- if this request is denied). >>=20 >=20 From michael@stroeder.com Thu Nov 17 12:43:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A70D11E80E9 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:43:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WFrmkADflI39 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:43:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mo-p00-ob6.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob6.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:53f0::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AAC11E809C for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:43:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1321562627; l=349; s=domk; d=stroeder.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From: Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=YOWw58zYHYZMEh31mmDOaox/0O8=; b=FmUMManpzD2ghSDW7cdOGhWdK1wsecSCL9OZHVrPgT91Rl65Fi7mPRIxJrDOq9MxCQd /g6fAAmQDqKnPNfN1KvmqRL0NQ+3891Vs6wcpHVti+fZ15SH2pRf4+5p/XP0fL+gfNhqG 2F06E/wTW7zGU00B3I+PITLEYKqwxUsJ5hA= X-RZG-AUTH: :IWUHfUGtd9+vE/nIU31usF8LLMefsb7+CgbCKRTRv10B3E6U4QnmQh7JklQ= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from [10.1.1.5] (p54A32A26.dip.t-dialin.net [84.163.42.38]) by smtp.strato.de (fruni mo40) (RZmta 26.10 AUTH) with ESMTPA id L06952nAHHWjd5 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:43:23 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <4EC571E9.8050102@stroeder.com> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:43:21 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_Str=F6der?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ldapext@ietf.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ldapext] RFC 2589: limits for requestTtl X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:43:57 -0000 HI! RFC 2589 says: The requestTtl is a time in seconds (between 1 and 31557600) that the client requests that the entry exists in the directory before being automatically removed. 31557600 seconds is 365 days (one non-leap year). That's not so much. Does anybody here know why this limit was defined in this RFC? Ciao, Michael.