Subject: [lmap] FW: [ippm] Second WGLC on draft-ippm-lmap-path was Re: Revised: draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-03

From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 08:53:11 +0000

Please pay attention to this 2nd WGLC in IPPM of on draft-ippm-lmap-path. Please send your comments and/or statements of support to the IPPM WG mail list. 

Regards,

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ippm [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Brian Trammell
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 6:56 PM
> To: Al Morton
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: [ippm] Second WGLC on draft-ippm-lmap-path was Re: Revised:
> draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-03
> 
> hi Al, all,
> 
> Thanks for the updated draft!
> 
> The changes appear to be extensive enough that a second WGLC is
> warranted; please provide any additional comments (or just a statement that
> you've read the new doc and it's OK) by Friday, June 13.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brian (as chair)
> 
> On 29 May 2014, at 21:50, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi IPPM, and Lingli, Charles, and Dan in particular:
> >
> > Thanks for providing comments on this draft during WGLC.
> > A version which hopefully addresses all your comments is here:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-03
> >
> > It should be fairly easy to find where your comments were addressed,
> > using the diff file:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-03.txt
> >
> > Some changes are fairly extensive, to address Charles'
> > request for rules for example. The co-authors had some fun with that
> > aspect.
> >
> > I remember one specific question from Charles, "what is [SK]?"
> > it's just a very tight reference to an informative white paper:
> >
> >   [SK]       Crawford, Sam., "Test Methodology White Paper", SamKnows
> >              Whitebox Briefing Note
> >              http://www.samknows.com/broadband/index.php, July 2011.
> >
> > regards,
> > Al (for the co-authors)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ippm mailing list
> > [email-masked]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm