From owner-ietf-ltans Fri Jun 18 14:05:18 2004 Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5IL5In9072191; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:05:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i5IL5Iim072190; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:05:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from smtp-relay-8.adobe.com (smtp-relay-8.adobe.com [192.150.22.8]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5IL5ItA072123 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:05:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from LMM@acm.org) Received: from inner-relay-3.corp.adobe.com (inner-relay-3 [153.32.251.51]) by smtp-relay-8.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5IL4tSO001755 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsj-dev (mailsj-dev.corp.adobe.com [153.32.1.192]) by inner-relay-3.corp.adobe.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5IL4rks001473 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MasinterT40 (c-66-174.corp.adobe.com [153.32.66.174]) by mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HZI0031GVW5UR@mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com> for ietf-ltans@imc.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:04:53 -0700 From: Larry Masinter Subject: Quote for '7, 30, 100'.... To: ietf-ltans@imc.org Message-id: <0HZI0031HVW5UR@mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcRVd+axO0+h2Y11R6GQxvAU6jvhQA== Sender: owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: I'm trying to track down Richard: Point was made that archiving the result is different than archiving signed data. Suggested 7, 30 and 100 years as relevant landmarks to target. Noted that spliting up data into n of m type scheme is a completely different aspect. Is there a reference for the analysis of "7, 30 and 100 years" as different problems? Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5IL5In9072191; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:05:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i5IL5Iim072190; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:05:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from smtp-relay-8.adobe.com (smtp-relay-8.adobe.com [192.150.22.8]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5IL5ItA072123 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:05:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from LMM@acm.org) Received: from inner-relay-3.corp.adobe.com (inner-relay-3 [153.32.251.51]) by smtp-relay-8.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5IL4tSO001755 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsj-dev (mailsj-dev.corp.adobe.com [153.32.1.192]) by inner-relay-3.corp.adobe.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5IL4rks001473 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MasinterT40 (c-66-174.corp.adobe.com [153.32.66.174]) by mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HZI0031GVW5UR@mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com> for ietf-ltans@imc.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:04:53 -0700 From: Larry Masinter Subject: Quote for '7, 30, 100'.... To: ietf-ltans@imc.org Message-id: <0HZI0031HVW5UR@mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcRVd+axO0+h2Y11R6GQxvAU6jvhQA== Sender: owner-ietf-ltans@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: I'm trying to track down Richard: Point was made that archiving the result is different than archiving signed data. Suggested 7, 30 and 100 years as relevant landmarks to target. Noted that spliting up data into n of m type scheme is a completely different aspect. Is there a reference for the analysis of "7, 30 and 100 years" as different problems? Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net